Leverkusen actually made Bundesliga more interesting and more colorful after many years under Bayern Munich domination. Dortmund last season came very nearly to the finish line to lift the trophy but they lost it in last minute to Bayern Munich. What Leverkusen have done in Bundesliga this season is similar to how Bayern Munich usually dominate this league in the last decade.

They will have two other Europa League semi finals after going there last season. It's coincidence that they have a same opponent in two latest seasons in semi finals, AS Roma. With their outstanding performances in this season, from Bundesliga to Europa League, they have enough strength and confidence to beat Roma and have a first Europa League final match.

Dortmund played many seasons in Champions League and they are experienced there but they don't have much experience in Champions League quarter finals or semi finals. They regularly participate in Champions League but are different than biggest clubs like Real Madrid, Bayern Munich or Barcelona with ability to appear very often in deep phases of Champions League.

Fortunately for Dortmund, PSG don't have many seasons in semi finals too so their semi final matches in this season will be very equal from their squad quality to experience in this round. Chance for Dortmund is like 50% to win and is not too smaller than chance of PSG.

Bitcoin is fungible, nobody and no government can change it.

Because Bitcoin is fungible, we have Bitcoin transactions with any bitcoin value different than round numbers. Because of fungibility, 19,689,128 BTC in circulating supply can be exchanged by many people. If it is non-fungible, actual available bitcoins for circulation will be very smaller because many bitcoins will be locked.

In addition, miners get transaction fee because Bitcoin is fungible. It is unrealistic to get transaction fee in only round numbers of bitcoin.

I don't know any resource to show you cost of mining 1 bitcoin in 2009, but there is information for it in 2010. It is related to the forum admin, theymos.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/su7jld/mining_250_bitcoin_with_1_computer_12_years_ago/

There is risk from malware and people must be very carefull when copying, pasting an address in their transaction broadcasting process. Check, double check will help them to avoid risk of sending their precious bitcoins to a non-wanted address.

How to lose your Bitcoins with CTRL-C CTRL-V

It can help to reduce risk and loss of hijack from malware attackers.

As far as I read from the case's update, the user who created the accusation seems to fail with it. The moderator on Casino.guru briefed the case, so far, based on evidences of both sides, game logs, it seems the user has very suspicious activities which are not helpful for this accusation.

You can read two latest updates from moderator on this case.
With a big company like Roobet, they have a big business and valuable reputation to protect, and I am not surprised that the user was accused with cheating accurately by Roobet.

If Atalanta can beat Marseille and have a final match, even the opponent in the final is Leverkusen, they will have chance to lift Europa League trophy. In a single match like a final, a weaker team can win if they have proper approach, players execute tactics well and have enough support from luckiness.

Atalanta are not weak and they can beat any team in semi final rounds from Marseille, Roma to Leverkusen. The odds makes sense in my opinion because Atalanta looks better than Marseille.

The higher odds for Atalanta against Roma is because they don't have to meet Leverkusen in semi finals. Roma will be a direct opponent of Leverkusen in semi finals and the given odds shows that Leverkusen is a strongest candidate and most favorite team for Europa League title.

So in another semi final pair, Atalanta are considered higher than Marseille and it explains why their odds is better than Roma. It does not mean Atalanta are stronger than Roma.

I agree and I shared my thinking that they can come and go, many times. Except if Bitcoin developers can do something to stop these attackers. I really consider them as attackers, not actual users of Bitcoin blockchain.

They know that it's more easily to be known if they deploy their inscriptions on Bitcoin blockchains than altcoin blockchains and they see opportunities to make noise, get rich with Bitcoin blockchain. They will not abandon their rich games if the bull market is still here but actual Bitcoin users deserve to use the blockchain in either bull or bear market.

Bitcointalk is the oldest and most famous forum about Bitcoin. It is not the initial domain name for Bitcoin forum but it inherits user data base from original Bitcoin forum created by Satoshi Nakamoto.

You don't need to be a genius to search about Bitcoin and will be given resources, links that direct you to this forum, Bitcointalk.org.

If you want to be an influencer and go around to make speeches and let people around you to know about Bitcoin, this forum, it's not bad. You must know about risk on yourself like life and your bitcoin, can be kidnapped, stolen, and more risk. If you accept such risk, go ahead with public speeches in your communities but you can not control what people do. You only give them information, be a kind person or a scammer, they choose, not you.

It's very unrealistic. You can not know what they want to do and if they are scammers, they will not let you know their scam intention. Very few scammers will let people know about their plans to scam.

Complain does not help anything for us in our practice. We have to switch to other blockchains for our fund transfers when Bitcoin mempools are continuing to be spammed by Ordinals and Runes.

I believe these spam waves will come and go but it takes time for them to be resolved block by block and hypes on Ordinals, Runes become less and there will be less demands from them on Bitcoin transactions. It's certainly that we have to adapt to live with Ordinals and Runes so we must have other plans for fund transfers.

It's true to say Bitcoin blockchain during these attacks, are not helpful for the poor with small fund and even for the rich, if they are smart, they will not waste their precious satoshi for very expensive transaction fee.

No contract between theymos and merit sources that after a merit source applies and gets approval to be a source, the merit source user will have to use sourced merit for distribution in one or two boards only. It's free to distribute merit to any board if the merit source sees good posts.

Merit sources don't have time to read all posts of the forum, in all boards. Theymos does not ask merit sources to do it, it's a free job and they are volunteers to be merit sources.

If merit sources distribute sourced merits to good, quality posts, they complete their tasks, no more stress.

I use Chrome browser and it happens when I click on like a post or repost. I barely do it as I usually only read so I can not understand why Twitter detects me like a bot and log out my account. A notification appears and if I refresh, my account will be required to log in again. It only happens recent weeks, less than one month.

He has a lot of ideas, some are good, some are bad and I see he wants to change it to be a better platform. Succeed or not, I don't know but talking about bots, I think he is right on his intention to control bots that are contaminated many social media platforms.

We use a platform but want to interact with actual people, not with bots.

Bitcoin does not choose anything. It is coded by Satoshi Nakamoto, and mined by miners. It is traded by investors and traders and price will depend on Supply and Demand Principle.

After a halving, future supply for next 210,000 will have half of previous 210,000 blocks. Halving helps demand on Bitcoin to increase so you can see, less future new supply, bigger demand, what about price?

Innovations or new upgrades on Bitcoin protocol don't depend on Bitcoin halving. Developers work daily to upgrade Bitcoin protocol, from idea to code, test with test net before a deployment on main net. If you see an upgrade after a halving, it does not mean Bitcoin developers only develop it after halving, but they did it months or years before the halving.

Yes, it will. More noise on media, more free advertisement for Bitcoin, more people will get involve in Bitcoin.

Problems are solved and it's good to see Duelbits do more interesting events for their users and community. I am really uncomfortable with Twitter recent weeks when they regularly automatic log out my account and I have to sign in my account again many times.

It does not happen with Twitter on their application but happen regularly with a browser. I read news that Elon Musk wants to charge minor fee for posts and interactions with bots on Twitter. He considers it as good solution to fight against bot and I guess log out account regularly is another solution from Elon to cope with bot accounts.

It's sad that a normal user can be affected too.

Liverpool started that match very good with a goal at 7th minute but they failed to trigger a collapse of Atalanta. They tried to do something in a second half but can not score any more goal and it's not because they played bad. Atalanta did played a careful match and reduced as much as possible risk from Liverpool. They know that Liverpool have a huge task to complete and when their players managed successfully against panic, they won.

Liverpool only can feel regretful with some individual mistakes in a first leg match and finding three goals against a club from Italy is not easy especially when they only focus on defense.

Manchester City did played good but I can say they wasted many opportunties in two quarter final matches and Real Madrid are simply strong and experienced enough to take advantage of any chance to beat Manchester City. They are at same level and both played well so if you can not beat the opponent, the opponent will beat you at the end.

The severity of their matches shown in penalty shootouts with two Croatian players missed their penalties. Modric and Kovacic are very experienced with penalty shootouts because they joined some with Croatia national team in World Cup and Euro tournaments. But experience can not help them to finish their tasks in this match because pressure is so huge.

They will not give up and will fight for their own chance to have a position in semi final round but their chance is not too good. Three goal difference is too much at this level and they will have to play home away in Bergamo. Atalanta is not a big club but if they can beat Liverpool with three goals at Anfield stadium, I believe they will be strong enough to secure this big advantage at their home stadium.

They have another support from not too good form of Liverpool recent matches. Atalanta will only need to start this match with maximum carelessness in their approach by which they will reduce risk from Liverpool a lot.

Trading is actual spending your money for trading.

It is different, very different than trading with demo accounts or learning trading courses with fundamental or technical things about trading. When it comes to actual trading, actual money, profit and loss, you will be affected by emotion and your psychology will be affected a lot.

You can see a professor teaches about trading but it's unsure that if the professor uses his money to trade, he will be one of rare winners in the market.

I read that thread on Casinoguru and so far, there is suspicious and skeptical thinking about that user. There is also no final conclusion about the case yet but from what I read, it does not has anything to support the user to claim that winning.

Before the case is finalized by the regulator, it is not right to say either the casino or the user is the winner. Casino guru also recommended that user (if not you) to wait for updates from the regulator. Else you can go with hiring a lawyer to do it, escalate it for you.

I am neutral but it seems evidence shared to Casino guru and regulator, their, so far, thinking is not on that user.

They need to have talent and luckiness to win trophies. Every coach needs those factors to win trophies even they are temporary coaches like Di Matteo who won Champions League with Chelsea, Tuchel won Champions League with Chelsea some seasons ago. Luckiness is important to win a single match and a battle but winners must work very hard so that luckiness will be like enough constructive factor for their success.

It's still far for De Rossi and Roma to win Europa League and a first barrier is to win against AC Milan at Olimpico stadium after all. They only need a draw to win in aggregated result but I am sure it will not be an easy task for De Rossi and Roma. After that, Leverkusen will likely be their next opponent and after that one more opponent in the final match.

They will have go through some last challenge to win Europa League that will be a second title in Roma history in Europe.