First of all in my opinion, people will not at all reveal their true identities in promoting a site only @$0.32 (price at the time I'm writing this)! Secondly, the posts that you are trying to promote (quoted below) are all referring to 4 scammy websites! Note to all Bitcointalk Members : It would be better not to promote these posts at all because you don't wanna risk the finance of your near and dear ones on Facebook. They might be noobish and might therefore fall into the trap by following your shared post! Or if you need that $0.32 and won't be able to survive without it, go ahead! Nobody's blocking your way.  OP, you might get offended by this post but it's the truth. Try posting some good shit instead! |
|
|
|
Will first off the girls send in verification pictures to me ( the mod )  so not everyone is allowed to post there they have to be invited to be able to submit their pictures there which eliminates most people wanting to do that! Well, that's a good idea of verifying members before posting there but one thing is certain for those members who don't want to reveal their identities, i,e. they will have to trust you fully to an extent that you'll not leak their identities in any way, sooner or later! So better manage those verification only by yourself, manually. Otherwise, this may affect the whole reputation of that community! Good Luck.  |
|
|
|
Yes, I hear your point. More like an aggregate of small tips gathered into one. I'm sure they are looking into this. The volume of pictures we are getting are not going effect ChangeTip and the network congestion.
True that xD! But how will you be assured of the fact that they are not spamming /r/NakedBitcoins by posting pictures from free porn sites ? They might be hot linking some pictures from there! |
|
|
|
|
Has Changetip agreed upon this idea yet? Moreover, using micro-payments nowadays might hurt the Bitcoin network with unusual traffic congestion, leading to slower verification process! In my opinion, Changetip should increase the value of tips given or should pay in aggregate of 10-20 small tips at a time so that it doesn't clog the network.
|
|
|
|
Does anyone know where i can get the estimated next difficulty via an api? I was searching, but didn't find a suitable api.
You can use Blockexplorer's API to get the current status of Bitcoin Difficulty. Where "xxx" can be: getDifficultyMoreover, you can replace "xxx" with the following on that same code to get these statuses: Hope this helps. |
|
|
|
I have tested the latest version out and everything seems fine. Also, by making it draggable everywhere on desktop, it's advantageous to drag it down on the taskbar below. Due to this context, can you make that clickable bar few pixels thicker? After a few days out I've taken i'm going to rewrite the program in the next days to finally add the save button. What do you think of adding a option to display the estimated next difficulty change? Beside that i'm going to add the color change option and the promised save button. And the optional backup API if the other one fails.
Yes, it yould be great to add an option to display the estimated next difficulty change. BTW, what API did you use in V1.4.2? It seems it hasn't failed till now! |
|
|
|
Hi, is there a way to restore the password?
NO! You must have a backup of your wallet's encrypted or non-encrypted passphrase. Otherwise, sorry to say, your coins are lost forever. Check whether you have written it down somewhere? Hope this helps! |
|
|
|
Looks like your altcoin in your signature is also shady   So, better back yourself up before accusing any false remarks to anyone, specially to our Global Moderator Good Luck! |
|
|
|
So you might think oh lose a little mbtc no problem that's because your in control. An addict on the other hand will keep on ploughing their funds in until they have nothing left and you don't think these people need help ?
In the middle of nowhere, someone, having no trust at all, is trying to help stupid gamblers not to "plough their funds". Instead, to store the funds inside an unknown treasury! LOL! Great joke man! I was having a tough schedule today until your joke has made my day.  |
|
|
|
Wait, so genesis mining isn't 100% confirmed legit either?
genesis-mining.com 1+2+7 => 3/7 = Probably legit.
A cloud mining company that won't let you direct the hashrate to your pool of choosing and can't prove its actually mining bitcoins itself, is very likely a scam. There is no reason to hide mining address or not sign blocks. None! 2) No endorsement from any ASIC vendor.ASIC vendors will gladly make a simple post to show the company in question is a significant customer of theirs. Its free advertisement for them and it helps their customer grow their business, so there is absolutely no reason they wouldn't. If a (cloud) mining company cant get any ASIC vendor to post such endorsement, you should assume they don't have any hardware to mine with. 7) No exit strategy.If you can't sell your position, you can't get your money out. That's the ideal case for a ponzi and allows it to run for a long time. Hope this helps! |
|
|
|
--- UPDATED LIST ---Ponzi's that have already collapsed as predicted: PBmining.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
Lunaminer.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
coinsoncloud.eu 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
Cryptomine.io 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
hashie.co 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
bitcoinlabmining.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
ltcgear 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = (very) suspicious
hashprofit.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
minethatcloud.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
CoIntellect.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
terabox.me 1+2+3*+4+5+6+7* => 7*/7 = Ponzi (pictures are not at all convincing, exit strategy involves 60+ days stall tactic)
chabatmining.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
Ecrypto.co.in 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi (+ confirmed scam, they are no partners of cex.io)
GenerateBTC.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
cloudminr.io 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
grmining.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
hashwar.co 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8 => 7/7 = Ponzi
bitrush.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
scrypt.cc 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8 => 7/7 = Ponzi
Kryptologika 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
Cryptsy MN 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi ( + no details on fee structure) (withdrawl problems noticed!)
Coolhash.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi (+ possible malware/wallet stealing software)
Bitminr.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi (+ possible malware/wallet stealing software)
MineProfit.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi (+ possible malware/wallet stealing software)
SpecialMiner.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi (+ possible malware/wallet stealing software)
Likely Ponzi scams that have yet to collapse:
cloudmining.website 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi
Skycoinlab.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi (+ organized by serial ponzi scammer: ?topic=583177.msg10298730)
btcslice.com 1+2+3+4+5+6+7 => 7/7 = Ponzi (+ pays out in reversible paypal ?)
bitcoinmaker.ch 1+2+3+4+6+7+8 => 7/7 = Ponzi
eobot.com 1+2+3+5+6+7 => 6/7 = Ponzi (+ possible malware/wallet stealing software)
nexusmining.com 1+2*+3+4+5+7 => 6/7 = Ponzi (Guy from Spondoolies says im wrong, but I can't score what I haven't seen and he seems to confirm they have no hardware)
minerslab.com 1+2+3+4+6+7 => 6/7 = Ponzi (+ selling hardware that doesnt exist + using purchased "legendary" account)
bitcoincloudservices 1+2+4+5+6*+7 => 6/7 = Ponzi (+ founded by known scammer https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=860400.msg9638868#msg9638868)
cloudmining.sg 1+2+4+6+7 => 5/7 = Ponzi (Founder's LinkedIn account deleted, Uses Weebly's free checkout platform)
hashcoins.com
and hashflare.io ~1+2+3+4+7 => 5/7 = (very) suspicious (user selectable pool requires fee, dc pictures show no miners, linkedin profile doctored, hardware sales very dubious,..) (*now owned by hashflare.io)
Zeushash 1+2+3+4+5 => 5/7 = (very) suspicious
Rest: pow88.com 1+2+5 => 3/7 = Probably legit (preliminary assessment) (Suspicious referral bonus : 1% hourly !!!)
genesis-mining.com 1+2+7 => 3/7 = Probably legit.
Bit-x.com 1+4 => 2/7 = Probably legit (preliminary assessment, partnership confirmed by Bitfury)
haobtc.com 1+2 => 2/7 = Probably Legit (investment based cloudmining company => https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1023187.0)
bw.com => 0/7 = Legit
Hashnest => 0/7 = Legit
Obsolete or suspended: AMhash => 0/7 = Legit
KNCcloud 7 => 1/7 = Legit
Cex.io 4 => 1/7 = Legit
Cryptx PETAmine => 0/7 = Legit
Megamine.com 1+4 => 2/7 = Probably legit
GAWminers 1+4+5+~7 => 4/7*= Possibly/partially legit based on criteria set forth. Based on wider context: more suspicious than a nun squatting in a cucumber field Small tips are much appreciated! My tip jar: 1SoumyadbsfCGsSekYdgAkWpGZM3WSaxtThanks.
|
|
|
|
Now they are trying to hide their shadiness by releasing S7 lite with lower hashrate! I think they need to change this BM1385 chip in order to overcome with heating and efficiency issues. At least in S8 maybe! |
|
|
|
I have noticed few bugs which I want to point out: 1. Sometimes, after fully downloading a course, some of the video lectures within a section doesn't get downloaded! Is there any ways I can download only those files afterwards? Because I don't want to download it fully again. 2. When I try to download multiple courses at a time, and due to some reason when my internet connection speed gets slower, the script stops downloading abruptly and I had to start all over again. Please add a feature in your next update such that the download gets paused in those situations or when I want to pause it. 3. There are some courses which showed me this error in the "debug.log" file and stopped downloading : 2015-11-13 13:30:33,048 - INFO - Downloading Course #16
2015-11-13 13:30:33,049 - INFO - Download Location: F:\crypto\udemy\x-x-x*
2015-11-13 13:30:33,049 - INFO - Course Link: https://www.udemy.com/x-x-x*
2015-11-13 13:30:33,062 - ERROR - err
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<string>", line 698, in I1i11
File "<string>", line 680, in II1IIIIiII1i
File "<string>", line 531, in IIIIii1I
File "<string>", line 119, in Oooo
File "<string>", line 42, in get
File "E:\Users\Evan\Dropbox\Work\Uemy Stuff\ifuckedyourmumnores\build\udemy_ripper_launch\out00-PYZ.pyz\requests.sessions", line 468, in get
File "E:\Users\Evan\Dropbox\Work\Uemy Stuff\ifuckedyourmumnores\build\udemy_ripper_launch\out00-PYZ.pyz\requests.sessions", line 456, in request
File "E:\Users\Evan\Dropbox\Work\Uemy Stuff\ifuckedyourmumnores\build\udemy_ripper_launch\out00-PYZ.pyz\requests.sessions", line 559, in send
File "E:\Users\Evan\Dropbox\Work\Uemy Stuff\ifuckedyourmumnores\build\udemy_ripper_launch\out00-PYZ.pyz\requests.adapters", line 375, in send
ConnectionError: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='www.udemy.com', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: /x-x-x* (Caused by <class 'socket.gaierror'>: [Errno 11001] getaddrinfo failed)
x-x-x* => PM me for the links.
 Please try to fix these issues (PM me if required), otherwise everything else is fine |
|
|
|
OP, can you sign a message from this and this addresses mentioning your username and the date of winning? The site you've mentioned is highly dubious, looking merely like a faucet! So instead of bragging yourself, let us know that you own those addresses |
|
|
|
I think CoinRoyale's Blackjack is mostly in favor with the dealer because when I tried card counting from start I still couldn't get my luck when the counting was in a bit higher position! That's why I mostly prefer live dealers over automated bots |
|
|
|
Yesterday I played a couple of local lottery but couldn't get my luck through any one of them  Lottery in fact sucks like the way a winner is chosen from a draw of lots!  |
|
|
|
I really vouch for GenesysCoin buy can you add an android wallet with android based games? Most of the time I remain outside and am unable to keep in touch with my PC games. That would be awesome addition for your innovative cryptocurrency Likewise, it would be more overwhelming if you vouch GenesysCoin to Shapeshift.io so that one can directly exchange Bitcoins with GSY ! |
|
|
|
Got my script at last Already completed downloading 2 courses of $297 each, FOR FREE ! Works pretty smoothly and OP won't let you down. I really vouch for this script. And it's highly recommended for students who can't afford $297 for each course! So I think this isn't illegal at all!A+++ seller |
|
|
|
In my opinion, this thread should not be indexed in Google, Bing or any other popular search engines! Because, if it gets too popular early then Udemy's technical team might release a patch against it! I think, changing the title ("subject") of this thread by not using the word "Udemy" might help somewhat in hiding it's true potential Anyways, this is just an advice from my side! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
