Have you seen this?

Andreas M. Antonopoulos educates Senate of Canada about Bitcoin (Oct 8, ENG): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUNGFZDO8mM

Interesting.

That's the goal, right. Then it will go up further, because it is on the radar for the "mainstream"-investors and -traders again. Most of them are trading against BTC, as it seems.

The next thing will be the new wallet.

If anybody is here, who has a script-idea for a Mooncoin-bounty-board, let's see it.

MOON on Cryptsy still at 10 Litoshi - with little volume today.
I wonder when it will finally go up. It is underbought at the moment, as it seems - with only those little mining rewards pouring in. And the mining-reward is going down shortly again.

I saw a really nice full Moon yesterday.

The lightsaber fell again. Luke is back.

Strange, can we not ask the authorities to prohibit this horrible behaviour ...?
Selling Mooncoin ... tststs ...

 ... that simply does not work ...  

Or we should engage the Ghostbusters now ...

Then just sell all your Mooncoins to let this come true - and for us to get more cheap coins ...  

MOON on third position in XRP-market - right behind BTC and LTC, ahead of DOGE -, and fourth position in LTC-market on Cryptsy.
I'd say, that's nice. And it clearly shows the capabilities of Mooncoin regarding what to come in the future.
 

But my question was about the mentioned 15 LTC. I don't see any 15 LTC in your above calculation.

Don't understand what you mean exactly ...
Do you mean 15 LTC or 15 Litoshi? How do you calculate that?

My calculation was:

1 LTC = ~749 XRP
1 LTC = ~9090909 MOON (at 11 Litoshi)

so 1*749/9090909 = ~0,0000824 XRP as a realistic price for MOON to be sold for - if you relate to current XRP/LTC and MOON/LTC.


If you'd like to buy MOON for Ripple, then the calculation was like this:

1 LTC = ~749 XRP
1 LTC = ~10000000 MOON (at 10 Litoshi)

so 1*749/10000000 = ~0,0000749 XRP


Right? Or an error in reasoning?


Edit:
XRP/LTC now 541 (buy) and 931 (sell), hence the calculations should be readjusted accordingly.

Not exactly halving, but going down like this (from the initial posting of this thread):

Block rewards:

Blocks 1-100,000: 0-2,000,000 MOON
Blocks 100,001-200,000: 0-1,000,000 MOON
Blocks 200,001-250,000: 0-600,000 MOON
Blocks 250,001-300,000: 0-350,000 MOON
Blocks 300,001-350,000: 0-175,000 MOON
Blocks 350,001-375,000: 0-100,000 MOON
Blocks 375,001-384,400: 0-50,000 MOON

So it is rather a reduction by ~42%, if I calculate right (175.000 vs. 300.000 MOON/block). But for the sake of simplicity, one could say "halving".  

Edit:
Regarding calculations: Has anyone of you an idea, what would be a fair price for Mooncoin vs. Ripple (based on MOON/LTC), as there now is the new market for MOON/XRP on Cryptsy?
How many Mooncoins should one be able to buy for one Ripple, respectively how many MOON are fair to sell for one XRP?

Nice picture - and thanks for the constant Mooncoin-promotion on twitter.
 

The current difficulty is >17 ...

... but absorb the sells at a good price, if they occur ...

I wrote them too:


But only got this:




Edit:
I then answered this:


But got no response anymore.

After informing www.cointweak.com, that we have a new block explorer, so that they have a new API to pull the relevant-data from, Mooncoin is back in their list as a top-ranking Scrypt-coin.  
Now we only have to solve the reward-problem, so that really ALL miners can get that shown profitability.

Have you looked at the designs he's linking? Those aren't slightly overworked original ones, like the ones you mentioned as a reference.
I did not say in any word, that we cannot overhaul the original-logo sometime, but a completely new logo NOW, only in the hope of "saving" Mooncoin??
So please read my postings in the way they are meant, before calling them retarded. We only speak about this time, not the time three years from today. To illustrate what I mean: Do you think Mercedes-Benz would abandon their three-pointed-star-logo completely, only to signal, that they have a new line of cars ...? A logo can be maintained (edit: /overhauled), too, of course. But a completely new one? Would you recommend that to Apple, Microsoft or Mercedes-Benz?

Edit:
Btw: I'm not even sure, if those logos are made by him, or if he only gathered them from the internet, which could lead to licensing issues, too, if the creators are not involved. Just saying.

Edit 2:
Only to illustrate the difference between a completely redesigned logo and an overhauled one, check out gjhiggins' one, here:
https://github.com/mooncoin-project/mooncoin-landann
This is something I could imagine (only the graphical-work could be better, so that we could have the 3D-appearance of the centered moon-surface again). In combination with communicating that this is only a temporary change to celebrate something, this is even more appealing. We could revert back to the original one afterwards. But this would have to be a concerted action and every place, that uses the old logo, would have to be informed twice, to change the logo. And we would have to issue two wallets with different logos.
What I was suggesting to gjhiggins when he was working on the landann-wallet-experiment, was to implement a function, that the user himself can use the graphic, he'd like to have in his wallet. That way he/she could, for example, choose from the graphics gogotan is linking, or from any other source, so even could set a picture of his/her beloved into the wallet, just like some do in a physical wallet. By that, the wallet could be kind of "personalized". Maybe that could be the way to go ...? Only an idea.
In the end still the real question is, if a new design will outweigh the loss of brand-recognition in terms of "good things" to happen. There are many new coins with completely new appearances popping up to the surface every day. If the tag "new" was as good as it is perceived by many, they should take the cryptoworld by storm, right?

Says the one, who wanted to reduce the rewards by half back then:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=389403.msg6864609;topicseen#msg6864609
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=389403.msg8974003;topicseen#msg8974003
 

We have to maintain the code gently, in order to prevent miners cheating, and even out bugs, which will further add to the good reputation of Mooncoin. Only one who doesn't care about the miners, can really be against this. And we need good miners, as every other PoW-coin does.
Regarding changing the appearance, others have already mentioned above, why we should keep from changing it: brand-recognition.
If MOON doesn't make it with its inherent values, it already has and represents, it won't make it with a new design either.