Auctioning:

Casascius 2011 Brass Error 1 BTC coin, loaded with 1 BTC + forks.
Coin is graded by ICG, grade MS-64. Coin ID is 13EjRFZd, address 13EjRFZdSwz2kUURW3ywGfJuMd65rJZcM1.
Coin is early made & funded. Coin is #656 in the full list published by Casascius.
Ordered by funding times, the coin is #540, from the 17th funding of Casascius coins. (list)

Location: USA.
Shipped world-wide from minerjones, shipping paid by the winner of the auction.

Starting price: 1.2 BTC
Minimum increase: 0.005 BTC
No reserve price.

Auction ends on Sunday 1st Sept. 21:00 UTC.
Bids in the last 10 minutes extend the auction to a maximum of 10 minutes after the last bid.

Proof of funds or a collateral may be asked from new bidders to be eligible to bid on the auction.
I reserve the right to reject bids from or deny sale to any individual for any reason.

Happy bidding!

Pics:

 

Feel free to ask questions.

For what it's worth, I think Poloniex is currently owned by Circle.

Correct -- that's what Lauda has been saying too.


Your subjective non-contributing view to the matter, which also contradicts what Lauda says about himherself.

You are delusional to think that people see theymos as "just another member of DT" or that he would actually be just a member of DT.

I agree with the general sentiment of suchmoon and others here. Especially now when this new flag thing was implemented, it isn't surprising to see it being accidentally misused or problematic at this point. Also, I would not go distrust Lauda solely because Lauda really just made a negative flag about Quickseller, regardless of whatever was incorrect or bad in the flag.

Bump

Zeto has not paid, so he has been red-rated now and auction is resumed.

Auction has been resumed until 1st June 20:00 UTC.


Current highest bid.

If you have a suggestion, please let me know. What would you do right now?

I considered declining his bid, but chose not to do so due to various reasons. Most important reason was that his account is almost 3 years old. His bid is worth around $150. Not really worth the deposit hassle. All in all, I consider his bid as valid as any others, for now.

He hasn't been online for 4 days. I give him 1 week more to pay for the domain. If he doesn't pay, something will be arranged, probably a new auction.

^ Winning bid. I've contacted zeto but haven't heard back yet.

Yeah. How does nothing regarding Vod's "tax fraud report" crack you up? I see you always badmouth everybody involved except Vod, even if Vod was being at least as silly as others.

Regarding others IP addy talks....
IP addresses are worth nothing unless LE is doing the investigation. Also, a link between IP address and a physical person is always very weak.

Suchmoon, could you for once lecture all involved parties instead of targeting just one? (In case you insist on lecturing in the first place.) You bring nothing good here by doing what you're doing right now.

1.145 BTC

Would be glad to give you merit for this, but you're simply too damn obviously correct, so I can't. (You stated the obvious.)

The difference is that your lies are verifiable and proven.

Vod, let me explain it to you (and to others who may feel confused as you shamelessly deny these events...) I use color coding to increase clarity.


Proof for blue part:


That's your reply to OgNasty's question about being distrusted. Your reply states that the reason for your distrust towards OgNasty is that he trusts Anduck and Quickseller.

Proof for red part:


This further clarifies that the only reason for your sudden change from trusted to distrusted is these two ratings, and clearly implies that if those were to go away, trust would be back to what it was: trusted.

Vod you're a documented liar. More lies at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4415201.msg39447493#msg39447493

This coin indeed looks like peeled coin. Would need more pics from other angles.. Is this a peeled coin, OP?

(It looks like peeled but most likely is not.)

Vod told me that he doesn't see anything untrustworthy in what I did. Let that sink in.
Soon after this we discussed a little and he threatened to red-rate me unless I changed my rating. (Call that blackmailing or whatever you want.) And I did not change my rating.
Additionally, I also told him that I don't specifically trust him. This, I think, hurt his ego very badly (was not my intention though), finally triggering him to his sudden change of "opinion" etc, and rating me red.


OK. Can't really remember exactly what I thought back then, but I did not see anything to "correct" at the time. Also, this whole auction case is completely out of proportions. For example, a staffer (mprep) changed his auction rules in the middle of an auction with bids in, and same handful of people (you, saltyspitoon and vod) who are now, still after many years whining about my vendor bid, are completely ignoring or accepting that, and so on. Hypocrites.

Regardless, none of this has anything to do with this auction and Vod's rating towards me has nothing to do with that auction, except that he uses it as it the "reason" as it's the only thing he could find about me that is even remotely controversial.

What is so hard in understanding that Vod's rating towards me has nothing to do with the auction, anyway? Yes, he states something about it in his rating reason, but could you now try to finally understand what happened in messages between us. Like, e.g., read the messages before constantly talking about irrelevant stuff.


Of course. Only thing I can really do is to tell you to educate yourself about auction standards in the world. I gave you just one example for e.g. starting point.