Gravity is crap. (2/10)
Interstellar isn't that bad. (6/10)
As bad as the ending is in Edge of Tomorrow, it's still better than both these movies. (7/10) I like Oblivion better. (8/10)
After seeing Gravity right after hearing all the hype I was dissapointed and would rate it a 6/10 after the first viewing. The second time around I bumped it up to an 8/10 because Sandra Bullock did a pretty good job - it's hard to play against nothing. EoT and Oblivion I liked as well - not as good for cinematics but better Sci-Fi.
|
|
|
I read somewhere that electricity in turkmenistan is free. Does anybody know if this is true?
Well, I don't think electricity would be free anywhere. It might be available for a very low cost instead. I think China and Russia have the cheapest Electricity available. Why people keep mentioning china? I though china is like USD 0.15 per KWH or something? Probably because more then 1/2 of the worldwide hashing power is now in China.
|
|
|
I have had Paypal send me to collections. I took them to court and collected the lost judgement and had them pay $2000 towards reputation/defamation. Good times.
|
|
|
Requiem For a Dream was pretty weird for me, but might be normal for others who have used before.
|
|
|
Proudhon's Bitcoin is a Bubble
|
|
|
Banned for closing primedice signature campaign
Banned because I'm new, the new bad mod. Banned for banning senior member. Banned for ramming 3130 when you should have rammed 3129. Banned for being too damn cute.
|
|
|
Can I pay to be put on that list? That in itself would be retarded. Foolish/retarded behavior is a God given gift and must be earned - it cannot be bought. Except maybe if you OD on a drug coughDankcough
|
|
|
If you still have 1 for sale I'll buy one.
|
|
|
I'm thinking about investing into cloud mining but i don't know where... Can someone explain to me why the ranking on these two sites is so different? http://www.cloudminingreviews.com/ http://cryptoverse.org/cloud_mining/ On cloudminingreviews 808 mining is on rank 6 and at cryptoverse 808 mining is on rank 26 (the last one). Should i trust any of them? PBmining is rank 1 on cryptoverse but only rank 8 on cloudminingreviews !? Look at the reviews on those sites. They're like 5 words reviews like "nice interface. I like site". Those sites are meaningless. More appropriate reviews would be from other miners that have positive or negative experiences who post it here on Bitcointalk.
|
|
|
That's a pretty nice price. Actually I guess you could call it crazy. I'll take a code if you still have one
|
|
|
There are literally hundreds of ways to mine and no one post can cover all of that. To keep it simple: -Buy Miner -Plug it into computer/laptop/Pi or configure it through web acess -Pick some pools to mine on and make accounts -Mine using CGMiner or BFGMiner -Spend BTC and be happy! Here's a more detailed guide for many ASIC models: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=702653
|
|
|
It took a while but I was finally able to get all the coins out - even Kittehcoin - moved it to cryptsy and managed to get a billionth of a LTC
|
|
|
Well I was able to sell off 20 of my newer 7xxx cards today, so I'm left with my last 10MH/s - some of these cards started with Bitcoin back in 2011 I just have the cards listed on Amazon and if they sell then I just use the proceeds to buy more coin. Even with my free power it's just not worth mining on GPUs anymore, at least not for me. Thanks for the fish Eleuthria. I'll keep my SHA-256 mining on BTC Guild though that is coming to an end too I fear.
|
|
|
Well I ran into a problem last night and am working with Poloniex on trying to find out the issue. I sent an XMR payment of 1.0 XMR (including 0.001 fee) and I included the required payment ID. Poloniex says it didn't arrive in their wallet and on the blockchain there in no payment ID. This is my transaction has: http://monerochain.info/tx/ee635cbdbcaa1634867cdc6bd63003f9ef08032b106e11d8fd40c09d10561f18Here is a screenshot showing the send: Any ideas what is going on? I manually reduced the default fee from 0.005 to 0.001 and was just curious to see what would happen - did that mess something up? Currently, the specification does not allow fees lower than 0.005, but to avoid confusion, I'll make it a minimum in the next release. I also did this by curiosity, and suggest that you should re-index your wallet in the following way: - Make sure you have a backup of all your wallet files, just in case...
- Close Monero Client
- In the wallet data folder, delete the 'wallet.bin' file (but keep the '.keys', and if exists, the '.address.txt' file)
- Restart Monero Client, and wait about 20 or 30 minutes until simplewallet re-indexes your wallet and makes it usable again. Before closing the client, make sure that wallet ('.bin' file) autosave has happened.
I deleted the bin file, relaunched it and it only took a couple minutes to reindex it (i7 laptop & SSD). It still shows the 1.0 transaction in my history but it looks like my wallet has the correct amount now. Is there anything I should be worried about with those 1.0 coins? Was it a failed send? I'll leave it at the default send fee from now on, but we should probably post a warning or make it minimum as you noted.
|
|
|
Wallet seems to be working well but how come the incoming and outgoing transactions are showing up as the same.
|
|
|
0.023-0.027 in Washington State.
-D
Dalkore, roughly how much hashing power are you supporting with your co-loc service currently?
|
|
|
Slush's pool can sometimes be punishing to somebody with a low hash rate. You might want to consider a PPLNS payment pool to decrease your variance if your rate is low.
|
|
|
|