In short, the STE token is the old token and changed by the A2A token? If then, is it possible that STE will devaluate soon?
Now I see that A2A token is really differ from STE token and I think this is the first ever project I've seen that used 2 different tokens during token sale.
I want also to clarify this.

I think the next update will be at the end of the token sale which held on the 2nd week of April. We need to keep an eye for this project! Until now, I am confuse on the difference of STE and A2A token aside from their meaning. I mean,  why does the STeX made a new coin?

First of all, its been a long day since I replied in this thread and it seems that my post was at the middle of the thread. Glad to see the new investors of Lina.
Anyway, I think there are many people that engaged in lina.review. Well, it is not anymore a big deal because I knew that soon lina will bullish by people.
Lina is made in order to fight review fraud and hidden costs. That is the primary objectives of this project. One thing we should know that lina is not just a product or services. They can also review the cryptocurrency and hopefully, soon, ICO will be the next target of this review because 80% of ICO.nowadays, are fake and scam.

Why? Is there any news or changes about ethereum? Well if it has, I am not updated about it. But I think nothing goes wrong with ethereum. Its price is normal and it does not fluctuate very much. Anyway, I want to hold ethereum right not because the price of it is more low than before. Maybe, it will rise up when the quarter 3 will start. Hopefully, I will invest in ethereum for the couple of days.

As far as I know, lina review will focus in the service of the firms and company, not in the government. And I think it is hard to integrate reviews in politics since we all know that the politicians don't have the plan to drop their position in just a matter of review.

I thought STeX did not anymore seek for a partnership. Well, I think it is better to have partnership because supporters and partners in order to promote the project though we knew that STeX is popular.
It is a great opportunity for both of them.

Yes, I observed it last day ago that there are some exchange projects that are similar with STeX. And I think it is better to know what will be the advantage of STeX to their new unknown competitors? What will be the uniqueness of this project if there is a look alike with their features?
I think that STeX must rapidly launch the project before the people will turn to others. I am a fan of STeX but not all people has the same perception like me. A perception that even there are existing campaigns related in exchange, I will support and participate only STeX because I can see the future of this project.

Moderator is not available eversince. I always keep an eye for this project but I did not see any footsteps of the moderator of lina. I think this thread is self-moderated.
The project surely applied in real life situation. In case that a person will search for a good/services, he will use lina.review in order to have an idea about the products offered by a firm. The review will serve as the guiding tool of a client to find the best firm that sells products.

I saw other projects a little bit alike in STEX because they are also aggregating lot of coins in their pwn exchange and I think they are promising too. It seems like STEX is outdated in their updates regarding in their platform even their ICO. I hope they will launch smoothly because I want to use this exchange.

I hope you can aggregate many coins as much as possible. That's what I need in an exchange but it is good also if you will filter the coins from shitcoins.

In days of economic crisis, people will usually withdraw their investment or savings in order to supply their needs. As crypto investors, people may withdraw a lot of cryptocurrency to convert into fiat. Now, if there are many people who will withdraw cryptocurrency, it will lead to a great loss of its price.

There is no update as of now on how does the lina will pay the advertisers and clients. But I think the payment will either in the form of fiat currency or lina token.

"The end justifies the means"
As we walk to our own journey, there is always a problem that we will encounter. Problems that will test our faith, capability, and endurance. Problems that will put ourselves to a great fatality. Problem that is hard to overcome. But, why do we need to suffer from a devastating problem? There are times that we want to surrender, there are times that we want to give up! Because we know that it is too hard to surpass. I am sure that everything has a purpose. God will not give a problem that we will not overcome. He knows everything, He knows what will be the good for us. Stop complaining to your problems. Let the negative turns to be positive.
I know that it is not easy to move along the path we didn't know. But, how we will finish the road if we will not take it? Darkness covered our way, mistakes scares us to fight and hope does not exist to ourselves. We need to conquer them all! We must not negative things ruin our life, we must maneuver the road that we will walking. Yet it is hard to move but we need to take a risk. Because success  is only for those who tried. The essence of success cannot be measured by material things but by the problems you have overcome. Just don't surrender when you have been mistaken. Remember, Failures and rejection are the first step to success!
Life is full of circumstances, full of tragedy but we must conquer it till the end of our life! Because, as William Henly said:
We are the master of our faith.
We are the captain of our soul.

Many threads discussing the reason behind the objection of the government in cryptocurrency.
There are two reasons:
1. The government is threatened by the power of cryptocurrency in future. They cannot manipulate the citizen wether in illegal activities nor storing of assets without any taxes.
2. The government do not want to risk the financial stability of their citizen and economy to a volatile asset.

Yes the helpers are moderator of every review. But the main purpose of the helper is to make an original post about the criticism, suggestion and comment wether good or bad in goods and services offered by a firm.
Moderation is a helpful way to enhance the reliability of the lina review. It can ease the review fraud.

I hope it will not affect much the total market cap of cryptocurrency because definitely, people withdraw their life in crypto. The crisis in cryptocurrency makes a lot of people disappointed in the current trend in our economy. Hopefully, crisis will not happen and somehow, cryptocurrency will bullish by this year.

Are you mad?
If you are looking for transparency, lina will provide a tranparent review because of blockchain technology. Helpers are traceable and in case they allegedly prove that they made a biased review, they will remove from the service.
Clean Review is like a paper, if you don't want to mark it by even a small tint then try not to write on it. I hope you'll get my point.

I do not know as of now what are the exchanges or projects that are decentralized. But I think it is good to be decentralized since cryptocurrency is made for the decentralization.

Quite ironic isn't it?
You are promoting the project by wearing the signature of lina but look at what you are saying in the project. It seems like you did not read the whitepaper, you just join in a project that is not totally convincing to you.
If you have doubt in the project, why you are still promoting it?

We have different views! I pointed out for the paid customers who will make review for the service. What are you talking about is the helper. Definitely, helpers are paid to make an equal review for all. They have the right to make negative or positive review as long as it is genuine. The protocol in helper is that, if anyone of them are caught to be in connection with a firm or making a biased review, automatically, they will remove from the service.