CZ is trying his best to make sure BNB keeps pumping by pegging lots of coins. If, in the end, it was not pegged at all, then I can imagine how fucked up the user would be.

They need to use a better naming system, though. Every token comes up with a weird name.

I just tried to access the website and it's on maintenance. You guys might want to stabilize the website first before creating an announcement.

Yeah sure nobody can know what the next block nonce is, and thus it's 'fair,' but requiring a user to guess all four correctly is straight fucked up.

You should give them an option to guess one digit, two-digit, three-digit and so on. Don't be too greedy. No one is going to play a guaranteed-to-lose game.

How can you sing with a Ledger?

Btw, why did you have to use a device that isn't yours in the first place? They might not be able to steal your private key directly but you'll expose your crypto ownership to others. I's as if you're saying "hey, got a bitcoin here, nobody want to steal it?"

When you mention these, McAfee is probably one of the most prominent figures. Lots of scammy projects use his name with his consent (maybe he get millions of tokens for that) and encourage his follower to buy and pump it.

A few months later, the tokens are dead.

I don't think a failed bounty gift count as losing your BTC. It's different because bounty tokens are bound to be worthless until proven otherwise. Which is why you should stop doing bounty here and there. Stick to sig campaign for a better result.

It would be better if the data is published and how they detect it. It's like saying you know everything but nobody else should know it.

You're really optimistic. What is the reason? Libra is not even started yet and lots of their partners are withdrawing their support. US government can kill them anytime.

Digital banking is already here, Libra is way too weak to even compete with a local bank.

As long as it is not CMC then that's true. CMC scrapper is terrible. They even list Vindax as the top exchange with a distinct wash trading.

I'd instead use Coingecko, their Trustscore is reliable, at least for now. It tracks the order book depth so you'll know the liquidity and not the (fake) adjusted volume.

You can ask a developer to build a website like Alfacashier, as I also doubt they're using a 3rd party script without any improvements (if they did).

Most reputable exchanges builds the code by themselves and scale it on their own so nobody knows what is the weakness of their code.


So that's the reason why lots of anonymous centralized exchange keeps popping out of nowhere with the same design.

The core problem is not the medium of payment, but the people itself. Tools are just tools, sophisticated or not. Some will always find a way to use it for something wrong. What 'society' needs to do is to make sure people like that get caught or prevent somebody else from doing the same thing.

Education, inclusivity, and other social aspects must be good. Else, police will always have to work hard.

I found some links but it's not updated. For example https://data.bitcoinity.org/markets/volume/all?c=e&t=b.

You can also find data from Coingecko digital reports even though it will only give you a percentage difference between each month. IIRC Icoanalytics also release exchange related stats on a monthly basis.

Batas minim atau maksimal tidak ada yang punya wewenang untuk menentukannya, sifatnya tetap akan jadi saran. Para pemberi pinjaman harus bisa menilai sendiri apa mereka mau ngasih lending 1 BTC atau jumlah yang cukup besar lainnya, dengan berbagai pertimbangan masing-masing seperti kolateral, akun yang mau meminjam, apakah tau siapa orangnya dsm.

Kalau harus dibuat badan khusus nanti malah terlalu jauh intervensi sana-sini, padahal member itu bisa jadi ga punya kapabilitas seperti bank imo.

---

Btw mana nih lender atau yang mau ngutang, jangan terlalu banyak posting diskusi di sini tapi ga ngutang-ngutang.

Are you suggesting you're looking for ideas to scam people? Please don't.

Why don't you open an account on eToro so that people can know your trading performance without looking at your trading history? Be transparent to some degree, don't lie and don't hide the fact if you can't make 100% ROI every month.

IIRC there is a study that said most people still believe that Bitcoin is a speculative asset. This means, if economics crumbles, then they won't store their wealth in Bitcoin. Gold is still the choice for a store of value, and the next one is land.

This might change with time but I don't think it can change that easily.

Definitely true.

I use Bitcoin regularly to buy subscription packages from various porn e-commerce site. It's way cheaper than using my debit or credit card. It's really easy to do and I don't have to prepare a lot of paper works.

Attractive or not depends on what you compare it. Let's stop doing pointless discussion because surely everyone can say X is better than Y while Z is better than X, and so on.

Instead of focusing on that, we should discuss whether this 8% is really possible and sustainable or not.

Cointraffic is probably a better option. But if your website is really good, then Adsense would give you a better pay rate.

One of the possible reasons is that it will decrease the chance for lower-ranked members to participate in a campaign. But most managers won't do this if there is no good poster on that specific rank.


It's obvious that Full Member with 200 earned merits is way better than a Sr. Member with no earned merits and most of the time only post 1 line garbage.

Which wikipedia you're using?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitcoin#Units
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Satoshi_(unit)


If you know about crypto, the chance your kids know about crypto is higher. Oh, btw, I don't think you'll see Oxford as a mainstream book that everybody read.

---

That aside, I'm seeing cryptotalk everywhere.