0.18BTC
Highest bid so far. You got your rolls now get yo singles! |
|
|
|
You are bidding on all three together. 2018 Gold Bitcoin Penny 2018 Platinum Bitcoin Penny 2018 Silver Bitcoin Penny Starting Bid: 0.15 BTCBid Increments: 0.001 BTCAuction End: Monday - January 28, 2019 8PM EST (Auction ends when forum time(EST) hits 8:00:00, not when countdown timer ends) (CountdownTimer) https://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/generic?p0=179&iso=20190128T20&year=2019&month=1&day=28&hour=20&min=0&sec=0&msg=BitcoinPenny%20Trio&csz=1
Sniping Rules: Any bid made in the last 15 10 minutes extends auction by 10 minutes until there is no new bid in the 10 minute timeframes. *ninja edit.. sorry copy pasted this and 15 doesn't make sense. If someone bids at 7:56:00pm then auction extends to 8:06:00pm etc... Payment Address: ( I will only ask winner to pay to this address ): 34FthxcHpSMCW9zFhVw5yremTA9XgYd8aG Shipping free for Canadians, rest of the world pays(depends on location of buyer), escrow accepted on your dime. I reserve the right to refuse a bid from any user, or ask for a deposit to confirm the bid.  |
|
|
|
Went to try and immediately buy this. Then saw price and threw my PC out the window in disappointment depression.  |
|
|
|
|
As one that doesn't visit the Meta board much, I want to thank LoyceV for the continuous original fact proofing he has been providing.
edit to add: I read that it was a suggestion from OgNasty, but thanks for following it through and doing it.
|
|
|
|
You are completely right! In fact an Address Explorer was available before I took the website down to remodel it (Yes, a long work in progress I hope to finish really soon) at http://uberbills.comI will work to release that list in a clear and easy way very soon  If you dont have time to turn it all into a website there are some very capable people that can assist here too. I believe Anduck did the BTCC Mint one and rusbitcoinuser has a casascius one always being updated with cool new info. |
|
|
|
None of those are shadowless and the 1st edition is the mass produced one worth about $3 USD
All the cards together maybe $120
Quick ebay search on those games add up to ~$180 aswell |
|
|
|
Added some prices in OP, always willing to talk. 3 BTC Alitin Joan of Arc Told you they'd be high  but I'm not unreasonable if there is a serious counteroffer. Is that Joan of Arc still loaded? Edit...forget it...just read that it might not be Yes it is loaded. No Joan of Arc's were ever reported to have been swept when the Adam Smith/Alitin Breach happened. I've thought long and hard about breaking it open and offloading it but have decided against it. The pub key for it can be seen in the picture and I have it on a watch list that I check often lol. |
|
|
|
Added some prices in OP, always willing to talk. 14 BTC King K 4 BTC CI Gold/Silver set 7.5 BTC BTCC Titanium 5 3 BTC Alitin Joan of Arc Told you they'd be high but I'm not unreasonable if there is a serious counteroffer. |
|
|
|
This is also what bothers me about OP. Did you lose the bug bounty on FJ as well?
Gambling addiction is real. If this guy was gambling on FJ for 8 to 13 hours... of course he has a problem.. by giving him free spins thats nice and all.. but how long does that last (long enough where it ends up being.. ok one more spin, nvm I meant one more after that.. or trips to the atm to withdraw $50.. gone.. ok this $100 is the last of it, fuck it with $200 more I can break even) and how quickly was the 0.2BTC dumped back into the site. A nice gesture but with sinister motives behind it. These guys at the online gambling sites know what they're doing and how to kickstart the gambling addiction that so many have. Not much to do with the case but it's why you gave the guy free spins on top of everything else. Business model/marketing 101 in that line of work but don't pretend like it was you doing him a favor. Deep down we know free spins are just a fishing hook reeling in a gambler that can't stop. |
|
|
|
Apparently he was given 0.08 first, but then they increased it to 0.2BTC. If this was meant to be hush money, perhaps. I think they felt with the guy though (from the conversations I've seen screenshots of).
Such thing doesn't exist in this space. Casino isn't charity organization. There must be specific reason why player was funded with additional 0.12btc, if it was for a bug then everyone else should also receive 0.2btc, if it is because his plinko win was big then something is wrong here. I think if the "correct" outcomes from the OP playing the new game would have resulted in the OP having sufficient funds to make the plinko bets up until he won the jackpot, the entire jackpot should be paid out.
If the above is not the case, the floor the OP should receive is what MadZ suggested above. However there are other considerations that would make me believe the OP should receive more, such as FJ essentially "freerolling" their players, and the possibility that the OP may have made different sized rolls had he had a different bankroll size.
I have to agree with you. Quoted in case one of you or MadZ starts wearing a FortuneJack campaign sig tomorrow. Agree 100% with the above and MadZ's post on the other page. edit add: joke post. very nice unbiased posts/research from the above I quoted/listed. |
|
|
|
|
There are often places where you can receive free lawyer consultation up to 30minutes.
Nothing done or said in this thread will end in FortuneJack paying you the 20btc. What is currently happening is the decision to either leave it or to paint the trust page of FortuneJack with red negatives and have it be a shame to wear the FortuneJack signature/avatar. (Whether this does 20btc worth of damage to their reputation/traffic is debatable)
|
|
|
|
|
B. Non forced error. Me like.
|
|
|
|
Hello everyone thank you all so far for your numerous inputs and countless insights to the current situation that is in front of you. I believe I have a reasonable solution to all this which was in fact suggested by another user. If you could all please read and post +1 if you agree with this as a reasonable solution for both parties or simply - 1 for against.
We have ascertained many facts regarding this case. I had acquired roughly 2 BTC from the bugged money. During the 13 hours within casino grounds however I had not spent more than 0.2 BTC on any slot or casino orientated game and that at best I had not used more no more than 0.209 BTC throughout the whole night. Casino has acknowledged they were slow to respond to the situation which cause this whole mess to occur. Then would it be possible for the casino to agree that if they had given me their bug bounty of 0.2 BTC earlier before I had gotten my way over to the Plinko section. I would have in fact had reached the jackpot with their bug bounty money. I feel this is 99% possible and a very solid solution that would diffuse confusion of whether it was the bugged money at play or indeed my initial deposit. Would the community find this highly agreeable? As stated please comment simply with a +1 for and - 1 against.
Thank you all so far in helping me build my case and helping me reach a resolution with the casino. You guys have all been very helpful. Even the negative ones.
but I wanted it to be a separate post and unique in its own right as a means to end the ongoing problem with the casino in hopes we may all move on to greater things in life. Like taking unexpected shots at Lauda unexpectedly and out of the blue. The quality of your posts is sharply decreasing. Stop trying to pander to the side that are partially against FJ/Lauda/FJ Sigs and stick to posting facts. |
|
|
|
I don't know if there was more malice behind this, but if FortuneJack knew verusfides was a plinko player and had a good plinko win coming up from his seed, they might have wanted him to win using "fake balance" to avoid paying out a large win.
This seems like a conspiracy theory at best, do you really think they are monitoring players like that? Especially ones who make a 0.009 BTC deposit? Probably not if they aren't even monitoring their own games paying 70 consecutive wins in a row and immediately contacting the effected players. I guess that depends on several factors such as: Do they have a specific system in place that can detect undetected bugs? Did they have the correct personnel available at the time? (They should at all times, but perhaps they didn't at this time, right?) Do they have it as normal protocol to monitor all games at all times? (Like some high tech security center at a vegas casino ((doubt it))). There have been and currently are companies large and small, that grow too fast too quick. They see the influx of money and profit coming in and they get greedy. They do not hire the correct amount of staff, instill the proper securities, and instead spend the money on marketing. Any online casino/exchange that I can answer No to any single one of your questions asked would raise the largest red flag. (think exchange and you get a big ol clear picture of past happenings and why this should be worrying) They only way to truely settle something like this is by getting a lawyer. Everybody is dying to give you their opinion on this but it isn't going to help you at all.
We all know why they're registered in some buttfuck nowhere shell company haven areas. So that lawyers don't even think it worthwhile to be involved. |
|
|
|
I don't know if there was more malice behind this, but if FortuneJack knew verusfides was a plinko player and had a good plinko win coming up from his seed, they might have wanted him to win using "fake balance" to avoid paying out a large win.
This seems like a conspiracy theory at best, do you really think they are monitoring players like that? Especially ones who make a 0.009 BTC deposit? Probably not if they aren't even monitoring their own games paying 70 consecutive wins in a row and immediately contacting the effected players. |
|
|
|
|
Say verusfides never tried to withdraw(that was halted and needed further approval).. continued to play with the 2btc he had won.. loses it all. Stops playing. Would FortuneJack have contacted him that the game he was playing was bugged and caused him to lose his initial deposit and that they would refund it for him.
|
|
|
|
|
So was this game Adrenaline possible to lose at? Or could you only win. Surely there are safeguards that would trigger and alert somebody that there is somethin irregular happening in a game.
|
|
|
|
|
Can you clarify in your auction rules if you require anything from newbie bidders or not? AuctionPolice
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
