Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 11:11:07 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 »
561  Other / Meta / Re: "Censoring" off-topic posts on: July 24, 2012, 11:52:59 PM
They are deleting my posts again..

Dude, no one cares about your idiotic babble.  Ignore.
562  Other / Archival / Re: deleted on: July 24, 2012, 11:33:22 PM


LOL, there isn't anything illegal about deploying hashrate in excess of 50.1%. It's not my fault that that the flaw even exist.

~BCX~

You are also ddosing websites which is illegal.

And if he dumps fake coins on the market and takes my btc it's fraud/theft.

So good luck with all of that.
563  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: So, I've been out of the coin loop for a looong while... on: July 24, 2012, 10:22:05 PM
...and now there are all these damn alter-coin things.

Any of them worth notice, and if so, why ?

I think if you just peak your head out in the forum.  You'll see what's been the focus of everyone's attention.  It's pretty obvious.
564  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: ATTN Litecoin GPU Miners - Scrypt support for cgminer on: July 24, 2012, 09:42:00 PM
Litecoin is a scam - there is no such thing as a "CPU coin" and never can be. 

Could you go into more details on this one ?
It is impossible to design a proof-of-work that cannot be specialized (eg, ASICs). Designing them to be resistent to existing technologies increases the security risk such specialization presents. Simple proofs like SHA256 (in Bitcoin) have proven to work well, since it scales up in tiers (CPU -> GPU -> FPGA -> ASIC).

Some of you Bitcoin purists really are scared of LTC aren't you?  Start your own thread if you'd like to discuss this.  I'm sure some would be more than happy to talk.  Otherwise STFU.
565  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: ATTN Litecoin GPU Miners - Scrypt support for cgminer on: July 24, 2012, 09:18:04 PM
Okay, maybe I am being painfully slow today but...

1) Litecoin is intended to be a CPU coin, right ?

2) So, from this thread it appears that GPU mining it in a manner that is more economically effective than CPU mining is possible, right ?

But, if both 1 and 2 is true, doesn't that mean that litecoin is kinda...pointless?
Litecoin is a scam - there is no such thing as a "CPU coin" and never can be. I think Con is only doing this because he's being paid - in Bitcoins Wink

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Litecoin#Criticism

Well considering you wrote that.  It's totally believable! lol.
566  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Change.org petition to get BitcoinEXpress arrested! on: July 24, 2012, 08:57:05 PM
I'm still waiting for all this to happen.  How long until this is supposed to start?  I've seen nothing but words to this point.
567  Other / Archival / Re: deleted on: July 24, 2012, 08:39:44 PM


LOL, there isn't anything illegal about deploying hashrate in excess of 50.1%. It's not my fault that that the flaw even exist.

~BCX~

So then do it.  Stop talking as it's cheap.  Let's see action.
568  Other / Archival / Re: deleted on: July 24, 2012, 08:07:36 PM
I understand the controversy, but succeed or fail, this attempt will be good for us. If he breaks it then it's better him than a crook. If he fails we can all have more confidence that our money is secure.

If he does ddos that does make him a crook.
569  Other / Archival / Re: deleted on: July 24, 2012, 07:36:24 PM
It might be a catch 22.
If BCX succeeds and destroys Litecoin, then good luck proving damages. The coin was not viable and therefore without value.
If BCX fails, no damage occurs and thus no plane ticket to Gitmo from our jackboots.

P.S. no wonder SoiledCoin development ground to a halt, Groinhunter spends all his time here trolling threads instead of coding.

LTC isn't getting destroyed.  The price may crash temporarily but that just enriches me in the long run as I'll just stop mining and start buying from all the BTC I've all ready made.  Not to mention there are big names in BTC heavily invested in LTC already.  It's not going anywhere.

I will take it personally though.  I will go after those who willingly try to destroy my investments.  He better not be in the US or any of his "help" better not be.  That's all I have to say.
570  Other / Archival / Re: deleted on: July 24, 2012, 06:19:10 PM
@Coblee


This isn't personal at all but your fellow miners over at BTC-E are taking on some serious Solidcoin type attitudes.

The challenge has a been made and apparently support over there was with them on it, in making a challenge that I couldn't 51% LTC.

Nothing like that to give me reason to resurrect some serious GPU hashpower, build up some EC2's (keep in mind even Coinhunter verfied I had over 700 EC2's running at the SC2 launch), connect up with some botnetter friends and bring some BTC out of USB deep freeze for fees... LOL....

This is fair warning to all.

Challenge accepted.

~BCX~

Standard shorter tactics:

    1. Badmouth the security
    2. Announce a major negative event for it
    3. Crash the price
    4. Buy a ton when it's worth nothing.

And y'all are swallowing the whole thing hook line and sinker.



yeah, i just bought everything up to .006 again. thanks for helping me get some coins!   Smiley

I hope you realize right now you're not getting anything really cheap at all...especially if the price falls and people sell...

First of all some asshat is not going to destroy my confidence in LTC.  I will continue to buy even if it tanks back to 0 and will weather the storm.  Don't see how he'll gain anything though.  Other than maybe federal charges.
571  Other / Archival / Re: deleted on: July 24, 2012, 06:14:52 PM
not sure of the exact methods planned but attacking peoples computers is illegal in many countries
http://www.technicallylegal.org/the-legality-of-denial-of-service-attacks/ relates to the US
one snippet
In terms of criminal violations, there’s the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (the “CFAA”), which prohibits a person from “knowingly caus[ing] the transmission of a program, information code, or command, and as a result of such conduct, intentionally causes damages without authorization to a protected computer” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(5)(A)). The requisite “damage” element under the CFAA is “any impairment to the integrity or availability of data, a program, a system, or information” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)(Cool) and a “protected computer” is defined as a computer “which is used in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, including a computer located outside the United States that is used in a manner that affects interstate or foreign commerce or communication” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)(2)(B)).

but ppl that get upset over what goes on in a shoutbox probably think that wont relate to them...

Did BCX ever claim to be a US citizen, or even live there ?

If he didn't, how relevant is all that verbiage ?


Very relevant.  If I get hit by a ddos, I will turn it over to the feds.  And yes unless he lives in IRAN he will be brought to the US on those charges.

Good Luck though.
572  Other / Archival / Re: deleted on: July 24, 2012, 05:13:04 PM
Read though this whole thing and all I can say is the OP is such a man-child.

Wow dude, grow up.


"Someone hurt my feelings.  Now I'm going to F up everyone's hard work. sniffle"

Get a life.
573  Economy / Services / Re: Gigamining / Teramining on: July 24, 2012, 06:39:55 AM
It seems your argument is that because I make BTC doing this that I am somehow doing something wrong.

You have to admit there's kind of that vibe here on the forums.  I've notice that kind of reasoning in many other threads as well.  The whole, "No one should make money off of something other than me!"

It trips me out how dense some people are.
574  Economy / Auctions / Re: Liteco.in domain on: July 24, 2012, 06:07:12 AM
$125

$130
575  Economy / Services / Re: Gigamining / Teramining on: July 23, 2012, 06:11:32 AM
I see another large buy order 1815@1.09 and the price is slowly creeping back up.  I thought with the news of the expansion the price might have even doubled on speculation not make it worth less.  I think people are beginning to realize what a deal having one bond @ 1.09 actually is.  I just hope the price doesn't rise too fast as to not let me get some more funds into gigamining. Smiley  Still a long way from even 1.5 though.  I'm sure the second wave of investors have some shot nerves at this point.

Oh, can get divs a little early today?  I'd like to put more funds in before I have to go back out on the road in the morning.

Cheers!
576  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: [WTB] USED/NEW GPU mining rigs. on: July 23, 2012, 05:42:15 AM
Thanks for the pm's and emails.  Keep them coming.

I got called out on the road for a few days so if I don't get back to you right away I promise I'll get to you.

Cheers
577  Other / Archival / Re: We suspect that - SupaDupaJenkins Pedophile. on: July 22, 2012, 09:14:07 PM
faceless accusations..

I didn't make any accusations.
578  Economy / Auctions / Re: Liteco.in domain on: July 22, 2012, 09:07:24 PM
Either my candle auction strategy is working, or we're just beginning to approach the real value of this thing. In either case, I'm a happy man!

So I won?

Awesome!  I'll send you money/bitcoins/litecoins which would you like? j/k  Grin
579  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: LTC under attack? on: July 22, 2012, 09:03:57 PM
Is this yours?  I just found it on the webs.  I'll remove it if you like.

No, don't remove it! I'm glad somebody uses it. You can even have the sourcecode (done in povray) if you like Smiley

Cool!  Thanks!
580  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Best <insert name>coins to speculate on on: July 22, 2012, 08:44:23 PM
In my opinion once asic hit, all gpus will be targeted on litecoin.  Just a hunch.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!