Whoring self out for replacement SP20 controller boards...
Yup, controller boards R'US - I could do with a couple myself........
|
|
|
I'm like the guys who are paying a premium and sleeping next to the front door to get the latest Nintenstation 6 at midnight the day it's released Never had you down as one of.....those. Oh dear
|
|
|
I've emailed the hosting provider, but have yet to receive an answer. Are you using the same name with the hosting company as on these forums? If you can give me a price for postage then I'm sure we can sort something out Cheers. EDIT: Just had a reply from them: Hello,
He has just sold all 3 Of them as far as I know and they will be hosted at our farm.
-- Mining Sweden - Tommy So they've gone then?
|
|
|
I contacted Sfards some time ago regarding p2pool compatibility & pricing, they seemed very keen at the time to test their hardware out with p2pool & asked me for more info & a node to test with, which I duly provided them. However, since then they have been completely silent. I've just emailed them again in the hope they can clarify things, but the pricing is so high that I doubt they will ever be competative even if their hardware does work with p2pool.
I notice it uses a fork of Pooler's cpuminer via USB & raspberry pi - which is interesting though.
|
|
|
Nice one Ahmed - if you need a p2pool tester, let me know
|
|
|
Pulled the latest, compiled without error on 14.04 64bit & it runs - but still getting disconnects in between bandwidth saturation with tx sizes 3404 using the eu node Fixed server memory usage, bumped the buffer size, should work now? Nope: Sent transaction of size 3644 to relay server Received transaction of size 3644 from relay server Sent transaction of size 3644 to relay server Received transaction of size 3644 from relay server Sent transaction of size 3644 to relay server Received transaction of size 3644 from relay server Sent transaction of size 3644 to relay server Received transaction of size 3644 from relay server Sent transaction of size 3644 to relay server Received transaction of size 3644 from relay server Sent transaction of size 3644 to relay server Received transaction of size 3644 from relay server Sent transaction of size 3644 to relay server 127.0.0.1 Disconnect: failed to read message header (Transport endpoint is not connected) 127.0.0.1 Disconnect: failed to read message header (Transport endpoint is not connected) 127.0.0.1 Disconnect: failed to read message header (Transport endpoint is not connected) 127.0.0.1 Disconnect: failed to read message header (Transport endpoint is not connected) 127.0.0.1 Disconnect: failed to read message header (Transport endpoint is not connected) 127.0.0.1 Disconnect: failed to read message header (Transport endpoint is not connected)
...still getting flooded with large tx's all the same size too
|
|
|
Hello there,
I'm interested in 1 or 2, but have a few questions:
Can you post confirmation/proof of where they are hosted? What make/model are the PSU's? Will you accept escrow? What is the shipping price for 2 to the UK? Rough price for 2 in BTC?
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
Hm this is interesting and worth investigating. However, now I have no idea how to use p2pool over TOR?
Can't help you there I'm afraid, but I'm also interested in how to set it up.......gonna google for a while
|
|
|
Pulled the latest, compiled without error on 14.04 64bit & it runs - but still getting disconnects in between bandwidth saturation with tx sizes 3404 using the eu node
|
|
|
Doesn't joincoin use TOR? I've never tried using p2pool over TOR, but I'm sure it requires a slightly different configuration, ie: -tor=<ip:port> Use proxy to reach tor hidden services (default: same as -proxy) Just a thought......
|
|
|
Or just restart your coin daemon - p2pool will then kick in
|
|
|
More improvements? Look forward to seeing them.......I'm still impressed with how it looks & runs as it is tbh, I wouldn't know it was running if it wasn't for the occasional payment pop-up - very stable. Exchanges & a couple of pools would help a lot.
|
|
|
Luck it is then......
|
|
|
Wow guys - that's some blocktastic green run you've got going on there, well done! Do you think it's because of your modifications -ck mentioned earlier?: Gimme gimme........ The modifications are custom and private, sorry Pools need to have some advantage. I'm intrigued......
|
|
|
How do you figure your sharechain was corrupted?
I'm not sure, I can only put it down to the bad peers, which I've now blocked - no problems since
|
|
|
Does no one use it any more? Does it still work?
I've not been able to get it working since upgrading to Bitcoind v11 a few days ago.......... I'm on 0.11 as of recently as well. Perhaps that's the common issue... I just done a git pull - it's working again, but I'm not receiving - only sending.........
|
|
|
Wait......... Back from the dead....Muuhhaahhaahhaaaaaahaha!!
|
|
|
Does no one use it any more? Does it still work?
I've not been able to get it working since upgrading to Bitcoind v11 a few days ago..........
|
|
|
|