38 confirmations of my transaction and no sign of it in your system.
i cannot understand why you decided to generate unique btc adresses for each transaction. we are forced to trust you about the total amount. can you explain what motivated you to deploy this non-transparent system?
also please confirm that you are aware of the ongoing delays of ~6 hours.
this is getting rather unsettling.
They already confirmed several times also the last ETA was an hour like 10 mins ago. Learn to read before you make a new account to talk down on someone. |
|
|
|
Are they already giving out the waves before the end of the ICO? It just shows you how much you will get approx. you can't withdraw or send. |
|
|
|
guys we're almost there. soon all balances will be credited, due to high load we'll the shift the bonus period for a couple hours.
Good to hear. Not sure why people panic when the website is obv. overloaded (which is good news because it means it generated good traffic). |
|
|
|
|
Can you guys slow down for a second, the site is probably lagging like hell because of the traffic. I'm pretty sure everyone's deposit will show up with time, mine isn't showing yet either, but no point in spamming.
|
|
|
|
|
Seems there are some internal problems within the organisation on IOHK side.
|
|
|
|
Invested a few BTCs into Waves, waiting for it to confirm on the ico page  |
|
|
|
Would sending BTC from an exchange cause problems or is it ok to do it? If you don't have private keys you don't own coins. Don't send payments from exchange addresses. In a possible problem how would you prove that address belong to you? You can't sign a message when you don't have private keys. Send BTC from your own Bitcoin wallet. Since everyone has their own Pay Adress I dont think I would need proof that I sent the coins in the first place. Or am I missing something? |
|
|
|
|
Would sending BTC from an exchange cause problems or is it ok to do it?
|
|
|
|
|
Yobit shouldn't have added IOU trading, can't go any lower I guess to raise popularity and use of the exchange.
|
|
|
|
Not sure, but after readin the whole thread I have found no solid proof from E-K that he is the original owner of his account. Mentioning here also the "I have my Trezor I will send you a transaction > Trezor is in the trash can't find it" and later just showing a few links from the old E-K story. Also no escrow ico coupled with a moderated thread should hold up red flags for everyone. Hope people won't get scammed as it wouldn't do very good for the scene, but tbh not very much BTC was invested so far compared to the "proper" ICO startups like ETH/Lisk (and SYS in the past). Look at how waves will solve the escrow as an example: Alexander Kuzmin, mycelium.com founder.
Paul Klanschek, coinimal.com founder. |
|
|
|
|
BTC is still going to pump. Even though the block size debate is/was critical and it's sad to watch how they handled it, there is still 2 much money invested there to just let it rot. Not pumping would cause some panic and negative thoughts imho.
|
|
|
|
|
No escrow ICO while offering a 1:1 clone with no proper future plans from a new account. This is so 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
Will follow the project, looks promising.
|
|
|
|
Nothing against vCash.. looks good ..have a tiny amount. Although MS seems to be allowing a lot to join now. Not sure how much of a big deal it is now. The first few seemed to gain a lot of traction by the announcement. It will be less of a boost as they add more and more.
That's true, but what made me feel more positive is the order of the additions and the early acceptance. Anyhow the project has enough to look forward to. |
|
|
|
Good thing to note here is that Vcash has been granted this opportunity before several older crypto projects that offer some form of anonymity and privacy features meaning that it may soon be noticed by a wider audience. The fact that Vcash uses a different and more modern codebase just makes this even better. Regarding the market/price: it seems to have calmed down after several news hit and is on a higher base now than before, holding the uptrend that started around december. Still lot's to come according to the new 12 month roadmap. |
|
|
|
noobtrap buzzwords
Almost always = scam Wouldn't call it a scam, the developer wasn't the one advertising here. |
|
|
|
Yep I think time to advertise it as Dash2 on the main board. Change heading to darknet - dash 2 you can all own some of for 40 bucks or whatever a masternode is now.
This time everyone can mine it up. How much has been mined. I tried to mine it but seems there are some big miners already.
I can't make a profit from mining it so I just bought 20k of it for about 80 bucks. Not too bad to run 2 masternodes once i work out how to set them up on vps. Let's see how it goes.
The main thing I like about DNET (other than the lack of instamine) is that it doesn't have an identity crisis, it isn't trying to break away from its roots and it's actually proud to be associated with the dark net. Anyone reading this, feel free to pm me if you need any help with setting up a masternode. Not to be offensive in any form, but how can you consider a newly released DASH clone as a "DASH 2" project? With buying DASH, you buy into a long-term support from the developers who have invented/coded the features that DASH currently owns and they will most probably stick to their project meaning it's less risky than investing into the 22nd DASH/Bitcoin clone. With buying DNET you invest into something that is literally a clone of another project with no background knowledge on the developers or their past coding experience. Also about the identity crisis issue, DNET doesn't seem to have anything even closely related to darknets except it's name and cloning of anonymity features. I see that you are obviously invested and I am also against DASH's early instamine issues (and as disclaimer I don't own a single DASH nor do I plan to buy any), but luring people into a project with bullshit claims like "this is the new and better DASH" is just plain wrong. If the DNET developers were here to stay for 2+ years and would try to build groundbreaking anonymity and cryptocurrency features they wouldn't have started with cloning another project on a 1:1 basis. PS: I have 0 problems with the DNET project, but was randomly reading around and the noobtrap buzzwords were bothering me here. Good points you made. I was also thinking that Dash itself hasn't even penetrated the dark markets to any great extent, has it? I asked this question in another thread and I was told that most merchants use bitcoin. That certainly doesn't bode well for dnet if true. There was some news about a year ago on 1 or 2 smaller darknet markets accepting DASH, but they were low volume and/or newer markets. I doubt they still exist, didn't really research it since, but I guess you would have read about them if they were doing big $. Meaning no one really penetrated the darknet markets so far except BTC. The time may come sooner or later that the bigger markets start accepting altcoins, but if that happens, it will be the older, more tested and surviving altcoins (probably with some form of anonymity feature) with good liquidity and better known exchanges. |
|
|
|
Yep I think time to advertise it as Dash2 on the main board. Change heading to darknet - dash 2 you can all own some of for 40 bucks or whatever a masternode is now.
This time everyone can mine it up. How much has been mined. I tried to mine it but seems there are some big miners already.
I can't make a profit from mining it so I just bought 20k of it for about 80 bucks. Not too bad to run 2 masternodes once i work out how to set them up on vps. Let's see how it goes.
The main thing I like about DNET (other than the lack of instamine) is that it doesn't have an identity crisis, it isn't trying to break away from its roots and it's actually proud to be associated with the dark net. Anyone reading this, feel free to pm me if you need any help with setting up a masternode. Not to be offensive in any form, but how can you consider a newly released DASH clone as a "DASH 2" project? With buying DASH, you buy into a long-term support from the developers who have invented/coded the features that DASH currently owns and they will most probably stick to their project meaning it's less risky than investing into the 22nd DASH/Bitcoin clone. With buying DNET you invest into something that is literally a clone of another project with no background knowledge on the developers or their past coding experience. Also about the identity crisis issue, DNET doesn't seem to have anything even closely related to darknets except it's name and cloning of anonymity features. I see that you are obviously invested and I am also against DASH's early instamine issues (and as disclaimer I don't own a single DASH nor do I plan to buy any), but luring people into a project with bullshit claims like "this is the new and better DASH" is just plain wrong. If the DNET developers were here to stay for 2+ years and would try to build groundbreaking anonymity and cryptocurrency features they wouldn't have started with cloning another project on a 1:1 basis. PS: I have 0 problems with the DNET project, but was randomly reading around and the noobtrap buzzwords were bothering me here. Don't take the term Dash 2 too seriously. Dash is an old, established coin and DNET is new so it's obviously not Dash 2 in a sense that it is its successor. But it is a Dash fork without the premine following Darkcoin's original idea (as far as I can tell at least) so given time and development it has the potential to close the gap to Dash. Obviously there is the opportunity for every new project to prove itself and there is an existing chance that DNET will come out as something different from the DASH forks/clones. I'm just saying that to this day, none of the DASH forks have done anything better/more compared to the original. The (probably pre-planned) instamine is something that is not welcome in this community (and that's a good thing), but on the other side, they have proven that they have the intention to innovate aswell. |
|
|
|
Yep I think time to advertise it as Dash2 on the main board. Change heading to darknet - dash 2 you can all own some of for 40 bucks or whatever a masternode is now.
This time everyone can mine it up. How much has been mined. I tried to mine it but seems there are some big miners already.
I can't make a profit from mining it so I just bought 20k of it for about 80 bucks. Not too bad to run 2 masternodes once i work out how to set them up on vps. Let's see how it goes.
The main thing I like about DNET (other than the lack of instamine) is that it doesn't have an identity crisis, it isn't trying to break away from its roots and it's actually proud to be associated with the dark net. Anyone reading this, feel free to pm me if you need any help with setting up a masternode. Not to be offensive in any form, but how can you consider a newly released DASH clone as a "DASH 2" project? With buying DASH, you buy into a long-term support from the developers who have invented/coded the features that DASH currently owns and they will most probably stick to their project meaning it's less risky than investing into the 22nd DASH/Bitcoin clone. With buying DNET you invest into something that is literally a clone of another project with no background knowledge on the developers or their past coding experience. Also about the identity crisis issue, DNET doesn't seem to have anything even closely related to darknets except it's name and cloning of anonymity features. I see that you are obviously invested and I am also against DASH's early instamine issues (and as disclaimer I don't own a single DASH nor do I plan to buy any), but luring people into a project with bullshit claims like "this is the new and better DASH" is just plain wrong. If the DNET developers were here to stay for 2+ years and would try to build groundbreaking anonymity and cryptocurrency features they wouldn't have started with cloning another project on a 1:1 basis. PS: I have 0 problems with the DNET project, but was randomly reading around and the noobtrap buzzwords were bothering me here. |
|
|
|
|
A coin becomes a scam because whale trust it enough to buy a large chunk and pump it up on legit news?
The forum keeps amazing me.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
