Lower, not low, for me I still think 51,025,700 is significant for a weekend, in my modest opinion |
|
|
|
|
Russia out of Athletism might change things.
Russia probably will have less golds and maybe China can dispute with US for most golds
|
|
|
|
|
What was the transaction fee?
Medium priority transactions usually take 6 blocks to confirm(something like 1 hour or so),
|
|
|
|
|
with the tipster championship maybe?
if you know how to gamble and don't lose everything trying to chase losses
|
|
|
|
|
But you still are someone with 0 trust and no trading record asking to hold other people's fund for more than a month
Even if we trust you won't run away, how can we know that you'll be able to secure the funds and don't lose them for a hack or to a hardware malfuction or something alike, and that you won't gamble away all the money(like MRKLYE and others did)?
Even people once with high positive ratings now are with red trust(like escrow.ms and that other escrow that I don't remember the name)
|
|
|
|
You are the one that has no trust and wants to hold people's money for more than a month, and you don't accept people with negative trust  How could they scam you, if they pay upfront? |
|
|
|
|
Both and none in the same time.
I don't want something bleeding my money and with tiptster championships and giveaways I can recover any losses I have. But of course I don't have hope to make it for a living, only 1 among some millions can do it, I have more chances if I try to play in Barcelona than if I try to make a living on bets.
But I can't have fun with a sport game if I don't put money on it, so it is for fun too
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe both.
There is no reason to Bitcoin disappear in less than 4 years, but it is more than enough for a "better"(of course there are different definitions of what "better") appear.
But Bitcoin also is the infrastructure, not only the tech, and infrastructure won't appear overnight, no matter how good the tech is
|
|
|
|
By the way, how can we know if he's telling the truth when he says that he has no Bitcoin?
We don't. He might might be holding a boatload of bitcoin, but wants to go broke by convincing people that it's worthless. Dialectic thinking. If he is wrong and BTC goes to the moon, he will be rich. If he is right and BTC fails, he will lose, but at least he can brag to others he was right all the time. He will "win", one way or another |
|
|
|
|
I don't know.
If the bonus is good, being a non deposit one, will be prone to abuse.
If the bonus is bad, meaning your hardly will withdraw anything, then it is a waste of time anyway.
Better don't think much about it
|
|
|
|
 Mark T. Williams Mark T. Williams teaches finance, risk management and capital markets at Boston University School of Management and is a former Federal Reserve Bank examiner. Stolfi has a wikipedia article only for himself. It seems very accurate: Bitcoin activities
In late 2013 Jorge took an active interest in the emerging market of Bitcoin trading, and invested a substantial portion of his personal wealth in the cryptocurrency. He is assumed to be among the 500 largest holders of Bitcoins in the world. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jorge_StolfiThat's why I love Wikipedia. They might not be accurate, but sometimes they are funny as hell. By the way, how can we know if he's telling the truth when he says that he has no Bitcoin? |
|
|
|
|
But if under 2.5 is a common result, then the odds for under 2.5 will be lowered by the sportbooks, and maybe bet everything under 2.5 won't be profitable anymore
|
|
|
|
|
40 Euros for a premium tip?
Since I would not put hundreds on it, I'll pass, no matter if it is a good or bad tip.
I can get cheaper tips here, even for free
|
|
|
|
|
I would say: learn not to lose everything in the valleys and not think you have superpowers that can make you predict the future and you bet too much and lose everything
|
|
|
|
|
Forget about it.
They could just make you loss when they want if they have such control.
Either they are probably fair and you trust them or you don't and know they can cheat at any moment. If you don't trust the site better don't use them to bet
|
|
|
|
|
Gonna make the survey because of the cat. Not because the WWF donation or because of you.
Cats rule the world
|
|
|
|
|
Hard to find a site with analysis of the Europa league classification and I only see lots of unknown team to me.
I really don't know what lines to pick
|
|
|
|
|
Games at physical casinos of course.
Just see the James Bond movies, he always bet millions in physical casino, he never used BTC to gamble and would never trust millions to an online casino
|
|
|
|
|
You can do it even with signature campaigns, if you are patient.
For example, with bitmixer you get 0.0007 BTC/post, no matter the BTC price. If you do 50 posts/week in 600 weeks more or less you'll have 21 BTC, that is like 11 years(this is the time for a single account, you may get it quicker probably with more than 1).
Even if you can's spare real life earnings, if you post and always hodl you'll eventyally get to 21 BTC
|
|
|
|
Does the low volume means no one is spending or buying coins? Also, if the volume is so low why does it not affect the price?
Does this mean people are just hodling?
Just trying to work out the whole low volume thing.
There are around 1600 BTC being generated every day, so people must buy BTC to price don't drop. The miners won't just hodl everything because they have to pay bill and taxes. And low compared to what? Volume is lower than before the halving because the halving was a hyped event, now things are back to normal |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
