Just to add that noone is writing/signing fiat (real) money when buy something or give to someone. So EU will ban the real money too??
. Before coming on here a pretending to know what your talking about... Read what the new feature set will be for evolution slatted for later this year. For s guy that spends as much time trolling us, you would think you would be better equipped.  And for the record there Mr . know it all... I built up an entire multi-million dollar winery business with mostly cash. With no banking... The old fashioned way.... People like you are brain washed to think you need these other instruments that have record of account and the "man" would have you believe that... But it's rubbish. Okay, I'll take all your affronts with good humor if you are able to truthfully come back and say that you kept all your money under mattresses and in coffee cans buried in your backyard. I suspect you can't, and that after reading this you've now understood how badly you MISunderstood the topic of conversation. In any event, please let me know. You were/would be/are/will always be the exception regardless, and I'm interested in knowing if that exception really exists on the scale you report. |
|
|
|
That's a lot, but I was addressing the single issue of anonymity. Was there something there in your list that deals directly with anonymity and people's fundamental desire to have their store of value (i.e. money) directly and legally identifiable and tied to them, and the negative impact on mass adoption that the absence of such would or would not have? If you could just post the pertinent link, it would be of great help. TIA |
|
|
|
Just to add that noone is writing/signing fiat (real) money when buy something or give to someone. So EU will ban the real money too??
That is when they choose to spend a small portion of their money using cash. The rest is safely and securely linked to their person (or entity) in a legally binding and recognized way. Their "cash" may be stolen without trace, but the rest can't. There's a big difference between paying for a coffee with cash, and carrying around the equivalent of a masternode in that wallet. It's not too big a deal if someone robs me of my walking around cash, but it can be quiet ruinous if my masternode is stolen and it's impossible to show where it went or who did it. |
|
|
|
Something traceable that they can demonstrate is Does anyone really believe that anonymity is viable long term? That is if you really want to take a cryptocurrency mainstream? Does anyone think that ordinary people will entrust their hard earned money to a system that does not allow them to prove their ownership of that same hard earned money? I think people want their name and Social Security number stamped on the transaction inside the blockchain, and that they also want their transactions to be traceable. I invite you all to try to stay on topic (this is central to cryptocurrencies) and "discuss" this issue without insults and intimidation. It shouldn't be too awfully hard since it is rather subjective and opinion oriented to begin with - there are no hard facts to hide from - and we can share our opinions about what the ordinary man and woman on the street want when choosing what kind of money they want to use. Something traceable that they can demonstrate is theirs in a court of law, or something anonymous which they can never prove is really theirs after being hacked or simply making a mistake with who they sent the money to? A bearer instrument/token derives its entire value base from consolidating possession and ownership into a single asset. There are no 'owners' with bearer instruments. There are only holders. That's what makes them able to 'back' other assets where the owner is distinct from the backing collateral. It's also why blockchains must remain transparent if they want to consolidate that monetary archetype. If people want an asset with their name on it, encrypted transfers and endorsed ownership they can get themselves a bank account. And that's why people only carry a certain amount of cash and why most choose to use credit cards. So your opinion is to forget about mass adoption all together? |
|
|
|
Does anyone really believe that anonymity is viable long term? That is if you really want to take a cryptocurrency mainstream? Does anyone think that ordinary people will entrust their hard earned money to a system that does not allow them to prove their ownership of that same hard earned money? I think people want their name and Social Security number stamped on the transaction inside the blockchain, and that they also want their transactions to be traceable. I invite you all to try to stay on topic (this is central to cryptocurrencies) and "discuss" this issue without insults and intimidation. It shouldn't be too awfully hard since it is rather subjective and opinion oriented to begin with - there are no hard facts to hide from - and we can share our opinions about what the ordinary man and woman on the street want when choosing what kind of money they want to use. Something traceable that they can demonstrate is theirs in a court of law, or something anonymous which they can never prove is really theirs after being hacked or simply making a mistake with who they sent the money to? |
|
|
|
Oh you're still here. What made you decide to become a Dash troll? Depends on how you define a troll. If it is something along the lines of: a person posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal, on-topic discussion then you and the rest of the Dash Cheerleaders had better take a look in the mirror. Because everything you all post is only designed to provoke emotional responses (albeit positive - as in positive for the people lining their pockets) that disrupts all efforts at taking a serious and objective look at Dash. On topic in this case would be intelligent discussions regarding the technology, the "early fast mine", the math behind a sustainable masternode network, etc., all of which is impossible to do thanks to the persistent efforts on the part of the Dash Cheerleaders to stay off-topic with the extraneous (give me a D, give me an A, give me a S, give me a H, what does that spell?), inflammatory remarks (directed at those who pose the difficult, very on-topic questions to deal with), and otherwise disrupt all intents to raise the level of discussion. And the reason why this is done is obvious if you consider just who most benefits from that strategy. It doesn't take a rocket scientist, just a little common sense. You're all very lucky to have people like us warning you now, when price is high and you can get out. What you'd better be concerned with is the troll's troll, who comes around to rub salt in your wounds once price has crashed.And on top of it all, you're all a bunch of ingrates. Are you beginning to understand. And normal people don't spend much time with the likes of that. |
|
|
|
More exchanges, ATM machines, business development, for what? All of that will disappear thanks to the self-destructing design of DASH. It's a major design flaw that nobody has seemed to notice. You seem to want look like an expert. Listen, you are free to fork it. Make it better. People surely come to support you mentally and financially. Go and make it real. Stop looking like emotionally driven SJW. (And then let me know when you find buyers for $100,000 masternodes for a cryptocurrency that trades in the dumps for lack of tradable shares, and I’ll start an escrow house for you.)
I just found few for the start. They were there yesterday  (btw, in case you don't know, expert, 1000 Dash isn't a unit of this currency)  Do you feel better now? |
|
|
|
All replies are lacking in substance and (I suppose) capability, and it’s true to form that subnormal responses are the only kind of response anyone from DASH is capable of. It’s not surprising; it’s actually expected as confirmation as to how the DASH to TRASH phenomenon is able to exist.This model doesn't work!
PhD in economics right? This model doesn't work!
PhD in economics right? I assume that the last time this guy has seen maths was at elementary school This model doesn't work!
PhD in economics right? I assume that the last time this guy has seen maths was at elementary school I think it's just that after 2 years of dismissive trolling didn't work, he thought he might get round to quietly asking some tentative questions. (Albeit thinly disguised as dismissive trolling  ) This model doesn't work!
PhD in economics right? I assume that the last time this guy has seen maths was at elementary school Aside that right now there are 3974 masternodes, not 4100... That makes 120 000 coins difference No he is not good in math.
Not that data observation has anything to do with maths itself . . .
Dash blockchain currently showing 4088 “Master Nodes”. And you strike out on that one too. And then repeating the same mistake twice counts as strike three. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/dash/
You guys are a mess. Let me know when you have something serious to say.
|
|
|
|
I have not bumped this post in a while now, Is there any news that just pushed the price past 33 USD ? +15% +20% against BTC in a few minutes ?? 
Major Exchange Integration in few weeks
Dash added to General Bytes ATM Machines
Another good one to add to my collection. This is huge and could potentially lead to purse.io, coinbase and many others integrating Dash!!!More exchanges, ATM machines, business development, for what? All of that will disappear thanks to the self-destructing design of DASH. It's a major design flaw that nobody has seemed to notice. Right now there are over 4,100 masternodes. That’s more than 4,100,000 DASH locked up as collateral (over 57% of circulating supply). Aside from the fact that this severely limits the number of DASH available for trading (and the fact that little more than 10% of total circulating supply has actually traded on the run up over the last month – a paltry figure that equates more with thinly traded OTC stocks than with major Blue Chips), it ultimately leads to a self-defeating vicious cycle into its own self-destruction. Not only does the “interest” earned by each masternode fall with every additional masternode added to the network, the number of “shares” available for actual trading also diminishes. Once the number hits 6000, the “interest” earned will fall below 6%. With all the notoriety that DASH is currently getting, that could happen shortly. And with 7000 masternodes “interest” would fall below 4.5% a year. But what’s more serious is that there would only be a little over 168,000 DASH available “on the market” available for trading.Price would literally be determined by a handful of cronies playing games with each other. Not at all a realistic price discovery model.The only “trading” in existence would be the buying of selling of masternodes, and that would ultimately resemble something that looks more escrow structured in character, something more like real estate, and something that looks nothing like an exchange dealing with liquid instruments like cash. The success of the whole scheme leads to its own death in so far as highly liquid, non-manipulated exchange trading goes, and obviously the same for being a viable alternative "cash" for that matter. (And then let me know when you find buyers for $100,000 masternodes for a cryptocurrency that trades in the dumps for lack of tradable shares, and I’ll start an escrow house for you.) So, when are the "workarounds" and "fixes" going to start being rolled out? What’s the cap going to be for masternodes? Will you re-brand again? Perhaps "PatchWorkCoin"? |
|
|
|
Just some people who wants to bashing around here. Better don't give them attention. Its the same game as always here on bitcointalk. See guys like this in every thread where is real development ongoing.
The amazing thing, in my opinion, is that after all these years, serious people still allow themselves to get sidetracked by the trolls instead of staying focused on moving forward with their positive ideas and proposals and forgetting about the idiotic distractions and their distrators. I politely explain up to 3 times, but after that I give the nuisance up for dead (and I don't ever even need to use the "ignore" button as a crutch to help me with that - you know, the same thing happens in real life, and what do we do?). |
|
|
|
Just to update everyone on my situation with a Poloniex withdrawal being "hijacked:"
Today I learned that BTC-e will reveal private user information to anybody who asks, but will not recover funds.
Let me explain.
The hacker withdrew the stolen funds to XiYy9fpSTwd35jsri6K2UetYtbJdt1APfh (TX ID: 9f70b83243a890daa85c279e409feb36db40238427220551f392e1dcdb4c5712) and from there to XtM1U21eqWu7JPmKscJeHod74EqR4A6bFS (TX ID: e2e2c4b7dd31f4af1280f626468b1878ea12f9e0b5344f5d4296f78ead84ab6d). Poloniex has been very helpful every step of the way, and the informed me that XtM1U21eqWu7JPmKscJeHod74EqR4A6bFS is a BTC-e address and gave me BTC-e's email address.
I contacted BTC-e and explained everything, and asked that they contact Poloniex for verification that what I said was true and that the funds really were stolen. At first BTC-e was very helpful; I asked if they could see which user deposited funds in XtM1U21eqWu7JPmKscJeHod74EqR4A6bFS and they told me (ltcexchange) and even gave me his email address. This was much more than I had hoped for--I assumed they wouldn't release any information about their users. I then asked if he had any funds that they could confiscate and return to me. BTC-e replied that yes, he had funds in his BTC-e account, but that they had to unfreeze the account because he told them that he didn't steal anything. I asked BTC-e to contact Poloniex and gave them my ticket number, but for whatever reason they refuse to do so.
So they don't believe me when I tell them the funds are stolen and they won't even make an attempt to verify with Poloniex. Fine. But they're going to give user information to any random person that asks?
I'm afraid that's the end of the story. I cannot recover my funds, which I accept. However, I did learn that BTC-e will reveal the identity of their user's upon request. If you trade there, beware.
That's what "dark" gets you. Privacy comes at a cost. Like everything in life. |
|
|
|
Let's do it!
Let's not. Fortunately nobody will because this is one coin that doens't deserved to be revived. Anyone who has a spent even a tiny amoutn of time researching this coin knows it was just a money pit, pumped by shill accounts who have gone missing, projects nobody but an idiot could believe and probaby the most incompetent fan base in the world. Do you have any evidence? Any examples? Maybe even personal experience? When you limit what you say to insult and innuendo, your point always gets lost. |
|
|
|
The development marketing of dash is steady and solid
Fixed ^^it. The cryptography and rest of dash's technology is falling behind Bitcoin every single day. Dash cannot keep up with Bitcoin's rapid development. Dash is based on an outdated fork that is several years behind the current Bitcoin 14.x release. Bitcoin has RBF/CPFP, segwit, and is 1000s of lines of code ahead of Dash's codebase. Dash has none of that, and has managed to break IPv6 functionality. The promised Masternode blinding, IP obfuscation, 2mb blocks, Lamassu ATM, etc. are all goals which have been forgotten in the rush to be the next Paypal. And on top of that, that is to say on top of being the Telsa or Snap of the crypto world, people still can't see the trees for the woods. I'm going to flip if 81.45 (Poloniex) turns out to be a multi-year high (after having put up an EW target of ~81 just a few posts earlier), but that last rally out of the last dip was a 5th with an extended 3rd as well (5 min chart). We'll see . . . . . . how playing with fire ends this time. |
|
|
|
Over 25000 twitter followers and digibyte is 20 sat? Over 20 000 gamers and digibyte is 20 sat ? Coins in the top 20 don't have near this many followers.
You have to be brain dead if you think those figures havent been manipulated.
Here, take some snake oil.
The main thing I would say to refute your accusation is that DGB has a huge current widely distributed float of more than 8 billion which makes it much more organic and almost impossible to manipulate. When contrasting with current high flyers like ETH and DASH, the difference is obvious since their distributions are much more concentrated and only a small percentage of their current "available" supply is actually available for trading, all of which makes them much more easily manipulated. Throw into the equation the concept of the sheeple following the current trend[ing topic] (where 95% of traders lose money) and the difference not only becomes more evident, but you also have a lot of the explanation for why true cryptos like DGB or MYR are making their particular journeys through the proverbial wilderness. Just some ideas to contrast with what you're saying. . . . and the truth is always somewhere in the middle.  Cheers |
|
|
|
Does anyone do Elliot wave analysis of Dash?
Not a big fan of Elliott Wave theory, but, according to the theory, we may have just seen the high, or very close, as ~81 would be the target for the current wave since the theory calls for a wave 5 equal to wave 1 when wave 3 is extended. http://stockcharts.com/school/doku.php?id=chart_school:market_analysis:guidelines_for_applying_elliott_wave_theory The corrections on wave 2 and wave 4 also match well with the idealized extended wave 3 scenario. According to the theory, the big question will be whether the current move is the last of the run-up beginning in October 2015. As I said, I'm not a big fan, I'm more into probability theory, and that would also have the odds very much in favor of it being the last with a 78.6% "pullback" likely being in the cards. ( http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/05/fibonacciretracement.asp ) Good golly Molly! With the prospect of locking in 24 years worth of 10% compounded interest NOW (that's for those who bought at 8 last November!), what do you think? It's pretty obvious even if you don't do fancy calculations. It's common sense, isn't it? |
|
|
|
PS: HR, can’t think of any particular reason other than, because it was posted here at a time near where many traders may be thinking about what they are going to do with their BTC next, not pump DigiByte I’m hoping.
That's what I was thinking too. It would be a very good sign, but I'm not holding my breath. Nevertheless, there are two sides to every coin (pun intended) and I will keep accumulating DGB.  |
|
|
|
when the dump signal for Dash comes, you'll hear it here first. ...once he gets his faulty "signal box" sorted.  WOW! What savoir-faire! So inspiring! Professionalism incarnate! Now I understand how so many can so confidently entrust their hard earned money! (Because if one thing has been made very clear here by supporters and Devs, "investing" in DASH is all about trusting the truly worthy geniuses behind the scenes.) |
|
|
|
Well worth the watch. Nice to see everything successfully maturing while staying true to the underlying principles of the UTXO set. (That's clearly one of the keys for long term success IMHO.) Marketing will come later, or so they continue to say.  I would start with concerted efforts to disseminate this type of youtube communication. 327 views looks more like fringe cult numbers than what one would expect of a widely distributed decentralized cryptocurrency of DigiByte's character. You tube views are better now. 😉 Wow! 2,500 new views in 2 days! After getting only 327 in the first 8 days of its existence. #4 on the all time best list for DigiByte and better than any DigiReport! That's phenomenal . . . if they're real . . . and I don't have any reason to think that they aren't. Anyone have any idea as to what's caused this sudden interest? My favorite is still #3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmDyhKOjNKM (behind #1 & #2 which are DigiByte gaming related) and should be posted everywhere possible, including prominently on the website, IMO. This one's great too with both great content (all implemented) and production values (except for the sound . . .) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-haCDqhaTqc . Let's get these climbing the charts too! |
|
|
|
the fuck is happening to dash? lol it was 0.02 last week O_O 0.06 now!! crazy
I guess pump of the year this time DASH is winner I would say after that pump you should keep away from dash over next 2 years to get some real value. Good i want whales more pump Dash to make BTC community jealous, if they will price decline against DASH they will make needed changes faster. Dash will slap BTC developers/miners in face hahaha... Those folks need to work and make solutions and that is possible with fear of losing ground Yes this is problably "the big one", if not for the year, certainly for Dash anyway (I think we'll see others this year that will dwarf the percentage gains seen here though). As for any sort of rational explanation, by the looks of the limited exchange I've had with developers and holders, I'll have to stick with my initial executive summary from a few days back: The epitome of Dash to Trash? http://lmgtfy.com/?q=dash+to+trashYou know, they named it Dash for a reason, didn't they. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
