How much did you pay on fees? I don't believe that blockchain supports RBF so you probably can't do much aside from waiting. It would help if you could post the transaction ID.
Alternatively, you can try and use ViaBTC if your transaction fits their criteria.
|
|
|
Which site is this? I'm not that familiar with the Tron network, but I would imagine you're connected with Tronlink or some other wallet to do this staking? If so, don't you have to confirm whatever action you're trying to do, from the wallet?
|
|
|
كما كنت قد ذكرت في المنتدى الانجليزي منذ قليل، لقد انضمت منصة كوكوين لبقية المنصات التي تطلب توثيق الحسابات، هذا التغيير سوف يكون بداية من الخامس عشر من الشهر المقبل.
السحوبات لن تتأثر و يمكن للمستخدمين سحب أموالهم متى أرادو، لكن من الأفضل القيام بهذا الأمر الان ان كانت عندكم أموال في المنصة، لتفادي المشاكل في المستقبل في حال كان هنالك تغيير لسياستهم.
|
|
|
-snip- Quite right. Exchanges allow you to edit data that is not confirmed with real documents or selfies.
It's not all of them though. If my memory serves me correctly, Bittrex never allowed users to do that back when they enforced KYC so it's probably best to check with other individuals first.
|
|
|
Hello, please don't worry, we don't have this problem. All your trading liquidity is provided by us. There is no third-party situation. Moreover, the exchange is automatic and timely. There will be no stuck situations. If you have any worries, you can try a small conversion to understand our transaction status.
Understood. I have also noticed that none of your app links work properly, they're all redirecting to this page: Where there is nothing but a list of trading pairs. It's also unclear whether you provide spot trading or not. it looks like you do, but the "fees" and "about us" pages make it sound like you only have the instant exchange.
|
|
|
Hello, We truly appreciate your message about our service. The instant exchange function on the home page does not require KYC. Because it does not involve legal currency. There will be no audit issues. If you need to use the credit card to buy coins, you need to go through KYC verification. We encourage customers to use their own wallets. Perform currency exchange. The coins are all in your own wallet. So there is no such audit problem. Because the transaction is automatically processed by the system from time to time.
I think what Jerome was trying to ask is whether you're using a third-party service to provide liquidity, or all of the funds are yours, and if you've built this from scratch yourself. If you are using a third party, this would mean that they are the ones processing the transactions so if they decide to ask the user for KYC, the users have to comply. Correct? An example to give for this is wallets with built-in exchanges like Exodus, atomic wallet, etc. They have zero control over the swap feature, so if any issues arise, the wallet provider can't do anything and the user has to contact the third-party service.
|
|
|
Their site mentions that the protocol has been verified by multiple auditing firms, but nothing links to the audit. There's also no mention of any auditing in their Twitter page.
So as mentioned above, it's probably not worth the risk and you shouldn't be fooled by the founders sharing a picture of their faces either.
|
|
|
لقد تم اعتقال 50 شخص صيني الجنسية في ليبيا (مدينة زليتن) بتهمة تشغيل مزعة تعدين للبيتكوين منذ ثلاثة أيام[1] (و الذي يعتبر أمر غير قانوني في البلد) كما يبدو أن السلطات بصدد التحقيق في أمر مزارع اخرى في العاصمة طرابلس و كذلك مصراتة. ما هي أرائكم حول هذا الموضوع؟ المقال لم يذكر الكثير من المعلومات حول المزعة أو أرباحها الخ لكن أفترض أنها كانت مزرعة كبيرة نظرا لعدد المعتقلين. [1] https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/libya-chinese-nationals-arrested-mining-cryptocurrency
|
|
|
I wouldn't consider anything on this list valid collateral. I don't think anyone cares about KYC, since people can buy these, probably for less than 900$. It's about the ability to sell the collateral if necessary.
So if lend you 900$ and you decide to not repay me, can I resell the Coinbase account for 900$? obviously not.
Verified accounts are probably riskier than anything else because if the account is verified using your real identity, you can always claim it back.
|
|
|
AFAIK, most exchanges pretty much use the same third party to provide on and off-ramp services. KuCoin, Bitget, Binance, ByBit, etc. all seem to use Simplex or Banxa so there's probably not that much difference between them.
How about using Interac-e or Wire transfers? Not an option?
|
|
|
Hi. No - I am not promoting anything. According to your involvement I guess capitalwallet is not trustworthy. They work like this: Broker shows me ther USDT account number linked to them - I deposit USDT to that account. There is no need to open an account as far as I know (Because it shows me a spesific USDT address). Does not matter where I purchase USDT from - it is what I know. With account I mean USDT address.
I'm not saying they're scammers. I haven't tried them myself so I could definitely be wrong, but it's just the way that the user was promoting them. But the way you described this whole process sounds like the service you want to deposit funds to, is just using Capital wallet as a payment processor so I don't think you would have any issues in that case (if you trust this broker you're referring to)
|
|
|
I'm not sure if this is just your way to promote Capitalwallet like this user did a few months back[1] or if you really want to know, but assuming the latter, do you trust whoever you're sending the funds to? What do you mean by they allow capital wallet for payments? Do you need to make an account there and deposit funds? or you're paying for a service that uses Capitalwallet as a payment processor?
Now regarding your second question. If you're from Turkey, you can just make an account on OKX, and buy using your card. Or if you want to use wire transfers, you can try their P2P platform. [1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5259548.msg61345763#msg61345763
|
|
|
Yes, I think this is it. But I can't figure out what, since I've apparently never violated the regulation. -snip-
Since this is related to your crypto deposit, it's probably because the funds are connected (and I could be wrong) to a mixer, a gambling site, etc. It doesn't necessarily have to be a direct connection either so maybe you received funds from someone who dealt with the services I mentioned.
|
|
|
I don't use Coinbase but what are the errors you're getting when trying to withdraw to an external address? I would imagine they at least sent you an email explaining why your account got blocked and the steps to follow to unlock it. Usually, when an exchange does that, it's because they detected suspicious activity with your transactions or account. Have you tried calling them?
|
|
|
That's pretty weird, why would they return a value that has no practical use to users? -snip-
I would imagine it's because they also use that on their site. It's a shame though, the API seven only seems to support only Bitcoin mainnet, and legacy addresses at that (eg. It returns the size but not the vsize which uses vbytes).
I know that Blockchair supports both testnet and segwit addresses but the limits may not be the best. Have you looked into these alternatives?[1] [1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5386348.0
|
|
|
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think that Electrum support generating Taproot addresses, there's also no mention of it in the Changelog with the exception of this: - bitbox02: bump bitbox02 to 6.0, support send-to-taproot (#7693)
|
|
|
|