~snip~
In the country I live in there is a very high percentage of gamblers who play on foreign online gambling sites, because it is officially allowed to play only in a few specially designated areas for gambling. Many people do not make sense to lose a day or two to get to a land-based casino located in one of these territories, so a lot of money goes past the tax system of the country. I believe that this is a shortcoming of our authorities. The government missed so much money that is leaving without them profiting from it. Most countries however have their own sponsored lottery game where the locals can buy tickets in different stores. If this lottery contributes a large percentage to the economy, the more the country could get if they allow online operators. The catch however is that more of its citizens will be hooked into gambling. Bad enough with the terrible stories about housewives who are just addicted to social media. If housewives get hooked on casinos, its the end of it many will be divorced. Many peoples of the world have been gambling since ancient times and it hasn't stopped society from coming to where we are. Why exactly now all housewives will suddenly start gambling? They have always had the opportunity to gamble. Online casinos didn't appear yesterday or even a couple of years ago, and before the advent of the internet, you could play card games with almost any neighbor, because no one could ever enforce a ban on gambling where law enforcement couldn't get in. You can't just ban something that is in the blood of many nations. |
|
|
|
^
На мой взгляд особой разницы нет в POW и POS сети работает тот или иной проект. Падения сети бывают на ранних стадиях у многих. В POS сетях блоки так же создаются и проверяются валидаторами, как и майнерами в POW сетях. Работа происходит все на том же железе, если исключить гонку за хешрейт, которая ведет к все более мощному оборудованию в POW сетях (асики, мощные видеокарты). А по моему так разница колоссальная. И речь идёт не о техническом моменте а больше о финансовом, а именно возможности концентрации токенов у руководства или у скупающих монету китов. В PoS системах это реализуется просто на раз два. И без особых хлопот. В PoW все сложнее так как требуется все таки железо, а не просто элементарная скупка токенов. В результате, если рассуждать о централизации/децентрализации, но, конечно с учётом, что децентрализации не может быть полностью на100% реализована (это очевидно), а централизация запросто (как например в Солане, но это по моему так), то и получается что PoW имеют гораздо большую ценность как гарантированно распределения система. А все сказки про зелень и углеродный след, это просто сказки для наивностей типа Греты Т. На самом деле децентрализация это миф, с которым уже давно пора смирится. На открытом рынке можно купить любые монеты (POW или POS, нет никакой разницы) и в любом количестве. Большей долей монет всегда стараются владеть разработчики и фонды, т.к. в противном случае им нет никакого смысла заниматься развитием проекта. Разработчики нанимают маркетмейкеров чтобы управлять ценой монет и пополнять запасы, которые опустошаются на бычке. Большие дяди делают деньги, а про зеленую повестку толкают речи люди, которые далеки от криптовалют. Они могут и говном шубы из натурального меха мазать. А в POS действительно идет более высокое энергопотребление за счет постоянно растущей сложности добычи монет и это факт. |
|
|
|
~snip~
In the country I live in there is a very high percentage of gamblers who play on foreign online gambling sites, because it is officially allowed to play only in a few specially designated areas for gambling. Many people do not make sense to lose a day or two to get to a land-based casino located in one of these territories, so a lot of money goes past the tax system of the country. I believe that this is a shortcoming of our authorities. |
|
|
|
~snip~
All gamblers are different, so the options can be as many as you want. I can name three of the most common in my opinion: - beginner is likely to return after a loss because he wants to win back, - experienced player knows that losing is as natural as winning, so just does not pay attention to it, - a gambler with an addiction gambles with all the money he has, so he will return to gambling until he gets help or runs out of money. |
|
|
|
^
На мой взгляд особой разницы нет в POW и POS сети работает тот или иной проект. Падения сети бывают на ранних стадиях у многих. В POS сетях блоки так же создаются и проверяются валидаторами, как и майнерами в POW сетях. Работа происходит все на том же железе, если исключить гонку за хешрейт, которая ведет к все более мощному оборудованию в POW сетях (асики, мощные видеокарты). Взять тот же ETH. Сейчас не найду ссылку на время и дату происшествия, но сеть ETH так же переставала производить блоки. В BTC тоже была остановка и разработчикам приходилось исправлять ПО и сообщать майнерам о необходимости срочно обновить ПО. К тому же в BTC сети время от времени встречаются и двойные траты - а это может быть гораздо серьезнее, чем остановка сети. По моему мнению остановки сети по большей части бывают из-за того, что именно разработчики что-то не предусмотрели в новом релизе ПО а во время тестирования это не было выявлено. |
|
|
|
Вот же блин. Дожили до того момента, когда приходится перебирать разные vpn-ы. Я про них раньше только читал, но никогда не пользовался. Думал, что не понадобится и никогда не дойдет до такого. Ох, как же ошибался по этому поводу. Теперь поменял свое мнение и видение ситуации. ~
Да уж. Я уже ничему не удивляюсь. Первое к чему я мягко сказать был не готов это коронавирус, потом эта СВО. О блокировке VPN-сервисов говорили уже дано и в принципе многие к этому были готовы. В РФ все давно уже привыкли, что средства выделенные на многие инициативы распиливаются где-то в кабинетах и эти инициативы остаются выполненными лишь на бумаге, поэтому ничего не меняется из года в год. Блокировка VPN видимо находится под особым контролем, т.к. эта инициатива реально выполняется. Smartprofit, спасибо. Взял на заметку lantern.io. |
|
|
|
|
My parents found out I was gambling when I was in high school. They did not react in any way, as card gambling was widespread in my country at that time, both among young people and older people.
When they found out that I liked to spend time in a land-based casino they took it more seriously. I remember that conversation with my father. I didn't stop gambling from that time, I just started hiding it from them.
|
|
|
|
^
During the pandemic, schoolchildren and students in many countries switched to distance education. Without the Internet, not only would they not be able to connect to online lectures, they would not be able to receive assignments. In today's world, everyone should have access to the Internet. Also, if you think children are so limited in information that they only get it from their parents and teachers, you are wrong. Kids know a lot more now than we did at their age. |
|
|
|
^
I believe that parents should not forbid gambling but explain to the child that the price of gambling is very high and they will have to face the loss of what they value. The child should realize that the chances of losing what he already has a little higher than the chances of gaining something. In my opinion, before risking anything you have to learn how to earn and it is really important for children to understand this. |
|
|
|
А что за кошелек, если не секрет?
Phantom 23.14.0. Вот так отображается на нескольких десятках NFT:  Попробовал сжечь одну NFT - возврата SOL не произошло. У меня та же версия Phantom. Я все же смог найти на своем кошельке единственный скам токен, который при сжигании не дает Sol (третий скриншот).    Заметил, что первые два скам-токена имеют рабочие контракты на solscan, а третий нет. Не стал публиковать эти ссылки, т.к. существует вероятность, что кто-нибудь может перейти по ссылкам из контракта токена и остаться без средств на кошельке. |
|
|
|
Well but the thing about that is that the entertainment they get is very, very expensive.
They would be much better off to pay for any other type of entertainment.
Gambling can get very, very expensive
The gambling is not like the normal game to play and don’t worry about the win or loss.Because gambling need some money to play and surely it’s expensive,the win from the gambling always gives money in the gambling.The same was not the possible in the other games.If you are not afford to lose the money,you can play the normal games.Why you are getting into the gambling and blame the gambling sites after the loss in the game.No one going to blame gamble sites after the win,So why you blame on the loss in the gambli It is expensive if one fell off into the addiction hole but not if one knows how to stay within their limits. Gambling is actually like any other game to play but it was only the people who think it's not. They are the only one who likes to complicate things. In gambling, it is still possible to enjoy it even without a money involved but a lot of people can't be contented with that because they always sees gambling as a money-making machine. Those who blame the gambling site for their loss are crazy type of people. Yes they should have avoid gambling in the first place but I hope they will now right after it because there is no way that a gambling company can return their money no matter what they do. Yes, gambling is something similar to other games, but unlike them gambling allows you to get your hopes up about a big win. And this hope appears in all gamblers regardless of the size of their bets or the amount of money. That is why gambling and gather around so many people. The only thing that not everyone realizes is that luck can not smile on everyone. By the way, if you exclude money from gambling (can be replaced by any other value), then such a game loses its meaning. |
|
|
|
I see too many people playing way too often. I couldn't agree more that taking a break between gambling, especially when you've got a problem or you simply gamble a whole lot, it's always good to take a break for mental health. To me gambling should be something that is a fun hobby for people, not something that people should be doing every day and stressing themselves out with.
If a person has a serious gambling problem, he needs to either stop gambling completely, or learn to control himself and his money while gambling, and not to take breaks. Any gambler who has long abstained from gambling, well remember the greedy feeling with which he returns to the game after a break. Sometimes at such a moment you can spend even more than you were going to spend at first. Controlling your interruptions helps if you do not have a gambling addiction and want to reduce the likelihood of having one. |
|
|
|
^
Сейчас зашел в кошелек Phantom и проверил работу процесса сжигания на скамерской NFT. При вопросе о сжигании сообщается, что адрес будет пополнен на 0.00230928 Sol. По идее изменений быть не может т.к. это средства за удаление суб-аккаунта, который создается под каждый отдельный SPL-токен. Могу лишь предположить, что ваш кошелек не показывает это. А что за кошелек, если не секрет? |
|
|
|
~ У меня всё очень нестабильно, к сожалению.
В общем, нужно постоянно искать новые способы борьбы с блокировками. ~
Red Shild VPN вам в помощь. Тьфу-тьфу, у меня пока все работает стабильно, но эту тему стараюсь постоянно мониторить на тот случай, если проснувшись как-нибудь утром обнаружу, что последний рабочий VPN оказался недоступен. Вообще не представляю себе как можно будет жить без VPN, т.к. использую его не только для посещения форума, но и многих других дел. |
|
|
|
One thing I also discovered on this discussion is that the kind of games children play is different form the one gamblers used to gamble with money. Children will not paly game that will not give them join and happiness. And they like cartoon Network games. Normal casino games are boring to them so they are not even interested to play those games. And children does not like sport the games like that. Though they can play the he's with PS2, 3,4 or 5 but for them to use money bet on sport games I have not seen such in my locality. Though it is better to caution them at the early age so that when they grow up, they will not depart from the moral caution of the father.
That's not how it works all the time, there are children who get curious about almost everything they see their parents doing, and when they see them gambling, they get curious and will obviously start asking questions about it and some might even want to try it sometime, and kids of this era are very smart and they don't forget things very easily. That's why, we as parents need to be careful about what our children see us doing because those things will literally be imprinted on their minds. It might be true that a lot of children might not be interested in the games that they see their parents playing unless it's a slot game because we all know that slot games are pretty interesting with their graphics and everything and it is fun to see the gameplay of some of the slot games like Sweet Bonanza, etc. Children always try to repeat the behavior of their parents, because such actions allow them to gain new experience. Remember how we learn to draw - we just draw someone else's drawing until we start drawing it ourselves. That is why it is very important that children until adulthood do not see in the behavior of their parents that could provoke them to explore entertainment for which they are not yet ready. I will use your example  When we learned how to draw, by repeating other drawing or with help, we did not became real artists that draw masterpieces. That is why if kids see parents gamble, most likely they would also only gamble from time to time, like their parents. They wont become paranoid on gambling, have shaking hand due to desire to place a bet every time they have money. Just teach kids that gambling is hobby, entertainment, time killer, but not a way to earn or get rich. And that is it. They wont become addicted just from watching or trying to gamble themselves from time to time. My children have asked me several times about gambling because they have seen advertisements on the internet. I told them about the risks of gambling using the example of chocolate slices. They seemed to realize that it is not very reasonable to risk what you already have for a small chance to increase the number of chocolate slices. They also don't want to invest their chocolate slices with a 10% daily return. They want them here and now. From my observations they really enjoy playing computer games and watching entertainment content on Youtube. I am sure that if they never try gambling they will not be interested in it. |
|
|
|
One thing I also discovered on this discussion is that the kind of games children play is different form the one gamblers used to gamble with money. Children will not paly game that will not give them join and happiness. And they like cartoon Network games. Normal casino games are boring to them so they are not even interested to play those games. And children does not like sport the games like that. Though they can play the he's with PS2, 3,4 or 5 but for them to use money bet on sport games I have not seen such in my locality. Though it is better to caution them at the early age so that when they grow up, they will not depart from the moral caution of the father.
That's not how it works all the time, there are children who get curious about almost everything they see their parents doing, and when they see them gambling, they get curious and will obviously start asking questions about it and some might even want to try it sometime, and kids of this era are very smart and they don't forget things very easily. That's why, we as parents need to be careful about what our children see us doing because those things will literally be imprinted on their minds. It might be true that a lot of children might not be interested in the games that they see their parents playing unless it's a slot game because we all know that slot games are pretty interesting with their graphics and everything and it is fun to see the gameplay of some of the slot games like Sweet Bonanza, etc. Children always try to repeat the behavior of their parents, because such actions allow them to gain new experience. Remember how we learn to draw - we just draw someone else's drawing until we start drawing it ourselves. That is why it is very important that children until adulthood do not see in the behavior of their parents that could provoke them to explore entertainment for which they are not yet ready. |
|
|
|
Games like dice give a player a 49% chance of winning a bet if the odds are set at 2x, and that doesn't include the house edge as that is cut from the amount if you win the bet. If we talk about slots, most of them have a lower than 97% RTP (Return To Player), so there is basically no chance for a player to get back the complete amount even if the slot gives back to them unless the player is extremely lucky and they manage to win more bets than losing.
So, the probability of losing in slots is obviously higher than in other games and that is the reason why they eat up a lot of money even if they have good RTPs. Other games might not have any RTP, but they provide slightly higher chances for the player to win certain bets.
The dice game can be altered using the risk management key,the gambler can use the 10 percentage risk game also in the gambling.But the only negative in such gambling was,the amount of the money he had win from the game will be very low compared to the dice with 50-60 percentage of the risk.Most of the gambler use the low risk in the dice like 10-40 to avoid of big loss then the big win.Big win was the secondary when you compared to the big loss in the game.If you loss small in the dice will help to win big in the other game. As far as I know RTP is a theoretical calculation that is very different from the real value of the return to the player as your gaming session lasts much less than 1 million spins. That is why relying on RTP values is not right. Yes, and does not make any sense. If you do not believe, you can do your own research, but remember that the more spins you make the more accurate will be the RTP, in addition, the result will be affected by such a factor as randomness. So every time the results will be different. |
|
|
|
~snip~
According to the description of your gambling strategy you are very much mistaken. I will remind you of a few indisputable facts that you forget about: - Each subsequent bet in gambling is not related to the previous ones, so linking the time of the game and success is not quite right. - Breaks in gambling make sense only when your emotions prevent you from making adequate decisions. - Gambling is a zero-sum game, which is why you can't win all the time. |
|
|
|
~ Кстати, думаю что с большой долей вероятности введут KYC при раздаче и вообще для всех будущих проектов тоже. Проектам уже хорошо известно о сибиллах и что у некоторых есть по 1000 акков. С другой же стороны, если бы не они, активность была на крайне слабом уровне, но я все равно к ним негативно отношусь. Интересен механизм все-таки как ZkSync и Starknet будут отбривать их, я просто в этом не сомневаюсь. ~
Не нужно забывать, что проекты также знают о том, что существуют сибилы, которые смогут пройти KYC хоть на тысяче аккаунтов. Мы же все прекрасно помним историю СНГ-абузера, который выносил сейлы на Coinlist с тысячи аккаунтов. Поэтому я не думаю что проектам есть какой-то смысл вводить KYC. Им гораздо проще, зная собственные критерии отбора для ретродропа, заводить свои собственные аккаунты и тем самым забирать ликвидность на себя, обходя при этом регуляторов. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
