我还真不知道比特币有过两次rollback，rollback是不是简单的否认某些区块数据？rollback与硬分叉又有何区别。
rollback基本上就等于硬分叉，只不过rollback是以故意让某个交易无效的硬分叉。 比特币的两次都是因为技术原因，导致必须紧急硬分叉，这个过程导致了至少几十个block的交易无效。 |
|
|
|
我觉得bter处理有误：
1. 坚决不能与黑客妥协
2. 应rollback
3. 尼玛50m放在热钱包，这不是坑爹吗？别的币种也这样吗？
黑客盗币不是回滚的理由，blockchain任何情况下都不能回滚。回滚区块意味着区块链系统完全受到个开发者控制，他们能回滚区块，也能修改区块。这样的系统根本无法保护你的财产，更谈不上去中心化。 你不回滚就意味着系统不受开发者控制了？掩耳盗铃？ 回滚也是靠所有人协作而成，也不是开发者一个人说了算。开发者只不过是个牵头的，是大多数人的意志的执行者。回滚成功，也不意味着不去中心化，只要这是绝大多数人的意志就行。 回滚是最佳方案，任何个人损失可以由bter事后分辨和补偿，应该绝对不到100 BTC。 另外bter怎么这么天真啊，还跟黑客谈判交钱。你要明白偷钱的黑客都是没有节操的，他们其实并不是真正的“黑客”，他们首先是盗贼，然后“黑客技术’只是他们作为盗贼使用的工具。你跟小偷还要谈判，再给钱吗？这些偷钱的盗贼，唯一目的就是将自己利益最大化。 绝大多数人的意志就行，当小孩子过家家呢! 当然可以，实际上比特币也是控制在开发者和miner手里，两者有紧密的联系。比特币有过两次紧急回滚，都是开发者和miner紧密协调实现的。我认为在crypto中，各种回滚是不可避免的，不是被偷，就是技术出问题，只要大多数人同意就行。 |
|
|
|
我觉得bter处理有误：
1. 坚决不能与黑客妥协
2. 应rollback
3. 尼玛50m放在热钱包，这不是坑爹吗？别的币种也这样吗？
黑客盗币不是回滚的理由，blockchain任何情况下都不能回滚。回滚区块意味着区块链系统完全受到个开发者控制，他们能回滚区块，也能修改区块。这样的系统根本无法保护你的财产，更谈不上去中心化。 你不回滚就意味着系统不受开发者控制了？掩耳盗铃？ 回滚也是靠所有人协作而成，也不是开发者一个人说了算。开发者只不过是个牵头的，是大多数人的意志的执行者。回滚成功，也不意味着不去中心化，只要这是绝大多数人的意志就行。 回滚是最佳方案，任何个人损失可以由bter事后分辨和补偿，应该绝对不到100 BTC。 另外bter怎么这么天真啊，还跟黑客谈判交钱。你要明白偷钱的黑客都是没有节操的，他们其实并不是真正的“黑客”，他们首先是盗贼，然后“黑客技术’只是他们作为盗贼使用的工具。你跟小偷还要谈判，再给钱吗？这些偷钱的盗贼，唯一目的就是将自己利益最大化。 |
|
|
|
|
我觉得bter处理有误：
1. 坚决不能与黑客妥协
2. 应rollback
3. 尼玛50m放在热钱包，这不是坑爹吗？别的币种也这样吗？
|
|
|
|
|
question: do I have to re-backup my wallet each day after playing some dice games? since I see the winnings all come in as different addresses?
|
|
|
|
I see, that's what I figured.
I think 0% house edge is a great choice for now, to gain market share from all the web-based dice sites.
Thanks. I think we'll be able to keep it at 0% forever. Having players helps increase demand for LTS, and improves liquidity. Also dice players may play the lottery occasionally too with their LTS. Now can you make a profit long term at 0%? I thought the house needed a slight edge? Good luck! But is there a "house" in LottoShares? Any player that want to play, will have to hold LottoShares, which simultaneously makes the player also a investor (house?). I think this is pretty neat, true P2P gambling, where the player is also the "house". |
|
|
|
|
I see, that's what I figured.
I think 0% house edge is a great choice for now, to gain market share from all the web-based dice sites.
|
|
|
|
lol, what are these? "guarantee dead cert everytime"?  |
|
|
|
|
sweet!! haha 0% house edge, this is so great
|
|
|
|
unless they dump slowly.
That's what a smart scam artist would do, after letting the hype build up the value for some time. Slowly trickle out your earnings so as to not set off any alarm bells that could slow the tide of profit from morons. BTW Bitcoin has already begun its recovery from the low point of 525, back near 540 now. Yeah, the ethereum people are surely not wasting any time. Their initial funding drive is barely a week old, and they are already cashing out thousands of Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
http://www.panture.com/bitcoin-could-financially-liberate-citizens-under-isis-rule/I see people from Iraq and Syria on the internet, it's not like it's shut down. When terrorists come to your down asking for a tax, just show them that you have nothing. All you have to do is hide your private key, or use an online wallet like Coinbase. Using something like PayPal or Western Union can be risky, as terrorists are aware of it, and those services don't like doing business with those citizens anyways for obvious reasons. We need to focus on educating people in third world countries more, that is where bitcoin can do the most good. It's not that easy, about 400 years ago when Manchurians invaded China. Manchurians made a law in occupied territory, that each month the Chinese must pay 3 bushels of grain per person (doesn't matter how you get it, you can buy it or grow it yourself) OR be beheaded. ISIS could just adopt a similar policy. |
|
|
|
|
ethereum is just Ripple scam 2.0, except they are cashing out way earlier than Ripple did.
ethereum founder's new mansion thank you for your donation.
I'm not even sure why centralized shit like Ripple or ethereum can even scam anyone from Bitcoin community.
|
|
|
|
从你们刚开张，我就战战兢兢的在用。一直都还好，没有什么大问题，唯一就是没搞明白bter point是什么玩意儿，曾经我账户里有几万，后来又都没了。怎么来的我也不清楚，怎么没的我也不清楚，不过这个也无所谓了。
我觉得最主要的问题是，你们怎么保证你们不会卷币跑路？是否应该在About Us这里，公布一下owner和团队的名字照片什么的。当然如果你们怕比特币交易所违法，被政府抓的话，我也可以理解。
亲 我们老板有照片的，还有关于比特儿的专访~~比特帮链接： http://www.btcside.com/new/detail/1029嗯，这个不错。但是如果你们最好官方放到你们自己网站的About us区域更好些，否则用户不容易看到。 |
|
|
|
This one I could actually understand and support her on, because it was not her fault, it is a design problem, and one that I will support fixing. I don't think her post was about $1, but fixing a problem that potentially could cost other users more money/time wasted. |
|
|
|
|
从你们刚开张，我就战战兢兢的在用。一直都还好，没有什么大问题，唯一就是没搞明白bter point是什么玩意儿，曾经我账户里有几万，后来又都没了。怎么来的我也不清楚，怎么没的我也不清楚，不过这个也无所谓了。
我觉得最主要的问题是，你们怎么保证你们不会卷币跑路？是否应该在About Us这里，公布一下owner和团队的名字照片什么的。当然如果你们怕比特币交易所违法，被政府抓的话，我也可以理解。
|
|
|
|
没有这些钢性成本就没有钢性铁底价，之前4，5月在2700附近徘徊的时候，这价应该就是矿工底线价了
图样图森破 |
|
|
|
So SecondMarket hasn't bought shit for over 3 months now.
Looks like it. Should probably worry those who believe that the listing of an ETF automatically means new price surge. You may be right with that. But couldn't a real ETF be another investment vehicle serious investors want to use in order to get their Bitcoin? What are the advantages over SecondMarket in this case? (compared to e.g. the Winklevoss' COIN) The advantage of an ETF is that it is accessible not only to high-net worth individuals, at your regular broker. I think it'll help a lot, but it will depend a lot on the circumstances of when it is launched because the sentiment/price environment will dictate demand. Spot on (as usual). ETF listing will be a major chance, but it's just that: a chance. If demand doesn't match the offer at first, price will not do anything. The *prospect* of the ETF is long priced in, the actual effect of buying pressure coming from it remains a possibility - a good one though, I'll admit. Yeah I really think in the current state of Bitcoin that shuns all the good news that occur, an ETF would most likely cause a $15 rallye and then drop back $20... I guess they should launch in winter or when things have changed in Bitcoins ecosystem. Nope, an ETF will change EVERYTHING. Before ETF, gold was $250 an ounce for a long time. After various gold ETF were created, it went to $1600 an ounce and is currently $1300. ETF will only have a BIGGER effect on Bitcoin, because gold already had a mature investment/trading community before ETF were created for it, yet it still had a huge effect on gold price. |
|
|
|
If there's one criticism I have of blockchain.info it's that you have to manually input the fee so I can see how this could happen. It should be autofilled with the suggested amount based on what transaction you're attempting to send.
uh No you don't, in the BCI's default quick send mode, the appropriate fee is auto filled, you can't even edit it. Now when you do want to edit the fee, you could go to custom send mode, which does allow you edit the fee, but you don't have to. If you just leave the fee blank, it automatically uses 0 fee, and if your coins are not qualified for 0 fee, BCI will warn you. |
|
|
|
|
holy shit, 11 pages for 0.2 BTC? it was your own mistake, just take the loss and learn from it. I have used BCI for 3 years and thousands of transactions, I never put the wrong fee. So that says something about how "smart" you are (since you claimed you are a "smart" person).
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
