with c version speed up is ~1% or so 1.7%  |
|
|
|
@ewbf, any reason the miner can't recover from a error 46 (I think that's the right code). This happens when the graphics driver crashes in eventlog. A simple close and re-open gets it going again. Do I have to resort to a script? Anyone have one configured for these bat files already? I know I have a sample somewhere...
too much overclock probably, additionnaly you can try :start your command goto start if command crash or stop for any reason it will restart it again But what if you want to stop the miner? Wont the .bat be caught in an endless loop? It will not, but to work 100% you need to disable windows error screen nag, so if miner crash with error message you don`t need to click OK on it |
|
|
|
@ lokko Some newbie twat as you first need to learn and respect ppl that help community and develop for a change... and better stfu about thing you have none knowlage no one is forcing anyone to use nicehash miner or fee miner, and you moaning is beyond all good taste also there is constant problem with zcash and pool luck on most pools, its hard to get 100% luck with any, and most time its under by 5-7% so even if nicehash zcash pool is a market which is mostly under zcash price, the difference is not so huge as idiot as you try to show You need time and resources to investigate profitability, and twat mining 2h on some pool know shit And if you are zcash holder I am really sorry for you but you have no right to spread hate and lie due your bad investment! |
|
|
|
EWBF is also out 0.9v speed is 2% less but comparing memory controller usage is not same 85 vs 81% same setting NH vs EWBF  |
|
|
|
@vaulter You know when you use very low TDP you can push OC to +180-220 on core with right TDP miner that can result undervolt but its hard to find stable settings, because on low GPU usage GPU will boost as mad...  Same results can be done with afterburner graph ctrl+f and limiting freq/voltage to <1v for 1900-2000Mhz but its a bit hard to do with more then one card, stupid afterburner must to it for each card one by one, and looks like the graph have some issues, the graph must not be linear to the end as last 3-4 settings must be higher then the rest of graph For best undervolt we need BETTER OC tool for NV that can do manual volt/freq adjustment! |
|
|
|
|
some ~8% speedup on 1070, memory controller usage is up from 81 to 85%
|
|
|
|
Try see if GPU-Z sensor tab detect any temp/power/ulility limit by GPU, I have no 1080 but it might happen, also try to run/close miner few times to get more speed, sometimes it helped on 1070 on some memory intensive coins (maybe due memory alocation or hell know) Waiting for 450+ sol/s for 1070 |
|
|
|
|
Its true that EWBF in last releases managed to drop power usage a lot and match nicehash miner, had he learn something from disambling nicehash miner, but still his speed is ~3% less for same frequency he only match same speed for same TDP, eg. his miner will boost more on same TDP then nicehash and produce "same" speed
can two coders came to same solution
can analising one miner help the other coder to see same or can he stole code, i have none knowlage
|
|
|
|
|
Tested it with OC-ed 1070
2 instances 300sol/s
nicehash 410sol/s
If I up the threads it give only 0sol/s
looks like windows build use some CPU 20% for instance on i5 CPU
|
|
|
|
Strix OC, MSI X, Gigabyte G1 (1070): all stock clocks EWBF = NH for me
might be true, because ewbf use a bit less of power and cards will/might boost more, my results were done on fixed frequency |
|
|
|
ewbf just released v0.007 its nice to see we still have a healthy competition  |
|
|
|
For me this miner is about 5-7% slower than nicehash on EVGA 1070, but still worth it.
its not if you run 2x exe then its ~4% nicehash 420 ewbf ~400 but a bit less power usage |
|
|
|
|
You ppl know pool luck change all the time?
and there is also coin network stability, diff adjustment, with 2.5min block time we should see near 100% production, but in real is it like that?
|
|
|
|
|
nicehash dev sad they will break 400sol/s on 1070 in next release
|
|
|
|
Do you believe you can push it even more? Maybe over 400 sols for the 1070? Yep, latest version in development does more than 400 on overclocked 1070 with almost same power usage. But still trying some tricks before we do any release. !!!!!! kill the ATI abomination! |
|
|
|
EWBF Version 0.0.6b is out, its time for nicehash to step up a bit |
|
|
|
|
For Nvidia you must solve specific memory access, duno if anyone managed to get full coalesced memory transaction which should provide max performance...
atm nicehash miner is doung 215-250sol/s on 1060 6GB (3GB version is less because GPU is crippled)
|
|
|
|
|
EWBF need more GPU usage to match nicehash miner....
|
|
|
|
nah ewbf is a clear different, one is GPU heavy and use a lot less memory controller, I bet if they would share code, we can see 500sol on OC-ed 1070  SUCK AMD! Big green TROL !!! just look at your post history... I fell sorry for you |
|
|
|
nah ewbf is a clear different, one is GPU heavy and use a lot less memory controller, I bet if they would share code, we can see 500sol on OC-ed 1070 SUCK AMD! NVIDIA Trol  nVdia was rekt yesterday by VEGA. Now I regret buying gtx1070, in few months new gtx1070 will be 300 USD or less. Now on ZEC nV is too damn hot, myth about nV low power usage and low temps is officially busted. Are you ppl insane or what?? Vega is 3 month from shop and some proper availability, and performance will be in par with 1080, HBM2 memory still is not good for memory intensive mining so zcash and ETH will prolly be slow, but we need to see it first/test, and only then someone need to make use of 4096bit memory interface and very slow access time! NV 1070 is not hot it use less power then RX 480, FFS stop FUD and shit if you know nothing at all And we don`t need to match speed in zcash for nice hash miner we need 400+ sol/s ! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
