|
Well, I think in defense of rollbit I must add to this, not only you need to do video calls to ask for binance and google live login procedure, you'd also need to ask the client to pull down their pants to verify their gender, because you never know if you are being cat fished or not, am I right or am I right? Freaking lol.
Why don't you guys ask for a family video call as well, just to make sure it's really him/her, this is a serious privacy violation, and if this is legal in any country to allow third parties to request such disturbing procedure, you should perform a naked walk of shame in public for who ever legalizing that. Hopefully you realize the implications of such actions.
|
|
|
|
Those keys are in decimal, you have to convert them to hex : 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000eb5
Public key =
028bb9e12dc5e8ff3e4ba25775f1552e3b9be21f274250d511fce5cf15e73bbf2c I wonder if you are really a puzzle hunter, what are you even doing btw, regarding solving a puzzle? I thought last year I told you to ask anything you want, but seems you rather stay idly by and let others claim the prize! |
|
|
|
|
Funny, rather ironic to see you talking about such a subject, I believe you left a neutral tag on me claiming I'm posting spam to reach a quota, yet your reference points to a thread of mine with only a few replies, which if you had completely read the other replies, you would have understood that my post was a sarcastic respond to other replies, but since you are a sig spammer, and a DT abuser, you didn't care to read the other replies, and now you even have an opportunity to do more sig spam.
Now go a head and put your nose in people's posts and act as if you are a moderator, or a DT police, I guess the shame is on you. eh?
|
|
|
|
OK. Genius. I left this thread. If you wanted it, you succeeded. Enjoy your intelligence alone.
Don't do that, never back down from a challenge, especially this one which is a world stage class challenge. If you are discouraged, find the courage to keep going forward. Remember I talked about this? Imagine this is #130
00000000000000000000000000000002c56510da49e97b94ca065bbdfb67309c
And this is -n of 130
fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbf549cc0c655f24a6f5cc02ced4cf10a5
What happens if you drop all the leading Fs from -n of 130?
bf549cc0c655f24a6f5cc02ced4cf10a5 Now if #130 starts with 2, the inverse of #130 would be a value subtracted from n, and n has an e as it's 33rd character from right to left, so it should look like the above key, now if you drop b from it's beginning you will have this f549cc0c655f24a6f5cc02ced4cf10a5 All you have to do is to calculate their percentage differences, then from there you could potentially reduce the bit range by guess work, and even if you have to guess 100 million keys, which is not the case, because with this method you can pretty much reach a very low range result after 1000 guesses, but lets multiply that by 100, you will have 100k offsets with one of them being a low as 65 bit low key. Then you can unleash savage kangaroos to catch the correct key.😉
I see other than *A holes, we also have artists here, is that Nicholas cage? ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣠⣴⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠿⠿⠛⠻⠿⣷⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠟⠋⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⢷⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣾⣿⣿⣿⠟⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣻⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣴⣿⣿⣿⡿⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣴⠟⠉⠉⢳⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⡴⠶⠦⡄⠀⠀⠈⠃⡴⢻⣷⣾⣇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠞⠁⢀⣴⣶⠦⡄⠐⡆⠸⣟⠚⠋⠁⠈⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢯⣸⣿⠟⠃⠀⢷⠀⠈⠣⠀⠀⠀⠈⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣰⠟⠀⠀⠀⢨⡷⣄⠀⢿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠸⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⠛⠿⢿⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠀⠐⠛⠀⠀⠀⠙⠆⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣿⣿⣿⡹⣄⡶⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣦⠀⠀⠀⣀⡤⠴⣶⠀⠀⢸⣦⣤⣄⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣀⣀⣤⣽⣿⣿⣧⡻⣷⣦⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠙⠂⢶⣯⣥⣴⣾⠏⠀⠀⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣦⣤⣀
⠀⠀⢀⣠⣤⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⣤⡰⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⢹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
One has to wonder, what is he looking at? 😅
*= not WP though, he is one of the best in these woods.😘 |
|
|
|
I don't want anyone to attack our doc here, he is a special case. But if anyone is interested to discuss reversible whatnot, please visit this topic and ignore my posts there https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5450882.msg62179276#msg62179276I'm just allergic to any coin other than BTC, hence my hostile approach towards their blockchain and devs.
On topic, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, people usually fail to provide the evidence. |
|
|
|
0.815357061263719417471324966
Now here is the important part, how many keys will result in the fraction above when divided and by what? You could divide trillion trillion different numbers by trillion trillion other different numbers and get the same result. So that's not going to work, however there is something else to think about, have you started to divide by 2, 3, 4, 5 etc by iterating through different values? You can try dividing this 134778443257800664321 by e.g, 333, then add 1 to it and divide by 333, so if the last digit of your number is 1, try all from 0 to 9, then compare the hex representations mod n, after that change the second digit from right, do the same, you could also change all the digits one by one and then divide to see what big changes you can detect in the results. For instance, when you divide by a 1 digit number, you will only notice the resulting hex changes it's starting character, which is obvious. Maybe the best thing to do is to divide n and focus on that, then subtract 1 at a time from n then keep dividing, you can only understand things when you see the results in hex, decimal won't be too much of help, unless your brain can handle it. |
|
|
|
This is the public key for your private key, 04153df4aa85d71c050b77eed7661d594c2a50f7570e65af9c0ac1873e1cdd219296ee01b6fa3ff308facf19398d837a79dc04b4a78e7afb02cfea43c060c1c2df You just need to use mod n of secp256k1 to convert it to a valid private key, so it doesn't matter what private key you are using, it will be valid no matter what. Here is your correct private key : 0xe74ec556e3fc86f032e676a8a519cf270f5135ab8541a8a665a7d49905bc62d3 Easiest way to use mod, go here always place n on Y. |
|
|
|
|
Can they please move over here in this forum? I never visited that mailing list before, maybe once but I'm tired to talk to faceless experts here, if they come here we can know who they are. More importantly I with a few others can share our mind blowing and reality bending discoveries with them directly. Now which ring do we need to kiss to make that happen? Who is the BIG GUN in charge around dev team woods?😉
|
|
|
|
This whole puzzle is some sort of fuse. Someone is measuring currently available cracking power.
Isn't that suspicious that someone choose to not cash out on those bitcoins and instead organized some sort of competition
I'm currently running keyhunt in bsgs random mode on a 10gb bloomfilter file on puzzle 130. But i realize its probably pointless...
Not suspicious at all, why would someone who has more than a million, way more than a million Bitcoins care to cash out 1000 BTC? This is the best way to test the security of a system, I bet he even paid some "experts" to try and crack these puzzles, which appears that they have failed, and then the next best thing is to use the community in such a challenge. Can you tell us why do you need 10gb of public keys to search? And how did you get them, by which method?, because if you just did some subtractions, it won't be that easy, also if you have 10gb of data to compare your generated keys on bsgs, you should divide your speed by how many keys you have saved for comparison, AFAIK, the more keys you have, less speed you'd get. But imagine having only 1 key in a file, then if your speed is 5T/s, you can actually search 5T keys per second. Though I'm not sure if I even know how does bsgs work, however it works, it is just for low ranges, high range keys are no child play to use kangaroo/ bsgs etc.
That will probably be solved by the same group/individual that solved 125. And after that, we only have Puzzles with hash 160 left.  Why do you say after 130 we are left with hash 160? What about 135, 140 etc? |
|
|
|
While I don't have much information and data about this project. I can provide some general insights on the potential risks involved with projects like Flow. It's important to note that these risks can vary and are not specific to Flow without further analysis. Here are some common risks associated with blockchain projects:
1. Market Volatility: The cryptocurrency market can be highly volatile, which means the value of tokens like FLOW can experience significant fluctuations. This volatility can affect the overall market cap and investor sentiment.
2. Regulatory Uncertainty: The regulatory landscape surrounding cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology is still evolving in many jurisdictions. Regulatory changes or actions could impact the project's operations, token utility, or legal compliance.
3. Technological Risks: Blockchain technology is complex, and there can be risks associated with security vulnerabilities, consensus mechanisms, or scalability limitations. Projects need to address these risks to ensure the stability and robustness of their platform.
4. Competition: The blockchain space is highly competitive, with numerous projects vying for market share and attention. Flow would need to differentiate itself and continually innovate to stay ahead of the competition.
5. Adoption and Network Effects: The success of blockchain projects often relies on widespread adoption. Flow would need to attract developers, users, and businesses to build on its platform and create network effects necessary for sustained growth.
6. Ecosystem Expansion: Flow's success relies on expanding its ecosystem beyond the NFT space. This expansion may require strategic partnerships, developer support, and attracting a diverse range of projects to the platform.
7. Tokenomics and Governance: The design and implementation of a project's tokenomics and governance models are crucial for its long-term viability. Ensuring fair distribution, effective governance, and proper token utility are essential considerations.
It's important to conduct thorough research and analysis, including reviewing project documentation, team credentials, partnerships, and market trends, to gain a comprehensive understanding of the risks specific to Flow.
Hive moderation: 99.9% AI generated. Copyleaks, AI content detected. Sapling.AI 100% fake.
Then the usual ad hominem. These parasites should be dealt with, have you seen a human saying I don't have much information and data? Lol what are you a cyborg?
Note, I wouldn't mind someone providing useful information by using AI, only if they learn and type the post by using their own fingers, using AI to type everything for you is no good. Anyways I apologize for not following the thread rules, this is because of my knowledge cutoff, you know.😂 |
|
|
|
|
With the current situation, having the ability to insert garbage into the blockchain, and then having greedy miners that don't care whether legitimate Bitcoin users are suffering or not from increased fees, then on top of that having different opinions about censorship etc, it seems such systems where any change is dependent on consensus is proving to be a failure, unless they wake up to see the consequences of not stopping these garbage transactions. BUT GREED, YOU KNOW?
As a normal ONLY BITCOIN user, when I see how banks/central dictators( dictators controlling central banks) are taking advantage of us, I can think of miners the same, so should we consider them to be the same only with different names? I guess Satoshi never thought about this, where ever is money, greed follows, whether it be governments, or miners.
|
|
|
|
`a+b=c` is irreversible when `a` and `b` are variables, turning it into `a=c-b` doesn't change anything since you are still left with 2 variables. The more you go back up the algorithm (in reverse) the higher the number of these unknown variables. The more you try the more unknown variables you are left with.
To put simply if you could ever reverse something as simple as (x+y=10) and tell me what x and y are in this equation, then you can reverse hash algorithms too.
if (x+y=10) x=10-y then substitute x as 10-y in the equation to get the unknown. With this method, it makes it possible to reverse the hash algorithm So can you tell me the value for x and y? Is it 9+1, 8+2, 7+3, 6+4, 5+5, 4+6, 3+7, 2+8, or 9+1? Your method seems to fail, x and y could be any of them, and this is only 10, now you can realize the possibilities when you increase the size of your number.😉 |
|
|
|
"I apologize for the confusion", where have I heard this phrase? Right the same apologetic idiot we call AI uses such phrases all the time. I don't know how these things go usually, I'm not the type to report such things, but this one is worthy. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5473275.msg63122253#msg63122253
I apologize for the confusion. You are correct that the maximum block size in terms of weight units is close to 4MB. While the maximum block size on-disk and over-the-wire can be almost 4MB, this size is rarely reached in practice.
The actual size of a block can vary depending on the number and format of the transactions included in it. If the block contains a large number of small, simple transactions, the block size will be smaller. On the other hand, if the block contains complex transactions with many inputs and outputs, the block size will be larger.
It's important to note that the Bitcoin network has a block size limit to ensure the stability and security of the blockchain. This limit helps prevent spam transactions and ensures that blocks can be propagated and validated by the network efficiently.
The block size debate in the Bitcoin community has revolved around finding the right balance between scalability and decentralization. Increasing the block size too much could lead to centralization concerns, while keeping it too small could limit the number of transactions the network can handle.
Overall, the actual size of a block will depend on the specific transactions included within it, and the block size limit is a critical factor in maintaining the functionality and security of the Bitcoin network.
|
|
|
|
Here is something interesting I found during my research:
if we have a pk e.g.: 0xA9128E282
we can substract from pk = 0xA9128E282 - 0x1. This is on +N. Not on -N!!!
After that I can add 0xA9128E282. You will see what you get when you research on your own. Please remember to give me my share when you find #66 or #130.
Well, for starters you can't solve #66 by doing math on private/ public keys, also you can't solve #130 with your small example, but since you are a rookie hunter, we let them slide. Remember when you are publishing your non existing research, do some actual testing before "publishing them". This is what I do, I test a few things and if it has promising results, I post them, unlike some people.😉 Next time share your discoveries with your main account, then we can talk, eh? |
|
|
|
|
The main question is, even if we manage to reverse a hash to get back an input, how can we know the input is our original input, I think I asked this once before, but the answer wasn't what I expected, if we don't have access to the original input, which is the case in every hash function out there, not having/knowing the input. We can never truly reverse the output to an input knowing whether it's the same original input or not.
This is because of collisions, they exist for a reason and I think it's what makes hash functions secure, for example if you take a sha256 hash of an uncompressed Bitcoin public key, can you guarantee that if we manage to reverse the output, we could get the same uncompressed public key back? You can't, because even if you get an actual collision as the result of your reversal, there is no way of knowing whether the result is our original "unknown" input. Unless you check all possible candidates aka every single possible collision, how many would that be for sha256?
However if you can figure that out by working on more blocks and correctly guess the original input, then we are screwed.
Now I'm a bit confused, our math ph.D talks about energy efficient computing when he mentions "reversible computers", which has something to do with erasing and writing bits of information, are they related?
|
|
|
|
|
You got it backwards though, first of all tell us what exactly is an offline blockchain? And how do you suppose we should have a currency in an offline blockchain, don't bother because "offline" blockchain (currency) has been around ever since of invention of banks. You could claim it's interesting to see decentralized offline banks, but that can't happen due to the nature of DDL, or decentralized distributed ledgers. Maybe I am the one getting all this wrong, right?
Thanks to cryptography, generals have no problem anymore.😉
|
|
|
|
This is the output i got when i tested:
Private Key: 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002000000000010c4fc
Public Key: 03747a90acd8efec7e9cf1a7555b6c9e4404fc521fc3aebb965bc3bf7e73ef1579
Bitcoin Address: 88508b5ae0788248196a88b63949182342c66ca2
Negated Private Key: fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffebaaedce6af48a039bfd25e8cd0257c45
Negated Public Key: 02747a90acd8efec7e9cf1a7555b6c9e4404fc521fc3aebb965bc3bf7e73ef1579
Negated Bitcoin Address: c711d99906689482d858a688a3cef4ee5f652e48
i see pub key and negated pub key are the same, how can i use this?
I see that you just found out about n and -n, if this is your first time working with public keys, you won't be able to reach anything meaningful, honestly I thought you are all in on public keys, that's why I wanted to help you by providing a hint, but the thing is I haven't worked on this angle yet myself, I will let you know when I can find a correlation between the two keys. However to make it fair for all, the answer is in secp256k1's representation for 2^256.
Even though I know most of you won't understand what I'm talking about, but those who do, remember we are partners.😉 |
|
|
|
ps.. finally showed my wife what im working on.. and why i couldnt help pay the bills.  I thought you were up to coding any ideas, what happened to that promise? I really hope you can find at least one of them, but if you want to not only pay the bills but even buy your wife some jewelry, then I'd suggest you to work on public key related scripts. For example, if you can find a relation between a key and it's inverse aka -n of a key, you can easily solve low range keys like 130 etc, here is a hint : Imagine this is #130
00000000000000000000000000000002c56510da49e97b94ca065bbdfb67309c
And this is -n of 130
fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbf549cc0c655f24a6f5cc02ced4cf10a5
What happens if you drop all the leading Fs from -n of 130?
bf549cc0c655f24a6f5cc02ced4cf10a5 Now can you find something useful from this new key above without those leading Fs? I'm sure you'll be surprised when you figure it out.😉 |
|
|
|
How about we just try dividing the public key multiple times with multiple different numbers so in the end we can at least get a divided result of a new pubkey that is non float division?
Since you don't know the key you are dividing, you will only get public keys as results, so how can you guess if the result is correct or not? When you are using -1 divide by 2, there are 50-50 chances of each division to be correct because there are 5 odd and 5 even numbers. For example, target = 99, now you sub 1 to get 98, then divide 98/2 = 49, 49-1 = 48/2 = 24, 24-1 = 23/2 = 11.5 game over. Unless you do this 99/2 = 49.5, 98/2 = 49, now if you subtract 1 from 49.5 you won't get 48.5 in EC, you'd get half of n+48. But your other division result which is 49, you can divide that as well as it's -1, which would be 49/2 = 24.5, 48/2 = 24, then you can continue with 24.5/2 = game over, 24-1 = 23/2 = 11.5 game over, 24/2 = 12. 12-1 = 11/2 = 5.5 game over, 12/2 = 6, 6-1 = 5/2 = 2.5 game over, 6/2 = 3, 3/2 = 1.5 game over, 3-1 = 2/2 = 0 you just won. But can you detect which one of the results were game over or not when you are dividing a key in 2^130 key space without knowing the key? If you can do that, you win the game.😉 |
|
|
|
It all depends on the neighborhood. Hiding from high electricity consumption by using generators will surely disturb the neighborhood as someone said above. Then, if the generator runs upto 18hrs of 24hrs, it will raise higher suspicion.
A way I think would be better to hide the consumption rate is running a charity by providing power for the entire neighborhood. You will have to regulate what power the neighborhood will consume. It could be upto 30% of the power you can generate. By this, the your rate of electricity consumption will not raise an eyebrows.
The impact in the business will be high cost of power supply or maintenance while using generators. The best is to find an environment where your rate of power consumption is not a problem, provided you can pay for the power.
So cute, so your suggestion is to steal electricity from other people for your own profit? Well, even if you manage to get away with excessive power consumption, you'd still have to pay exponentially more than export rate, and if you steal from people, you'll have to deal with angry angels while flying towards hell. 😉 therefore there is no profit in mining Bitcoin with those 2 options. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
