Bitcoin Forum
June 11, 2024, 06:59:14 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 »
521  Economy / Services / Re: PB Mining -- 5 year mining contracts! on: June 30, 2014, 11:05:17 PM
GOAAAALLL 2:0 Germany Win Win Win  Grin

Darn... as you can see I have no glass ball, but I can bet 48651667069 BTC that in the next year the average increase of difficulty will be between 15 and 20% on every step of 11-13 days  Wink
522  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: 400GH/s - how many BTC can you extract? on: June 30, 2014, 10:51:05 PM
Anyway, what do you think the price will be for this new piece of miner?

From the article:

Quote
It is priced at 0.75 BTC.

Duh jumped that line, thank you!

So here's the result: https://tradeblock.com/mining/a/c42525c314

Good to mine for 6 months, then you can trash it away again  Cheesy
523  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: 400GH/s - how many BTC can you extract? on: June 30, 2014, 10:42:27 PM
Next 12 months around 1 bitcoin or so:

https://tradeblock.com/mining/a/d28b241a18

Thank you!

It looks that you won't take back your investment if the machine costs 1000$ (but I think it will cost more).
https://tradeblock.com/mining/a/bb554ee8f3
And of course I have put in there the sheet values: 470 GH/s and 366W.

But if you spend 0 in electricity you will actually earn 21$ (0.03 BTC) after one year!
https://tradeblock.com/mining/a/2feb5cfd9d
524  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: 400GH/s - how many BTC can you extract? on: June 30, 2014, 10:35:34 PM
I know this is a bit off topic but extract is not the right word to use. These bitcoins aren't hidden in lines of code that need to be "extracted" as you make it seem. They are simply created; basically out of nothing. When a miner finds a block, that miner is rewarded 25 bitcoins that are created - and proven to be valid.

Thank you for the explanation but I don't know if there's much to discuss.
If you FIND a block, you were actually LOOKING for something, that's why I use the word "extract".
In fact, you don't really FIND bitcoins, right? They are a reward because you FIND a block.
So you extract them thanks to your mining. Or you get them as a reward.
It's just words I think, there's 2 different POVs here, that's all.

Anyway, what do you think the price will be for this new piece of miner?
525  Economy / Services / Re: PB Mining -- 5 year mining contracts! on: June 30, 2014, 10:27:06 PM
There's always the option of running your own hardware if you think you can do it cheaper.  Smiley  

Iyou know perfectly that at 0.0036 per MH/s the payer will never get his money back  Wink


at 0.0036 per MH/s never, yes, true

I'm still trying to determine whether he has time traveled from the future and seen the difficulty changes, or if he has traveled from the past when the prices were 0.0036/Mhs.  Either way, he needs to patent that technology ASAP.  If he can share some lottery numbers with us I'll give him free hash power.  Wink


For prediction difficult changes and btc price (and those two factors are big) you need a glass ball

You must have some brain damage, or you are just playing dumb because you are friend with the owner of the "service".
526  Economy / Services / Re: PB Mining -- 5 year mining contracts! on: June 30, 2014, 10:25:38 PM
There's always the option of running your own hardware if you think you can do it cheaper.  Smiley  

Iyou know perfectly that at 0.0036 per MH/s the payer will never get his money back  Wink


at 0.0036 per MH/s never, yes, true

I'm still trying to determine whether he has time traveled from the future and seen the difficulty changes, or if he has traveled from the past when the prices were 0.0036/Mhs.  Either way, he needs to patent that technology ASAP.  If he can share some lottery numbers with us I'll give him free hash power.  Wink

You look a bit stupid with this question.

Here, if you are not a complete idiot, you can see that the difficulty is rising by around 15-20% on average for each step.
To be more precise, the average on the last 20 steps is around 18%, so my counts are even too sweet, as I based them on a 15% increase.
This last increase was a 24% hammer anyway.
And the more people will put power to mine (and this IS happening), the more the difficulty will rise.

But you know this perfectly, you are only playing dumb to not get your "activity" exposed  Smiley
I'll be here though, and I'll try to save as many people I can from cloud mining and especially from PBMining  Cheesy
You better lower your prices and give back at least some chance of recovery of investment or you'll find me here wasting your efforts every time I'll find a minute.
527  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / 400GH/s - how many BTC can you extract? on: June 30, 2014, 10:04:04 PM
As per title, asking you experts.
528  Economy / Services / Re: PB Mining -- 5 year mining contracts! on: June 30, 2014, 09:57:19 PM
There's always the option of running your own hardware if you think you can do it cheaper.  Smiley  

I'm not saying I can do it cheaper, I'm saying that PBMining (and probably all the other cloud miners as well) don't pay back.
As far as I know PBMining is the cheapest for MH/s so I guess the others are even worse.
Anyway, cheaper or not, you know perfectly that at 0.0036 per MH/s the payer will never get his money back  Wink
So, you are actually scamming people or, at very least, teasing them.

BTW, I wish you spend all the money you will hold from me in doctors and medicines  Smiley
529  Economy / Services / Re: PB Mining -- 5 year mining contracts! on: June 30, 2014, 08:57:44 PM
Germany lose 0:2 ?

Dream on Wink






I donīt know how much GH/s was back then exactly but seems GH/s are about to break even. At least looking VERY good when look at total payout.

Without fuck or scam anybody Smiley

I wasn't considering the fact that BACK THEN when you made the contract, if you paid 0.0036 for GH/s, you GET them back.
This is because back then difficulty was lower, so you got much more reward.
It's new contracts that will never see it coming back.
530  Economy / Services / Re: PB Mining -- 5 year mining contracts! on: June 30, 2014, 08:18:57 PM
This thread may interest somebody...

Ghash.io has 36% not 51% hash rate of the total network. interesting indeed.

Was reading the boring title and the very last posting only.

One thing is sure:

I would have scammed myself BIG time when i bought hardware and mined myself btc with 0.27 Euro per kw/h electric cost instead investing in Clould Mining (PB Mining)

I didn't talk about the % of net owned by somebody in my thread, the title is clear.
The title is boring but very clear, but you didn't read the post and you talk about % of network owned.

Anyway, can you prove my calculations wrong somehow?
Otherwise you are just talking.
And my calculations are very easy to reproduce:

Initial cost.
First BTC income after 12 days.
Previous BTC income after 12 days - 15% (now 25% sigh).
Repeat.

See what you get back after 1 year.

The image in the opening post is very easy to understand.
Unless you can prove that image false or wrong, I am right.

And I am not posting here to attack PBMining, CEX.IO pays even less than PBM.
I am here to say that cloud mining will never get you back what you put in, by simple math, not in 1 year, not in 2, never.
Unless difficulty will get lower than 10% or something like that (not great chance).


I see that my first GH/s which i bought back in march already broke even or are about to - and we have June.
And i see many many broke even completly now.

PS: And now i watch soccer: Let`s go germany!!!!!!

Yes sure.
I proved it with simple math.
At 0.0036 / GHs you won't ever get back what you pay.
The image is there.
Numbers are there.

That's simply impossible unless you have referrals.
But referrals make of it a perfect Ponzi scheme.
You didn't get fucked, but you fucked somebody else.
Still, the site is a scam.

And Germany will lose 0 - 2 Smiley
531  Economy / Services / Re: PB Mining -- 5 year mining contracts! on: June 30, 2014, 08:11:20 PM
This thread may interest somebody...

Ghash.io has 36% not 51% hash rate of the total network. interesting indeed.

Was reading the boring title and the very last posting only.

One thing is sure:

I would have scammed myself BIG time when i bought hardware and mined myself btc with 0.27 Euro per kw/h electric cost instead investing in Clould Mining (PB Mining)

I didn't talk about the % of net owned by somebody in my thread, the title is clear.
The title is boring but very clear, but you didn't read the post and you talk about % of network owned.

Anyway, can you prove my calculations wrong somehow?
Otherwise you are just talking.
And my calculations are very easy to reproduce:

Initial cost.
First BTC income after 12 days.
Previous BTC income after 12 days - 15% (now 25% sigh).
Repeat.

See what you get back after 1 year.

The image in the opening post is very easy to understand.
Unless you can prove that image false or wrong, I am right.

And I am not posting here to attack PBMining, CEX.IO pays even less than PBM.
I am here to say that cloud mining will never get you back what you put in, by simple math, not in 1 year, not in 2, never.
Unless difficulty will get lower than 10% or something like that (not great chance).



Edit: mhhhhh I see your signature... and your reliability... high chance you are the same owner of PBMining, just another account made to fight people uncovering your scam, you probably have several accounts for this purpose. Or maybe a friend, it doesn't matter anyway.

Or maybe just somebody who can't count (there are many, anyway, and I also trashed some money in PBM before realizing it was wrong) and now can't admit he mistaken.
532  Economy / Services / Re: PB Mining -- 5 year mining contracts! on: June 30, 2014, 07:15:35 PM
This thread may interest somebody...
533  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Blockchain size (another thread, yes) on: June 29, 2014, 11:34:06 PM
Don't many newcomer use webwalllets anyway?

they do, but most newcomers only have pocket money amounts at first. once they start getting more then a weeks salary worth of bitcoins they should switch to proper security, such as a node/offline store of bitcoins where they truly own the privkey.. not third parties

anyone using web services long term to store more then a week of labour is just asking to get hacked.

which is where i find the funny part, people argue about data stor that amounts to a $10 microSD card. and downloads of a week of fibre optic speed for full blockchain sync again only$3-$10. yet are willing to risk alot more throwing their funds in webwallets..

the mind truly boggles!

You are right but keep also on mind that this is a completely new thing, and many people not only can't understand how they get hacked, many don't even install or keep updated an antivirus... the truth is that half population of the world is simply not ready for Bitcoin... it's like they would walk with a bag full of money on their shoulders and don't care if they are going into the bad famed spot of the city.
534  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Blockchain size (another thread, yes) on: June 29, 2014, 11:31:07 PM
at current block limit of 1mb per block.. there is a max monthly growth of ~4.4gb, with a current block fill of 10%-25%.

as it has been discussed, its not a problem.

for instance Call of duty has a larger data size then bitcoin, with its updates, patches and new versions every 18 months. call of duty need to solve their problems of data bloat and download times.... way before blockchain does

yet i do not see millions of shoot-em-up users complaining.

same goes for world of warcraft. and many other games.

this is not the 1990's where hard drives are a 32gb max limit, where internet is 64k.. we are in the age of fibre optic cable and where something smaller then a postage stamp can store more then games/bitcoins needs.

data storage and internet speed evolution is the solution
This may be true but bandwidth and storage is not free. The fact that it costs people money to provide a service to the network (keeping it secure) while not receiving anything in return (anything tangible) will always have the number of nodes depressed.

it costs $50 for call of duty, and >$300 for a console to play it and be part of the playstation/microsoft network. but they get nothing back in return..

hmmmmmmm how many consoles are there in the world which proves that people dont truly care

Erm... they PLAY, in return.
Bitcoin has no other function than replacing money, it's not so fun as CoD.
535  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Blockchain size (another thread, yes) on: June 29, 2014, 08:32:57 PM
...gnagnagna I know everything you are ignorant gnagnagna...

Thank you for all the info, that's all good news, but even when you know everything about Bitcoin you shouldn't talk (write) like a presumptuous dick.


No reason to get insulting.

Dont thank me if you dont mean it.

Yes I know this has been "discussed" a thousand times already, -snip-



I mean it, you gave good info, but the way you post is irritating.
Keep in mind there are probably something less than 7 billion people out there that know far less than what I know, about Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies.
It's good to explain things, it's not good to talk to people like if they were idiots.
536  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Warning about portable versions on: June 29, 2014, 08:04:11 PM
Could you add an image based password?
That would make it perfect, probably.
537  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Blockchain size (another thread, yes) on: June 29, 2014, 06:55:46 PM
...gnagnagna I know everything you are ignorant gnagnagna...

Thank you for all the info, that's all good news, but even when you know everything about Bitcoin you shouldn't talk (write) like a presumptuous dick.

Anyway, the basic problem of giving people a good impression since the very first moment they enter Bitcoin, remains.
Quote
A NEW user that just wants to understand how Bitcoin works, will much probably use the Bitcoin Wallet because he believes it's the most up to date or secure or official or anything.
And what does he meet?
Hours and hours of download before he can make any operation.

As I wrote, most people aren't computer experts or geeks, they just want to escape from the bank system (the ones who understand its perversion).

For how I see it, a Bitcoin light client ready in the very same page where you can download the Bitcoin full client, probably on the model of Electrum, would be the best solution.
Then they'll have all the time to learn that there are other wallets, web wallets, etc. but as first impact I think this should be done.
538  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Blockchain size (another thread, yes) on: June 29, 2014, 05:19:27 PM
I run a full QT wallet node for security and to help the network. It uses only around 60 mb on my 1 tb hard drive. Storage options are always growing as well. A light version of QT would be helpful for beginners, but less nodes means less security doesn't it?

Less nodes probably means also slower confirmations of transactions.
But this shouldn't be a real problem, as the userbase widens, also full nodes will be more.
I would hold a node up as well if I didn't have this crappy connection.

But anyway, what I wanted to put the accent on, is that this file is becoming large and annoying.
I don't want to say that you can't deal with it, but the world is NOT USA, there are other countries.
With my connection, in that shit of country named Italy, I need more than two days to download the whole blockchain.
Space is not so much a problem FOR ME, as I have over 3 TB of hard disks, but many people have old computers, they are not geeks or nerds and are only interested in disconnecting themselves from banks and saving their money.
Not to mention people going around with tablets and smartphones. You can't ask them to fuck up all their memory with the blockchain.

What I want to pass on over here is that NEW USERS will get annoyed by this, and I think there's no doubt this file IS a bit heavy.
And I want to pass over that if Bitcoin will boom, like everyone of us hopes, the transactions number will grow exponentially.
Then what will you do if you go on 4GB per month growth of the blockchain size?
Better solve this problem now, I think.
539  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Blockchain size (another thread, yes) on: June 29, 2014, 05:14:53 PM
I run a full QT wallet node for security and to help the network. It uses only around 60 mb on my 1 tb hard drive. Storage options are always growing as well. A light version of QT would be helpful for beginners, but less nodes means less security doesn't it?

For security???

There are light wallets, why make another one?

I don't think it will ever hit a Terabyte, but a light wallet is needed.


Multibit? Electrum?

Plurality is also a factor of security.
Once a dev shuts down its wallet for whatever reason, what will you do?
540  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Should banks offer Bitcoin custody and payment services? on: June 29, 2014, 02:55:33 PM
Why I can't vote?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!