Hello all, I've noticed some people have access to a more detailed list of the reports they have made. Many have mentioned that there is a link on the "report to moderator" page labeled "Your Report History" and I've seen a screen shot of some users' statistic page that has that link. I seem to be missing this feature. Does it have to do with my rank, or the lack of reports I've made?
|
|
|
~ There's already a thread relating to your situation, please stop derailing this one.
|
|
|
Still trying to figure the last part of your post @OP. If you meant would you be able to join a bounty after you must have shown your claimed discover. I don't think that's possible you don't have the needed rank or activities to join a bounty yet https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2818350.0But after showing it if it's good then you can be awarded merit which you require. That's embarrassing for Sharon, but I'd cut her some slack. It's obvious English isn't her native language, and we know that many English words can be used in a variety of ways. In this case it appears she mistook the use of the word "bounty."
|
|
|
What are your thoughts about this? I mean, I'd guess it would be okay, as long as I hold his posts to the same standard as other people's posts, right? As long as you hold to that philosophy I think you'll be alright. You might even want to be a little more scrutinous since he's your friend. Think of it as if you're a teacher and your child is one of your students, you wouldn't want to be accused of showing favoritism to your child. This concern can lead a teacher to be especially hard on his own child, and expect more from him. You might want to deploy that strategy with your friends. If his posts are that good, he'll earn merit regardless, and you won't have to concern yourself with this matter. Like hilariousetc mentioned, many merit abusers will use the "he's my friend" excuse when they are suspected of giving merit to their own alt accounts. If someone suspects that you are giving merit to an alt, or even just giving excessive merit to your friends it could adversely affect your reputation. Slightly off topic, but just a bit: This reminds me of a scenario that unfolded several months ago where a wife was pissed at her husband because he would not give her merit so she could rank up to Jr. I think it was right after de-rank-gate. The way that husband handled the situation is commendable, although he may have had to spend a few nights on the couch.
|
|
|
everyone and their sister has a hat by Homer! Homer hats are all the rage, he's the Gucci of Bitcointalk.org.
|
|
|
I see lots of hats coming out of the closet. We look like a bunch of unemployed scribes hanging out at the local cafe.
|
|
|
Bitcoin Blender is shutting down. Please withdraw. This is unfortunate news. The service was great, I will miss it. I don't know anything about the management of BitBlender or where it they are based, but I can only imagine this has something to do with same troubles plaguing the folks at BestMixer. My hope is that BitBlender and other mixing services can find a hospitable location to base their businesses and servers.
|
|
|
It has been my absolute pleasure to work with each and everyone of you throughout these 18 weeks. I think it's safe to speak for all who participated in this campaign when I say the pleasure was ours. You've done an great job managing this campaign, and I look forward to our next opportunity to work together. Thank you, Hhampuz.
|
|
|
Its not QS , its CH behind that !!!! Yes, it's obviously CH. Just look through the post history to see her swooning over CH every time some one makes the connection between the two accounts. @cryptohunter, congratulations you're the first person ever to make it a whole week on my ignore list without the slightest temptation to peak. Not even a little. Life here on the forum is way less polluted as a result.
|
|
|
Sad to see it end this way but with the recent news about bestmixer and all the other shit going on I completely understand the decision and don't blame them. Very sad indeed. Not only the loss of a great sig campaign, but also the loss of a great bitcoin blender. I really liked Bitblender, there were some great features, like the auto withdrawal with multiple addresses and timed, random releases. It's really too bad, I'll miss the service.
|
|
|
The money very clearly was moved, that cannot be disputed. I explained in the OP how I know Hhampuz did not receive instructions on how to return the money after he ended the campaign. You explained why you think Hhampuz has not received instructions to move the funds. Perhaps Hhampuz made every attempt to communicate with the BestMixer team here on the forum for tractability, but having the Feds knock on your door changes things. Maybe they moved communication to an encrypted texting service, we don't know. I don't know, and you don't know. All we can do is speculate. Like I just did. The theory that Hhampuz moved the money to his own hidden address unknown to anyone and therefore is not stealing is quite the leap. The action of moving the money through a mixer is evidence his intention is to keep the money for himself. There is no reason they would want him to do this. I can think of reasons why he would move his clients money if the client just had the feds knock on their door. And since we are now in the business of speculating I think the safe speculation is that Hhapmuz is just as trustworthy with half a bitcoin today as he was on the 21st of May. Yes, more speculation.
|
|
|
Based on the above, I believe that Hhampuz has stolen the excess money from the BestMixer campaign for his own personal use. That's quite a leap. You've offered no proof the funds have not been returned BestMixer, or that that Hhampuz sent them to his own personal wallet. You don't know where the money ended up, and apparently that's by design. BestMixer hired to Hhampuz to escrow their funds, and even if he still has the funds in his possession, that's not a scam, he's doing what he was hired to do. This whole thread is based on a lot of speculation and wishful thinking.
|
|
|
Bill, stop. Just stop.
You're making an even bigger cry-baby out of yourself than you did in the previous thread about your tags. You and nutildah are not the same, your situations aren't the same. The fact that you bring this up as an example of double standards is laughable.
Nutildah realized he was making a mistake after he had offered to sell his account completely out in the open. You are still trying to justify your actions taken in secrecy.
You still haven't admitted why you bought the account, and your explanation that the name of your previous one no longer suited you sounds like a pile of steaming horse shit.
You want to know what the real reason is that nutilidah didn't get tagged and you did? Honesty.
|
|
|
For your consideration: A Springfield Armory M1A National Match rifle, new in the original box, factory built with TRW USGI Parts. The M1A is Based on the U.S. M14 7.62mm rifle, the last and most advanced of the US battle rifles. The rifle is built with predominately TRW parts, most major components are U.S. Government Issue. This one is in National Match configuration with a national match barrel, factory glass-bedded stock, and a unitized (staked) gas cylinder. It also includes national match sights, a national match tuned trigger group, and a national match spring guide. The bolt, operating rod, and trigger housing are TRW manufactured. TRW is highly regarded as the most precise of all M14 manufacturers. The rifle includes a ten-round magazine, the original box, and all documentation. Originally the rifle was shipped with a 20-Round magazine, and a NM flash hider. Some time in the '90s the rifle was configured for California compliance, so the flash hider has been replaced with a factory Springfield Armory muzzle break. Neither the 20-Round magazine, nor the NM flash hider are included, but both can be sourced easily in many states. I inherited this rifle from a close family friend. He purchased it new in the early nineties, and I've had it since December 2015. This rifle has never been shot since leaving the factory. I removed the action from the stock only to take these photos; this is the first time the rifle has been disassembled. The rifle's born-on date is 10/24/1989. Price: $3900 USD Offers welcome. More Photos here.US residents only. Buyer to pay shipping and insurance fees. The rifle must ship to a federally licensed firearms dealer. Payment in bitcoin. Escrow Okay.
|
|
|
Kimber. Of course it is, I should have guessed you wouldn't settle for any thing less than top notch. The sights would have given that away, but... Here's my colt officer's model. This would be the gun I would carry if I lived in Free America instead of Commifornia. Yeah, I have a thing for 1911s, and colts, and WWII history. It's a dangerous combination.
|
|
|
Good Morning, Bitcoinlandia. Just got back from running around grocery shopping with Rick, and remember; personal hygiene and personal safety are very important to any HODLing regimen. Stay safe and clean, HOLDers ! Attaboy! 1911 stubby, cocked and locked. The man means business. Is that a Springfield Armory? But most of all I liked AK - 47 and M-16!) That's because I don't see an M14 on your list.
|
|
|
I'll take a random spot, please. Thank you for your kindnezz.
|
|
|
I've never used Coinbase myself, but last I read about them they were offering users the ability to back up their private keys to Google or Apple's cloud storage. I don't understand how anyone who has been involved in crypto for more than a week would want to use that and not understand how awful an idea it is. It is strange they offer that option, and it is laughable. I've used Coinbase to convert fiat into bitcoin, but that's about it. If I do store anything on their platform it's for a couple of days max, so they can do what ever they want with my "private" keys. Wasn't Ledger supposed to implement something similar in a software update? I might have confused it with Trezor. I know blockchain.com has a specific Ledger built HW wallet that can be used in conjunction with their web wallet. That's a brilliant idea, more web wallet services should offer such an option.
|
|
|
|