Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 04:43:24 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 [32] 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 ... 170 »
621  Economy / Investor-based games / Re: (ⓝⓔⓦ) Coin Generator ▲ HYBRID FAUCET ▲ build your city ▲ real business <·´¯`·. on: February 29, 2016, 11:01:00 AM
Ironic aint it ... remember how he was active all the time and now not a word ?  Cheesy
622  Economy / Investor-based games / Re: (ⓝⓔⓦ) Coin Generator ▲ HYBRID FAUCET ▲ build your city ▲ real business <·´¯`·. on: February 29, 2016, 07:47:11 AM
Well ..5 minutes ago I used  FireFox to open it and YES It really works !!
Actually I use Chrome but I try to change my Browser to be FIREFOX  ^_________^
I am so HAPPY !! But a few munutes ago FireFox need me to update the new version.
When I updated finish ..I can not open https://coin-gnt.com anymore !!
OH MY GOD !! What 's going on !! I so worry cause my LEVEL is 8
And I really like this website and just wish the sever will run in the normal way ASAP !!


-- DEAR ADMIN PLEASE.. UPDATE THE NEW INFORMATION FOR US AGAIN PLEASE !! --
-- THANK YOU SOOOOO MUCH IN ADVANCE !! I LOVE YOUR WEB PLZ KNOW THAT !! --


lol, it was the cached version which you previously opened ...


   
623  Economy / Reputation / Re: Default Trust List is a Joke.Theymos Save This Forum. on: February 29, 2016, 03:55:03 AM
Op went silent?? lol


However,I need to fall down to your level to explain things because you certainly don't understand scenarios without real life implications.I think I'm done conveying what was suppose to be done way before.Its time that I use my powers as well.

Let's see how many more days you enjoy your privileges .

Probably in the process of growing a pair or something.
624  Economy / Reputation / Re: @james.lent gives me negative trust for no reason on: February 29, 2016, 03:52:35 AM
But you are a troll.  You even trolled my trust page.  So suck it up, be a man and move on.
I did not troll your trust page, your posts are plain, its like you dont put any effort into them, it makes it look as if you are only posting for the signature money, and for that i gave you a neutral rating, if you think that is trolling then you have no idea what trolling is

edit: at least you made it off my ignore list
That's your own bias against sig campaigns, my man.  And even if it was true, it has nothing to do whatsoever with TRUST.  You are misusing the trust system here, so what else would you call that but trolling? 

Ignore him. He's butt-hurt because his stolen netflix account sales thread got trashed : https://web.archive.org/web/20160130035305/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1330483.0
625  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Senior Member legendster's Multimedia Services on: February 29, 2016, 03:47:10 AM
So he should send you his source files? remove your negative trust at once
LOL. Why are you so strongly defending legendster? I have read up on a pretty good number of crazy views however this post makes it outright look like you are an alt of legendster Roll Eyes Is this the case?

Even if legendster is exonerated of the allegations mentioned in the OP, he has a very sketchy past and I would not trade with him.

Kind Regards
Panthers52

Most likely he is.
Well if i were his alt you would be the first to know @panthers52 , after all, you are the expert at such matters

This thread isnt about his past so none of that cant be used when deciding on his trust ratings
I am good at finding alts, however I am unable to find everyone's alts, as some people are more careful then others. I am unable to locate any blockchain evidence that you and legendster are the same person.

My point above is that I believe legendster is a scammer, and I believe that negative trust is appropriate, even if the comments on his trust profile for the negative ratings are (potentially) inaccurate (if you were to assume that he is innocent of the allegations in the OP.

Another point is that legendster has a history of engaging in this kind of behavior.

Kind Regards
Panthers52
As said earlier, his previous ratings and past history should play no part in what is happening now

So i guess Theymos created that section so that we can post birthday greetings and it's nothing related to what he has done which would portray what kind of person he is. Thanks mate for the insightful info, now get back to your minecraft forums already.
626  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Senior Member legendster's Multimedia Services on: February 29, 2016, 03:32:49 AM
So he should send you his source files? remove your negative trust at once
LOL. Why are you so strongly defending legendster? I have read up on a pretty good number of crazy views however this post makes it outright look like you are an alt of legendster Roll Eyes Is this the case?

Even if legendster is exonerated of the allegations mentioned in the OP, he has a very sketchy past and I would not trade with him.

Kind Regards
Panthers52

Most likely he is.
Well if i were his alt you would be the first to know @panthers52 , after all, you are the expert at such matters

This thread isnt about his past so none of that cant be used when deciding on his trust ratings

The he shouldnt have used those pics for his portfolio. Simple as that.

If the pics are his they are his, i dont know why he needs to go as far as proving his identity and handing over source codes, ave you traded with this user?

No one asked for the source codes fool. Learn to read before posting. Start posting with your brain and not your ass.
627  Economy / Reputation / Re: @james.lent gives me negative trust for no reason on: February 29, 2016, 03:30:45 AM
The image taken from wikipedia was created by Gilles Tran, if you can proof that identity, I'm ready to remove my negative trust.
This is not you asking for proof of identity?
I'm asking him to proof that he is Gilles Tran on wikipedia, as I can proof I'm Lutpin on Wikipedia.
For what it's worth, that Wikipedia user could be named Xx_snipz0rkill0r123_xX.
There is publicly available information about that person on the internet, proving that he is Gilles Tran on wikepedia will make him an easy dox target

Why would he worry if he had done nothing wrong.
OK, how about you release your information on a public forum with half a million people
You can start with your age, sex and location

This should not be a problem since you have done nothing wrong

You want to  force people to do things you wont do

go ahead, post your data

Am i the one who posted googled pics claiming to be mine? Posting his identity as in editing his wiki post. No one asked for his damn address. Now drop the trolling efforts as it only shows how immature you are. Either that or you're an alt of Legenster
628  Economy / Reputation / Re: @james.lent gives me negative trust for no reason on: February 29, 2016, 03:24:22 AM
The image taken from wikipedia was created by Gilles Tran, if you can proof that identity, I'm ready to remove my negative trust.
This is not you asking for proof of identity?
I'm asking him to proof that he is Gilles Tran on wikipedia, as I can proof I'm Lutpin on Wikipedia.
For what it's worth, that Wikipedia user could be named Xx_snipz0rkill0r123_xX.
There is publicly available information about that person on the internet, proving that he is Gilles Tran on wikepedia will make him an easy dox target

Why would he worry if he had done nothing wrong.
629  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Senior Member legendster's Multimedia Services on: February 29, 2016, 03:22:14 AM
So he should send you his source files? remove your negative trust at once
LOL. Why are you so strongly defending legendster? I have read up on a pretty good number of crazy views however this post makes it outright look like you are an alt of legendster Roll Eyes Is this the case?

Even if legendster is exonerated of the allegations mentioned in the OP, he has a very sketchy past and I would not trade with him.

Kind Regards
Panthers52

Most likely he is.
Well if i were his alt you would be the first to know @panthers52 , after all, you are the expert at such matters

This thread isnt about his past so none of that cant be used when deciding on his trust ratings

The he shouldnt have used those pics for his portfolio. Simple as that.
630  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Senior Member legendster's Multimedia Services on: February 29, 2016, 03:16:31 AM
So he should send you his source files? remove your negative trust at once
LOL. Why are you so strongly defending legendster? I have read up on a pretty good number of crazy views however this post makes it outright look like you are an alt of legendster Roll Eyes Is this the case?

Even if legendster is exonerated of the allegations mentioned in the OP, he has a very sketchy past and I would not trade with him.

Kind Regards
Panthers52

Most likely he is.
631  Economy / Reputation / Re: @james.lent gives me negative trust for no reason on: February 29, 2016, 03:14:04 AM
@james.lent left me negative trust calling me a troll, refference is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1380870.0;topicseen

He is asking for source files for files created as far back as 6 years ago and a member of his hateleague is also in his thread asking someone to show proof of identity

You are clearly trolling. I didnt ask for a 6 years ago file, he posted it last december. Now those who can read would know whats being requested. You deserve that feedback.
632  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Senior Member legendster's Multimedia Services on: February 29, 2016, 03:12:47 AM
lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Wouldnt be hard for him to do a basic reconstruction of those images now to prove his innocence. Clearly those images are not his. They're not only available on that one source which i've posted, but all over google.
So why not just ask for him to do a basic reconstruction instead of having him show proof of identity?
I think you guys arent clear on what bitcoin and this forum is about


I did. Stop trolling and get back to your bridge.
You did not, you asked him for screenshots of when the images were under original construction, what are the chances of him taking screenshots from 6 years ago and still having them?

Quote
screenshot when its under the designing process or something

did i say 6 years ago ? Under designing process could also mean a recreation , or maybe he has the project saved. Not talking about the first pic in general, now stop trolling.

But, if he does have the skill to do this and he does create something and provides screenshots, how will that prove that he made the original pictures
simple-- (how will he prove he made the old pictures with new ones?)

Since he updated his portfolio recently with those pics, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1072391.msg13354700#msg13354700 , and if he's the original creator of those pics, then im sure he wont have an issue proving them.
But my question is how you think he is going to prove that he made the images, do you think he made screenshots halfway through his work?

Wtf, are you retarded or just trolling ? If he owns the image im sure he has the means to prove em. Every project has a source file. Like photoshop has .psd files. Source files is a must for 3d renderings as they're needed for edits/ touch-ups . Stop shilling
So he should send you his source files? remove your negative trust at once

No, as i've already stated, he can open that file, take a snapshot of his work and post it. Cant you read?
633  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Senior Member legendster's Multimedia Services on: February 29, 2016, 03:09:04 AM
lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Wouldnt be hard for him to do a basic reconstruction of those images now to prove his innocence. Clearly those images are not his. They're not only available on that one source which i've posted, but all over google.
So why not just ask for him to do a basic reconstruction instead of having him show proof of identity?
I think you guys arent clear on what bitcoin and this forum is about


I did. Stop trolling and get back to your bridge.
You did not, you asked him for screenshots of when the images were under original construction, what are the chances of him taking screenshots from 6 years ago and still having them?

Quote
screenshot when its under the designing process or something

did i say 6 years ago ? Under designing process could also mean a recreation , or maybe he has the project saved. Not talking about the first pic in general, now stop trolling.

But, if he does have the skill to do this and he does create something and provides screenshots, how will that prove that he made the original pictures
simple-- (how will he prove he made the old pictures with new ones?)

Since he updated his portfolio recently with those pics, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1072391.msg13354700#msg13354700 , and if he's the original creator of those pics, then im sure he wont have an issue proving them.
But my question is how you think he is going to prove that he made the images, do you think he made screenshots halfway through his work?

Wtf, are you retarded or just trolling ? If he owns the image im sure he has the means to prove em. Every project has a source file. Like photoshop has .psd files. Source files is a must for 3d renderings as they're needed for edits/ touch-ups . Stop shilling
634  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Senior Member legendster's Multimedia Services on: February 29, 2016, 03:02:49 AM
lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Wouldnt be hard for him to do a basic reconstruction of those images now to prove his innocence. Clearly those images are not his. They're not only available on that one source which i've posted, but all over google.
So why not just ask for him to do a basic reconstruction instead of having him show proof of identity?
I think you guys arent clear on what bitcoin and this forum is about


I did. Stop trolling and get back to your bridge.
You did not, you asked him for screenshots of when the images were under original construction, what are the chances of him taking screenshots from 6 years ago and still having them?

Quote
screenshot when its under the designing process or something

did i say 6 years ago ? Under designing process could also mean a recreation , or maybe he has the project saved. Not talking about the first pic in general, now stop trolling.

But, if he does have the skill to do this and he does create something and provides screenshots, how will that prove that he made the original pictures
simple-- (how will he prove he made the old pictures with new ones?)

Since he updated his portfolio recently with those pics, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1072391.msg13354700#msg13354700 , and if he's the original creator of those pics, then im sure he wont have an issue proving them.
635  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Senior Member legendster's Multimedia Services on: February 29, 2016, 02:56:42 AM
lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Wouldnt be hard for him to do a basic reconstruction of those images now to prove his innocence. Clearly those images are not his. They're not only available on that one source which i've posted, but all over google.
So why not just ask for him to do a basic reconstruction instead of having him show proof of identity?
I think you guys arent clear on what bitcoin and this forum is about


I did. Stop trolling and get back to your bridge.
You did not, you asked him for screenshots of when the images were under original construction, what are the chances of him taking screenshots from 6 years ago and still having them?

Quote
screenshot when its under the designing process or something

did i say 6 years ago ? Under designing process could also mean a recreation , or maybe he has the project saved. Not talking about the first pic in general, now stop trolling.
636  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Senior Member legendster's Multimedia Services on: February 29, 2016, 02:51:44 AM
lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Wouldnt be hard for him to do a basic reconstruction of those images now to prove his innocence. Clearly those images are not his. They're not only available on that one source which i've posted, but all over google.
So why not just ask for him to do a basic reconstruction instead of having him show proof of identity?
I think you guys arent clear on what bitcoin and this forum is about


I did. Stop trolling and get back to your bridge.
637  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Senior Member legendster's Multimedia Services on: February 29, 2016, 02:46:59 AM
lol, you guys are going too far, lutpin is now asking this guy for proof of identity
Also @james.lent if he made the pictures years ago, why would you expect him to have pics of it being constructed from that many years ago? why would he even have pictures of the image in construction?

Wouldnt be hard for him to do a basic reconstruction of those images now to prove his innocence. Clearly those images are not his. They're not only available on that one source which i've posted, but all over google.
638  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Senior Member legendster's Multimedia Services on: February 29, 2016, 02:33:20 AM

Not sure why he would do this if he was expecting people to pay for his services - once they see his REAL work, they would most likely bomb him with negative feedback (maybe he wanted them to send first?)

That would most likely be the intention he has.
639  Economy / Services / Re: Multimedia Services - [[Legend Creatory]] on: February 29, 2016, 02:12:55 AM
Updated Skill set on main post.

Will be bumping this everyday till new year's eve after which I'll be busy with some pre-scheduled projects.

Nice pics, check out this thread : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1380870.0
640  Economy / Scam Accusations / Senior Member legendster's Multimedia Services on: February 29, 2016, 02:10:05 AM
What happened:: This member started a thread on the service section offering 3d rendering/modeling services. He has also 'updated his portfolio' which are actually random images grabbed from google and he slapped trademarks on them

Scammers Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=93844

Reference Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1072391.0
         Archived : https://web.archive.org/web/20160130051714/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1072391.0

Images source: first pic : https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datagrafikk  / https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ec/Glasses_800_edit.png

                     second pic : http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-0FBjowpxpxU/TjgX8-M0gbI/AAAAAAAAAEw/Bgf7nAR1xG4/s1600/Home-theatre.jpg

                        third pic : http://s3images.coroflot.com/user_files/individual_files/407503_ZEl1NoCTwdYBpAVqUS1QckNtr.jpg

                         fifth pic : http://www.offshorerenderingservices.com/images/architectural-samples/3d-interior-rendering-18.jpg

Slapping on a trademark on someone else's work doesn't make it yours. Only proves that you're out to scam.

edit: If you really did design them, then im sure you have no issue's proving it as maybe a screenshot when its under the designing process or something.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 [32] 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 ... 170 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!