i believe that in the sector(reviews/reputations) there is no serious operator that can be trusted, perhaps repu can fill this gap by gaining the trust of users with its work over time and perhaps even with some prestigious partnership...
The problem is that companies had no real guarantee that the reviews are genuine. With Repu and blockchain they can offer that guarentee. |
|
|
|
|
I don't see a lot of discussion about the Sphere business model. Allowing it's users to profit from selling their own data, unlike with Facebook, where they just take your data and sell it. I see they have made great strides in developing the platform, but i wonder if there are talks with companies yet who are looking to buy the data.
|
|
|
|
I look at icobench just to know which ICOs are around, I just completely ignore ratings because in my opinion are useless as hell
Totally agree with you. A quick look at the bitcointalk thread and a skim though the whitepaper will tell you much more than all those rating sites combined. Not to mention that you can't trust those sources, they might just be paid to give a high score. That's why i like that the CEO did an interview on Youtube, where he passionately talks about the project. That is something you can trust. |
|
|
|
|
I like the Youtube videos with introductions from the different team members, but i would also like to see a video that describes a bit more concrete what the goals are. The whitepaper is so big so a lot of people don't take the time to fully read through it.
|
|
|
|
The free unit you get when investing in the ICO might become very valuable in the future. Other people will have to pay for it  |
|
|
|
I just noticed now there are already more than 11k people in it, not bad  This is also counted by people who grade ICO's to invest. A big community on social media is a factor these days for listing on exchanges and thus a positive factor for investors. |
|
|
|
after successful ico, that won't matter anymore. I think, after a successful ICO, the Sphere community including the development team, investors and supporters must altogether unite to make this project more successful. I mean everybody must do their part for this project to accomplish its goals. All they really need to do is keep communicating with the Community. So many ICO's just hardly put out any information when the ICO is done. If you just show people the progress you are making, your project will stay in the spotlight and top of mind for people. And in the case of Sphere this will most definitely result in sign-ups. |
|
|
|
It is nice when I read that cryptoflix will offer free educational contents. I wish the content will have a good quality and not just the ordinary one.
Many wrote that the content of the educational plan will be distributed free of charge. I wonder what it will be for the content? Who knows?? Please tell me. I think you can already make a lot of deals with providers that already offer free educational content. I hope there will be a focus on blockchain education, since i think this is a yet untapped market, one big database of videos about blockchain. |
|
|
|
Have they mentioned something about potential users that are ready or want to use the platform? maybe on the whitepaper or article.
Like there are some hospitals that are ready to use ehealth to store their patient's medical records/history.
it's way too early for that. they need to develop the product first and then shopping around. Its not about the time actually , i think their team has a big connection in this field/sector, so it can bring this to some potential users that will say "Hey i want to user this platform once its ready." If it really happened, It would be good if they tell the community about it. Even the most patient users will forget about the platform in 5-year time, too long still to aim for customers. If there's no product, no demo, no something, you can say whatever you want about potential user amount, in reality it will still be different. I think they should already give some details on what parties they are interested in offering their services too. Given the extensive roadmap, they probably already have plans for this. |
|
|
|
I read the descriptions of the project,but either I have too bad English , or I just don't understand what it is about )can someone quickly and easily explain what and how?
Maybe it is easier for you to watch some of their videos. Like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4ttCNFNidIAnd they have a lot more videos on their channel, detailing all the different aspects of the platform. And benefits for investors like getting a free spot in the VR world. |
|
|
|
Pretty slick looking. Great that they already have so much of the development done in this early stage, so after the ICO the focus can be on marketing and growing the platform. |
|
|
|
I wonder if a model like Basic Attention Token is not better suited for CryptoFlix. Basic Attention Token rewards users for consuming ads in a browser. Monetary rewards for consuming entertainment would be a great way to spread adoption.
I think that wouldn't be profitable. The production of movies and documentaries is very expensive and money is needed to finance everything. It's a nice idea, but not really feasible. The money needs to be there before, so they can produce the film. |
|
|
|
Are they planning to write a shorter version of whitepaper or they are sticking only with 288 pages? I think they will have to come up with something before their ICO otherwise they will scare investors away.
A one-pager would indeed be advisable. Though i think it will come. Maybe they just want very serious investors who have read the entire thing. |
|
|
|
The only mind that the development team is Russian, so you need to approach this project with caution and carefully investirovat to this company
Normally i would agree with you on this. But the project and it's team members have been very open. You can see interviews with them everywhere, so i have a very good feeling about this. |
|
|
|
Less funding only means the project will take a lot of time, not but it still could be done, so it's just a question to wait if one trust the project, REPU is an interesting idea that can take off well if handle right.
Does anybody know if leftover tokens will be burned? After the normal crowdsale? This would be very beneficial for investors in that case. |
|
|
|
App is running well on my smartphone. Search function has to be improved, but it makes a good first impression.
They has 200k users - this is large audience - when browser version will be available, I think there can be new wave of users, because Facebook every day is losing popularity. Maybe we will see sphere bounties in the future instead of facebook. Who knows? Targeting Facebook in the beginning can be an unrealistic target for Sphere, but after some time sphere can alter the game. I agree. It is better if they target a smaller group or even continent first. Probably a tech/blockchain crowd is a good choice since Facebook has banned all crypto ads and stuff. Sphere can offer all things crypto. |
|
|
|
Since this project has a VR/AR technology concept via blockchain, I think it has a bright future because that is where we are heading to. Good luck! VR is a present of technologies today, so if they did what they promise, it will be top of the market. I'm not sure that virtual reality will occupy the top of the market! There are no guarantees that this service will not leave the market in a year, since now it is not such a high demand I think a lot of people feel that way since everybody was already expecting mass adoption of VR by now. But i think the main reason there has been little adoption is because first generation hardware for it is expensive as fuck. Second is that there is still very little content for it. But i have no doubt that this market will boom within a year. You see all the big players like Facebook investing heavily into it, they will not make it fail, i can guarantee. Anybody who has tried proper VR experiences, not some Google cardboard, knows this is the future. That is why i am bullish on the Mark.Space project. They combine two sectors who are growing enormously, blockchain and VR. My one wish is that there will also be a focus on AR, since i believe this will also offer a lot of opportunities. |
|
|
|
Why do you care if your name will appear in credits  ? Maybe they will put your name I don't know, I'll care only about if a movie will give me profits They probably won't put all the nicknames of anonymous crypto investors in their credits but maybe from the top contributors? Maybe like kickstarter they can offer tiers when donating. Like donate x amount and get your name in the credits. But what i would really like to see is also your profile on Cryptoflix growing and showing the movies you've backed. That's something to be proud of and would be fun if you can share it. |
|
|
|
Well, some projects need time to develope even further. At the beginning of this project, there was not even a whitepaper and now we have a 260+ pages wp. The Team is also getting bigger and the future is getting brighter and brighter.
I don't mind the roadmap to be long. It shows me they have planned far into the future and have set realistic goals. I think a lot of people don't realize the scope of this project, healthcare is a big big sector and with advancements in medicine and technology it's only going to get bigger. When you want to bring together the worlds experts and globally have an impact on healthcare, it will need time. I will invest and wait. 5 years is not even that long for an investment to wait outside of crypto. |
|
|
|
Just to look at ICOs' name and that's it, it's so dumb to invest in a ICO by looking at those ratings where usually one person and a bot vote lol
I think so. But the ratings on these top sites greatly affect the fees for the ICO. Many projects get 4-5 points. Although most number of that projects do not deserve 3 points. I still hold the opinion that you should not trust these sources. It's best to think and analyze everything yourself. You should always make your own research, read whitepaper and listen what are people saying about this project Exactly. Until there is stricter regulation, i don;t trust any review. They can be used as guidance, but you should always do your own research. Luckily Mark.Space makes it easy by having a prototype already. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
