|
I agree
Of course those tags don't mean much but if you're ok with tags meaning nothing when tied to post number, why aren't you ok with tags meaning nothing when tied to post number+date of arrival ?
Everyone has his own way to value people they don't know (yes, reading posts is better but sometimes you don't have time), so we'll never all agree. Maybe a forum mod can allow us to chose which calculation we want
|
|
|
|
Beware: r and s are unsigned, so if first byte of r is > 7f: r='\x00'+r
 I don't see the logic behind this null addition. Unsigned is unsigned, so you can occupy the highest bit without permission.... It's a concatenation Same for s
r and s are 32 bytes numbers, so, as it can one additional byte because of above, you have size(r)=0x20 or 0x21
So, I guess 0x1F, 0x1E, 0x1D... are allowed. Thanks a lot!  I never thought about that, but now you mention it I think so |
|
|
|
There are studies for everything. Several actually link smoking cannabis to cancer.
Fix'd |
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I was on my mobile phone
It's 30 + len(z) + 02 + len(r) + r + 02 + len(s) + s, z being what follows its size, ie 02+len(r)+r+02+len(s)+s
Beware: r and s are unsigned, so if first byte of r is > 7f: r='\x00'+r
Same for s
r and s are 32 bytes numbers, so, as it can one additional byte because of above, you have size(r)=0x20 or 0x21
|
|
|
|
Visitez Ecoin.fr pour vendre vos bitcoin, litecoin, namecoin, ppcoin.
Ecoin.fr peut acheter en cash(argent liquide) ou selon vos modalités
Pourquoi ces 4 en particuliers ? |
|
|
|
Is that regex working? I'd put some parentheses /^5[1-9A-Za-z][^OIl]{20,50}/ or /^5([1-9A-Za-z][^OIl]){20,50}/ Try with some private keys from https://www.bitaddress.org/ |
|
|
|
|
Interesting project
Quick questions:
Anyone=anyone in Colorado, US, world?
Have you started anything yet?
Are you planning to verify whether your 'customers' has cancer? I'm scared Devcoin would be seen as the drug money otherwise. I know you can buy drug with cash too, but average Joe won't care. BTW I'm not saying you should verify it.
|
|
|
|
la plupart des robinets à bitcoins sont vides, quand ils ne le sont pas ils payent une somme du genre 0.0001 btc / 2h ? 24 h ? ...
A mon avis la perte de temps que génère ce genre de site par le simple fait de l'afficher, de le lire, d'entrer son adresse btc, de résoudre un CAPTCHA etc... équivaudrait plutôt à une perte d'argent qu'un gain (même infime).
En effet, les sommes gagnées sont absolument ridicules. A moins de penser que le prix du bitcoin va être multiplié par mille (on peut toujours rêver), le seul intérêt de la chose c'est que ça permet d'essayer le système et d'effectuer gratuitement des tests de transaction. Et c'est déjà pas mal |
|
|
|
Question: in the line of code "db.delete(key)", if the "key" don't exist, will it raise an error or it will pass without problem?
It looks like that it passes without problem. Actually the delete function searches in all the DB to find all the keys to delete, so my method is pretty dumb... I made it at the beginning of my fork, which corresponds to the beginning of my learning of Python/serious programming. The more I look at the code I made, the more I find it ugly My suggestion: when deleting transactions, instead of applying the modifications on the "key" to compare to the "keydel", why not just transforming the "keydel" to the "key" format and deleting it without iterating through all the wallet keys?
Yeah that's better that what's done currently, but as I wrote the delete function will take care of that even better |
|
|
|
|
Where is that pool? Disk? Not RAM I suppose...
|
|
|
|
hahahaha, hater. wow, this must be one of the guys who ddos new coins.
Why would I want to DDoS a chain? Let the users have their fun. Sheesh. who quoted you? oy, get off my back!!!! m talking bwt the OP, wow  answering 2 years later, wow |
|
|
|
|
I didn't check the source code about that part but I think so...
I'm interested too btw
|
|
|
|
|
I know but the system I'm currently on is not really powerful... Not to mention the horrible bandwidth.
Thanks for the input, I'll search who's in charge of it now. I checked on blockexplorer.com before sending the PM but it still mentions Theymos.
|
|
|
|
|
I would have preferred to avoid downloading all the blockchain and setting up a software
But yeah that's a solution if the block explorer isn't repaired soon
|
|
|
|
I just pushed the new version: no more '#' bugs in passphrases and you can use file for deletions Format: 1st line=type ('tx' or 'key'), then 1line=1data to delete Code: pywallet.py --multidelete file.txt [--wallet wallet.dat] [--datadir /bitcoin/directory] tx
b0b0865e723101b5a720a79d805efd544c59fa2ceebffc724a12cd5fe683057f
07941322e6dd5b15b3bde0739648d49526e19ea78b8f4085e943fca473cbfdbf
etc...
by the way, I received the following error when making the dump (but it completed successfully):
2013-05-22 18:36:52-0300 [HTTPChannel,2,127.0.0.1] Wallet data not recognized: {'__type__': 'orderposnext', '__value__': '\xc1\x8b\x03\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00', '__key__': '\x0corderposnext'}
That just means that the 'orderposnext' entry in your wallet isn't recognized. That is because I personally don't know what it is and I doubt it's useful. Pywallet will keep it inside your wallet when you import/delete/dump/whatever though, it just doesn't understand it |
|
|
|
Yes, let's try to kill a dead blockchain.
Let's try to learn reading dates, too. this thread is proof of haters soothsayers everywhere in timespace (even in such old topic) yeah, but you were right with solidcoin FTFY |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
