Maybe Wemby is affected to much on the attention he gets from media that's why he always get distracted when playing a game since on his mind he don't want to commit a mistake since it will be all over in media and fans will criticize him. While Chet is enjoying some low limelight that's why he can focus on his game and became more better player. Wemby situation is hard since he's all over the news so if he will not meet what fans like to see for sure he will be called bust and that provably hurt his feelings.
Wemby should do more better job since he have all the potential and he should never entertain any distraction so he can perform so well on each games he played.
Initially, the fans were singing Wemby's praises, thinking it would fuel his fire on the court and keep those impressive stats rolling. However, things took a turn for the worse. Can't fault the fans for that though, it's par for the course. If they're not feeling a player's game, criticism is bound to follow; if they're enjoying with it, cheers are in order. Now, Chet is at 17 PPG, Wemby at 19 PPG, and they're neck and neck. Still a bit early to make the call, but it seems like Wemby might be facing some tough challenges especially now that the Spurs are at the bottom of the standing with 8 Losing streak. |
|
|
|
|
To be a winner in gambling, you gotta have certain skills. When I say "successful," I mean raking in a good amount of cash. These skills include being sharp with math and knowing how to keep your cool because if you nail both, making money in gambling isn't some far fetched dream. And yeah, you don't have to hit the books for a stable job since making money through gambling could be the easiest job for you.
Honestly, I don't personally know anyone who made a fortune gambling, but I've heard stories that make me believe it's doable. So, I'm not giving up hope that one day I might hit that success jackpot like a few others. Those names you mentioned? I might just check them out because I know they'll give me that extra boost toward my goal.
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin right now probably can't make you rich, but it can help give a good boost to your net worth — obviously due to price appreciation, and depreciation of fiat currencies.
Bitcoin isn't a get rich quick scheme, it's a not-get-poorer scheme.
Bitcoin is considered a long-term investment, and its value is expected to continue increasing. It serves as a good hedge, especially for countries experiencing hyperinflation with their fiat currencies. Governments that may not be transparent about their economic status, particularly the impact of substantial debts, could potentially surprise their citizens with the existence of hyperinflation. In such cases, being aware of Bitcoin could provide a safeguard, allowing individuals to relocate to other countries if necessary. All they would need is the key to access their Bitcoin wallet, making it a portable and potentially secure asset in times of economic uncertainty. |
|
|
|
|
So, are all the traders out there being controlled by AI?
It could be a game changer, but even with AI, trading still doesn't guarantee profits because there are winners and losers in the market. I don't understand why some people thought AI would automatically make them successful in a guessing game like trading. Predicting price movements in trading is like making educated guesses, and it's heavily influenced by rumors and news. While AI can gather info from news, handling rumors is trickier. Without considering these factors, AI might struggle to provide reliable predictions.
|
|
|
|
I want to verify my exchange account.
Many people will say that you can verify by searching YouTube or Google but I am not interested in that.
I want to learn from our experienced and senior brothers in this forum and know how to get my Binance account verified easily and quickly.
I want your advice.
I don't think this even deserve a thread, you can just simply search on google on how to do it. It's not complicated if you will carefully follow the procedures, since Binance is a regulated exchange, the KYC requirement is the basic requirement and you have to sumbit the necessary documents which is your ID. |
|
|
|
Everyone will be affected since we are in the digital age now. We can't live without the internet; people will panic, and yet the bank could not provide withdrawals as it's on a system basis. So it's important that we stock the necessary supplies in case this would happen, as our money in the bank might not be accessible even through offline or actual visits due to the high demand. But let's hope it will not last long, as even one day, lots of things could already happen since our world moves fast already, and the "no internet" would kill that movement. We will literally be back in the old days without the internet. I will also take a break from bitcointalk if it would happen, i mean everyone of us.  |
|
|
|
|
Welcome back! That's exactly six months since your last login. You came back with good news, and I'm sure the community will be happy to see this. This doesn't happen all the time, as some casinos could just quit their old name, forget their responsibility to refund, and just start a new one. But this action is quite commendable, trying to redeem yourself by keeping your casino's name. If you pass all this, you'll gain back your reputation, so good luck, and hopefully, everything will go well as plan.
|
|
|
|
This is my winning screenshot.  Is that is USD? If so then I woudl say congratulations as I find it a big win. Sometimes watching streamer and being motivated to play unknown games to us brings luck out of nowhere. Keep on trying but just don’t over commit. Trying the unknown and winning big time is really fun experience. It's just that the timing is good for you. But honestly, my principle is not to try my luck on games that I don't know. But you did, so you're a different gambler and lucky at the same time. Just like you, I also don't like this game, but I'm inspired by your win. So, let's see if it will tempt me to try it.
searching this name (xposed ) in youtube now  |
|
|
|
Obviously Shakur is way below the 135 pounds limit. Nevertheless I don't see any problem with it. There's some trash talking during the face off, however, I understand that Edwin speak little English. But obviously, boxing has no language barrier, someone's ass gonna be whoop this weekend though.
So, it's a go. But isn't this fight happening tomorrow? So, it's not yet the weekend, unless we have a different timezone. But anyway, thanks for the update. Although this fight isn't as hype as the fights of the KO artist, I'm interested to see how De Los Santos would solve the problems Shakur's opponents have faced in the past.
I don't know mate, I have a feeling that Shakur might go in this fight and trying to proved himself in this division. So he will be looking for a KO win, and definitely I think he will be fast here. I'm thinking that he will go enough for the body of Edwin and test it out.
And he is the taller guy, I'm not saying the bigger but the taller in terms of height. It looks like Edwin is a big smaller in this division. I mentioned this because I'm again, seeing that Stevenson will take advantage of his height and length and jab and then look for the body of Edwin to try and soften him and then he will take the heads later.
That's a wild imagination, my friend. But of course, we never know what could happen here. As Shakur is a proven winner, he would easily win through points since he is quicker. However, if he looks to impress the fans and not be tagged as a boring fighter like Haney, then he should probably go for the knockout win against a boxer who's never been KO'd. |
|
|
|
Looks like the NBA made the decision to suspend Draymond for 5 games for his choke on Rudy Gobert. Honestly, I was expecting at least a 6 game suspension, but the NBA is pretty lenient when it comes to fighting (in my opinion). Draymond has a long history of this though, so I would’ve liked to have seen him get a little bit longer of a suspension.
Fair enough, what he did was unacceptable, so he has to learn a lesson from that. Now, the Warriors will struggle more as they lose one of their key players. Draymond should have thought of that before he made that stupid choking gesture.
Anyway, tonight we are going to see the Suns finally playing their big 3 together. They'll be facing the Wolves, and let's see if they can start a winning streak. Currently, they are on a 2-game losing streak, but it should end tonight. |
|
|
|
So gonna be hard to predict the fight. But if we are looking for a good odds, then yes, winning via KO is good as the odds is still as high as 3.x something. As maybe De Los Santos might just be good in paper, but when they go out in the ring, he will be overwhelmed by Shakur's technical ability and he can't adjust and then just being bully in the ring by Stevenson's boxing IQ.
The only good thing about De Los Santos is that he has a high KO rate; other than that, I don't see anything special about him. I'm sure Shakur has fought opponents before with a better resume. Since De Los Santos is a KO artist, he will likely play his style and chase Shakur to try to knock him down. So, there's a big chance that Shakur could also win via KO, as De Los Santos would be vulnerable if he keeps chasing while disrespecting the power of Shakur and not maintaining good defense. |
|
|
|
|
When we use a banking service, we have to comply with their rules, and I understand why they don't want our account to be associated with mixers because it will be hard for them to trace transactions. To ease their job, they require that all transactions we go through have a clear identity, either a person or a business.
This is quite simple to understand: if we use mixers, let's not use banks, as these two are in conflict. Banks promote transparency, and they advertise that they keep our privacy within their systems and with regulators. So, if we don't trust them on that, we can always go fully crypto with the help of mixers to achieve anonymity, although it's not guaranteed.
|
|
|
|
|
You can try different gambling sites, though. Every gambling site has its own rules, and as long as you are not scammed, you should be fine. You know, experience teaches us a good lesson, and we can always find a gambling site that we feel comfortable using. I have used a lot of crypto casinos, but based on my personal experience, Duelbets and Sportsbet have the best customer support; they'll reply right away. With regards to KYC, they haven't asked me to comply yet, so I'm okay with them.
|
|
|
|
What percentage of bitcoin investors are gamblers ? Where will this figure be if we consider worldwide users ? I think it will be somewhere between 10-20% ? Also, it is possible that most of gamblers are still not bitcoin investors ? I see less chances of the later happening.
Its difficult to guarantee a definitive answer to your question. Even if you conduct a survey on this forum or any other platform, its not guaranteed that you will receive an accurate answer because some investors might prefer to keep their privacy and choose not to answer. We can make assumptions, but ultimately they may not be relevant. Yeah, Exactly, and honestly, I don't think these surveys are needed. From what I've seen, there are a ton of crypto enthusiast who are more into gambling than investing. I'm even leaning towards thinking we've got more gamblers than actual investors. See, when people are all serious about investing, they usually have to throw in a big chunk of money to have a shot at a decent return. It's the opposite for gamblers, though—they toss in a little and hope for a huge payout. Here's my guess: Out of the 100% who are investors, I figure only about 1% of them are real gamblers. And by real investors, I mean not those who bail on their investment the moment things start feeling too much like a wild gamble. And that is where they are wrong, there is a reason why the rich will always get richer, there is a reason why investors will always have the best result, all these requires money, I mean good amount of money, but just because you don't have the big amount for investment and gambling seem like the best solution is foolishness. It's not easy to make money they say, and this word is so on point, this is nothing but the easy way out, if 100s of people decide to walk in this path of luck maybe only one or two will come out with good results, all the rest are going to lose their money. Investors don't find it easy to invest, but they get used to it, they also need money but to get the best result they have to wait for years, those who don't have the money don't want to wait, it's not that they can't find the money, it takes not so much money to be a good investment, but many people just like the idea of quick result. Most of the so called investors that has few money to start with investing are not so patient, so their approach would be aggressive even consider their type of investment like a gambling, you know, when it comes to investing in the crypto space, bitcoin nowadays aren't really bringing much profit unlike in the early stage, so they are looking for an alternative coins that is quite new to the market and hoping it will boom like x100 return but without realizing that the level of risk is very high, that's why it's comparable to gambling since both have higher risk of losing while despite there's a better side, you'll only enjoy if if you are are lucky enough. Success does not measure through luck, it's more on how you handle your investment using your knowledge and skills and it will not happen overnight. Take that world "patience", and everything you do is considered as gambling. |
|
|
|
But here comes the most intriguing question: is the level of privacy provided by these tools enough to protect our identities and activities in the digital world? Or should we be focusing on developing new solutions and improvements to further safeguard our privacy in the Bitcoin ecosystem?
Achieving privacy becomes possible if we avoid services that demand KYC requirements. Keep in mind, with blockchain, once a record is written, it's permanently public. So, if we maintain anonymity and refrain from complying with KYC, even if others see our address, they won't know who it belongs to. The problem arises when we do go through KYC. If we still want to keep our anonymity, which is already challenging, our only option is to use a mixer to blend our transactions, making it tough to trace. However, take note that while mixers make it difficult, it doesn't make it impossible to discover transaction origins. Therefore, it seems avoiding the KYC route is the most effective way to preserve our privacy in this context. |
|
|
|
What percentage of bitcoin investors are gamblers ? Where will this figure be if we consider worldwide users ? I think it will be somewhere between 10-20% ? Also, it is possible that most of gamblers are still not bitcoin investors ? I see less chances of the later happening.
Its difficult to guarantee a definitive answer to your question. Even if you conduct a survey on this forum or any other platform, its not guaranteed that you will receive an accurate answer because some investors might prefer to keep their privacy and choose not to answer. We can make assumptions, but ultimately they may not be relevant. Yeah, Exactly, and honestly, I don't think these surveys are needed. From what I've seen, there are a ton of crypto enthusiast who are more into gambling than investing. I'm even leaning towards thinking we've got more gamblers than actual investors. See, when people are all serious about investing, they usually have to throw in a big chunk of money to have a shot at a decent return. It's the opposite for gamblers, though—they toss in a little and hope for a huge payout. Here's my guess: Out of the 100% who are investors, I figure only about 1% of them are real gamblers. And by real investors, I mean not those who bail on their investment the moment things start feeling too much like a wild gamble. |
|
|
|
We are well aware of the risks associated with playing at a non-KYC casino, but we are willing to accept those risks in order to enjoy full privacy and anonymity. It's similar to using a bitcoin mixer, we understand its association with money laundering and other illegal activities, yet we still use it for the purpose of gaining anonymity. After all, crypto is supposed to provide us with anonymity, and we are simply trying to achieve that goal.
There’s already non-KYC casino that is complete decentralized. It doesn’t need you create an account and you can play by just interacting to smart contracts. The only danger is if you didn’t know how to read code but most of this casino is open source and has a smart contract audit that is equivalent on having license to check their code. They are just offering simple games that’s why they are not popular and also they don’t of VIP rewards like the casino with KYC offers. People is just not contented on what’s available but they really have a choice to play without KYC but still safe. But are these games really popular? I don't think so. Sports betting still dominates the gambling scene with the largest audience. The only notable distinction in fiat casinos is the KYC factor, which isn't always required in some crypto casinos. Despite the risk of potential scams and the uncertainty of retrieving our money, many choose reputable casinos from the outset. This confidence in the casino's reputation helps mitigate the associated risks, making the overall risk level lower. |
|
|
|
|
We are well aware of the risks associated with playing at a non-KYC casino, but we are willing to accept those risks in order to enjoy full privacy and anonymity. It's similar to using a bitcoin mixer, we understand its association with money laundering and other illegal activities, yet we still use it for the purpose of gaining anonymity. After all, crypto is supposed to provide us with anonymity, and we are simply trying to achieve that goal.
|
|
|
|
Hello everyone, do you have sites with no deposit bonuses or no deposit free bets?
I'm not sure because the gambling industry has been growing rapidly in crypto. When a popular gambling site offers a deposit bonus, it would be unwise for a new site to come up with nothing to offer. So, most gambling sites ready to compete typically have deposit bonuses. The only difference lies in the amount of deposits and the rollover requirements, which can be found in the terms of service. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
