First impression: nope. After finding out what it is supposed to be: still nope.
Edit: forgot to mention what I see. I only see a tree with small section of lighter-colored bark.
|
|
|
Sorry, I realize that it might be hard for people to verify if that token really came from that account's UID because bctalkaccountpricer.info usually takes some time to process the requests queue. So here's a normal token for that => http://www.bctalkaccountpricer.info/?token=pfur17jqAs you can see, most of the stats matches.
|
|
|
I bet it's this account. look what I found when I requested the merchant token for with it's UID => http://www.bctalkaccountpricer.info/?token=7or93jinPosts: 1020+ Activity: 720+ (Hero Member) Potential Activity: 720+ (Potential Hero Member) Post Quality: Very Poor (43.83%) Trust: Positive, Dark Green Trust 100% match P.S. I only posted this is because I think the account is hacked. Read this thread for more info
|
|
|
Hold on a minute anyone, this account has not been active for the last 6 months, probably bought or hacked account, for anything take a valid collaetral and a signed message from an old stacked address. Don't say you haven't been warned.
I don't think that the account might be hacked or stolen because password wasn't changed in the last 30 days May be he just need some money and remembered this way to do so But Precautions should be taken in any condition 0.38 btc seems quite big for such account, isn't it ? The account might be hacked or stolen. There is no need to change password of an old inactive account because the real owner might have left the forum the day said account stopped posting. Also if you look at OP's post before this, he was denied a loan from zazarb because he wasn't able to sign with an old address.
|
|
|
I don't know if there's a lender that will accept facebook account as collateral, but most lenders won't because accounts can be recovered easily and thus are not considered as valid collateral. You can find the list of valid collateral on the second post of this sticky
|
|
|
What product and will I get it for free? That's how product reviewing usually goes, right?
|
|
|
I never said that you scammed anyone (hell the only trusted negative rating on your trust page only said something about faking positive feedback). I was merely implying that a negative trusted users cannot be trusted not to scam because they have little to lose. And this have been proven to be true so many times in the past
Bitcointalk users can't be safe only by being wary of scammers. They have to be wary of potential scammers too
|
|
|
Hi I have 0.26 btc and i need paypal. I'm not going first. You can send as digital goods If You consider im not trustful. It takes arround 3 hours for my bitcoin to Be released from wallet (i am saying this from the beggining not to have problema after this)
So thats all
With your trust rating? Then you're going to scam. Period Find a person that I scamed and I'm agree with you Usually im the one who is scamed Let's do some observation, then You're account is worthless so you have little to lose even if you try something fishy. Then we have the buyer who have a slight chance of not being able to chargeback. And you asked for a 0.045 BTC loan just few hours ago and edited the thread (to add a collateral?) minutes after you posted this thread ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1501757.0 . Before . After) So for all potential (trustworthy) buyers: use escrow
|
|
|
Hi I have 0.26 btc and i need paypal. I'm not going first. You can send as digital goods If You consider im not trustful. It takes arround 3 hours for my bitcoin to Be released from wallet (i am saying this from the beggining not to have problema after this)
So thats all
With your trust rating? Then you're going to scam. Period
|
|
|
No. I understand some can get rich with gambling if they're lucky enough but unfortunately I'm not lucky enough. So I've given up trying to get rich with gambling firs of all rich is no a person who have a lot of money. those people are also rich who have a sound physical and healthy body. those who have no sorrows in their lives. those people who have very limited amount of money but still they have their inner satisfaction. so i like to say that i am no such a rich person. but what i have is not because of gambling.
Rich can have different meaning depending on the subject of the topic. In this case it's about bitcoin and gambling so it's money "rich"
|
|
|
Perhaps you should do a bit of research on the speculation section before asking this question. There's more than 5 threads about the halving there, and there's not one sure answer among them. Some say it'll go up (for the record, I'm one of them.), some say it'll stay as it is, some say it will go down
|
|
|
I lost 700mBtc (0.7BTC) today on gambling (dice) site.
Sorry for your loss. Is that all you want to say or is there anything else?
|
|
|
I am using Multibit HD since a couple of days and I am wondering how to import my vanity addresses? I did some research here and on Google but I could not found any useful information. Is it even possible?
I don't think we can import private keys to Multibit HD wallet. Correct me if I'm wrong
|
|
|
Hi Guys,
I am pretty new to bitcoins and Need to find a good online wallet. Is there a decent alternative to bitcoin chain, maybe without fees?
Thanks for any suggestions.
Mauser
There's no wallet named "bitcoin chain". I would advise to use blockchain.info legacy wallet. Don't use the new wallet until after they fixed all the problem and/or have a simpler import address feature for the non-imported addresses
|
|
|
I don't think there's enough bangladesh users to make the board lively considering that the thread here only has 6 posts You can post in bengali there if you want
|
|
|
It would be nice if the BTC symbol would be visible in the title of the threads as well, not just posts.
Is it possible to add this feature to the forum?
It would have to be white colored to contrast the blue ribbon of the title.
What blue ribbon? If you're saying that it should have a different color, that's not a good idea because some users might abuse to make their threads more noticeable
|
|
|
|