man and I told you what does it do!?
And yes i have myself compiled ccminer and aro miner, drop are more or less same

Its not miner efficiency of the miner is insane drop clock to 500-600mhz at P2 state which should not happen

I have man....... default work better but i never used card at 250W nor I want

200w PL is also bad as same speed as GTX1070 at 110w, LOL insane

there is defo some issue with PL limits and sw cap control with 1080ti and ubuntu 20.04

I am now mining some more light algo that kinda work but still it was not as it should be

But what to gather on 16.04 and 18.04 I have none power cap, only power cap is if I push 250w and temp hit 85C, also issue is with all miner its just depend of power demand they need from GPU

I was told to try older kernels <5.4, tested 5.3.18 same...

Its clean system so issue is not there, OC, PL all works OK issue is just sw pow cap activation, its even active at default PL but you don`t see huge clock drop as it burning 250w

Again you get card downclock to 550-600Mhz at 160W PL?
Ppl are mininng up to 20Mhs at kawpow at 160W and i get 11Mhs.......

Also its software power cap which i had no issue with 16.04

I did more digging and as soon i start GPU cude appz Sw power cap change to active
GPU 00000000:05:00.0
Performance State : P2
Clocks Throttle Reasons
Idle : Not Active
Applications Clocks Setting : Not Active
SW Power Cap : Active
HW Slowdown : Not Active
HW Thermal Slowdown : Not Active
HW Power Brake Slowdown : Not Active
Sync Boost : Not Active
SW Thermal Slowdown : Not Active
Display Clock Setting : Not Active

My gtx1070 and 1060 rigs SW cap is not active even I use PL limit too... strange

No memory don`t drop the core clock do
| NVIDIA-SMI 440.64 Driver Version: 440.64 CUDA Version: 10.2 |
|-------------------------------±---------------------±---------------------+
| GPU Name Persistence-M| Bus-Id Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan Temp Perf Pwr:Usage/Cap| Memory-Usage | GPU-Util Compute M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
| 0 GeForce GTX 108… On | 00000000:01:00.0 On | N/A |
| 80% 61C P2 163W / 160W | 2654MiB / 11178MiB | 100% Default |
±------------------------------±---------------------±---------------------+
| 1 GeForce GTX 108… On | 00000000:02:00.0 On | N/A |
| 80% 60C P2 163W / 160W | 2580MiB / 11178MiB | 100% Default |
±------------------------------±---------------------±---------------------+
| 2 GeForce GTX 108… On | 00000000:03:00.0 On | N/A |
| 80% 56C P2 102W / 160W | 2580MiB / 11178MiB | 100% Default |
±------------------------------±---------------------±---------------------+
| 3 GeForce GTX 108… On | 00000000:05:00.0 On | N/A |
| 80% 58C P2 163W / 160W | 2580MiB / 11178MiB | 100% Default |
±------------------------------±---------------------±---------------------+

±----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Processes: GPU Memory |
| GPU PID Type Process name Usage |
|=============================================================================|
| 0 2389 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 18MiB |
| 0 2492 G /usr/bin/gnome-shell 69MiB |
| 0 3480 C ./nbminer 2553MiB |
| 1 2389 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 14MiB |
| 1 3480 C ./nbminer 2553MiB |
| 2 2389 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 14MiB |
| 2 3480 C ./nbminer 2553MiB |
| 3 2389 G /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg 14MiB |
| 3 3480 C ./nbminer 2553MiB |
±----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
ru7@ru7-System-Product-Name:~$ nvidia-smi -i 0,1,2,3,4 --format=csv --query-gpu=clocks.mem,clocks.gr
clocks.current.memory [MHz], clocks.current.graphics [MHz]
5514 MHz, 658 MHz
5514 MHz, 658 MHz
5400 MHz, 544 MHz
5514 MHz, 683 MHz

That does not change nothing if its prebuild, i have compiled miners too clock drop more then expected happen on them also

I am not sure of performance at default power limits as I never used any card on them...
I just tested it, as I have AORUS GeForce® GTX 1080 Ti Xtreme that are pre overclocked at 250w clock was ~1600Mhz mining kawpow

Problem is at 160W power limit gtx 1080ti hash only 11Mhs on kawpow and it should do ~20+
also the clock drop to 500-600 Mhz which i never seen in ubuntu 16.04 what ever algo to drop under 1200Mhz at 160W

And no @rikuu
Its not power leaking as in ubuntu 16.04 same rig works at 75C without issue
They could have changed some rules about temp and power and made some shit storm, but it looks like more issue with the ubuntu 20.04 in general

Its on most/all miner gminer, nbminer, performance state is fine P2 clock just drop as insane and power use/draw is still huge

cuda version has nothing to do as miner is precompiled, and i tried older drivers that are not 10.2 cuda its same behavior

I aslo notice on GTX1070 if card go over 65C temp or so it drop the clock a bit, but here with gtx 1080ti temp is no issue

But its strange as GTX 1070 in different rig same ubuntu configurations works just fine... PL limited to 110w and it hashed kawpow ~14Mhs

So old rig that worked fine on 16.04

Tested all 390, 435 and 440 driver as soon I apply power limits let say 160W and start miner clock drop as mad to ~500-600Mhz

depending on miner used, kawpow is droping it most, power state is same P2 just clock drop as mad, aslo power use does not drop its limited to 160W

i think even mining at 250w the hash is a lot worse

gtx1070 i have in other rigs have no issue 110w limit is 14mhz and 1080ti 160w limit is ~11mhs (insane)

FPGA and ASIC is same as cancer 

Its the proposal, score heavy depend on flip quality, issue now there is just reward for good flip and even if you post random flip imagines you would not lose a lot.... and you know ppl as most are lazy and they are used just to harvest some coin (their asic/gpu) and not invest brain nor time

pls don`t buy invites they are free and each person with the score over ~91% has one or two, also community is sharing them free on discord and telegram (they are must as none chain is perfect so this one is also open to AI mass attack which is sorted by invites which are each epoch limited so no one can stage mass AI attack)

If invite links are invalid this is a new one for Discord:
https://discord.gg/ygKj8kV

Anyone with more trust "Legendary" bought already?

As far i can tell STEEM was 99% ninja mined so 100% centralized....... at least for IDEAN you know its 101% decentralized

On point how would it  behave, devs even now has almost no control, consensus of people have it, will it be good or bad depend on majority vote that will start very soon...

You know everyone alone can kill identity to free up the staked coins? and more then few did that

just beware @quantumj have few newbies accounts and i bet he gona as you first 

don`t feed the troll just hit him as FUD-er in his trust

they don`t understand the mean of known consensus where whole network is truly decentralized and very hard to manipulate

also don`t forget we are still in testnet/ semi mainnet phase so many changes coming each validation to stop assholes that try to attack honest projects and shit on their mouths

this one asshole wanted to BUY all premine for a 1kg of fish, as he is used to do, then he list it with his chines scam exchange and p/d it to 2x and dump all
as he got refused as idena is not scam project he is butt hurt greedy moron now

@Crypt0-B
If its a private sale how then its a scam 

or what? you are pissed of you did not buy it for 0.0001$ per coin you offered to devs months ago so you could dump on first exchange?

you are just stupid troll that don`t understand full decentralized network with consensus vote (which can not be manipulated nor faked) where even evil primine can`t be abused or would be blocked by users in a day or less!

ARE YOU SANE!

almost none use VPS, its a referral links I posted for vultr and digital ocean for 100$ free for VPS use for ppl that have issue running node 24h


here they are 100$ free for a month, 2 for DO  
https://www.vultr.com/?ref=8374690-6G
https://m.do.co/c/e77ca1afc891

I am sorry to say but rest asked also.......

I don`t like it either but poloniex, bittrex and cex all requested to see source of funds its the EVIL kyc/aml ...... bitstamp asked me too but I don`t use it atm so did not provide the info

on some exchange as cex it looks random on other its more when you pass certain volume... but cex one was most strict but was fine at the end