Bitcoin Forum
June 20, 2024, 04:24:06 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 [220] 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 ... 291 »
4381  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: >>>>>>>>>>>>>WTB 1500 BITCOINS<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< on: May 06, 2013, 03:36:47 PM
still need
4382  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Wouldn't it be possible to create a MASTER block and start the blockchain anew? on: May 06, 2013, 12:13:45 PM
One drawback is that the master block would be huge...
Splitting it in pieces is necessary
4383  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22] on: May 06, 2013, 11:42:26 AM
cant you compress your own keys?
Yes but compressing changes the address

Uncompressed: http://blockexplorer.com/address/1EHNa6Q4Jz2uvNExL497mE43ikXhwF6kZm
Compressed: http://blockexplorer.com/address/1BgGZ9tcN4rm9KBzDn7KprQz87SZ26SAMH
4384  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Wouldn't it be possible to create a MASTER block and start the blockchain anew? on: May 06, 2013, 11:38:48 AM
It is an option, but who do you trust to distribute the new genesis block?
The old blockchain itself?
  • Calculate the resulting hash
  • Make sure everybody is ok
  • Hardcode the hash
4385  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Safe Wallet : Keeping your wallets safe on: May 06, 2013, 10:40:38 AM
But how does that works? Do you delete the file? Rename the file?
4386  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Three potatoes, four potatoes! on: May 06, 2013, 10:26:07 AM
Here, that's for you

4387  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Im starting a new bitcoin-related project. ANONYMOUS OR NOT? on: May 06, 2013, 10:21:35 AM
As a Bitcoin enthousiast I'd like not anonymous
As a Bitcoin developper I'd advise anonymous
4388  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Safe Wallet : Keeping your wallets safe on: May 06, 2013, 10:11:31 AM
  • 15 posts
  • No explanation about how it works
  • Only .exe binary, no source
  • Random crazy download websites

4389  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: jeeq: ECDSA encryption on: May 06, 2013, 10:01:57 AM
AFIK, HMAC is needed only when you use a non self-authenticate symmetric encryption. For example, CTR mode must be used with external authentication (HMAC). But, in principle, CBC does not need HMAC (and so don't KDF, because the shared secret can be used as the single key).
Hmm ok I think I get it, I'll look into an ECIES implementation to see how they handle that

I'm not a crypto expert, but if your implementation is truly the same as ElGamal, well it is being used. For example, Pretty Good Privacy implementations use ElGamal as one of the options.
I meant ElGamal with ECDSA. ElGamal is only with DSA, doesn't it?
4390  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: RIP Satoshi on: May 06, 2013, 07:46:49 AM
almost killed bitcoin.

Glad we still have safe ltc so we can use crypto.
4391  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Avalon Asic chip Mini USB miner [Post if interested] on: May 06, 2013, 07:26:59 AM
Interested
4392  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin 0.8.2. What do you think? on: May 06, 2013, 07:22:36 AM
Noob question Huh :
Can we just move comma 2 steps right? For example turn 0.05297585 into 5.297585
So, 5.297585 will be equal ~5$ its very convenient. Block rewald will be 2500 BTC
Its like turn BTC to centiBTC.

Because i think, that when bitcoin was created, no one expected that it will be cost ~100$. And now we have some problems with useless micro BTC transactions dusting blockchain, and diffirent opinions about upcoming 0.8.2 client.  Roll Eyes
Oh look.
This.
'Fix'.
Again.
Again.
Again.Again.
Again.Again.Again.Again.
Again.Again.Again.
Again.Again.Again.Again.Again.Again.Again.Again.Again.Again.Again.Again.Again.A gain.Again.Again.Again.Again.Again.Again.Again.Again.Again.Again.Again.Again.Ag ain.Again.Again.Again.Again.Again.Again.Again.Again.Again.Again.Again.Again.Aga in.Again.Again.Again.
4393  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Create a temporary address or remove one ? Bitcoind on: May 06, 2013, 07:16:51 AM
You can delete keys with pywallet
4394  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: jeeq: ECDSA encryption on: May 06, 2013, 06:54:23 AM
Did you look at ECIES?
No, but as I understand the wikipedia article, it seems a bit more complicated (or maybe it's just because I'm not comfortable with KDFs and HMACs)
Can it be used with ECDSA private keys?

You've come up with ElGamal encryption independently. Pretty impressive Smiley.
Yeah that's true it's really similar! Not being a crypto guy (even though I'm rather good at maths) I can't imagine I'm the only one who tried that kind of things, so why is it not used?

Also, as I understand the article my implementation seems secure
4395  Local / Discussions générales et utilisation du Bitcoin / Re: Block Erupter USB on: May 06, 2013, 01:04:59 AM
Dernier signe de vie: 2007 Sad
4396  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / jeeq: ECDSA encryption on: May 06, 2013, 12:43:45 AM
Hey all
I read everywhere that ECDSA can't be used to encrypt
The fact is it can, I made a basic implementation: https://github.com/jackjack-jj/jeeq

It uses a kind of secret sharing and it looks like that works well
It's in python and requires no dependencies

Code:
> pubkey='0479be667ef9dcbbac55a06295ce870b07029bfcdb2dce28d959f2815b16f81798483ada7726a3c4655da4fbfc0e1108a8fd17b448a68554199c47d08ffb10d4b8'.decode('hex')
> print encrypt_message(pubkey,"goodbye world!")
amoAAAJQkgEDcToivOFhH0zhaytsAKbW9dKCmOJ25FMPaj/6WssXAQKsSJpnq1IlNOx7GZbg++x6ZRUXAb/3jxaxwPGqlcItmA==
Code:
> pvk = str_to_long('0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001'.decode('hex'))
> print 'output:', decrypt_message(pvk, msg_to_decrypt, verbose=True)
Public header (size:2): 0x5092
  Version: 0
  Checksum of pubkey: 5092
Private header (size:6): 0x0000000e75f1
  Message size: 14
  Checksum: 75f1
Decrypted message: goodbye world!
  Hash: 75f1
  Corresponds: True
output: ['goodbye world!', True]

My concern is about the security, can a crypto-pro give it a quick look? I'm sure it's as sure as signing because breaking it would need the same discrete logarithm than in Bitcoin but well, you never know...



Edit: I'd be happy to receive some crypted messages, you can find my public key on blockchain.info
4397  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: fake client on sourceforge under gavinadressen? on: May 05, 2013, 12:34:54 PM
Quote
Additional Project Details
Registered
3 days ago

4398  Other / Off-topic / Re: May the 4th be with you. on: May 04, 2013, 08:38:04 PM
I always forget those geek days...
What's the next one?
4399  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: How to transfer private addresses from one wallet to another? on: May 02, 2013, 08:34:10 AM
It looks like as long as one private key is shared among 2 wallets the amount of money on those 2 wallets are the same. Is that so?
No
You have on amount of money per address
The overall amount of money in a wallet is the sum of amounts from its addresses


To import keys you have dumpprivkey and importprivkey in rpc
4400  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: 234078 Longest block to solve yet? on: May 02, 2013, 06:58:40 AM
Yeah it decreases
Pages: « 1 ... 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 [220] 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 ... 291 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!