Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 02:06:32 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 »
561  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S5: 1155GH(+OverClock Potential), In Stock $0.25/GH & 0.51W/GH on: February 06, 2015, 03:13:38 PM
Anyone tried this fan in the S5 to replace the stock fan?

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Free-Shipping-Delta-120mm-12cm-PWM-TFC1212DE-252CFM-12038-DC-12V-cooling-fans-/171668885436?

It has a very high air flow with claimed RPM of 5000. Sounds like a good upgrade.
What would be the reason to try these? Being 38mm form-factor, the noise they emit has to exceed the stock fan noise.
The stock fan is 38mm.
I know it is, and so is the suggested alternative .... but the Nidec TA 500DC is a bigger form factor thus deeper fins
562  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S5: 1155GH(+OverClock Potential), In Stock $0.25/GH & 0.51W/GH on: February 06, 2015, 02:48:38 PM
Anyone tried this fan in the S5 to replace the stock fan?

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Free-Shipping-Delta-120mm-12cm-PWM-TFC1212DE-252CFM-12038-DC-12V-cooling-fans-/171668885436?

It has a very high air flow with claimed RPM of 5000. Sounds like a good upgrade.
What would be the reason to try these? Being 38mm form-factor, the noise they emit has to exceed the stock fan noise.

Try these out ...

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Lot-of-4-Compaq-Nidec-Beta-V-TA500DC-A34538-90-Proliant-Fan-with-Dual-Housings-/251820064274?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3aa1a53e12

Strictly speaking, these are not 120mm fans and the holes do not match up with the holes on the S5 mount, but they'll sit nicely inside the brace of the fan on an S5 (even S1 and S3), couple that with a slight mod (using this resistor: http://www.maplin.co.uk/p/wirewound-3-watt-33-ohm-resistor-w3r3 on the +ve line) plus double sided tape to hold them in position and you'll get a humming rig with more than enough CFM. If you put them in a pull configuration, the pressure will also help hold them in place.
PS. All the mod does is reduce the voltage to ~7 volts (and thus cut its noise dramatically), so if you have a source with that voltage, use that!

You'll need to strip all the housing off and remain with just the fan.
563  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S5: 1155GH(+OverClock Potential), In Stock $0.25/GH & 0.51W/GH on: February 06, 2015, 01:40:48 PM
I have ordered my first S5. Got to see how mining works with them. I have been mining with GPUs now for over a year.

Do you think it is more profitable to switch from GPU mining to ASIC mining via Antminer S5 for example? I don't have to pay for electricity anyways.
Therefore I could sell my GPUs (6x R9 280x and 3x r9 290) and switch them for ASICs. But lately GPU mining is dieing so hard. It was fun early, when coinlaunches were made. But there are so less coinlaunches in last time because of all the scams. The cards have been running on Nicehash since over 2-3 months now.
With free electric, it definitely is more profitable to mine with ASICs than GPU's. If I were you, and seeing you are already with nicehash, I'd get a couple more S5's ..... then you'll be making some serious returns in comparison with your GPU rigs ..... my 2 cents.
564  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: BITMAIN Antminer S3 support and OverClocking thread on: February 06, 2015, 12:32:18 PM
If you have the Advanced Settings page, then no need to SSH into the rig, just change frequency then click Save & Apply..
If you do not have the page, then YES, you'll need to SSH into the rig and edit the file manually. Google for Putty, it is one of the common software(s) for SSH'ing ...
565  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3+ Discussion and Support Thread on: February 05, 2015, 05:12:38 AM
What is the simple under 50 Word Lowdown on why the 121914 Firmware is 'Critical'?

Strato
Simplest answer is do not flash the 12192014 firmware because along with a raft of S3 firmware releases during that period, that version was scrapped by bitmain (after testing in general release) as being buggy. Proof of the pudding .... check the bitmain website, its no longer officially available / supported.
566  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [GUIDE] Strato's Antminer S5 Vertical Mounting Setup Guide - OC with Less Heat on: February 05, 2015, 03:09:21 AM
Overclocking voids the warranty? Then why is it a drop down option in the control panel of your software which ships with the units. I'm not trying to start a fight here. But I find that it's ridiculous to put an option to set a frequency higher than 350 with a simple dropdown menu - in your own software - and there be no warning whatsoever - and that BM would deny a warranty claim.

Yes it does. I can't really answer on behalf of the other questions as its not my rules.

I added an overclocking question to the wiki.

Quote
Is overclocking allowed?

Users may overclock at their own risk but overclocking WILL invalidate the product warranty.

This is a more official quote if you will, there is a bigger quote but this is the best one I can find with search as it is.

Over Clocking will void your warranty on the unit, please be careful  Cry

That is your usual waffle! There is NO official literature on overclocking voiding the warranty, and your quotes, wiki additions and public forum quotes by a bitmain employee can not be used as binding statements to bitmain. Like I said, waffle as usual!

Add to that, Strato (or anyone) is not obliged in any way to add a warning to their threads regarding any statement as to OC'ing voiding their warranty, if only because even bitmain themselves do not mention that anywhere authoritatively. You, dogie, are a simple dogs-body for bitmain, toothless dog if you want, as your assertions are not worth the digital ink that they are written in (let alone have the force to void a bitmain warranty)!

PS: And stop being off-topic here, if you are so concerned about the warranty warning, go and open a thread in the scam accusation subforum or press your favourite link to report to the moderator.
567  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [GUIDE] Strato's Antminer S5 Vertical Mounting Setup Guide - OC with Less Heat on: February 05, 2015, 02:10:15 AM
Whenever you post your next resource, please make it exceptionally clear that overclocking will void a user's warranty.

I am not sure that is necessary as most mining rig owners know that OC'ing voids the warranty.
In any case, it is bitmain's responsibility to advise its customers about the terms of the warranty, and to my knowledge, I have never seen any official bitmain literature to that effect, bearing in mind that the so called overclocking frequencies ship as selectable options (on the S5 at least)!
568  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3+ Discussion and Support Thread on: February 05, 2015, 12:46:43 AM
I really don't want to be arguing with you but I have to correct incorrect or misleading statements you make to customers, as you're neither the one who will end up with a bricked unit nor has to help those customers. You seem incessant on going against everything I'm saying - because I'm the one saying it. If you really don't agree with what I'm saying then simply ignore me.
I am not interested in arguig with or shadowing you, but I shall always point out the misleading information you give out under the pretext of being a bitmain representative. And the ball is in your court here, if you do not want to be challenged, stop giving false advice to bitmain customers (of whom I am). And if you do not know the answer, let others who know answer!

Your self-annointed bitmain representative badge neither confers nor imparts any knowledge unto you to shadow any and every comment on a bitmain instigated thread to the extent of you pretending to be an authority on all things bitmain. That much I know from your numerous waffle responses and the patently wrong advice that you keep giving.

EDIT: If bitmain have scrapped a firmware release, why do you keep telling people to install that release? Will you recompense them if their rigs (which may be out of warranty) malfunction? Or will it be a case of you can not help since warranty period has expired? Do you ever give thought to that you twat?
569  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3+ Discussion and Support Thread on: February 05, 2015, 12:26:58 AM
I am a representative of Bitmain. Absolutely upgrade to 12/19, it is the most stable of all S3 firmwares and fixes a critical bug.

That is bitmain's flaw to have you as a representative if they actually do. Saying that, I've never seen bitmain refer to you as their representative anywhere.

In any case, you should know that it is adequate to simply update cgminer in the Aug firmware as the reset button (your favourite excuse) works well. Just the stratum bug that was fixed in cgminer 4.6.1 needs to be corrected in the Aug firmware, but you did not even ask the OP to check for cgminer version before suggesting your firmware update (for all we know, his unit may have an updated cgminer from the previous owner!).

EDIT: And why do you insist on posting links to your firmware updates rather than refer people to the bitmain site? Does that link contain your own edited firmware where you've introduced suttle bugs to steal hash-rate or some other sinister stuff under the cover of a bitmain representative?

Because 12/19 is no longer hosted on bitmaintech, you can verify the MD5 is identical. Please take any scam accusations to the scam accusation subforum as its off topic here.

If it is no longer hosted by bitmain, then anyone in their right mind should never install it as it is junk firmware and will surely invalidate any warranty they may have. It is well documented, and been brought to your attention several times, that the firmware you refer people to causes all sorts of problems but you refuse to take any notice of it.

The most recent person you tried to ram your firmware up clearly has a pre-S3+ rig, i.e Aug firmware, and those particular units have been known to have a decayed performance with the latter firmware releases, but you still jumped at the opportunity to refer them to your special upgrade .... how daft is that?

If you think I am making any un-reasonable accusations, feel free to open a scam accusation thread against me. And your private firmware updates aree the off-topic ones in as far as this thread is concerned! All firmware upgrades SHOULD be downloaded from the bitmain site, not from your stash of compromised firmwares. How bitmain let you potentialy tarnish their image beggars the question, are you their hatchet man? Fortunately, this is not a bitmain forum.
570  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3+ Discussion and Support Thread on: February 04, 2015, 11:33:13 PM
I am a representative of Bitmain. Absolutely upgrade to 12/19, it is the most stable of all S3 firmwares and fixes a critical bug.

That is bitmain's flaw to have you as a representative if they actually do. Saying that, I've never seen bitmain refer to you as their representative anywhere.

In any case, you should know that it is adequate to simply update cgminer in the Aug firmware as the reset button (your favourite excuse) works well. Just the stratum bug that was fixed in cgminer 4.6.1 needs to be corrected in the Aug firmware, but you did not even ask the OP to check for cgminer version before suggesting your firmware update (for all we know, his unit may have an updated cgminer from the previous owner!).

EDIT: And why do you insist on posting links to your firmware updates rather than refer people to the bitmain site? Does that link contain your own edited firmware where you've introduced suttle bugs to steal hash-rate or some other sinister stuff under the cover of a bitmain representative?
571  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S5: 1155GH(+OverClock Potential), In Stock $0.25/GH & 0.51W/GH on: February 04, 2015, 10:25:57 PM
Today I added a Delta AFC1212DE which has 148cfm at 3900 rpm which is being run through molex so it's going full speed. I also have a second fan running in a pull configuration at 1800 rpm. But for some odd reason Row 1 is 58 degrees and row two is 44. There is A LOT of air being pushed and pulled through this miner, why is one side way hotter? Should I RMA? I've only been running it for 5 days. I should also add I'm running it at the stock 350 setting. So no overclocking. Also the temperature in the garage is 58 degrees Fahrenheit / 14 degrees Celsius.

EDIT 1: It has now started restarting mining every 7 minutes or so. It will be at 1Th then all of a sudden drop to 0 and then start to climb back up. There are no X's.
Nothing un-usual about the 58, 48 temp readings (mine has 44, 50 at night-time and up to 52, 59 day-time with just an S3 fan), but worrying in your instance are the restarts .... you need to get in touch with some-one directly at bitmain.
572  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3+ Discussion and Support Thread on: February 04, 2015, 09:43:38 PM
Or he could have a DNS clash.
Turns out he had the former .... simply setting DHCP on the active connection.
Saying that, what does a DNS clash look like?
573  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3+ Discussion and Support Thread on: February 04, 2015, 09:34:44 PM
While you're at it, update firmware to 20141219, its a critical update. Download is here.
Ignore him! If it ain't broke, don't fix it!
The only thing you'd need to update with the Aug firmware is cgminer, not the firmware else you run the risk of bricking your rig, even worse, installing dodgy firmware (of which there are loads for the S3 variants)!
574  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3+ Discussion and Support Thread on: February 04, 2015, 08:01:51 PM
Ok sorry, this is what I got
Firmware Version   Tue Aug 26 10:43:10 CST 2014
Kernel Version   3.10.12

By not working I mean that I plugged it, pointed it to my pool, tarted to mine for like 10 seconds and then started to beep.
After that I get no hash at all and the page system->miner status shows no information available

Beeping is more commonly associated with network connection failure, but you seem to have covered that. (though I'd make sure DHCP is enabled on the active connection nevertheless)
Try manually starting cgminer via the System -> Startup tab. Click on Stop first then click on Start.
575  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3+ Discussion and Support Thread on: February 04, 2015, 07:47:25 PM
Hello, I  aquired a couple of antminers s3+ an one is working fine but the other is not Sad the log says:

Can anybody help me please   Huh

Make sure network is set to DHCP .... also what firmware are you running (you can get this from the intial web UI page when you log in)

I am using Load: 0.06 0.10 0.07 | Auto Refresh: on and DHCP is on
Go to status - overview for the firmware date ...

Can you also be more explicit about the "not working". Is it not hashing at all or is it not hashing well?
576  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3+ Discussion and Support Thread on: February 04, 2015, 07:39:36 PM
Hello, I  aquired a couple of antminers s3+ an one is working fine but the other is not Sad the log says:

Can anybody help me please   Huh

Make sure network is set to DHCP .... also what firmware are you running (you can get this from the intial web UI page when you log in)
577  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [GUIDE] Strato's Antminer S5 Vertical Mounting Setup Guide - OC with Less Heat on: February 04, 2015, 06:52:20 PM
Stand the Miner Vertical.  Set it up like I drafted it out in my Op Post. See the heat difference. See the OC capability difference.

I have 24 of these. Im not making this up.

Yes the S5 is easilly a 1300 Ghash miner. All it takes is a 90 Degree Rotation of the unit.

Strato
Was not disputing any of your claims, just dogie's waffle responses.
I know the S5 is easily a 1300Gh/s + miner (mine is at 1350 albeit at a higher freq), but now you got me thinking of the S3 variants too .... aka the vertical position.
578  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S5: 1155GH(+OverClock Potential), In Stock $0.25/GH & 0.51W/GH on: February 04, 2015, 05:50:19 PM
I've posted a guide on how we've configured our Antminer S5 Units - by clustering them on a small in expensive shelving unit and mounting them vertically.

We're able to keep temps well under 60C - and overclock to 393.75.

The vertical config works great - and we are only using a single fan system for cooling. (Delta Replacement Fan).

Here's a link to the Guide:    https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=945775.msg10356519#msg10356519

Cheers!

Strato

Nice concepts applied there, aka pointing the rigs up, though I suppose it limits the number of rigs in a space as you can not then stack another set atop them.

Looking forward to your forthcoming guide ..... had a glimpse of the initial thread before the party pooper reared its ugly head!
579  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [GUIDE] Strato's Antminer S5 Vertical Mounting Setup Guide - OC with Less Heat on: February 04, 2015, 05:45:56 PM
Strato - nice concepts applied here .... still out on the extra cost of that huge fan though ...


They're designed EXACTLY to trap the flow and prevent it from escaping.

Thats nonsense. With the fan that ships with the S5, there's no chane of trapping anything between the blades. In any case, why trap the heat in the first place?

You want that air to continue down the entire length of the blades before being allowed to exit, else you end up with an even larger temperature gradient down the blades.

Thats waffle.

The curved design also adds significant surface area [heat transfer] for the same amount of material and volume.

Absolute nonsense! You mean the same material occupies less area when curved. Curving does NOT increase surface area (let alone significantly).

As a last point, passive convection effects are almost negligible in regards to heat removal when you have active convection operating.

So what's this all about then? "They're designed EXACTLY to trap the flow and prevent it from escaping."
580  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Spondoolies-Tech vs Bitmain for a larger operation? on: February 03, 2015, 10:41:17 AM
Yes, it makes it less of a gamble.  You can make it so there is no risk if you want.  Your point is?

This ...

.... Having a naked position in mining is gambling. ...

Hedging your position in mining is gambling too. I'll go further and say bitcoin mining is gambling to a large extent.

Anything you mention in the same context as hedging IS gambling, that is without doubt.
It reduces risk, makes things less of a gamble.  Anyways, I was just trying to point the OP in the right direction, not focus on the defination of words.  I am not sure if this is getting off top.
There .... you said it yourself ..... makes things less of a gamble.
I did not want to digress but you've forced my hand .....

It's not just the semantics of whether mining is gambling that you definitely got wrong, or whether hedging your position in mining makes it less so (not negating the fact it is gambling though), it is that you can make such a contradiciting statement, pretend to be ignorant of your error and then proceed to advise on something else! Staggering!
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!