Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 03:37:48 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 [248] 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 »
4941  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Something does not seem right (mining) on: August 25, 2011, 02:31:51 PM
It could be extreme bad luck, but the stats doesn't say so: http://bitclockers.com/blockhistory
So... I don't know... Try Deepbit(chose proportionate) for a while and maybe come back on Bitclockers later to see if it changed
4942  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Something does not seem right (mining) on: August 25, 2011, 01:44:16 PM
Only 0.2BTC for 24h?
You should really use another pool. Which one are you using?
4943  Economy / Marketplace / Re: 3 BTC for installation of Bitcoin-Poker-Room on my server. Anyone? on: August 25, 2011, 01:22:26 PM
I can try
4944  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Transporting $12 billion in gold internationally estimated to cost $400 million on: August 25, 2011, 01:11:06 PM
how do you force it not to force you to send the transaction fee?
With the official client you can't
4945  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Testnet coins on: August 25, 2011, 11:45:14 AM
It is a testnet, it's also a Namecoin address if you want
4946  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Finally, a Paper Bitcoin Wallet on: August 25, 2011, 01:17:56 AM
I'd definitely do it if I could generate my own. But I don't trust you that much and never will
You can generate your own address: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=37997.0
You randomly chose yourself the priv key (if you fear not being random enough, you can generate the priv key from a passphrase or from one of your file) and use the coresponding Bitcoin address
4947  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Help, I think i lost some BTC on: August 24, 2011, 09:03:52 PM
awh Sad  I tried Recuva, it recovered the wallet.dat but it was corrupted  Undecided

Thanks anyways guys.
Keep it
Download Hexedit and open your corrupted wallet.dat
Each "02010104" is followed by 64 characters (ie 32 bytes), which are a private key
Save them all, import them with pywallet and hope the good key was recovered, not likely but it's worth trying


I have gotten my private keys from a wallet.dat using a hex editor.  I modified a python script to accept hex formatted keys and let it insert them into a working wallet.
You modified which tool? Pywallet accept hex keys and I don't know other python scripts
4948  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Help, I think i lost some BTC on: August 24, 2011, 07:13:47 PM
I will try that, it was a new address, its not in this wallet's address book :\
If it was a new address you generated after the backup I'm afraid I have bad news for you Sad
4949  Other / Meta / Re: Forum preference language settings ... on: August 24, 2011, 05:16:13 PM
It has nothing to do with the forum, the problem is your browser
Firefox displays everything fine
4950  Other / Meta / Re: Why dont we have a security subforum? on: August 24, 2011, 05:13:09 PM
And still there is no security subforum, while the one for alternative block chains did get added... Sad
Sad
4951  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Pywallet: manage your wallets/addresses/keys/tx's on: August 24, 2011, 04:05:13 PM
It's nearly sure in win7 it's a shortcut, I'll use %programfiles% because of XP then
Thanks for all these info
4952  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Pywallet: manage your wallets/addresses/keys/tx's on: August 24, 2011, 03:10:00 PM
It was because of a temporary link to one of the install file, it's ok now
Could you launch update.bat, then install.bat?
I tried on a XP of mine, it runs as expected

Are you sure c:\programmi is not just a shortcut to c:\program files? This is the case on a french windows
4953  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin client improvements on: August 24, 2011, 01:47:59 AM
Flexcoin already is trying to tackle the Bitcoin Address problem (e.g. send BTC to "coffeeshop"), but, unfortunately, I don't yet trust ANY online Bitcoin service with holding my money for any long period of time.

Best way to do this is using Namecoin to map names to bitcoin addresses, but I'm guessing more development will be needed for this to work seamlessly.

Afaik, no
4954  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Can the same bitcoin be spent twice (or more) in one block? on: August 23, 2011, 11:22:27 PM
However... I don't think the standard software will let you spend it until it has at least 1 confirmation.

Are you sure? I think that with enough fee it's ok
Just a thought though
4955  Other / Off-topic / Re: Eligius miners aware of prayers in block headers? on: August 23, 2011, 11:16:09 PM
In fact the catholics literally did hold back scientific progress for centries
4956  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Can the same bitcoin be spent twice (or more) in one block? on: August 23, 2011, 10:58:29 PM
Yes
4957  Other / Off-topic / Re: Eligius miners aware of prayers in block headers? on: August 23, 2011, 09:25:56 PM
if Graet had noticed quotes from the Quran being quoted, would he have been so eager to post the same thread?
Give it a try if you're not convinced so
If not him, others would have created the thread

Even if you're right, so what? This makes prayers in the blockchain anymore acceptable?
4958  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Optimising 1 of 100 OP_CHECKMULTISIG transactions. on: August 23, 2011, 08:31:37 PM
Got it! Thanks! Seems obvious how the code works now. I don't know what I was thinking before!

listed in order.

This is what did it for some reason....

Anyway, so that this thread isn't a complete waste of time I'd like to observe that the current way of matching signatures to public keys is very wasteful of computation. For example, if you have a 1 of 100 multisignature then the code goes through the public keys sequentially trying to verify the signature until it either succeeds or runs out of public keys. As each transaction is verified each time it is relayed, wouldn't it make sense to indicate in the scriptSig the number of public keys to skip before attempting to verify the signature. This could be an (optional?) 1 byte parameter which would save a very large number of unnecessary signature verification attempts.

ByteCoin
Non-standard transaction, thus never relayed
Problem solved
4959  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: I'm selling BTC through PayPal! on: August 23, 2011, 08:03:53 PM
Quote
A hashed version will be stored in a database in order to anonymously identify you for your future purchases and increase your limit.
Wat?
6 seconds to calculate the hashes of all the phone numbers containing 6 digits
-> 60000s < 20h to calculate the hashes of all the phone numbers containing 10 digits

And this only on a CPU, imagine on a GPU...
4960  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Pywallet: manage your wallet on: August 23, 2011, 07:42:43 PM
New 64bit-friendly Windows installer:

Same steps:

Complete-update feature: run update.bat and all the files will be updated, ie you will have to download pwi only once whatever the future changes I'll make
Pages: « 1 ... 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 [248] 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!