Bitcoin Forum
May 23, 2024, 02:52:22 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 ... 95 »
421  Bitcoin / Electrum / Electrum - State of the Alloy on: January 22, 2014, 07:28:16 PM
Dear Bitcoiners,

Since the 1st of january I have officially left my previous job (computer scientist at INRIA) in order to work full time on the development of Electrum. My plan is to create a company, Electrum Technologies, that will distribute the Electrum software, and sell related services. This company project is now officially supported by the incubator of the french region Lorraine (http://incubateurlorrain.org/ ); we signed the contract yesterday.

I am now working on version 2.0 of Electrum. The following features are under development:

1. A Patricia tree data structure, also called "Ultimate Blockchain Compression", will be implemented in Electrum servers. This data structure allows a client to get the balance of any address instantly, and it will also generate a "proof of completeness" (the root hash of the patricia tree), that can be used to check that the server sent all UTXOs related to a given address to the client. A first implementation of this patricia tree was recently completed, and is available in the 'fulltree' branch of the Electrum server. This prototype uses a 256-way branching, and can import recent blocks at 2s/block. Following maaku's suggestion ( https://github.com/maaku/bips/blob/master/drafts/auth-trie.mediawiki ), I plan to upgrade it with binary branching. I also look forward to maaku's C++ implementation, which should be much faster than Python.

2. Version 2.0 will use BIP32 wallets with multiple accounts (this feature was initially planned for 1.9, but it had to be postponed)
Some of these accounts will have no "gap limit", so that merchants can create arbitrary numbers of addresses without messing with the internal parameters of their wallet.

3. Version 2.0 will have a daemon mode, that remains always connected, and that can be queried with json-rpc. This means that shell scripts will be able to use multiple Electrum commands without without opening and closing sockets for each command.

4. A 2-factor authentication service using multisig addresses is under development, that will be available in Electrum through a paying plugin. I made a demonstration of that service in Barcelona last fall, during the meeting organized by genjix. I am now working with lawyers, in order to define the terms of use for that service.

The ETA for version 2.0 (including points 2 and 3) is about 1 month from now. The multisig service (4) will probably require an extra month in order to be finalized.

I am looking forward to the coming months, and I hope to deliver the best possible software.

Thomas

Note: I will attend the Berlin conference in february; send me a note if you want to meet me there.
422  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Multi-signature plugin for Electrum - How much would it cost to develop? on: January 22, 2014, 06:06:43 PM
I am currently working on such a plugin. Expect an announcement soon.
423  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Several questions for a web service based on Electrum on: January 20, 2014, 04:32:28 PM
sorry but the merchant script is broken in the current release.
I am trying to fix it asap but I really have lots of things to do, so don't expect it too soon..
424  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: How do I add public notes to my transactions in Electrum? on: January 20, 2014, 04:18:31 PM
It would be perfectly possible to create a centralized service that stores annotations, and to use it in Electrum through a plugin.
This would be a public version of the existing "labelectrum" plugin, and could be used by other wallets.

Another option is to see if blockchain.info allows the addition of public notes from users who are not registered with them.

425  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Electrum increases the transaction fee without my consent on: January 15, 2014, 06:00:45 AM
this is what is called "dust change".
see https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/543
426  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: convert wallet type from old .dat to new type, or where is older version? on: January 14, 2014, 04:43:11 PM
how do you convert wallet type from old .dat to new type, or where is older version of electrum available?

thanks in advance

no conversion is needed, it is the same file type. only the name changed.
427  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Offline PC is not signing transactions on: January 12, 2014, 06:02:37 AM
it is fixed with 1.9.7 (don't pay attention to the "transaction not related to your wallet" thing)
428  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Electrum 1.9 released on: January 11, 2014, 12:02:45 PM
* Coinbase Buyback plugin

Ah this a way to monetize the software? Good. Some money flowing to the devs for all their hard work is good.

no, it is not.
but I do have plans for that, to be announced soon.
429  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Electrum 1.9 released on: January 11, 2014, 08:12:28 AM
version 1.9.7 is available (source code)
as usual, binaries will follow soon.

changes:
# Release 1.9.7
* Fix for offline signing
* Various bugfixes
* GUI usability improvements
* Coinbase Buyback plugin
430  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Getting address history from electrum server directly? on: December 25, 2013, 05:51:45 PM
why don't you use the scripts in the scripts directory?
431  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Warning: fake electrum website is distributing malware!! on: December 23, 2013, 09:27:45 AM
I called the support at gandi.net planet-work.com.
After a short investigation, they decided to take down the fake website.
432  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Warning: fake electrum website is distributing malware!! on: December 23, 2013, 09:20:12 AM
I just registered an account on reddit.
My username on reddit is ThomasV1  (ThomasV was already taken)
433  Bitcoin / Electrum / Warning: fake electrum website is distributing malware!! on: December 23, 2013, 08:35:10 AM
WARNING: a fake version of https://electrum.org is out, distributing malware:

Code:
h t t p : / / electrum-bitcoin.org/

This was reported on reddit here:
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1tin7f/warning_a_fake_electrum_website_with_malware_is/

The legitimate electrum website is https://electrum.org
We are curently reporting this abuse to the domain registrar.
434  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: hashing the seed or hashing the hex-string representation of the seed? on: December 18, 2013, 04:29:58 AM
The old code hashes the hex representation, which is a pretty harmless bug (no loss of entropy), but cannot be changed for compatibility reasons.

The new code will hash the string directly.
It is an arbitrary string, not an hex number representation.

so, no, it's not a bug, it is intentional.
435  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Electrum 1.9 released on: December 17, 2013, 04:05:11 PM
"deseed" is not available in the python console. it is only available in the terminal.
--> How do I use the deseed command with a windows build?
Use the command line of course.

Bring up the command prompt and run

electrum --help

for more information.
 Sorry, but it doesn't work that way!
 It would be nice if ThomasV could give a hint on this.

in a terminal:
Code:
electrum -w /path/to/your/wallet deseed

if you cannot use a terminal, use the 'restore' menu to create a watching only wallet
436  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Electrum 1.9 released on: December 17, 2013, 12:37:29 PM
version 1.9.6 is released.
 The "deseed" command still gives the message:
Quote
>> deseed
Traceback (most recent call last):
NameError: name 'deseed' is not defined
"deseed" is not available in the python console. it is only available in the terminal.

Quote
Quote
Changes:
 - During wallet creation, does not write seed to disk until it is encrypted.
  What does that mean in practice?
it improves security. previous versions used to write the unencrypted seed first.
however, there is no guarantee that the encrypted wallet will be written on the same disk sector.
437  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Electrum and yubikey on: December 16, 2013, 10:49:07 PM
there are plans for two factor authentication.
(it will first use google authnticator, but yubikey should be possible)
438  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: My receive addresses changed after upgrading? on: December 16, 2013, 10:42:47 PM
what you are reporting is either a very serious bug, or a serious misunderstanding...
can you provide more details? what exactly did you do?
439  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: [ANNOUNCE] Electrum - Lightweight Bitcoin Client on: December 16, 2013, 10:40:00 PM
...

you are right. currently, the offline wallet does not check that the change output actually is a change address.
thanks for pointing it; it should be relatively easy to fix.
440  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Electrum 1.9 released on: December 16, 2013, 10:30:57 PM
version 1.9.6 is released.

Changes:
 - During wallet creation, does not write seed to disk until it is encrypted.
 - Shows a confirmation dialog if the transaction fee is higher than 1mBTC.
 - fixes for various bugs reported recently.

Linux packages for now. Binaries for Win and Mac will follow.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 ... 95 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!