Very Skeptical of this GPU miner, can we test it or perhaps see a worker name for it on the pool to verify?
I understand the skepticism, this is BitcoinTalk after all. I've been a trusted member of this community long enough that I would not want a reputation stain for the sake of a couple BTCs. That said, please go ahead and ping me on IRC and we can work out a reasonable proof system. |
|
|
|
Apologies in advance for dropping the advert: I'm looking to find 2 people, 3 tops, interested in buying a private ccminer for Axiom. PM me here or IRC if interested, armed with 0.5 BTC to not waste my time (or yours). A trusted escrow is absolutely fine if the buyer has not already established prior business trust with me. [ Conservative performance, 250 h/s on a gtx 750 ti ] As far as I know, this coin is (was) only CPU mined until now, and it has a very hot market on Bitty.  |
|
|
|
Re-posting my advert from IRC: [WTS] Ready nvidia miner for Axiom. PM if interested, both exclusive or non-exclusive deal is still possible atm. A trusted escrow is absolutely fine if the buyer has not already established prior business trust with me. [ Conservative performance, 250 h/s on a gtx 750 ti ] |
|
|
|
Hey guys, we're really busy coding right now but it bugs us to see people nipping at other people. While there is a time and a place to correct those who step out of line. We really enjoy reading positivity and enjoyment while we're working.
Everyone here has some more A+ Code and innovation to look forward to.
Axiom Team
AxiomCryptocurrency, sent you a PM, tried to reach you on IRC also. Can you confirm that you received my PM here (and hopefully respond)? Thanks! |
|
|
|
Subscrito! Quando tiver um momento, vou ver se preparo algumas atualizações à tradução!  |
|
|
|
|
@ancientcoins;
IIRC, the default wallet name is wallet.bin, not wallet.dat.
Perhaps this is what you should be searching for.
Best of luck recovering your coins!
|
|
|
|
Is it ok that I post here wishing the opposite?  For once let me hoard some coins with my nvidias  |
|
|
|
I can confirm that these binaries just posted on GIT, do not give me any trouble opening both older and newer blockchain and wallet files. Thank you smooth & Arux! |
|
|
|
@ngdias: Not that I know much of compiling, and less with Linux. In any case, I think you'd be looking to change the target architecture. The target selection is on the following file/location: https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/blob/windows/Makefile.am#L79nvcc_ARCH = -gencode=arch=compute_50,code=\"sm_50,compute_50\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_52,code=\"sm_52,compute_52\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_35,code=\"sm_35,compute_35\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_30,code=\"sm_30,compute_30\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_20,code=\"sm_21,compute_20\" You can just comment the current selection (compute 50), and uncomment the desired one. Good luck! |
|
|
|
[...] The titans in this picture are to close to eachother. They will heat up and trottle.
Bether to use 70cm usb risers and spread the cards.
The titans are not good for mining. 12GB of ram doesn't help, and the prise is skyhigh.
Hm, cuda porn!!! The TitanX's should be awesome for high n-factor scrypt-n and scrypt-jane. The 12GB of VRAM will be entirely useful in Linux, and the cards will run much cooler with a properly selected lookup gap, trading a little bit of hashpower, for a lot of thermal and power savings. For every other algorithm, meh, waste of money  |
|
|
|
Yes windows. Started simple wallet and put in "simplewallet --restore-deterministic-wallet" and what I got was "The wallet doesn't exist, generating a new one"  The way you are doing it, you are opening up simplewallet without any parameters, then asking it to open a wallet file, by the name of simplewallet --restore-deterministic-wallet. What you should do instead, in a command prompt, or by editing the shortcut properties if you are using a shortcut, is have simplewallet executed along with the parameter that was explained: simplewallet.exe --restore-deterministic-walletSimplewallet will then ask you for the seed words, and a wallet file name, which it will then (re)create. |
|
|
|
Looks to me like that problem is caused by boost serialization failing to read one of the old files, possibly because a different version of boost was used, file copied across platforms, files corrupted, etc.
Definitely looks to be something around the highlighted portion. I can confirm that I now have a fully sync'ed node, but indeed it took me a full manual sync to get there. I then found that I have the same problem reading my existing wallet files. At first I was all  , but then I realized I could just recreate from the seed words and quickly turned  Sidenote: The old simplewallet bin could still open my wallet, and would connect/refresh balance without any trouble to the newer build aeond. Functionality is definitely not affected, the issue I have is strictly with the opening of existing, older files. @cryptrol & @Arux : great job guys, keep cracking |
|
|
|
I don't know of an actual thorttling indicator. Drops in the clock freq is how I uaually tell.
Your keyboard is throttling badly! |
|
|
|
My logs show: 2015-Jul-04 16:25:17.799529 aeon v0.8.8.2()I'm thinking that I might have been running the test version prior to this latest Phoenix release... In any case, a fresh download of the OP Win-x64 bootstrap is ignored by the latest binaries, and again, sync'ing starts from block 0. Me is clueless.  |
|
|
|
Cryptrol, Moneromooo, thank you both for the feedback. Removing the p2pstate.bin did the trick, though the daemon starting sync'ing again from block 0 at that point, so it looks like it somehow ignored the up-to-date blockchain that I already had. I'm letting it run to see that it syncs again up to the current block and hopefully find that I have no further issues from there Edit: decided to have a go at the blockchain bootstrap, and fwiw, as soon as I start the daemon, it complains that it can't access the blockchain file and starts sync'ing from block 0. The error message was: 2015-Jul-22 17:40:29.033663 Loading blockchain...
2015-Jul-22 17:40:29.034665 Can't load blockchain storage from file, generating genesis block.
2015-Jul-22 17:40:29.073606 Blockchain initialized. last block: 0, d1113.h11.m40.s29 time ago, current difficulty: 1I then checked that allowing a slow resync does work as expected, in the sense that I can save the blockchain state, and it does get loaded on subsequent daemon starts (so that I am not starting from block 0 again, every single time I start the daemon). I'll just let it sync now and see how that works out. |
|
|
|
@cryptrol : I tested your binaries on my Win8-x64 system, and got the following output from aeond: 2015-Jul-22 15:11:45.971044 aeon v0.9.0.0()
2015-Jul-22 15:11:45.972046 Module folder: aeond.exe
2015-Jul-22 15:11:45.974047 Initializing p2p server...
2015-Jul-22 15:11:45.976049 ERROR c:\users\u\documents\github\aeon\src\p2p\net_node.inl:108 Exception at [node_server::init_config], what=unsupported version
2015-Jul-22 15:11:45.980054 ERROR c:\users\u\documents\github\aeon\src\p2p\net_node.inl:229 Failed to init config.
2015-Jul-22 15:11:45.983056 ERROR C:\Users\u\Documents\GitHub\aeon\src\daemon\daemon.cpp:174 Failed to initialize p2p server.
2015-Jul-22 15:11:45.987060 Mining has been stopped, 0 finishedThis sequence happens right after I execute aeond (not using any parameters), and then it quickly exits. I double-checked that no other version of aeond (or any other cryptonote daemon) is running while I'm testing. Any hints for troubleshooting? This same system runs the previous version without issues. @Moneromooo : could you eventually post binaries for the updated cpuminer? With that (and working Phoenix bins) I think I'm all set for the forking party Thank you both! |
|
|
|
O que me atraiu para Monero, tem exatamente o mesmo peso hoje, que teve há coisa de um ano atrás quando descobri o projeto: O desenvolvimento tem sido inteiramente guiado por princípios corretos, começando pela segurança, infraestrutura e escalabilidade, e finalmente, um sentido apurado de colaboração open source (basta ver a atividade e variedade de pessoas que tem trabalhado nas diversas áreas no github). As alternativas (que nem penso se deveriam chamar de tal), são projetos completamente orientados ao marketing acima de tudo o resto, com pouco a nenhum mérito técnico, e finalmente, com distribuição notoriamente viciada. Dito isto, bem que gostava que o GUI que foi apresentado há uns tempos, chegasse finalmente a uma release para as massas. Infelizmente, a coisa dá realmente muito trabalho, e primeiro é preciso completar o trabalho de migração para base de dados. Já não há de faltar tudo. Era porreiro atualizar o post original em Português! Se mais ninguém pegar nisto entretanto e virmos que não surge o anonimus, eu posso tratar de criar um thread novo para manter sempre corrente. Abraços! |
|
|
|
Well it seems the humidity at 92% was causing it. And ccminer doesn't have anything build in it to start mining again at crash.
thx
Such high relative humidity is common reflection of increasing temperatures and little air renovation, and makes any ventilation system work harder to achieve the same results as with less humidity. Summer has arrived, but you do have various options: fans running faster, run the AC for lower ambient temperatures, lower clocks for less heat generation, etc...  PS: Running the AC is my favorite pick, because it actually lowers the relative humidity when it is on cooling mode. In this particular case, you get double benefits: less humidity, and cooler ambient temperatures. Though overall mining efficiency goes out the window. |
|
|
|
Yep. Latest block rewards seem to agree with you (can confirm on any pool stats page). |
|
|
|
Sigh. I bought a bunch of these ZRC a couple months ago with only very casual research, which was of course a mistake. The general ecosystem ideas for a new spin on coupon and loyalty incentives outlined in the roadmap looked unique enough to have potential but I didn't look much deeper than that, and I noticed the coin has had almost no reaction to the various pumps and rallies that Bitcoin, Litecoin and most other alts experienced, which also seemed interesting to me as well.
I thought it was worth a shot, but at this point I am starting to realize that all I did was I give free money to whoever has the uber secret kickass GPU miner farm that keeps relentlessly dumping these things on the markets. Been doing this stuff for years but still trip myself up in the altcoin shuck and jive game now and again.
Since I'm buried at this point I thought I might as well try to use ZRC for its stated purposes as a loyalty points incentive token.
Does anyone know where to start with this? I have about 3,000 ZRC, it's not worth much (not anymore at least) but should be enough to run through a test case or two in an online store that is set up to work with ZiftrCoin.
Anyone here had luck trying this yet? What are some good places or services you've used that I can try out actually using ZRC?
Highlighted in bold the 2 key points.It does not look like there is any " uber secret kickass GPU miner farm" out there. The nethash has been rock solid, always in the proximity of 1GH/s (+/- 20% at times, but usually even less variance). There's a neat bot on the IRC channel that lists all the pools and their hashrates, and adding them all up, you get a result that is always pretty much the same as the total nethash. I do suspect (or know?) that there's a couple of miner software developers, each with their own improved versions, which most likely stand for - at most - a couple hundred coins being dumped every day. In any case, I don't see that any single participant is large enough to explain the market behavior. Your second point is the key factor, in my view. The use case for ZRC is very well presented and I really like the concept, but, this use case is not realized yet. It is strictly not possible - yet - to use ZRC for its very core purpose.I do hope that the Ziftr team gets there, and so far, I don't really have any reason to expect otherwise (apart perhaps from the altcoin history books  ). I've just made a reddit post moments ago with a giveaway suggestion, that could perhaps help drive this point forward, at least in baby steps, while we wait for something of greater substance. Would very much welcome any feedback there: Ziftrcoin Giveaway suggestionCheers! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
