NOTICE: The Synchronizing with network in your client?  Wait for it to reach 100%, then complain.

What one calls gambling another calls speculating.

Is speculating good or bad for a market?

The biggest outrage that most would complain about is 'Cornering of the Market.'  However, even a Cornered Market behaves in predictable ways. Some might say, more so because it is in the interest for the people doing the Cornering to maintain a price. i.e. Debeers

I believe things are maturing with bitcoins and their development. Although node shrinkage has me a little concerned.

Next Up: The BTC Spot Market for miners.

The address that I sent the loan to for Geno was: 1Jp4S9GXsAZ6FDBVTX968uq8gNGyT4JaCH

If needed I have the internal MTGOX tx id.  It was apparently and internal MTGOX to MTGOX transaction.

I was paid back. So I have no issue here.

Wait,


 Are people questioning Pirate's 'Dis-Honesty' and saying he has 'impeccable references?'

Is he turning out to be an honest and respectable Pirate that likes Jimmy Buffet ?


Pirate say it ain't so. You are a bad pirate, right?

ah...


The proof is THAT there is no proof. duh...

If there was proof, I want some of my tax dollars back for them sucking so bad.

On the other hand: Paying spooks with BitCoin is a terrible idea so they just might be doing it.

I used to do the Seti@Home, then the Folding@, and BOINC.  You know what?  They never paid a dime.

Not that money is the ultimate motive. But I look at donating like this.  If my "Free" liver or whatever, is not used for anyone else to make money. I.E. The Hospital and Doctor usually do pretty good off of people's free organs.

Ah... You caught the Yen figure too...

However,

 Costs would need to be quantified. Many Business make money but report losses for many reasons. Is there a charge-back for new services or equipment (ie investment) ?  Not to mention, many business operate at a loss in the first years to later reap rewards with market share. Although operating at a loss, especially for a business so new, is not indicative of future data, it does make one look closer at the data. I would much rather see, projected growth along with current financial status as an indicator. Then one can see if the projected growth is hit or missed.

 Remember this is basically a new company. Don't solely judge it off of 1 years worth of data.

Nice catch on the Yen tho.

I believe there are some CFC's that would work. Actually, so would 'pure' water.

However, wouldn't it be less risky to figure out the thermodynamics of the system and appropriately set your Freezer to the correct settings. 

You do bring up a good point.

There is a difference between SCAMMER and Defaulter.

Maybe a Defaulter Tag is in order?


Best Wishes and Good Luck.

Assumptions often lead you to where you want them to.


Before an Admin could even check to see where his IP came from, "He has been weighed, he has been measured, and he has been found wanting."

Really?


Ok,

1st - Developers - lets say 10
2nd- miners - lets say 100
3rd- users - lets say 0


What was that order again?

You should try ARPA, It's way more effective. Have you calculated my PIP's set and drift? Is an Allision imminent?

I have received your PM. BTW: do you use OTR? with the product you mentioned in PM. If so, PM me the key.

Received Principle + agreed Interest. Plus a little extra over the agreed amount.


Thank You.


Best Regards,
The Bear

I don't know to laugh or cry. 


But I do appreciate the work you put in.

+1

Yep, verified again. See ya around.

Ironically, when I cut and post the last message, it does verify from the post.





 

Tod,

I have received.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I just submitted my public key to the mit keyserver here's the url:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF10F78069E6C77D7
you can also do the following to retrieve it if you are running gpg:
gpg --recv-keys F10F78069E6C77D7

all of the messages I have posted have checked out on my end. I hope my copy of gpg isn't bad (I'm pretty sure it isn't).

just in case e-mail formatting screws the message up I've included it as a text document

here's the little string you wanted: "akdaenfeah323nfn32o3rnf
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iJwEAQECAAYFAk8kjz4ACgkQ9itAoAf/M7FdbAP6AgckV9xj+uD0Ne1l7PLn63p7
dVPDUzQW7+FFyw6g2yjilu8LdpHpQ2u6+9ql5gqZWR3sZwue5q3P/+hfdYkSPDCX
u9w6T29bmkm+SL6F1YgIl+g/CkjdYJLkUpA7JEyblpzTrG4Lh+giv4UyT8SsE5sk
8ynQv5MRk0K2TbtXsZs=
=HifT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

from you. It has verified as a good signature.

Welcome, and good luck.

Best Regards.

Still bad, I went back and tested the original to insure it wasn't on my side or a cut paste error. It comes back good but the others have not. I sent a PM to try an email verification.

Still coming back as bad signature.