have you made aggressions against the state, which you are allowed to by NAP, that are hard to trace back to you?
2 things: 1: If they are retributive strikes against an oppressive government, they are not, by definition, aggression. 2: If I had, do you honestly think I would be stupid enough to admit it on a public forum? However, no, I've made no violent actions against the government. They would be counterproductive, and wasteful. No violent revolution has ever gained the revolutionaries lasting liberty. so, you sit in front of your computer, spreading libertarian propaganda on the internet, waiting for the ancap revolution to come. good luck, bro! So, in your mind the only actions I can take against the government are violent ones? Why would I want to play their game? no, i did not say that. what i meant was that you are talking the a very small subset of the population that mostly agrees with you(well i don't, but im one of the few.). go join a communist or statist forum and try to do a difference.
|
|
|
have you made aggressions against the state, which you are allowed to by NAP, that are hard to trace back to you?
2 things: 1: If they are retributive strikes against an oppressive government, they are not, by definition, aggression. 2: If I had, do you honestly think I would be stupid enough to admit it on a public forum? However, no, I've made no violent actions against the government. They would be counterproductive, and wasteful. No violent revolution has ever gained the revolutionaries lasting liberty. so, you sit in front of your computer, spreading libertarian propaganda on the internet, waiting for the ancap revolution to come. good luck, bro!
|
|
|
From the looks of this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=181278.0You got called on suspicious business practices, and proceeded to defend yourself by shitting on the table. I'm afraid to ask what got deleted, based on what's still there. omfg, OP is tarded. @OP: yes, you got called a scammer. and yes, greyhawk is right in doing so, based on experience of new and "untrusted" members of this forum. and no, a person that are a scammer would most likely behave like you did. a honest and intelligent person would not rage over being accused of scamming on this forum. my analysis of your behavior is that you are irrational and unstable and very likely to be a scammer.
|
|
|
myrkul, if you think that the state is evil, and have committed an act of aggression against you or one else, why have you not asserted the NAP and gone on some crazy suicide mission against the wrongful and evil oppression done by the state?
Because I'm neither crazy nor suicidal? the part about you not being crazy is debatable. okay. have you made aggressions against the state, which you are allowed to by NAP, that are hard to trace back to you?
|
|
|
This forum is privately owned. This forum is not a democracy. This forum does not have unlimited freedom of speech. This forum is not is not a place where you shit.
If you don't like it: fuck off, no one forces you to stay.
|
|
|
myrkul, if you think that the state is evil, and have committed an act of aggression against you or one else, why have you not asserted the NAP and gone on some crazy suicide mission against the wrongful and evil oppression done by the state?
|
|
|
Thanks, but when I read that - there was no mention of the maximun clients that can use the actual proxy application.
maybe because there is no limit? ... but other than a lot of technical jargon (that I find hard to follow) about the Stratum protocol itself, ...
so what you are saying it that you are too stupid to mine? have you tried turning it off and on again? I guess I will just keep pushing the proxy until it breaks down and report back here what I discover. good luck with that... surely it must be someone else's fault!
|
|
|
yes, but thats all about big data. a private key can you have in your head... there would be no need for a data haven in bitcoin's case.
|
|
|
@myrkul: Sealand, offshore offline bitcoin cold storage?
|
|
|
i don't know who maintains the wiki, but try asking on irc.
|
|
|
it depends on the level of security you want.
|
|
|
... This is the primary power of Bitcoin, ...
no, it is not.
|
|
|
i have not said that it was the best way, im just making a statement about human nature.
And I'd like to say that we can easily rise above that. It's not that hard. The only thing needed is for people to refuse to hurt other people. Not really a difficult thing. Basically, you just need to do nothing and the problem is solved. ah ha! so all the shit you people say about communism, that it can not function due to human nature, is also wrong?
|
|
|
OK OK I get it. Nobody wants to share their experience. I deleted my own post as well.
wtf? good conclusion after 4 hours... maybe people just are not interested in your thread?
|
|
|
We can rise above settling disputes with violence.
maybe, in some few cases. So, are you saying that the best way to chat in this thread is for us to get together with some baseball bats and beat the shit out of each other? That's the best way to have a heated discussion? [/quote] i have not said that it was the best way, im just making a statement about human nature.
|
|
|
I agree. We are a violent species and no society can ever exist without violence. I see you would prefer we were not a violent species. That's very nice.
I think that you seem to be missing the point... We can rise above settling disputes with violence. maybe, in some few cases.
|
|
|
theoretical answer: YES IT CAN. what the rest of the forum thinks: NO!!!! it will be over $50000000 in 3 minutes.
my guess: maybe.
|
|
|
Tanken var ikke, at det kun skal handle om mining. Men ofte er det meget godt at have noget konkret at tale ud fra, i dette tilfælde et hardware setup, for at forklare nogle ret abstrakte ting som Bitcoin. Det vil formentlig være abstrakt for mange af vores lyttere. Samtidig ville vi gerne lidt mere i dybden end 'her er kan du betale med Bitcoin' og med ned i teknikken og tankerne bag. Giver det mening? Mange hilsner
bitcoin behøves ikke at værer så svært at forstå. den simplste på hvorpå bitcoin kan forklares, er ved at sige at hver bitcoin har sin helt egen "ejer historie", mens blockchainen holder styr på i hvilken "rækkefølge" forskellige transaktioner(ejer skift) foregår i og gyldigheden af disse transaktioner. Dette er dog en meget grov skitse af systemet. bitcoin bliver skabt vha. mining fordi et eller andet sted skal de jo komme fra, og det virker som en fair måde at uddele dem på. alternativet ville værer en form for central kontrol, hvilket bør undgår pga. interresse konflikter.
|
|
|
|