I have been unable to withdraw Bitcoins to the address 1DN6ZttogE7eoKFGT3CQqZNDzZREucVmKD
I have used this address many times before, but last time I tried it, I received the error "Invalid BITCOIN address!!!". I also receive this error if I attempt to change the address to any other address, and it reverts back to the address I have always been using.
I will check it shortly. I am also experiencing this. Username is michaelmclees. |
|
|
|
thank you very much for the response! i just like the idea of uncovering a block myself even if it takes a little while~!
Welcome to the wonderful world of CPU mining! |
|
|
|
|
When I try to withdraw Namecoins, it says my address is invalid. Username michaelmclees, and Namecoin address is N36h1UhETzJdTYuBwusP1SfudswneBPW9z.
|
|
|
|
|
"CoinHunter is attempting to FUD LiteCoin because he knows that it's a better designed system than SolidCoin is. LiteCoin will likely take all of SolidCoin's miners in the next few months. He is scared."
Eventually, he'll be the last miner, last user, last everything... Then he'll claim the coin only he can use is more secure than ever!
|
|
|
|
|
I vote for release. It functions as security and advertising for Litecoin.
|
|
|
|
Anyone thinking these changes are in any way like SolidCoin, doesn't know enough about SolidCoin.
Say it with me.... "Voluntary."
That's a bit like saying it's voluntary to update to a new SolidCoin version to get past a checkpoint. If someone cannot reliably send a transaction over the network I would say you are forcing them to update to use pretty much the main feature of a p2p cryptocurrency, sending money. A client which joins the network using an older version, can only connect to 8 other clients. If all of those clients have new rules for relaying transactions it's quite possible that new client will be unable to send some transactions out. Sure, but you're admitting that whether or not someone is "forced" into using the new software is a function of the network, which is exactly what has been advertised from the start. Care to make the same claim about SolidCoin? |
|
|
|
|
Anyone thinking these changes are in any way like SolidCoin, doesn't know enough about SolidCoin.
Say it with me.... "Voluntary."
|
|
|
|
|
If we can't handle a dozen transactions a block, we need to just shut down. The bloat is negligible. I say just ignore it.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll be there. Might talk to some restaurants to see if their receptive to Bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
Litecoin version 0.5.0.5 has been released. - added minimum fee of 0.1 LTC for low priority transactions to deter transaction spam Please get latest from source or download the Windows client binary: https://github.com/downloads/coblee/litecoin/litecoin-windows-client-0.5.0.5.zipPool operators and solo miners should get this latest code so that you don't write these spammy transactions into blocks. Users should download the latest client so they don't propagate spammy transactions and let them slow down the client. As terrytibbs said, this won't totally fix the problem, as the spammer can still write his transactions into blocks he finds himself. But it should reduce the network congestion of propagating these spammy transactions and reduce the number of blocks that contain these transactions. Might want to announce in separate thread so people who don't keep up with the LiteCoin proper thread will get the message if they're unaware. |
|
|
|
I still don't understand why people do this? If the price has been trading in the 2.4-2.6 range, why not just put your sell of 20 000 btc at 2.4? Do they really need the money right now, so much they will take up to .5 less per bitcoin in trade?
You asking this and having the words "Lambert Investment Fund" in your signature scares me. |
|
|
|
Is this the "blood in the streets" moment to buy up BTC on the cheap?
No. You'll know there is blood in the streets when you start to question whether BTC will be around 5 years from now. That's when you buy. I've got a bid in at $1.65, just to make sure I don't miss something big down overnight, but I can imagine this going to 50 cents or so. |
|
|
|
block_nTime=1317972665
block_nNonce=2084524493
What does that actually do? I'm not sure you actually need that anymore, but the release of LiteCoin was scheduled so that everyone could verify the creators were trustworthy and that the chain was not premined by us. So Coblee held a poll and released those parameters at a predetermined time so everyone could download the client, verify its functionality, and begin use as soon as it was release. Those two parameters are part of what started up the client on the real chain and not Testnet. I think they're in the new releases of the client now without further action by you. |
|
|
|
|
It would be interesting to see if the largest holders would get together and form a pact. Everyone will put up a large number of BTC or USD on MtGox and create huge walls. The mutual promises from the buyers and sellers comes with the stipulation that the bids and offers cannot be withdrawn.
Initially, the spread might be very large, like a large buy order at $2.75 and sell at $3.25. Someone could work up some kind of algorithm to adjust the spread as appropriate.... Who knows?
|
|
|
|
|
The thing you guys seem to forget is that merged mining would have nearly no effect on LTC, but would greatly strengthen the power of TBX. No one is mining TBX now, which is why the next difficulty decrease keeps going ever further into the future. The only reason one would have to do merged mining is to strengthen TBX, but who would want to do that? The reason people are mining LTC is because they don't like TBX.
|
|
|
|
|
That ScryptMiner GUI is OUTSTANDING... assuming the rates it quotes are accurate.
|
|
|
|
Fantastic upgrade.
*edit - I notice that if I run my mouse over the hammers while I am mining, the client tells me that I am not mining. Small bug I'm sure.
No. I am mining in the client and it says not mining. |
|
|
|
|
Fantastic upgrade.
*edit - I notice that if I run my mouse over the hammers while I am mining, the client tells me that I am not mining. Small bug I'm sure.
|
|
|
|
|
All I did was edit out the dollar values, leaving only cents.
My point is, you can't be prepared for what you can't imagine. And if you can't imagine prices dropping back down to cents per Bitcoin, you're going to be caught with your pants down. That's my only point.
If a graph like that happening some time soon is on your radar, you're better prepared than many I see here, reading charts and tea leaves thinking they have a handle on this thing. They don't, and they might stand to lose a lot here.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
