I might wrong, but im 99.98% sure that he just sold the account.
He sold by asking for a loan... Thats why I offer him just 0.03 couse his account dosnt worth even 0.05
Have you look at his posts?
As I said, I might wrong...
Regards!
Usually, people(not all) who offer their BCT account as collateral is to sell it pretty fastly. If they wait a few days, their account will be bought at much higher price than what they borrow. His account is worth ~0.07 BTC - 0.1 BTC. All of his posts are one-line but FM can go for that price. Well... I hope that he repay but I dont think he will. I saw a red flag on it. What do you mean with FM? My english is not too good.  Regards! The red flag is in the untrusted feedback and wouldn't affect much of the reputation. Furthermore, the red flag is from another person who has a negative trust and is of no relevance. That's the reason I offered him 0.04. I still have faith that he would pay back though. Anyway, most accounts you buy would be full of one liner posts so it doesn't matter much. Also, please don't bump it anymore since its funded already. |
|
|
|
Why does PD have only English as languages options? PD is expanding, why not add popular languages like Chinese, Russian?
Translating the whole site would probably be quite costly and most people would understand most of the english words and google translate is your friend. Furthermore, I don't think devs have lots of time to attempt to redesign the whole site to suit the languages. |
|
|
|
Honestly who knows if its rigged or not. The problem is its impossible to get enough evidence to prove if its rigged or not because the chances are you can usually go on a huge losing streak as below.
Who knows? Maybe the sites use some algorithm that detects martingale players to clean them out. Either way its very difficult to prove.
Don't martingale, and if you do. Just do it across multiple dice sites and then you will know for sure if its a legit losing streak or you were being cheated.
You can verify every single bet to ensure that Primedice is not skipping nonce and the server seed checks out. The house pretty much have no chance to cheat if you do it this way. The problem here is you don't realised the house edge makes a difference, I have seen more than 20 lose streak at various dice sites and none of them is cheating. You are going to lose your bankroll eventually with martingale due to varience. You could also verify 999dice rolls as well but that site is still rigged ... Wrong, most people wouldn't bother to verify the bet since the page for verification method is very confusing and no tool exist to easily do it. A simple google would give you this. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=948965.0. Primedice, however, is pretty open about their fairness and there are lots of script to verify the bets. |
|
|
|
Honestly who knows if its rigged or not. The problem is its impossible to get enough evidence to prove if its rigged or not because the chances are you can usually go on a huge losing streak as below.
Who knows? Maybe the sites use some algorithm that detects martingale players to clean them out. Either way its very difficult to prove.
Don't martingale, and if you do. Just do it across multiple dice sites and then you will know for sure if its a legit losing streak or you were being cheated.
You can verify every single bet to ensure that Primedice is not skipping nonce and the server seed checks out. The house pretty much have no chance to cheat if you do it this way. The problem here is you don't realised the house edge makes a difference, I have seen more than 20 lose streak at various dice sites and none of them is cheating. You are going to lose your bankroll eventually with martingale due to varience. |
|
|
|
|
Nothing wrong with the bets, just someone getting butthurt and can't take the loss.
|
|
|
|
Didn't you ask a signed message? I have a hunch he is going for a run. Hope you won't get into a trouble.
He sent me a signed message and I verified it already. Thanks for the concern! |
|
|
|
It's normal and helps you separate your addresses. Also if you keep your coins on multiple devices you'll need to install wallets there. For instance I have a secondary wallet on my phone.
Blockchain.info solves that as well. Same wallet across your phone desktop tablet laptop any device that has a web browser can access it quite well and there is a good app for iPhone an android as well. Plus no need to sync 40gb of the blockchain Blockchain.info is also quite risky as we saw a few months back. It is not a good practice to use it storage. If you need a quick access to make some payment by all means use it, but to keep your coins secure use an offline wallet. I've used it for 2 years and zero problems. I think its the only web wallet I would trust. I use it primarely and don't use any cold storage wallets. I refrain from keeping things on exchanges but I do keep sometimes up to 1btc right before I am going to sell. exactly. i've been using it too. and so far not a problem. and i don't know what Fernandez means by "as we saw a few months back"; all i've found out from negetive posts about bc.i was the users fault like using tor, not having 2FA, having keylogger .... There was an accident which the developer accidentally changed the 'K' value used for private key and thus it was insecure. This showed that blockchain.info couldn't even take sometime to test out their update before applying it and risked the funds of thousands of user. No one could have prevented that except blockchain.info themselves. |
|
|
|
Amount required [IN BTC]: 0.04
Reason: Altcoin dabbling
Interest rate: 15% (0.046 repayment)
Time frame: 7 days
Collateral [If applicable]: I can provide my forum account as collateral.
Address: 1N6TTccV4Cr3VSajUcFBgBsS42sSEKzMdW
Denied. |
|
|
|
Amount required [IN BTC]: 0.01
Reason: Personal
Interest rate: 0.012
Time frame: Until March 19
Collateral [If applicable]: N/A
Address: 1242KA1ksikk67UNd1LStbJMijnXViLJYZ
Denied, unless you can provide your account as collateral. |
|
|
|
Not sure about that. However, if you try to claim lots of key at once, obviously Microsoft would be suspicious and close your account. It's common sense. I have never encountered Microsoft closing any of my customer's account and all of them have no complains about it. |
|
|
|
|
Bump. One last invite left. Very cheap!
|
|
|
|
But presumably this was sorted out a while ago right? The min tip amount was raised and the faucet was lowered and so now you get something like 500Sat or 1KSat from a faucet and then you have to somehow roll it into 50K in order to tip. I have to admit I don't understand how boris could do this once a minute. Furthermore, I've got an account with a 1200kSat faucet and I don't seem to be able to use the faucet more than once every 3 minutes or so. I'm confused by what this graphic means. Just a thought(not sure if it's possible but it would be a guaranteed ban): you could deposit 0.001 into account B, claim faucet from account A and then transfer 0.0005 from account B and transfer the entire balance back to account B and repeat. This is extremely time consuming and noticeable by members. |
|
|
|
Total amount loaned: 0.055BTC Amount available:0.2447BTC ACTIVEUsername: Amount: Collateral: Date of repayment: Username: Amount: Collateral: Date of repayment: Username: Amount: Collateral: Date of repayment: Username: Amount: Collateral: Date of repayment: Username: Amount: Collateral: Date of repayment: Username: Amount: Collateral: Date of repayment: RepaidUsername:BitBerau Amount:0.01 Collateral:BTCTalk Account Date of repayment:19th March 2015 (Repaid early on 18th March) Username:lucullus Amount:0.005BTC Collateral:N/A Date of repayment:21st March 2015 (Repaid early on 19th March) Username:BitBerau Amount:0.015BTC+tips Collateral:N/A Date of repayment:22st March 2015(Repaid early on 20 March 2015) Username:Sarthak Amount:0.01 + 0.006 tips Collateral:N/A Date of repayment:21st March 2015 Username: Amount: Collateral: Date of repayment: LateUsername: Amount: Collateral: Date of repayment: DefaultUsername: Amount: Collateral: Date of repayment: |
|
|
|
 . ranochigo's mini loansI am currently offering no collateral mini loans to Full Members+ Terms- Must at least be Full members to request a No-collateral loan
- Do not request a loan if your activity is less than 20
- Loans that have collateral would have a higher chance of getting accepted
- Loan will be accepted if you meet my requirements which will not be disclosed.
- All collateral should be held by a secure third party whom we both agree on
- When requesting a loan with no collateral, justification will be required
- I reserve the rights to deny anyone's loan request without specifying reasons.
- If you are trusted among the community, a no interest loan will be granted
- Basic interest are 1% for highly trusted/collateral and up to 6% for risky loans. [Per 24hours]
- If you are late for 1 day, 2% interest fees will be counted for 2 weeks. If there is no communications between me and the lender, the loan will be marked as default and collateral will be sold.
- Requests via PMs will be ignored
Collateral accepted: Full Member+ accounts*, 120% of stable alt-coins (Litecoin preferred)** *You will be requested to sign a message using an aged address associated with the account. **If the alt-coin falls below 110%, I will PM you and you are expected to respond to me within 48 hours and decide what to do next.(Add more coins or sell it) Please request a loan in the following format [b]Amount required [IN BTC]:[/b]
[b]Reason:[/b]
[b]Interest rate:[/b]
[b]Time frame:[/b]
[b]Collateral [If applicable]:[/b]
[b]Address:[/b]
|
|
|
|
and why? what's the point? i think you guys are just spamming for your signature campaign, you are not interesting in it at all
Since you are selling your account publicly, people would just put a negative feedback incase the buyer decides to scam others using the account. There isn't much demand for accounts recently and the market price has dropped significantly. To ROI, one needs to be very actively participating in the signature campaign. A signature campaign may not accept the account since it may be used by another person that is already participating in the campaign. Furthermore, your post are a bit spammy, most of them are not constructive enough for signature campaigns since most of them require posts that are well constructed and have useful replies. Above all, one can get it for less than 0.3BTC. and no, I am not participating in paid signature campaign. |
|
|
|
|
I'm selling 0 MSDN invites for $35 each.
-Accept escrow
-Will go first if you are a trusted member.
Please PM me first to verify the availability of invites.
I will give you an address to pay to or you can contact an escrow whom we both agree on.
Edit:Sold out!
|
|
|
|
|
Just wanted to post here to say that I have received my payment of 0.06BTC. And I will not be participating in any signature campaign anymore. Thank you for the smooth 5 weeks of the campaign.
|
|
|
|
Trojan targets everything, Bank system, nuclear power station, companies, etc ,and it try to make money or for some politics reasons.
Bitcoin is growing, becoming a traget is also quite common.
Who will benefit here .. By the way any trojans take bitcoin. And what should we do to save the bitcoin ?? All I know is using offline wallet to save btc There's a lot of trojan stealing wallets. Obviously the trojan owner would benefit. If you take safety precautions such as not installing random softwares, it should be fine. It would be rather inconvenient to save BTC on an offline computer so most would just put it on their online computer. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
