GRSers, we need your help.
DigiByte needs Groestl hash (myriadcoin-groestl) to get SegWit to its 70% threshold.
Don't do it for us though - do it because it's profitable. With the optimized sph-miner, you can mine the equivalent of 2.5 GRS per MHs per day (20 MHs = 50 GRS a day). If you want to mine the most profitable coin to mine right now, swap algos in your config file, then point your rigs to https://www.miners-pool.eu/pools/digibyte%20-%20groestl . No registration required. Just put your DGB address in the user name field, and mine away. (You'll find wallet installs at http://digibyte.co/ or https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=408268.0 . Thanks in advance for all your help.  This is the wrong thread, also there are more pools out there supporting segwit ... Please spam somehwere else Yes I know there are more pools out there, yours being one of them. Unfortunately your DGB Groestl pool has been down all afternoon. And this isn't spam. It's a request for help . . . but with folks like you and Srcxxx, for example, I wasn't sure if I should even try, and I use the word unfortunately again since you seem to be showing me that my first inclination was correct. A little camaraderie was just too much to expect. And to think that I was even starting to warm up to Groestl once again.  No problem asking for help, its just the way you ask it. When asking for help write down all the pools that are signalling segwit and not just 1. Otherwise it looks like endorsement/advertisement for that 1 pool. I can understand why ocminer was offended, he is a fair guy. Scrxxx is not involved in GRS since 2014, no need to mention him. We got a total new team since then. Let bygones be bygones. For what its worth i have asked my mining friends to help you and Litecoin out with signalling. Good luck with signalling. Hi there jackie, No prob. As I mentioned, ocminer's DGB Groestl pool was down all afternoon yesterday - you could hardly recommend a pool that wasn't working, could you? If you look at my second to last tweet, I was also recommending DigiHash, but (and this is on the BCT forum if you want to check) it was later confirmed to be down as well. I wasn't sure about the 2 other remaining pools (one of which is in the US with high latency for those of us in Europe) and they both require signup registration. You know what they say about the word assume. What might "look like" one thing could very well be another, and in this case with a little common sense, just a few minutes reading, and a little cooler head, the response to my request for help might have been very different. On the other hand, maybe not. Hot heads are difficult to cool.  Scrxxx is still on your OP by the way. (Good to hear that he's not with you anymore.) And thanks for asking your friends to help out with signalling. We've got over the 70% threshold. 6 more days to go. Oh, and the profitability for the last 24 hours sure wouldn't have disappointed you either! Cheers, The pool was down since it was upgraded to signal segwit as well - as you requested. Unfortunately the wallet didn't upgrade correctly from the old codebase to version 6.x without a full resync, so it took some time. Maybe ask 'your' devs to fix that so that upgrades go quicker. The pool is up and working well since then. However.. Again, This is the groestl thread - not dgb... Nobody else experience that "issue" with the full resync you mention. What would that be, 6 or 7 days for you? And how can you explain that your pool was working fine the night before? Thing is that it "looks like" your pool was down without you knowing it exactly when you were blasting me. Kind of ironic, don't you think? But I could be wrong of course, and, since it's irrelevant, I don't really care. With attitudes and after the fact contradictions like yours, it's really hard to understand exactly what you're trying to communicate. As far as this not being the DGB thread, is there anything that's been written here by anyone about assisting DGB Groestl signalling that suggests anyone is mistaken about this being the Groestl thread? And you've said it twice now.  Not to worry. I'm not bothered. Just trying to point out a couple of things that may help you in the future. And thanks again to jackielove4u and friends who have so kindly shown their support. |
|
|
|
BCT deleted a LOL post of mine in reply yesterday. (It was just that, three letters, "LOL", and it was deleted, as off topic . . . something that replied appropriately to a ludicrous post by a core dash hypester . . . go figure.)
That bid lasted about 2 seconds. It was erroneous data. Good catch by qwizzie though, although I would have expected he had better things to do than stay glued to the Polo order book.
Mh.. must have been longer on there. I seldom check that order book on polo and even I saw it. It was likely the reason why dash picked up the rise after the 0.061 step. Anyway. What puzzles me most this day is that there is this PIVX coin that gained a factor 300 since the begin of 2017 and you hardly see FUD and how it is unjustified and it will drop like a stone and all this trolls in the thread. It is just calm. DASH gained a factor 5 or 10 and this thread was full of the worst ppl telling how this is unjustified and it will crash and ppl crying rainbows and so many new trolls and wannabe traders and attention whores and full of themselfs... it was just plain ugly as if the world will end just because dash gained a bit value. How dare this coin to gain some value! Ignoring that other coins and not just that pivx gained a lot more and even keept the value after. ppl are wired Time for you to get over there with all the issues their supporters deny. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1262920.0Could also be that it's still only worth $2.16? Or it might be a Polo thingy? Put on your thinking cap. |
|
|
|
Any news? I see Myriad wasn't delisted from poloniex even though it had no volume for the last two years which is weird... and now the price wakes up along with the volume..
whats up?
It's one of those long term winners with no scams, no hype, no P&D - just long term real sustainable organic growth that results from it being a rock solid crypto - that will still be there steadily climbing when the current poorly coded fads come crashing down. JMHO of course. |
|
|
|
Found the Groestl miners address they are mining too https://digiexplorer.info/address/DLPgKoaJA6VAREBBzgWvkcncbtj7PB3JKrOver 114 million DigiBytes mined. Considering we only have about 5.1 million new DGB per day, this guy has probably been a loyal DGB miner for a year or more. Probably has just not heard of the update yet. Don't think they are intentionally trying to stop us. Let's keep getting the update word out! so this guy brings my faith back to multi algo coins! i always thought.. "5 algos = 5 different ports on one multipool" ( high centralization, dumping coins for btc ). if he knows that he sits on a vlaue of ~ 70 btc now? Yes, that's right. Succinctly explained (better than I could) on the website: You can mine DigiByte on one of five separate mining algorithms. Each algo averages out to mine 20% of new blocks. This allows for much greater decentralization than other blockchains. In order for an attacker to hardfork DigiByte the attacker would need to control 93% of the hashrate on 1 algo, and 51% of the other 4 making DigiByte much more secure against PoW attacks than other blockchains. http://digibyte.co/digibyte-blockchain-faqs Also here on the OP (although the print is so small that it's understandable that you could have missed it - an issue I've already raised):  |
|
|
|
LOL FUD and lies continue Save 30 seconds of your life and skip to the last paragraph, if you think you can get the stink of cointelegraph off of your browser. Otherwise treat it like anything else they publish, and don't bother at all. That last paragraph is what demonstrates that the article ISN'T FUD. But you didn't stop to think before your knee jerk reaction, did you? It is what it is, nothing more and nothing less, both sides of the coin, and with so much talk here about the subject and nobody having posted the article, I thought I'd throw it out there for you, without predisposed bias and to be treated as objectively as was written. Next time try being civil and thinking a bit. Sensationalizing old, and increasingly irrelevant 'news' IS FUD. Published 10 hours ago. Hey, everyone's got their own opinion - the trick is knowing how to express it in civilized terms. Best of luck to you. Peoples Kee jerk reaction are because this issue was fixed over a year ago and was reported by the Monero Lab 2 years ago. don't forget this code was inherited just like all the bitcoin clones inherited bitcoins failures. That paper is nothing more than saying what Monero Labs had already found and repaired. THAT is why it is FUD. Put your reading glasses on. You know what aggressive responses to impartial and objective reporting signal, don't you? Case closed. |
|
|
|
This is what a 14.4K buy-order looks like on Poloniex :  For now i'm calling it the MOABO (mother of all buy orders), but please correct me if you have seen larger buy-orders. i'm actually curious what the largest buy-order is that you have ever seen for Dash.... Catched my attention yesterday too. I wonder how can have one such a large sum on an exchange and sleep at night !? BCT deleted a LOL post of mine in reply yesterday. (It was just that, three letters, "LOL", and it was deleted, as off topic . . . something that replied appropriately to a ludicrous post by a core dash hypester . . . go figure.) That bid lasted about 2 seconds. It was erroneous data. Good catch by qwizzie though, although I would have expected he had better things to do than stay glued to the Polo order book. |
|
|
|
Sorry for noob question. But is the segwit activated already? Or we need to wait for next period? We just started a new Started period so you could pretty much take the information quoted below as though it had been written yesterday. We just released v6.14.2 which fixes the wallet loading delay where a wallet might take 20+ minutes to open ( should open within a minute or two):
Download here:https://github.com/digibyte/digibyte/releases/tag/v6.14.2Current Segwit activation can be tracked here: https://segwit.digiexplorer.info/The soft fork progresses through 4 phases: THRESHOLD_DEFINED, THRESHOLD_STARTED, THRESHOLD_LOCKED_IN, THRESHOLD_ACTIVE, THRESHOLD_FAILED, Earliest we might see locked in is about 12 days from now. Threshold = 70% Period = 1 week (1 week for Started, 1 week for Locked In & 1 week for active.. this is 2 weeks for each for LTC & BTC) |
|
|
|
GRSers, we need your help.
DigiByte needs Groestl hash (myriadcoin-groestl) to get SegWit to its 70% threshold.
Don't do it for us though - do it because it's profitable. With the optimized sph-miner, you can mine the equivalent of 2.5 GRS per MHs per day (20 MHs = 50 GRS a day). If you want to mine the most profitable coin to mine right now, swap algos in your config file, then point your rigs to https://www.miners-pool.eu/pools/digibyte%20-%20groestl . No registration required. Just put your DGB address in the user name field, and mine away. (You'll find wallet installs at http://digibyte.co/ or https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=408268.0 . Thanks in advance for all your help. This is the wrong thread, also there are more pools out there supporting segwit ... Please spam somehwere else Yes I know there are more pools out there, yours being one of them. Unfortunately your DGB Groestl pool has been down all afternoon. And this isn't spam. It's a request for help . . . but with folks like you and Srcxxx, for example, I wasn't sure if I should even try, and I use the word unfortunately again since you seem to be showing me that my first inclination was correct. A little camaraderie was just too much to expect. And to think that I was even starting to warm up to Groestl once again. No problem asking for help, its just the way you ask it. When asking for help write down all the pools that are signalling segwit and not just 1. Otherwise it looks like endorsement/advertisement for that 1 pool. I can understand why ocminer was offended, he is a fair guy. Scrxxx is not involved in GRS since 2014, no need to mention him. We got a total new team since then. Let bygones be bygones. For what its worth i have asked my mining friends to help you and Litecoin out with signalling. Good luck with signalling. Hi there jackie, No prob. As I mentioned, ocminer's DGB Groestl pool was down all afternoon yesterday - you could hardly recommend a pool that wasn't working, could you? If you look at my second to last tweet, I was also recommending DigiHash, but (and this is on the BCT forum if you want to check) it was later confirmed to be down as well. I wasn't sure about the 2 other remaining pools (one of which is in the US with high latency for those of us in Europe) and they both require signup registration. You know what they say about the word assume. What might "look like" one thing could very well be another, and in this case with a little common sense, just a few minutes reading, and a little cooler head, the response to my request for help might have been very different. On the other hand, maybe not. Hot heads are difficult to cool. Scrxxx is still on your OP by the way. (Good to hear that he's not with you anymore.) And thanks for asking your friends to help out with signalling. We've got over the 70% threshold. 6 more days to go. Oh, and the profitability for the last 24 hours sure wouldn't have disappointed you either! Cheers, |
|
|
|
LOL FUD and lies continue Save 30 seconds of your life and skip to the last paragraph, if you think you can get the stink of cointelegraph off of your browser. Otherwise treat it like anything else they publish, and don't bother at all. That last paragraph is what demonstrates that the article ISN'T FUD. But you didn't stop to think before your knee jerk reaction, did you? It is what it is, nothing more and nothing less, both sides of the coin, and with so much talk here about the subject and nobody having posted the article, I thought I'd throw it out there for you, without predisposed bias and to be treated as objectively as was written. Next time try being civil and thinking a bit. Sensationalizing old, and increasingly irrelevant 'news' IS FUD. Published 10 hours ago. Hey, everyone's got their own opinion - the trick is knowing how to express it in civilized terms. Best of luck to you. |
|
|
|
LOL FUD and lies continue Save 30 seconds of your life and skip to the last paragraph, if you think you can get the stink of cointelegraph off of your browser. Otherwise treat it like anything else they publish, and don't bother at all. That last paragraph is what demonstrates that the article ISN'T FUD. But you didn't stop to think before your knee jerk reaction, did you? It is what it is, nothing more and nothing less, both sides of the coin, and with so much talk here about the subject and nobody having posted the article, I thought I'd throw it out there for you, without predisposed bias and to be treated as objectively as was written. Next time try being civil and thinking a bit. |
|
|
|
SegWit activation is bringing big price appreciation to the coins implementing it. Here's a good thread with the coins in question: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1777136.0Then you can check out their price action on Poloniex or Bittrex or both. Handsome returns for something that looks to be revolutionary without basing itself on Ethereum like hackable code. And Quark would stay Quark - one of the safest algos in existence. Just saying. |
|
|
|
I seeing this project as good . But i see no an announcement on campaign bounty .
If such only a few going to be interested with this project
I fully agree. Communication and information dissemination have got to be improved ASAP. |
|
|
|
Wow, I'm honestly amazed at how Monero is holding on to it's market cap after such a damning academic paper.
It's a sad commentary on the average "investor" in cryptolandia, and nobody's immune. There will be lots of faces ripped off in the coming months and years. "You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time." - Abraham Lincoln Everybody's chickens will come home to roost sooner or later. It's not a question of if, but when. |
|
|
|
GRSers, we need your help.
DigiByte needs Groestl hash (myriadcoin-groestl) to get SegWit to its 70% threshold.
Don't do it for us though - do it because it's profitable. With the optimized sph-miner, you can mine the equivalent of 2.5 GRS per MHs per day (20 MHs = 50 GRS a day). If you want to mine the most profitable coin to mine right now, swap algos in your config file, then point your rigs to https://www.miners-pool.eu/pools/digibyte%20-%20groestl . No registration required. Just put your DGB address in the user name field, and mine away. (You'll find wallet installs at http://digibyte.co/ or https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=408268.0 . Thanks in advance for all your help. This is the wrong thread, also there are more pools out there supporting segwit ... Please spam somehwere else Yes I know there are more pools out there, yours being one of them. Unfortunately your DGB Groestl pool has been down all afternoon. And this isn't spam. It's a request for help . . . but with folks like you and Srcxxx, for example, I wasn't sure if I should even try, and I use the word unfortunately again since you seem to be showing me that my first inclination was correct. A little camaraderie was just too much to expect. And to think that I was even starting to warm up to Groestl once again. |
|
|
|
Quark as it stands now is well known . . .
Can we clearly express in 20 words or less just what that is? We need a starting point, and if we don't know where we've come from or who we currently are, then I would argue that trying to do anything with that basis would indeed be "pissing in the wind". Like the old saying goes, "don't put the cart before the horse". What is Quark well known for? I would also stress the need to try and frame the response in positive since negative thinking usually leads nowhere.I will work on my summary description and post later. Hopefully we'll have something to compare. Cheers, You must not have been around Quark in November/December 2013 there were only a handful of crypto coins on coinmarketcap.com back then and Quark had a all new algo and new security features and was CPU optimized as lots could already foresee the mining monopoly bitcoin was heading toward. Quark was the most innovative creation back then. So I should say that those who have been following this space since 2013 know Quark and Quark is famous. I apologize for my poor use of language, I am an Aussie so slang comes naturally to me. Sorry, but I'm not talking about what Quark was. It's not about what it was, and even less so what those of us who were around in 2013 remember it to be. Quark is no longer famous like it was. It's a fading memory for those who remember it. It's about what Quark is NOW. Obviously the CPU optimized angle no longer works as a marketing strategy. The "all new algo" needs revamping into something like "one of the most secure", for example. What else does it have that can be leveraged into a PR slogan? Still a widely distributed p2p? I think so. What do you guys have to say about Quark's current positive points? (Reading your posts one gets the idea that you want to throw everything out with the bath water.) qrk, cbx, wdc, dgb, mec all the first wave super alts of 2013 are dead I am totally up for throwing the baby out with the bath water. This coin and all those others are a prime example of total not moving with the times in and industry where moving constantly is key to success. In 2014 if we have did what i said and move to POS with a built in dev fund and kept the foundation and development team funded you can be sure qrk would not have sunk to this dead level it is at now. The only good thing qrk had going for it was the novel at the time algo. It has nothing going for it now except the once famous name. Everything else about it needs a radical overhaul. So radical only a coin swap will take care of it. Caution has no place in this industry right now except for those that have such luxury like perhaps the top 3 or 4 coins. There is no point at all qrk just being coin 1001 on cmc going nowhere and getting more and more a distant memory. The only hope is of a collectors coin in perhaps 25 -100 yrs time. Coin swap and burn to a PIVx type codebase is the way to go. Give it more than 3 months and that will not be worth doing either because every coinn and his dog is now switching to masternodes and POS. The only hope is to action it now since we do have a developer with some kind of coding skill as opposed to those other coins that are renting journeyman type devs who will not stick to that project. quark has a few advantages over a lot of these new ones trying to jump on the dash pivx train 1. famous name 2. good distribution 3. a dev that can code and update 4. a good exchange that many dont have btc38 (although we are not on bittrex or polo) 5. many investors outside of this board that are long term investors i suspect many want good returns so they will hold perhaps until 100k sats 6. therefore easy to restore a reasonable cap 7. I suspect some powerful whales. There were 1 million qrk buys at 15000 20000 sats price. I wonder where they are and who is holding them Plan of action... 1. official announcement we are moving to this updated system - think PIVx but with our own improvements tagged on too. I would think - tiered POS levels up to that of the level of becoming a masternode depending on coins held and duration of coins held. Also even masternodes could be tiered and get more for uptime and duration of masternode. I'm sure it would not be hard to think of other improvements too. We need the funding and governance features. MUE just announced going masternode and their price went from 80 sats to 5000 - that is just ANNOUNCED IT that was just the effect of announcing it not implementing it. MUE is not quark. We need a full time dev team. Quark is reduced to this level because of lack of development and community. Where there is no development you will find zero community and interest. Devs even those with great tech abilities are often the worst at marketing and gaining traction for their creations. This thread is dead. There are 3 people discussing the future of qrk. We need a new thread. We need a new coinbase. We need a new dev team and foundation and funding. This dev has skill and can over see all of this but he is hardly ever here and I suspect owns little qrk so has little motivation and incentive. Probably has a great job and isn't going to give that up anytime soon to go full time on qrk. We need bounties for devs that have done this before on other coins and can just replicate their work on QRK. Inaction or caution is the death of coins. I'd rather qrk goes to 0 sats and I close my book on it and move to projects that are moving ahead than sit here twiddling thumbs discussing forever the same things I was discussing 3 yrs ago. Do or die for qrk now. Time is running out. The master-node bandwagon may not have very good horses either. For the moment though, it's getting a big bang for those "taking advantage". Here's another one - they're called Uber-Nodes here. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1040956.0Edit: Here's another one I forgot about that'll cost only half of BATA. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=580725.msg18456746#msg18456746Wouldn't it be easier to just start from scratch? That's essentially what you're talking about. BTW, DGB is far from dead. They're currently working on SegWit activation in fact. (And MEC is still listed on btc38 . . .) |
|
|
|
So here's my "refined" retweet (to all of my 60 followers  . . . but if people start retweeting . . .). https://twitter.com/HR_DGB/status/853182368735211521Better safe than sorry. Point those Groestl miners to either http://digihash.co/ or https://www.miners-pool.eu/ just to be sure. Edit: according to the data Jared reported above, I estimate that with around 1.25Ghs more on Groestl, we'd make the 70% global figure. Time to rent hash power like Jared mentioned on the last round table? (Edit 2: of course that could be a waste if they don't have their wallets upgraded . . .) Digihash Groestl isn't working, confirmed by Jared. They just said on Telegram that Suprnova and Mining pool Hub were both updated, but now I'm unsure. Going to point my miners at miner-pool.eu for the time being Suprnova is currently down too (or at least reporting 0 MHs for the pool). Adding up all the hash of the remaining pools, the 17.4% figure would confirm that they are indeed signalling. The problem is with the private farm that doesn't seem to be aware of the update. We need some push technology incorporated sometime in the future to be able to inform end users who aren't "glued to their screens". |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
