|
Wow, that's some impressive wall work on Finex. He just keeps restacking that baby.
|
|
|
|
I'll also add that, contrary to popular belief, I cannot ban anyone from the thread. I can only delete individual posts.
A script that polls the thread every few seconds and auto-deletes posts from given user ids could achieve something similar. You'd want a box running it 24/7 though. |
|
|
|
Another x10 and you'll see grin at 22nd spot.
That would also make it the second most costly in terms of network support. Doable on a bubble, but not at present and not with the lack of liquidity in the grin markets. |
|
|
|
Except, as much as I would love to see an order of magnitude jump, there are not enough historical data to assume it would be an anomaly if it didn't happen this time.
We will see....
True. Plus it seems insane.  |
|
|
|
It is reasonable to expect some pullback in July and August. But I sure as hell would not short this market or try to sell local tops.
Growth right now is nutty. The last time we saw this kind of trajectory on the logarithmic and it didn't follow through with an order of magnitude jump was back in 2012. |
|
|
|
Not to be a grumpy old fart, but those are daily weighted averages, and the day isn't over, and if it was, we'd still be below the top 100 days. I have no doubt we'll make it very soon though. |
|
|
|
not to mention that Poloniex was once number one exchange before they were bought by Circle  Polo went downhill before Circle jumped in. During the spring and summer of '17 with the influx of new user registrations, they completely went to pot. Trade engine was lagging, you couldn't get verified to get your money out, no response from CS for months if ever. It was this that lead to the exodus of OG traders. |
|
|
|
USD/BTC is next  |
|
|
|
Roach will be pounding his wet pickle at this fine wench. |
|
|
|
Also a Superflare (alias microNova) event from the local star would wipe clean anything humans might leave behind. Most wont get their heads around it, but the article basically says they have hard observational evidence, from observing thousands of sun-like stars, that these things are happening on the order of 2k years, like clockwork. It is not a matter of if but when. The study would appear to demonstrate that for a slowly rotating star as our Sun, the flare would be limited to 5x10^34 erg, or about 500 times the Carrington Event. That would be bad, but hardly wipe-humans-clean bad. Indeed, if they do happen every 2000-3000 years, they don't appear to have had any great impact on pre-electrical civilisation, as the lead author readily admits: "If a superflare occurred 1,000 years ago, it was probably no big problem. People may have seen a large aurora." |
|
|
|
My quibble-nish arose...sorry yefi.
It is my belief that everything is in motion so to speak. Angular momentum and other kinetics obviously play a fundamental roll in our Universe and their influence can be easily observed. What is not so obvious to our perceptions is that everything is vibrating at its own unique frequency.
Certainly atoms in solids can vibrate, and increasingly so with heat, but they're fixed in position relative to each other. Except for ions in electrolytic capacitors and batteries, PoW is not moving atoms in electronic circuits. |
|
|
|
Not API imo
kracken last week 100 USD
coinbase april 2017 0.06 USD
Stamp June 2016 1.50 USD
Bithump Oct 2017 500 USD
Bitfinex feb 2014 100 USD
You've just presented another "crash" which is almost certainly an error in the feed. It's 500 KRW not USD by the way, and you can see that it isn't repeated in Bithumb's own chart. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin is not some sort of voodoo magic, it's still physical, atoms are there moving. Proof of Work needed to generate certain combinations of atoms, which cannot be generated out of thin air as you need said PoW. Metalheads have a hard time grasping this.
Charge carriers move rather than atoms. Your point is still valid however. |
|
|
|
I don't buy the API issue, it happens on diffent exchanges every now and again. Whale fatfinger or whale panic is far more likley.
1-min chart shows less than about 60 BTC during the supposed crash. That's minnow action, and it is frankly not credible to suggest Stamp's books would've crumpled under such a glancing blow. |
|
|
|
My mistake june 2016  I don't remember this, so I checked the thread from the 23rd June 2016 and it came to the rescue: Is bitcoinity malfunctioning? The chart shows a spike on bitstamp down to 1.5 dollars about ten minutes ago, but there were less than 200 Bitcoins dumped to get it down that low. That must be a malfunction, I can't believe anyone could buy a bitcoin for 1.5 dollars
[brokenlink]
edit
It must be a bitcoinity malfunction because bitstamp's data page shows today's range never went below $540.17
[brokenlink]
Appears to be an API error. This would explain why it doesn't show up on Bitcoinwisdom. |
|
|
|
remember it did hit $1.50 in June 2017 on bitstamp  . Say what now? |
|
|
|
In future please specify which cheeks you're referring to as this can cause great confusion, and indeed worry, to your reader. lol that's some impressive flexibility. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
