|
Go to Wallet > Addresses or press CTRL+A to enable the addresses tab. All of the addresses listed there are your bitcoin addresses.
|
|
|
|
He just warned us because of the those of the upgrade of it to HD and maybe he do really like the legacy login a lot but it was removed when the upgrade happen.
So this case is close, he doesn't have an issue upon using blockchain so do I. But stopping other people using a reputable and legitimate service.
I think its insane, why would I stop if I'm confidently having no problems with them at all?
When there's a cliff up on a road, people put a warning sign to let others know about it. You don't have to see and/or fall down the cliff yourself to stop going that way. This is just like that. It's just a warning, guys. The point of this thread is to make people aware that blockchain.info is prone to problems and let them decide if they want to keep using it with the risk of getting the same problems that others have been reported or change to another wallet. I think it's their double spend and occasional non-standard/invalid transaction that's worrying. Slow confirmation or fee aren't that big of a problem. Signed messages and private keys availability and being a web wallet are some big cons for me but people don't seem to care about that sooo... |
|
|
|
Just use the watchlist if you don't want to see topics that you're not watching. |
|
|
|
Your pic link leads me to a completely different pic when I clicked it. Some kinda tech tree of a game. Hello people. Here is a picture of the mempool data.  As you can see, the size of transactions with fees < 10s/B in kB is 20 times more than the others while concerning only 980 transactions. It doesn't make any sense to me, isn't the size of the transactions must be linked to the number of transactions normally? No, they are not. The 980 transactions with less than 10s/b fee could be much larger than the all of the transactions with more than 10s/b combined. |
|
|
|
|
It doesn't really "accelerate" transactions.
When you submit your transaction to that page your transaction will be included in a block mined by ViaBTC, so if they mines a block a hour after you submitted your transaction there's a chance that your transaction will be included in that block.
But sometimes ViaBTC (or any other pool, really) can take a long time to find a block, when that happens your transaction will have to wait normally like any other transactions until ViaBTC find a block and includes your transaction in it.
I guess it does work since the transaction you "accelerated" was mined by ViaBTC.
|
|
|
|
The only way to combine multiple outputs into one is to send them all to a single address. Meaning you'll have to create another transaction with pretty much the same size. |
|
|
|
Blockchain.info changed to HD wallet last year. The 12 words is part of the HD wallet. The blockchain.info page you linked actually says that you can import it to multibit. But If your private keys are encrypted, the only way to restore them is to use the password. So bruteforce is pretty much your only option. Thanks. I see... And how do I bruteforce it? Any idea? Check shorena's reply above. It'll direct you to a tutorial. Find "Quick Start" and follow the steps. Bruteforcing can take forever if your password is complex and very long and you've forgotten all of it, btw. |
|
|
|
Blockchain.info changed to HD wallet last year. The 12 words is part of the HD wallet. The blockchain.info page you linked actually says that you can import it to multibit. But If your private keys are encrypted, the only way to restore them is to use the password. So bruteforce is pretty much your only option. |
|
|
|
Thanks for the reply...
I tried all my usual passwords and none of the works but the wallet still exists.
I have just a file named "Bitcoin Wallet private key backup" (555 bytes)
and it has
{"pbkdf2_iterations":5000,"version":2.0,"payload":"[here a lot of characters]"}
inside but it doesn't look hex or anything like that inside the [here a lot of characters] - just a lot of letters, digits, = characters, / characters and \ characters...
Well those are not private keys. At least not importable unencrypted ones. You might have to brute force it after all. But last I checked the ability to backup your wallet's private keys is gone since a year ago. If that file is old and you've used addresses generated by the new blockchain.info wallet recently then those private keys are probably empty. |
|
|
|
Hi friends,
I lost my phone and had BlockChain on it.
I don't remember the blockchain.info password - but I do have the wallet ID + private key file.
The private key is really long and looks like:
{"pbkdf2_iterations":5000,"version":2.0,"payload":"[here a lot of characters]"}
Any idea how I can recover my account? I would be really grateful...
Regards, Joanna.
Blockchain.info can't help you with lost accounts so if you lost your password you lose your account. But if this "private key file" really have private keys (begins with 5/L/K) of your original addresses you can simply make another wallet and import them. |
|
|
|
So long as they don't keep records and doesn't give the info to anyone then yes. But most of the time you can't exactly verify if a service is keeping records or not, they'll just tell you that they don't and that's it. But if your bitcoins aren't acquired by some illegal means then there should be no problem in using mixer just to make them impossible to trace by normal users. |
|
|
|
Try copying the raw transaction and submit it to one of the sites listed here. Edit: Tried twice and works normally. I think it's server issues. |
|
|
|
No, you're not going to lose your bitcoins. Those transactions may take a while to confirm though. If you're using dynamic fee then you should set higher fee next time, if you're not using dynamic fee then use it unless you know what you're doing. Try submitting those txes to viabtc so that they will mine those txes. |
|
|
|
I've hit "unwatch" on the thread that I was involved in but even though I'm not watching it I still get notifications for it. If I make a comment in a thread am I forever to receive notifications on it unless I go back, find my comment, and delete it?
If you're talking about email notifications, you'll need to click "notify" to disable it or do it from this page. If you're talking about the "Show new replies to your posts" page then... All of the topics that you've posted in will appear in that page when there's a new post even if you are not watching them. The Watchlist however won't show threads that you're not watching. |
|
|
|
Good, morning, afternoon, evening, night, everybody . I’ve understood tha the seeeeed is the graal for electrum wallet… I install the last release and launch it… Electrum creates the default_wallet Gives me the seed and the first 20 adresses that I can give to those who want to give me their BTC. Then … If I loose the seed and the wallet (but not the software still installed on the same PC with the same OS) : I clean up properly the files, and re-launch Electrum which has to create a new “default_wallet” and the linked seed. Will this new “default_w” and the seed be the same than the first time  If YES, that could solve the problem of all the loosers of seeds who have a single wallet More generally speaking, what is the “starting point “ (or event ) for electrum to generate the seeds and wallets ? the clock of the phone or PC ? chance? anything else ? Your skilled answer or a link to the yet well known one will be appreciate. Each time your create a wallet with electrum you'll generate a new seed phrase. So the "default_wallet" file will be entirely different if you've lost the older one. |
|
|
|
The fees included is not high enough to make it confirm faster. Recommended fee is 80 satoshi per byte and you're using 38 satoshi per byte. It may confirm but it can take few hours. Pushing the tx here may help (I already did it). Or contact Quickseller or macbook-air to get your transaction pushed to F2Pool. TBH your transaction will probably confirm before any of the above options can help as you need to wait for those pools to mine a block or three. |
|
|
|
|
What version are you using? If you're using the latest version can you post the raw transaction here (Preview > Sign > Copy)?
Speak english, by the way.
|
|
|
|
How? If I save that string to a file, the file will be 409 bytes, the 408 + 1 end of line character.
I think that's because text files uses encoding (UTF-8, 8-bits ASCII, etc) that puts the minimal size per character to 1 byte (or more for other encodings) even though they're actually smaller to make it readable. Non-text files created by programming like blockchain files stores the data in binary which make things nigh unreadable if you open them with text editor (but you can read the hex if you open them with hex editor). |
|
|
|
Perfect, thanks for the help mate! You safed my day
The transaction just got confirmed. You're welcome.  |
|
|
|
The message is a warning that appears when there's a conflicting transaction. Only one of the two transactions will be processed (confirmed). The new transaction is using the recommended fee of 70 sat/byte so it should confirm faster than the older one (probably in few hours or less). |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
