The whole market is bearish and ICO's are failing because they may have got a great investment on paper but in terms of exchange, they got less. The green bars should be coming anytime and then projects like EHF will boom.
Actually I'm thinking that its a blessing in disguise that this project has a longer roadmap which can coincide with next year's crypto boom. Hopefully!  Yes it's good to follow a project from the start. Most just appear suddenly like a ninja from the shadows. Following ehf project could be the best thing we've ever made in crypto sphere. Even though the project has a long roadmap but it has a good chance to get success once it launched. At least it will not be a project with no need. They have a very necessary project can make the health sector way better. |
|
|
|
Too much of a bonus when purchasing a token will eventually cause any token to go down in price when its listed, because a lot of trader are now into token flip, no more holding and wait for the moon if you can get a good profit by quickly selling your token and jumping into another projects. but some cases are different its not always like that.
I agree. Huge bonuses always result in a bigger dump and I usually wait for the initial investors to dump them on exchanges rather than directly buying on the ICO. But, I am unable to find any bonus structure for Menapay. Could you please provide some link if there's any? I couldn't find that either. Maybe because there is still a big time before ico, they didn't decide or announced their bonus structure yet. |
|
|
|
Whales can dump at any given time, I prefer when there is a large community of average investors, then token price will be more stable.
Well let them dump menapay, i think the menacash serves that purpose of stability, meanwhile you could pocket cheap menapay  Security tokens tend to dump less. Because unlike utility they are backing with some real value (profit share of the company) so dump can happen of course but if it will, i expect a limited dump. |
|
|
|
|
I tried tokpie first and loved it.
It is working like a charm and actually, i can't think why nobody thinks this before. Still, better than never.
|
|
|
|
|
#PROOF OF REGISTRATION
Bitcointalk UserName: levyashin
Telegram Username: @levyashin99
Campaign Participated: Video
Ethereum Wallet Address: 0x68B4683475747E28a83596e94b58187d452099Cf
|
|
|
|
I followed the discussion but I have to admit I don't know exactly why MenaPay has to keep their tokens on an on-chain trading exchange.
Because of Islamic finance rules every transaction needs to be transparent and seen by at least 2 people. An off-chain, centralized exchange is a black box. As the transaction settlement in a centralized exchange takes place within the exchange's server we cannot see what is precisely going on. Actually I think the whole crypto market should adopt those Islamic finance rules because there is too damn much manipulation and wash trading going on. I totally agree with your idea. Some exchanges are involve in anomalous transactions that are quite hard to detect instantly and by applying Islamic finance rules then I think it would greatly minimize such incidences. I find Islamic banking is absurd because of how it is working right now (regular banking with different names) but this kind of thing really makes sense. And absurdity turns into something great even not Islamic people want to adapt. |
|
|
|
In a still weak and down market, slowly recovering, 60% soft cap for a long-running project is really enjoyable, inspires us to stay close to the community and hope for a return on investment
But what time do they have to close the %40 gap? Without a mvp this looooong running project can really reach to soft cap, i am having some (little) doubts about this, in this market. Actually, %40 is only 800k $ and that can be gathered from just one investor. They have a very good team and they can easily get that money. Maybe the crypto thing is making things harder for them. |
|
|
|
I followed the discussion but I have to admit I don't know exactly why MenaPay has to keep their tokens on an on-chain trading exchange.
Because of Islamic finance rules every transaction needs to be transparent and seen by at least 2 people. An off-chain, centralized exchange is a black box. As the transaction settlement in a centralized exchange takes place within the exchange's server we cannot see what is precisely going on. Actually I think the whole crypto market should adopt those Islamic finance rules because there is too damn much manipulation and wash trading going on. "Because of Islamic finance rules every transaction needs to be transparent and seen by at least 2 people." Wow, is that true? If it is, blockchain is a perfect fit for it. The biggest problem i see is the adaptation in Islamic countries very low for the cryptocurrency. But it can be changed. |
|
|
|
i see these Menapay team on social media a lot, they always attend meetings, i think team is hardworking and this is the most important thing for me to specify if the project is good or not. i think MenaPay can be successful.
It seems to me that in light of recent exit scams, team is one of the most important factors when it comes to choosing which ICO to join. If a team is willing to show their identity in different events, that means they are not likely to try to scam their investors. Yeah exactly. If team not revealing themselves and just putting some pictures on the website. It means scam is a high possibility. |
|
|
|
DUSK networks are noted for their fast, anonymous, and secure data transfer. But I want to find out how you can be widely accepted around the world when the project focuses on privacy?
Privacy is really important. Every Facebook and data leak scandal has shown that. People are starting to understand this, People are lining to options which give them anonymity online nowadays and this trend will just rise together with the rise of government spying so projects like Dust are going to be very wanted on the internet very soon. I am not sure about people want that or not. I want that, this is for sure but facebook still getting used by billions. So are they really want that? I think right now they are not caring at all. But if strong alternatives with real privacy occurs, they can start caring. |
|
|
|
Someone knows - they have competitors? or projects with similar concept, I like this idea, but competitors may hinder their progress.
Yes, they have. Utrust, Monetha, Pumapay, Agate - also developing similar payment platforms. But for different regions... in fact, the market seems full of more or less similar projects, the difference can be done in addition to the unique features by the launch on markets not yet saturated with crypto projects such as middle-east and African continent... I think those projects listed above will be direct competitors of this project and that competition should bring out the best on each and everyone of them. They have a partnership with Pumapay so it seems they don't agree with you in that manner. Or maybe they don't see as a threat because of focusing different regions. |
|
|
|
We live in a world where medicine is not reachable to all and in some countries only rich people can afford it. I hope eHealth will be able to help raise awareness and bring medicine closer to not so fortunate.
It is a good wish but i don't think a single project turn every wrong to the right in a big and lucrative industry like health and medicine. Still, any improvements can count as a big win. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
