Just to point out that AT was launched over a year ago (it does smart contracts but it does them smarter and simpler - http://ciyam.org/at).

The AT model doesn't allow changes to be made "to the contract" but there are functions that differentiate between the "contract creator" and others (as that is sometimes desirable).

There are reasons why you would want a smart contract to differentiate between its "creator" and another user.

Keep it up.

All the "non-investors" of IOTA are reading this topic and seeing what you guys are doing.

It obviously looks not the slightest bit professional.



(the more angry you get at me the more you lose - so let's have at it fucktards)

Yup - can't even spell IOTA but think you have some point to attack me on (it's a wonder that the IOTA crowd even allow someone who can't spell presumably because they are too drug fucked to even post for them).

Well - everyone can see you are an idiot already as I've proven - care to actually try and prove that of me?

Should we start a new "I'm so drug-fucked that I can't even spell four letter coins" topic just for you?

Oh - and you know this because?

(let me guess - you are a socky)

Lies - as I've stated many times - please provide proof of this claim.

(that you were offered to "lead my life's work" not anything else - as this is what you keep on claiming)

Two things are funny here.

1) You can't even spell the crap coin you are promoting.

2) You can't detect that this topic is not for shilling but for debunking.

Obvious shill or socky (thought you could "change the topic" huh?).

Extremely funny that you'd inject "technical questions and answers" into a thread that has nothing to do with that.

(perhaps you think that will help you look "more legit"?)

Hey - you wrote Nxt - that is about the "lowest quality" piece of P2P software that I ever looked at.



(or are you still going to try and pretend there was a "bcnext"?)

As a "smart arse" you fail miserably (maybe try and learn English properly for a start).

And yes your "non-investors" are probably watching this topic and beginning to question why on earth they invested with a couple of obvious scammers.

Yup - that is the core of it - take people's money after initially promising a huge return then deny any such promises and resort to hiding behind legal games to try and get away with the theft.

You should understand that your "non-investors" are probably following this topic and are also probably not happy.

You're continuing insinuations just make you look more like the true troll and scammer that you actually are.

Am glad you have admitted your support for using binary floating point (although you seemingly have forgotten the word "binary" before the "floating point" - are you drunk?).

Nope - I was not but seemingly I am drunk when it suits your and your dog but otherwise I am sober.

Anyone with the slightest bit of scientific understanding would require a blood alcohol test to verify such a claim (i.e. we don't decide that someone is drunk because a forum troll says so).

How funny that an idiot who thinks he knows me so well doesn't even realise that I'm not 50.



(good luck convincing anyone else that you know anything else about me when you don't even know my age which is actually rather easily found out)

I see - but it was you that started off with a post insinuating that I was drunk - you think that was polite do you?

(if you do think it is polite to suggest that people are drunk then I think perhaps you should take a course in manners)

No-one actually has any respect for you @CfB - you were well known as a troll on this forum (before Nxt even started) and now as a scam coin creator.

I see - so the stupid looking "pussy" with all the threats actually has nothing to show (why I am not surprised).

Go and lick your master's asshole (that would be CfB) and ask him for some more instructions seeing you've failed so badly to even make a dent.



(perhaps he recorded some stuff you can use)

Then you are wrong (you really are a pathetic piece of shit).

I did an interview with a guy - but no-one else was in that (and the interview was recorded and still exists today).

So the interview that was done was about AT - it did not involve you or anyone else other than the interviewer.

What coin?

And supposedly you don't have one either.

(although I don't have any "non-investors" that might try and report me)

Please provide the recordings of these conference calls (in MP3 format).

I have a very recognisable voice so it shouldn't be hard to work out if such "conference calls" did or didn't actually occur (and then to attest to what was said in them by myself).