What about the strange gap in that view?

If you choose this view: http://dc-charts.com/chart_moon.php?ex=2&cu=4&sw=4&tz=6&ar=0&dl=0&js=1&sc=0&re=0
... one could see a nice trend-channel building up: draw the lower line from the spike at 39 to 42 (omitting the runaway value, caused by the dump of JimHendrix) and the upper line from the peak at 65 to the one at 67/68. Then the broader consolidation range from ~40/42 to 60/62 would make perfectly sense. Think of the possibilities for traders, if they could use this huge channel with the ups and downs in the general Mooncoin-uptrend ...  

Yes, as you can see there: nice time for mining MOON at the moment, with the lower diff.

So narrow, the range? If one bigger buyer buys the 240 LTC chunk at 49, the range could reach up to 60 ...
What makes you sure about the 48 Lit.-resistance?

So it seems that the new consolidation-range in the overall upward-trend is 40-60 Litoshi?
What is your guess? When do we see Mooncoin sustainably breaking the 60 Litoshi resistance?

Obviously he wants 50 Lit./MOON.

Good idea.

How could you "lose" them, if not actively selling?

OK, I remember. Nice to have you here now. If you'd like to get more info about what has happened (and don't know already): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=389403.msg9456299#msg9456299

 

What is your username on reddit? Can't remember a username MobyDk ...

Hi miners,

if you can spare some hash-power, please point your machines to one of the pools:

http://mooncoin.rocks/official-pool-list

peme, could you check, why the layout is kind of strange on that page?

This could really only be done in a public draw with a notary and all that, because people invest spend money for that. If it wouldn't be like that, it would leave "enemies" of MOON with ammo. Or even disappointed people discrediting Mooncoin perhaps, because they didn't win. So I would really not recommend this kind of promotion, unless all necessary precautions are taken, to make it absolutely transparent and being conform with the rules in the country where it takes place.


Even if it is not illegal in certain countries, it would be problematic because of the above mentioned reasons. And since Mooncoin is international, there can be participants who originate from those countries, but possibly don't know about it being illegal in their country. It's the same with online-gambling.
It would be better, if a single sponsor does this alone. Then the participants don't have to invest money - what really makes the difference for being possibly illegal or not in some countries.
Maybe one should consult a lawyer for checking this, before going live.

I think, borders should play no role. To the Moon! 
But we have to think about existing legislative regulations in the single countries of the world, as long as they exist. And keep them in mind, if we want MOON to become a success.

Those who are placing sell orders now, could sell much higher, if they would let Mooncoin go up first. I can't understand who is so short-sighted.
So to all, who have put sell orders: please pull them. It is better for all, including yourself. Or do you only want to drive the price down, in order to buy cheaper? Then I hope all other Moonies simply don't are scared by this. Just wait long enough. The coins will be sold, or these speculators pull their orders, because it gets too boring for them.

Please check first, if it is legal to offer such kind of lottery. I would not participate in that, because in many countries it is not allowed (Edit:), as far as I know.
Sorry.  

We have time. They will be eaten away. One by one.  

But be sure to read your PMs before. 

Has user JimHendrix now finally sold all of his Mooncoins? 

Dumping-time on Cryptsy. Someone sold ~400 LTC of MOON.
If you like to place an order, to get cheap coins, the time is now.  

OK. To make it better understandable for other readers, too:
As it seems, it has to do with their explorer not showing the relevant amount that you were sending indeed to the receiver, but the sum of change (cambio) and original amount instead.
 

Trades? I think you mean transactions ...?

Regarding the unknown amounts, it could be and have to do with the change: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Change

So if you check this tx, there is one input (the "bill" in the senders wallet, as described on the bitcoin-wiki-page) which has to be split into the two outputs - one is the amount to be transferred to the receiver's address, the other one goes back to the change-address of the sender's wallet.

Edited