News is breaking about several subjects which point to the deep corruption that plagued the top ranks of our government.  The Obama administration will be known as the most corrupt presidency in the history of our country.  We saw signs during those years; Fast and Furious, Benghazi, the email server in the bathroom, the NSA and how they villainized Snowden.  But we kept sweeping it under the rug, pretending these were merely mistakes or policy blunders.  

The mistakes were when the administration allowed these issues to become publicly known, and when we didn't press the Republicans in congress to dig deeper.  The Obama administration filled the FBI and the CIA with partisan sycophants, and then used them to spy on Americans.  They spied on a Presidential candidate, and the President Elect.  The gears Obama engaged continued to churn for two years.  That's how ingrained and deeply rooted was the corruption.

The main stream media has shown themselves to have been complicit, if not accessory.  To this day they continue to omit from their programming what they would rather we did not know.  If they do report on a story which makes Democrats look bad, it's actually about how absurdly Trump reacted to the story.

The Republicans don't get a pass from me.  They sat their with their majority for years and did nothing.  Were they complicit?  Were they accessory?  What the fuck was Paul Ryan up to, exactly?  Lets find out.

I don't care how you feel about Trump, Democrats, Republicans or Whigs.  Pretend for a minute the Republican in The White House is Lincoln.  You like Lincoln, right?  What if it was Lincoln who was subject to these outrageous abuses of power?  What if it was Nixon who was responsible?  How would you feel?

If you're not outraged you're not paying attention.

---

Joe Biden admitting he bribed the Ukrainians to stop the prosecution of his son:
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/436816-joe-bidens-2020-ukrainian-nightmare-a-closed-probe-is-revived

Page and Strzok texts show the FBI tried to "develop relationships" with Trumps team, after he won:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/strzok-page-texts-suggested-using-post-election-briefing-information-trump-team

Ukrainians claim to have evidence their previous administration colluded with the Clinton campaign:
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/437719-ukrainian-to-us-prosecutors-why-dont-you-want-our-evidence-on-democrats

It must be, same address posted here:


Archive.



Moderators make mistakes, and reverse their decisions from time to time.  Here's proof.  I asked for a signed message because there is a 3 year-long gap in posting activities, and I want to make sure it's the same owner, not a hacker.

You just did it.  You posted twice in this thread without any other member replying in between.  You are only allowed to bump a thread once every 24 hours.  If you repeatedly post in a thread more frequently than that it's a violation of the rules.

To avoid that, just edit your previous post if you have another thought you'd like to share before any one else replies to your thread.

I'm not convinced they are alts, but I suspect the account 2double0 was owned by marco at some point.  The loan tag by marco might be for the purchase of the account, which was probably a pricey purchase nine or ten months ago and it's being paid off over time.  All mere speculation.

Marco has previously mentioned that he and 2double0 are working to get the loan paid off, but wouldn't divulge much more information than that on the subject.  I agree that it would be easier for 2double0 to get a loan if that tag wasn't there, and marco seems smart enough to know that.  If it was marco's alt, I doubt that tag would be there.

Can you sign a message from the address quoted below?

I don't see anything that would qualify as plagiarism, but there are a lot short posts.  I didn't look close enough to see if you were multi-posting, which could also get you banned.


Archive.

If you add CH and her alt...  over two times the runner up.  

Should I be jealous?  

---

Is it too late to change my guess?  After more consideration I think it's suchmoon.

I used to watch that board, not sure why.  I guess like you it was fascinating to see what digital goods were available, never tried to sell anything there except some crappy domain names.  For a while I would check that board everyday, but I got fed up with the sea of filth.

To an extent we have to put up with a wild west type environment, that's partially what crypto is about to begin with.  Don't expect the anarcho-capitalist who owns this place to do much about it. 

I wasn't implying that you had any thing to say about zazarb's rating.  I was just noting that my arbitrary policy is to exclude any one with a negative rating, not necessarily anyone with a negative review.  I just wanted to clarify that.

I noticed zazarb received a negative review from Lauda a couple of months ago, but his overall rating is ???: -1 / +23, which officially is a neutral rating.  I don't think he's a risky lender, so I think he deserves to be left on.

Having said that, this thread isn't a dictatorship.  If you folks want to see changes to the list, data added or removed, lenders added or removed, changes to the inclusion policy, whatever, please speak up.

Watch it, now.  I resemble that remark. 

I'm curious to know whom I've quoted the most, if I can play.  I'll have to guess CH, but I really don't know.

I would like to Foxpup to be BFF, but she doesn't even know I exist. 

You don't qualify for an unsecured loan based on my requirements for earned merit, and more importantly; you already have an active loan.

Once again, I'm sorry.  I can't help you.

Hi 2double0,
Thanks for inquiring about a loan from me, but I'm sorry I have to deny your request.

Thank you for the loan request.  It has been approved and funded.

Please send your payment to this address: 3MiRqZZ3y1dNqWqi4e1jkSYYPprTzns41b

TxId: e504a8c4e964902b6516fa20228f7513cd37d539e3de83d9dd3234679e0f4bbd

The mods aren't likely to waste anymore time on your spammy accounts.  It's now become obvious why you were banned.  Multiple threads, all being spammed with one, maybe two word replies, google translated, SPAM SPAM SPAM.

Also, I'll point out that you as a person are banned from the forum.  All your accounts are likely to get banned once they're found out.  If you post outside of this thread with your pushener account it will get banned also. 

Good idea.  If nothing else, it'll ease the burden of having to filter through microloan requests with the hope of getting a positive review out of it. 

@mdayonliner, sorry I didn't mean to derail your pity party.

Probably for spam.  All of your recent posts are one or two words in your Tx Acceleration thread, with a few multiposting bursts thrown in for good measure.



What's odd is I don't see his name listed in the SecLog, but I see Bpip has him listed as autobanned.  

That's probably the best way to approach it.  I don't want to overthink my impact, but it did occur to me that it can lead to abusing the trust system.  A functional trust system is more valuable to me than a few pennies earned on interest.  The more it gets abused the less functional it becomes.



That's who I was thinking of.  

Spot me a zpot, pleazez.

I've revised my rating to neutral. 

I have excluded people from my trust network because I suspect them of condoning "trust farming" with micro transactions and low value sales.  I wasn't around when the member you mentioned was selling email addresses (or was it google voice numbers?) but I do remember hearing about that and thinking the same thing.  I certainly don't want the reputation of someone who's trying to sell positive reviews for any amount, whether it's pennies or hundreds of dollars.  That's not my goal.