How do I know if my combustion is successful?
Can I query my BLN through web pages or tools?
genesis-tool prints list of accepted burns. Current list <block height>,<block time>,<transaction id>,<vout index>,<public key>,<satoshis burnt>
2252351,1536284720,164217b50136499296f0bd75f632f8bf625c84c664f7cfb1317cff2cdf296c9a,1,4251503ef62a7b0bbeb6529935e3b0a383849fb5b94085eeb665121a2faca242,16481003625333
2252487,1536293776,e4e4c9491b8090aa8e24d69d9d9e4b3260b70ec9890fe4fc4fecec655ac90b64,0,bbd6a2eba9e2da6d98116608984eabbb991049e55a76262ffec9f4c3d0abe485,100000000
2252491,1536294080,10afda4b0bbafc0eeed7ae6566f060591e5a91398eaf0f136f0ba2fb035c88ae,1,f9d56654f51d4637de56c4a9d71aab43a2c8c06e82a59db333e9c1304a879497,1000000000
2252498,1536294688,613c93d4f58a75c47d5ba9c029cad2b9b9798dc8b8195e57e50163662599914e,1,bbd6a2eba9e2da6d98116608984eabbb991049e55a76262ffec9f4c3d0abe485,100000000
2252647,1536304448,ca19cbb9b798e1067c73ca899f7c35ec73f99c6cdaaac593f830a6bca3f422ba,0,bf9535d059d3315b4ab44c2b96ae638c4ee8a68273bd2af694cf7a9924bd219f,1000100000000
2252889,1536320528,86882f32305156298425c499e81fc70bbe550a67e7399168b16311947f9421a5,1,ed448fbb209f78b54c0897b98d14efafc52e669ec481e41b4b020379476bcfdb,1000000000 didn't some person burn 10000 BLK last year, why are they not included? just asking out of curiosity  |
|
|
|
BitFunder Operator 'Close to' Plea Bargain in SEC Fraud Case - https://www.coindesk.com/bitfunder-operator-close-to-plea-bargain-in-sec-fraud-case/The operator of defunct bitcoin investment platform BitFunder, Jon Montroll, is reportedly seeking a plea bargain over fraud and other charges laid against him by the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (SEC).
FinanceFeeds indicated Thursday that, according to a document submitted by Montroll's legal counsel, "a plea agreement agreed upon in principle and expected to be finalized and entered by July 23" has accelerated efforts to reach a final court resolution.
Back in February, Montroll was hit with a number of charges for operating what the SEC said was an "unregistered securities exchange" and allegedly using the platform to defraud users of their cryptocurrency.
Separately, Montroll is accused of perjury and obstruction of justice over his failure to report a hack of his second business, WeExchange, in 2013. The breach ultimately saw roughly 6,000 bitcoins stolen – now worth some $68.7 million. The accused reportedly transferred some of his own cryptocurrency holdings to the exchange in an attempt to conceal the losses.
According to the New York Attorneys Office, William F. Sweeney Jr., FBI assistant director-in-charge, commented:
"As alleged, Montroll committed a serious crime when he lied to the SEC during sworn testimony. In an attempt to cover up the results of a hack that exploited weaknesses in the programming code of his company, he allegedly went to great lengths to prove the balance of bitcoins available to BitFunder users in the WeExchange Wallet was sufficient to cover the money owed to investors. It's said that honesty is always the best policy – this is yet another case in which this virtue holds true."
With the anticipated plea deal set to be finalized next week, negotiations between Montroll and the SEC are expected to reach a conclusion in the next three months, if not earlier. Jon Montroll, Bitfunder say they are close to plea agreement with US authorities - https://financefeeds.com/jon-montroll-bitfunder-say-close-plea-agreement-us-authorities/As a result of the anticipated plea in the criminal case, negotiations with the SEC to resolve the civil case have accelerated, the defendants in a Bitcoin fraud case say.
There is an update on the US authorities’ action against Jon E. Montroll and Bitfunder, accused of operating an unregistered securities exchange and defrauding users of that exchange.
On July 18, 2018, counsel for Montroll and Bitfunder submitted a status report with the New York Southern District Court. The document, seen by FinanceFeeds, states that “the defendants’ efforts to resolve the criminal case related to this proceeding, United States v. Montroll, 18 Mag. 1372, have culminated in a plea agreement agreed upon in principle and expected to be finalized and entered by July 23”. Put otherwise, the plea is expected early next week.
As a result of the anticipated plea in the criminal case, negotiations with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to resolve the civil case have accelerated, the counsel for the defendants says. Montroll and Bitfunder currently expect to resolve the civil case by agreement as well. The parties expect it will take 2-3 months to achieve a final resolution by agreement.
Let’s recall that in February this year, the SEC charged Bitfunder, a former Bitcoin-denominated platform, and its founder – Jon Montroll, with operating an unregistered securities exchange and defrauding users of that exchange. The SEC also charged the operator with making false and misleading statements in connection with an unregistered offering of securities.
In its complaint, the SEC alleges that BitFunder was an unregistered online securities exchange and that Montroll defrauded exchange users by misappropriating their bitcoins and failing to disclose a cyberattack on BitFunder’s system that resulted in the theft of more than 6,000 bitcoins.The SEC also alleges that Montroll sold unregistered securities that purported to be investments in the exchange and misappropriated funds from that investment as well.
The SEC’s complaint charges BitFunder and Montroll with violations of the anti-fraud and registration provisions of the federal securities laws. The complaint seeks permanent injunctions and disgorgement plus interest and penalties.
In a parallel criminal case, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York filed a complaint against Montroll for perjury and obstruction of justice during the SEC’s investigation.
|
|
|
|
BitFunder Operator 'Close to' Plea Bargain in SEC Fraud Case - https://www.coindesk.com/bitfunder-operator-close-to-plea-bargain-in-sec-fraud-case/The operator of defunct bitcoin investment platform BitFunder, Jon Montroll, is reportedly seeking a plea bargain over fraud and other charges laid against him by the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (SEC).
FinanceFeeds indicated Thursday that, according to a document submitted by Montroll's legal counsel, "a plea agreement agreed upon in principle and expected to be finalized and entered by July 23" has accelerated efforts to reach a final court resolution.
Back in February, Montroll was hit with a number of charges for operating what the SEC said was an "unregistered securities exchange" and allegedly using the platform to defraud users of their cryptocurrency.
Separately, Montroll is accused of perjury and obstruction of justice over his failure to report a hack of his second business, WeExchange, in 2013. The breach ultimately saw roughly 6,000 bitcoins stolen – now worth some $68.7 million. The accused reportedly transferred some of his own cryptocurrency holdings to the exchange in an attempt to conceal the losses.
According to the New York Attorneys Office, William F. Sweeney Jr., FBI assistant director-in-charge, commented:
"As alleged, Montroll committed a serious crime when he lied to the SEC during sworn testimony. In an attempt to cover up the results of a hack that exploited weaknesses in the programming code of his company, he allegedly went to great lengths to prove the balance of bitcoins available to BitFunder users in the WeExchange Wallet was sufficient to cover the money owed to investors. It's said that honesty is always the best policy – this is yet another case in which this virtue holds true."
With the anticipated plea deal set to be finalized next week, negotiations between Montroll and the SEC are expected to reach a conclusion in the next three months, if not earlier. Jon Montroll, Bitfunder say they are close to plea agreement with US authorities - https://financefeeds.com/jon-montroll-bitfunder-say-close-plea-agreement-us-authorities/As a result of the anticipated plea in the criminal case, negotiations with the SEC to resolve the civil case have accelerated, the defendants in a Bitcoin fraud case say.
There is an update on the US authorities’ action against Jon E. Montroll and Bitfunder, accused of operating an unregistered securities exchange and defrauding users of that exchange.
On July 18, 2018, counsel for Montroll and Bitfunder submitted a status report with the New York Southern District Court. The document, seen by FinanceFeeds, states that “the defendants’ efforts to resolve the criminal case related to this proceeding, United States v. Montroll, 18 Mag. 1372, have culminated in a plea agreement agreed upon in principle and expected to be finalized and entered by July 23”. Put otherwise, the plea is expected early next week.
As a result of the anticipated plea in the criminal case, negotiations with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to resolve the civil case have accelerated, the counsel for the defendants says. Montroll and Bitfunder currently expect to resolve the civil case by agreement as well. The parties expect it will take 2-3 months to achieve a final resolution by agreement.
Let’s recall that in February this year, the SEC charged Bitfunder, a former Bitcoin-denominated platform, and its founder – Jon Montroll, with operating an unregistered securities exchange and defrauding users of that exchange. The SEC also charged the operator with making false and misleading statements in connection with an unregistered offering of securities.
In its complaint, the SEC alleges that BitFunder was an unregistered online securities exchange and that Montroll defrauded exchange users by misappropriating their bitcoins and failing to disclose a cyberattack on BitFunder’s system that resulted in the theft of more than 6,000 bitcoins.The SEC also alleges that Montroll sold unregistered securities that purported to be investments in the exchange and misappropriated funds from that investment as well.
The SEC’s complaint charges BitFunder and Montroll with violations of the anti-fraud and registration provisions of the federal securities laws. The complaint seeks permanent injunctions and disgorgement plus interest and penalties.
In a parallel criminal case, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York filed a complaint against Montroll for perjury and obstruction of justice during the SEC’s investigation.
|
|
|
|
|
has anyone been able to sync this wallet? are there some working addnodes?
|
|
|
|
They got him  SEC Charges Former Bitcoin-Denominated Exchange and Operator With FraudSEC Charges Former Bitcoin-Denominated Exchange and Operator With Fraud
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2018-23
Washington D.C., Feb. 21, 2018 —
The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged a former bitcoin-denominated platform and its operator with operating an unregistered securities exchange and defrauding users of that exchange. The SEC also charged the operator with making false and misleading statements in connection with an unregistered offering of securities.
The SEC alleges that BitFunder and its founder Jon E. Montroll operated BitFunder as an unregistered online securities exchange and defrauded exchange users by misappropriating their bitcoins and failing to disclose a cyberattack on BitFunder’s system that resulted in the theft of more than 6,000 bitcoins.The SEC also alleges that Montroll sold unregistered securities that purported to be investments in the exchange and misappropriated funds from that investment as well.
“We allege that BitFunder operated unlawfully as an unregistered securities exchange. Platforms that engage in the activity of a national securities exchange, regardless of whether that activity involves digital assets, tokens, or coins, must register with the SEC or operate pursuant to an exemption. We will continue to focus on these types of platforms to protect investors and ensure compliance with the securities laws,” said Marc Berger, Director of the SEC’s New York Regional Office.
“As alleged in the complaint, Montroll defrauded exchange users by misappropriating their bitcoins and failing to disclose a cyberattack on the exchange’s system and the resulting bitcoin theft. We will continue to vigorously police conduct involving distributed ledger technology and ensure that bad actors who commit fraud in this space are held accountable,” said Lara S. Mehraban, Associate Regional Director of the SEC’s New York Regional Office.
The SEC’s complaint, filed in federal district court in Manhattan, charges BitFunder and Montroll with violations of the anti-fraud and registration provisions of the federal securities laws. The complaint seeks permanent injunctions and disgorgement plus interest and penalties.
The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Daphna A. Waxman, Daphne Downes, and Valerie A. Szczepanik in the New York Regional Office. Ms. Waxman and Ms. Szczepanik also are members of the SEC’s Distributed Ledger Working Group and the Enforcement Division’s Cyber Unit. The litigation will be led by Dugan Bliss. The case is being supervised by Lara S. Mehraban.
In a parallel criminal case, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York today filed a complaint against Montroll for perjury and obstruction of justice during the SEC’s investigation. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the U.S. Attorney’s Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
### US Gov’t Indicts Founder Of Long Defunct Crypto Exchange BitFunderThe US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Department of Justice (DOJ) have officially leveled charges against the founder of the now non-operational Bitcoin-dominated exchange BitFunder, Jon E. Montroll, Wednesday Feb. 21.
The SEC released a press statement Wednesday stating that they have charged Montroll, also known as Ukyo, with operating BitFunder as an unregistered securities exchange, defrauding the users of said exchange, and making “false and misleading statements in connection with an unregistered offering of securities.”
The SEC alleges that both BitFunder and its founder Montroll defrauded exchange users by “misappropriating their bitcoins”, operated as an unregistered securities exchange, and failed to disclose a cyberattack which led to the loss of over 6,000 bitcoins.
In 2013, hackers exploited a weakness in BitFunder’s programming code to falsely credit themselves with over 6,000 bitcoins. In an effort to recuse himself of the responsibility of having lost what was then about $720,000, today worth over $60 mln, Montroll denied the success of the hackers, and additionally provided false balance statements to SEC investigators.
The formal complaint filed by the SEC charges Montroll with violations of the anti-fraud and registration provisions of US federal securities laws. According to the press release, ”[t]he complaint seeks permanent injunctions and disgorgement plus interest and penalties.”
The DOJ also announced today Feb. 21, that Montroll has been arrested and taken into custody by the federal government. The DOJ has charged Montroll with two counts of perjury and one count of obstruction of justice. The counts of perjury and obstruction carry maximum sentences of 5 and 20 years, respectively.
Investor protection remains a priority concern for the federal government in these proceedings. Marc Berger, Director of the SEC’s New York Regional Office stated:
“...Platforms that engage in the activity of a national securities exchange, regardless of whether that activity involves digital assets, tokens, or coins, must register with the SEC or operate pursuant to an exemption. We will continue to focus on these types of platforms to protect investors and ensure compliance with the securities laws.”
BitFunder ceased trading on Nov. 14, 2013 amid complaints about delayed and frozen withdrawals of funds, following the August hack. Adding to BitFunder’s woes from the hack, the exchange went bankrupt after, following a ban on US traders, American traders left the platform in droves.
At a senate hearing earlier this month, SEC Chairman Jay Clayton noted that, so far, every ICO-issued token the SEC has observed is likely a security under US law, regardless of how the issuer refers to or markets the token. As of December, 2017, Clayton noted that not a single ICO had registered their tokens with the SEC. |
|
|
|
They got him SEC Charges Former Bitcoin-Denominated Exchange and Operator With FraudSEC Charges Former Bitcoin-Denominated Exchange and Operator With Fraud
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2018-23
Washington D.C., Feb. 21, 2018 —
The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged a former bitcoin-denominated platform and its operator with operating an unregistered securities exchange and defrauding users of that exchange. The SEC also charged the operator with making false and misleading statements in connection with an unregistered offering of securities.
The SEC alleges that BitFunder and its founder Jon E. Montroll operated BitFunder as an unregistered online securities exchange and defrauded exchange users by misappropriating their bitcoins and failing to disclose a cyberattack on BitFunder’s system that resulted in the theft of more than 6,000 bitcoins.The SEC also alleges that Montroll sold unregistered securities that purported to be investments in the exchange and misappropriated funds from that investment as well.
“We allege that BitFunder operated unlawfully as an unregistered securities exchange. Platforms that engage in the activity of a national securities exchange, regardless of whether that activity involves digital assets, tokens, or coins, must register with the SEC or operate pursuant to an exemption. We will continue to focus on these types of platforms to protect investors and ensure compliance with the securities laws,” said Marc Berger, Director of the SEC’s New York Regional Office.
“As alleged in the complaint, Montroll defrauded exchange users by misappropriating their bitcoins and failing to disclose a cyberattack on the exchange’s system and the resulting bitcoin theft. We will continue to vigorously police conduct involving distributed ledger technology and ensure that bad actors who commit fraud in this space are held accountable,” said Lara S. Mehraban, Associate Regional Director of the SEC’s New York Regional Office.
The SEC’s complaint, filed in federal district court in Manhattan, charges BitFunder and Montroll with violations of the anti-fraud and registration provisions of the federal securities laws. The complaint seeks permanent injunctions and disgorgement plus interest and penalties.
The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Daphna A. Waxman, Daphne Downes, and Valerie A. Szczepanik in the New York Regional Office. Ms. Waxman and Ms. Szczepanik also are members of the SEC’s Distributed Ledger Working Group and the Enforcement Division’s Cyber Unit. The litigation will be led by Dugan Bliss. The case is being supervised by Lara S. Mehraban.
In a parallel criminal case, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York today filed a complaint against Montroll for perjury and obstruction of justice during the SEC’s investigation. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the U.S. Attorney’s Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
### US Gov’t Indicts Founder Of Long Defunct Crypto Exchange BitFunderThe US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Department of Justice (DOJ) have officially leveled charges against the founder of the now non-operational Bitcoin-dominated exchange BitFunder, Jon E. Montroll, Wednesday Feb. 21.
The SEC released a press statement Wednesday stating that they have charged Montroll, also known as Ukyo, with operating BitFunder as an unregistered securities exchange, defrauding the users of said exchange, and making “false and misleading statements in connection with an unregistered offering of securities.”
The SEC alleges that both BitFunder and its founder Montroll defrauded exchange users by “misappropriating their bitcoins”, operated as an unregistered securities exchange, and failed to disclose a cyberattack which led to the loss of over 6,000 bitcoins.
In 2013, hackers exploited a weakness in BitFunder’s programming code to falsely credit themselves with over 6,000 bitcoins. In an effort to recuse himself of the responsibility of having lost what was then about $720,000, today worth over $60 mln, Montroll denied the success of the hackers, and additionally provided false balance statements to SEC investigators.
The formal complaint filed by the SEC charges Montroll with violations of the anti-fraud and registration provisions of US federal securities laws. According to the press release, ”[t]he complaint seeks permanent injunctions and disgorgement plus interest and penalties.”
The DOJ also announced today Feb. 21, that Montroll has been arrested and taken into custody by the federal government. The DOJ has charged Montroll with two counts of perjury and one count of obstruction of justice. The counts of perjury and obstruction carry maximum sentences of 5 and 20 years, respectively.
Investor protection remains a priority concern for the federal government in these proceedings. Marc Berger, Director of the SEC’s New York Regional Office stated:
“...Platforms that engage in the activity of a national securities exchange, regardless of whether that activity involves digital assets, tokens, or coins, must register with the SEC or operate pursuant to an exemption. We will continue to focus on these types of platforms to protect investors and ensure compliance with the securities laws.”
BitFunder ceased trading on Nov. 14, 2013 amid complaints about delayed and frozen withdrawals of funds, following the August hack. Adding to BitFunder’s woes from the hack, the exchange went bankrupt after, following a ban on US traders, American traders left the platform in droves.
At a senate hearing earlier this month, SEC Chairman Jay Clayton noted that, so far, every ICO-issued token the SEC has observed is likely a security under US law, regardless of how the issuer refers to or markets the token. As of December, 2017, Clayton noted that not a single ICO had registered their tokens with the SEC. |
|
|
|
Novaexchange is shutting down  Don't forget to withdraw your UMO if have some held there. |
|
|
|
I've gotten out of the busy season at work, and I've got a little more time to spend on projects. One of the oldest items on my to-do list is working on KDC, giving it the rebirth it has been waiting for. As such, I'd like to pose a question to the community to see what you all think.
Would you rather see:
A) The existing codebase be updated and the coin continue on the current chain. Discussions on how to do this would follow if chosen.
or
B) We start fresh with a new coin branded similarly, offer an exchange of coins, close out the old chain, and start fresh with no technical debt.
Ultimately, I'd like to do something with KDC that makes the community here happy, so I'd like to hear people's opinions about what direction they'd like to go.
-Fuse
A is the best option imho. Hardfork for new features but definitely continue the existing chain (the blockchain is less then 500MB, so relatively bloat free by comparison to other coins) KDC is in a good place in that it already has markets on Cryptopia, and as its their policy to delist coins have a coin swap/invalidate their blockchain so that the new coin must relist which includes paying the listing fee which costs more now then it did in the past and would be an unnecessary added expense. |
|
|
|
So I was reviewing a unique email address i had created and used only with this site, and i now find that my inbox is full of evidence that MegaCrypton has either been hacked, or the owner has sold or given away their user database. It also possible the owner is behind these scams and is making use of their user database at megacrypton to attempt to scam with fake ICOs and steal user credentials  here are some of the spam and phishing emails i have received over the last month from some one who knows the email address i used with MegaCrypton. Transaction [0.54798743 BTC] 09/25/2017 From: nc-schneina6@netcologne.de This is an automated notice that your wallet account has been credited with funds in the amount of 0.54798743 BTC. Details of the transaction you can see here. Do not reply to this email. If you have a question, use the help section. If you had a MegaCrypton account, your details have been leaked and are being used by criminals and fraudsters. You should change your passwords immediately if you have use the same email address, username and password on any other exchange, web wallets etc |
|
|
|
Hi Bullions,
Sinds several days I cannot sync my CryptoBullion 2.4.3 wallet for windows because I have no connections at all.
You can find connections to add to your CryptoBullion.conf here https://chainz.cryptoid.info/cbx/#!network Use some of the addnodes under 2.4.3 as that is the most recent version and what the majority of the network is using. |
|
|
|
no blocks since 8/4? is this right? what is going on?
Current Number of Blocks: 600722 Last Block Time: Wed 9. Aug 09:39:13 2017 |
|
|
|
I uploaded a new bootstrap.dat for SLOTH, might be useful for some if the network is too slow, mining seems to have increased and chain is moving, as another 20 blocks had flown past by the time i had finished uploading this. and so lite, only 224MB unpacked for 3 years of Slothchain history Blockheight: 598592 Date: Mon 31. Jul 14:02:24 2017 SLOTH_Bootstrap_2017-07-31_598592.7z 127.8 MB https://mega.nz/#!wYIU3Rrb!RpkRifiMLVSfmkq5ZhHjiLTqdUZovzxOMZ25-S8ZLV4 |
|
|
|
Whats more easy on the Rigs Ressources ?
The Lore or the Classic Client ?
Pretty limited with my shitty netbook here and dont wann resync bot to find out.
Still staking with the Classic client here, its light on resources, working well and rarely have issues with it running 24/7. |
|
|
|
power on my computer went out. I'm trying to sync, it says out of sync last block was 598194 on fri. it's been stuck at that number for a couple hours. could someone tell me what the current top block is, at least I'll know how far behind I am and maybe list some nodes. I'm connected to 7 peers right now. thanks
Current Number of Blocks: 598278 Last Block Time: Mon 31. Jul 01:35:41 2017 01:34:33 getpeerinfo 01:34:33 [ { "addr" : "31.28.12.26:5107", "version" : 70001, "subver" : "/Sloth Coin:1.3.1.3/", "syncnode" : true } ] |
|
|
|
Do you guys think Counterparty would move to the new chain in the case of a hard fork?
They state vaguely what their intentions are in their announcement.
its history would exist on any altcoin spawned from the main bitcoin blockchain, but there will be only one Bitcoin, would be a very bad idea for Counterparty to move to a minority and less secured BTC-altcoin, or for anyone to recognize it on the BTC-altcoin chain. I would expect people to sweep their counterparty addresses for the BTC-altcoin and then transfer to whatever exchange supports it to dump for the real BTC. |
|
|
|
Maybe digit could help us out (again ) Do you have a valid blockchain digit? We need to setup one or more full nodes if we want to revive this coin. I think i am in the same situation now as others here - I shut my wallet off a few months ago, i can try to get it going but expect its a bit more difficult now as I don't know of any nodes to connect with so have to rely on them being "discovered" by leaving the wallet running  , is anyone here knows yobit staff maybe they could get them to share the nodes they are connected to? or if you have the wallet open you can see the node info by typing "getpeerinfo' in the console and post the info in here and then we can use that to connect our wallets. CAPT also got delisted from Cryptopia so i guess they had the same troubles with getting the CAPT wallet working |
|
|
|
Does this mean a new WAVES coin will be created? or that the DOTcoin will be swapped for the current WAVES coin?
They explained it clearly in their news about this: We've decided to perform a swap of the DOT blockchain to a WAVES asset, the use case of DOT is not based around mining or proof of work so we don't think anything is lost in moving DOT to a token platform. A final block height will be defined to allow for a swap period of approximately 90 days before the cut off of new blocks being included in the swap. The new token will be created and swapped 1:1 with the old chain with the new asset matching the coin count of the old chain up to the cutoff block height. |
|
|
|
Crypto Bullion hits a milestone today.
HAPPY 4TH BIRTHDAY TO CBX!
That's a marvellous achievement, wow, 4 years in this space is a LONG time to survive, congratulations!! Wonderful About the masternode plan, if going down this road i suggest no higher then 1000 CBX to run one, and has anyone checked with Cryptopia, if they would be okay with an injection of coins into the supply. It might not be a rollback but it is still tinkering with coin supply. Should also be considered that there also can be unforeseen risks/exploits introduced with a creating a superblock eg someone finding a way to exploit it later to generate more superblocks of coins for themselves. As well as the negative perception of a hard fork that gives coins to the devs, this could be a complete turn off to potential investors down the track. If 10,000 CBX are required by the devs to make a supernode then these CBX should come from the existing supply via donation from the community. This would be the safer and less risk. Looking at the SPK ico it was able to take in 186,825 CBX, so it should not be difficult to get 10,000 CBX for the purpose of taking CBX forward as there are more users that would support this imho. I suggest a donation address should be set for the supernode fund and a progress meter posted to show how close we are to raising the 10,000. after which the new bullion nodes could introduce. This would also demonstrate some real community spirit vs creating a superblock. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
