Bitcoin Forum
June 19, 2024, 09:22:54 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 [219] 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 ... 291 »
4361  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: [BOUNTY: 2.0 BTC] Message Signing in Armory on: May 10, 2013, 06:18:33 PM
Thanks scintill,

That's a nice compact implementation.  I like it.  I was just looking through the code...

@jackjack

I forgot that Bitcoin-Qt uses key recovery for the signatures.  Meaning, that you only need to provide the signature, and the public key can only be one of four different values.  Thus, signature and a couple extra bits.  This is something I don't have implemented in any of libraries yet, and it doesn't look trivial.   But the code is all there in the C++ from scintill, and I am considering putting it into my own "EncryptionUtils.h/.cpp".

I assume you're not going into the C++ code in Armory...?  Just making standalone python files?  That will work for now, though I can see that having the C++ key recovery would be useful.

If you want to take a shot at implementing it in EncryptionUtils.h/.cpp, I will throw in another 0.5 BTC (on success, of course!).  I already have EC math operations available in the library.  I'm pretty sure you can do most of it with what's already there.  Though, you might have to add a sqrt-function or something (I cheated with UncompressPoint, by just letting Crypto++ do the uncompression for me, so  I didn't actually implement it).
I do have the key recovery in my python code
Techwtf's implementation too
4362  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Wallets supporting signed message on: May 10, 2013, 04:21:03 PM
Ah, same for pywallet, it signed messages since as early as august 2011
Far from being a client though

As for the Armory's ability, I resolved one problem I had. And I think I'm close to solve the last one. So it should be OK soon hopefully
4363  Local / Discussions générales et utilisation du Bitcoin / Re: Reportage TF1 on: May 09, 2013, 03:49:09 PM
Des nouvelles?
Personne l'a vu passer?
4364  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Python code for validating bitcoin address on: May 09, 2013, 03:45:08 PM
That's why I told you to look for the definition of DecodeBase58Check in the code, that's the function to decode address to hash160
4365  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Python code for validating bitcoin address on: May 09, 2013, 02:36:15 PM
https://github.com/joric/pywallet/blob/master/pywallet.py
4366  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Python code for validating bitcoin address on: May 09, 2013, 02:21:08 PM
Did you try pywallet's code?
Look for DecodeBase58Check or something like that
4367  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Denominating a 'BitCent' as a 'Gavin' ? on: May 08, 2013, 07:15:22 PM
Maybe we can designate 5340 Satoshies as a Gavin.
Give this guy a fucking medal
4368  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Good fraud detection method (reduce losses)!!!!! on: May 08, 2013, 07:00:35 PM
Am I the only one that thinks the quality of posts has seriously dropped off in the past two weeks? 



Put a limit of 200 posts and 55 hours on the Newb section, would solve that.
I agree


Oh sorry: +1 LOLZ!!1!
4369  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ixcoin - a new Bitcoin fork on: May 08, 2013, 04:42:48 PM
Interested in the answers as well
4370  Other / Off-topic / Re: Circumcision is Mother/Child Trauma Brainwashing; Male Genital Mutilation on: May 07, 2013, 03:35:59 PM
Quote
even after 350 million years of evolution.
WAT?
4371  Other / Off-topic / Re: Let's make a molecule adding one atom at a time. on: May 07, 2013, 03:27:15 PM
Proposal: don't build on molecules built with more than one additional atom
4372  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: ub3rl33t BBQCoin pool dangerously approaching 50% on: May 07, 2013, 03:12:08 PM
Net Hashrate: 303942.91 KH/s 
Pool Hashrate: 151158.06 KH/s

BBQcoin is ancient history.
BBQcoin is future.
4373  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] New alt coin generator on: May 07, 2013, 02:45:52 PM
10/10
4374  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [Get Involved] New Scrypt Altcoin on: May 07, 2013, 01:23:04 PM
I am looking for a team of individuals who would like to be involved with an exciting new project to build the next big coin. I will need:

- Graphic designers
- Programmers
- Marketers


I have been mining and investing for some time and will provide financial benefits to those whose are willing to help.

Please PM or reply to this thread.


I'm a graphic designer and marketer (I was one of those clickbank/ WF users back in the day). I primarily need a programmer and I want to get the whole alt forum involved so we have set launch dates etc. I want full transparency with everyone.

4375  Other / Off-topic / Re: Let's make a molecule adding one atom at a time. on: May 07, 2013, 07:34:13 AM
C2H2O - Oxirene
4376  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Where are the ByteCoin/BTE Devs!? on: May 07, 2013, 07:20:03 AM
There: /dev/null
4377  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Exact binary map of database blockchain?! on: May 06, 2013, 09:59:22 PM
Blockchain = concatenation of blocks
Block structure: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Protocol_specification
4378  Local / Discussions générales et utilisation du Bitcoin / Re: [PROJET] Site de vente avec bitcoin ! on: May 06, 2013, 09:08:24 PM
Le problème c'est pas d'être accusé de plagiat, mais avec ce nom-là les gens penseront (consciemment ou pas) à ce qu'il s'est passé
Càd escroquerie
4379  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Trying to find source code of Bitcoin clients version < 0.3.24 on: May 06, 2013, 08:24:55 PM
My fork (not updated since 0.3.25) can go back as far as 0.1.5 alpha, 'First commit' on Aug 29, 2009: https://github.com/jackjack-jj/bitcoin/commits/master?page=24
I don't know where previous version are
4380  Local / Discussions générales et utilisation du Bitcoin / Re: [PROJET] Site de vente avec bitcoin ! on: May 06, 2013, 06:43:28 PM
Je pense que bitmarket n'est pas le nom le plus judicieux. Voir bitmarket.eu
Pages: « 1 ... 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 [219] 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 ... 291 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!