That's a very small amount, you need at least a few million to get some reasonable staking return. 

That's cool, where did you first hear about masternodes?

That's quite a good name     WorkX will be a P2P job site then "Workin' for Gravy" is pretty apt.

Enable "Coin Control (experts only)" in options, then go to Send, then click "Inputs".  This will show you the current state of the collateral TX, which needs to be exactly 30M. You may need to re-do the setup.

Yes you can't stake and run a masternode at the same time because it blows up.  You have to lock the wallet after starting the node.

yes I think the SYNX coin would stay exactly the same as it is now and a brand new coin called Gravity will also exist and be traded separately, a bit like BTC and Bitcoin Cash.

Yeah no more ICO's for me..

If you want a buying tip right now I think PIVX is about to take off!  Have a look at https://www.pivx.org for more info.

Super fast confirming 100% Proof of Stake with Masternodes, self funding and voting governance.  100% private currency.  

It's pretty cool, check it out before the price goes up, they have a big public splash planned now that the wallet is back on Bittrex and Zero Coin is here.  

I think PIVX has got a few things over Deep Onion (which I think is pretty dodgy) and I think it's about to take off!

Super fast confirming 100% Proof of Stake with Masternodes, self funding and voting governance.  100% private currency.  

It's pretty cool, check it out before the price goes up, they have a big public splash planned now that the wallet is back on Bittrex and Zero Coin is here.  

You'd probably close the wallet software down, but there's no harm in keeping the wallet.dat or a backup of the whole data folder. 

You never know, those coins can get revived at some point and could be worth something greater than zero in the future.

The only reason I've seen the craved process get shutdown is because of low RAM, otherwise it's very solid and runs indefinitely (so far ).

We're more hoping for "Yay the Linda team is supporting their coin by having a working website and developing the wallet so hosting providers can run masternodes for their customers" kind of support.  

Isn't it more profitable for you as well to have a higher LINDA price? 

Are you trying to run ./craved getinfo instead per chance?  

Just ./craved should be attempting to start the server.  

If you run ps -A on the command line can you see craved process running?

Thanks for the link to https://icostats.com/roi-since-ico  - I wonder what will happen to NIMIQ.. That's the only ICO I've been a part of so far.

CROWN has more potential right now... Buy some before the system node release in a couple of days!!

This Monday?   

Precious Metal manipulation, LIBOR manipulation, insider trading, delayed market info etc etc..  Even regulated markets are risky and no amount of regulation will fix it.  

So I say, investors should do their own due dilligence and rely more on the reputation of the project.  eg LISK has open books, public meetings, real people with real names etc, which is therefore a more trustworthy project than a completely anonymous project with little in the way of accountability.  

The market will price it in, the forums encourage people to share their stories and in the end a good project will do well, and a shitty one will taper off. A regulator is not going to return anyones lost funds regardless, and an "approved" idea might also fail.

Look at BTC.. That is an example of the market accepting that the founder is anonymous (and therefore not possible to be an "approved" ICO), but the project is a runaway success.  

Buying into an as yet not realised idea is always going to be a gamble and high risk. I've bought in too early a few times, now I'm not going to invest in any ICO because "most of the time" two months later, the token or whatever is involved will be half price or less.  And then has to stand on it's own merit and show actual viability to be priced above the ICO price, so better off buying the dip and seeing what people are saying after the launch if you think it's got potential.

But I get that exchanges need to protect themselves as well.  So regulation in the country the exchange operators are in makes sense.  But how is a regulator going to be able to evaluate the state of an ICO on behalf of an exchange who wants to or has been paid to list a particular token/coin?

Check out something called Masternode coins..  For that kind of money you can buy enough coins for a node of your choice, and run it for as long as you like.  While you're running it, you'll get more coins.  Those coins may become more valuable while you're holding and making more.  This has been my strategy for the past few months and so far it's paid off.  

The risk is you're holding an alt coin, and if BTC goes crazy then people may choose to sell it and be worth less in BTC terms as before.  But I've not sold them and they have recovered, while I've been making more coins in the mean time..  There's no gear to buy and no extra power costs.  It's a pretty sweet deal and not many people seem to have cottoned on yet, so I think it's worth the risk.  

The list of coins:  https://masternodes.online
A background article that explains it better: https://www.investitin.com/masternode/

Precious Metal manipulation, LIBOR manipulation, insider trading, delayed market info etc etc..  Even regulated markets are risky and no amount of regulation will fix it.  

So I say, investors should do their own due dilligence and rely more on the reputation of the project.  eg LISK has open books, public meetings, real people with real names etc and therefore is a more trustworthy project than a completely anonymous project with little in the way of accountability.  The market will price it in, the forums encourage people to share their stories and in the end a good project will do well, and a shitty one will taper off. A regulator is not going to return anyones lost funds regardless.

Look at BTC.. That is an example of the market accepting that the founder is anonymous (and therefore not possible to be an "approved" ICO), but the project is a runaway success.  

Buying into an as yet not realised idea is always going to be a gamble and high risk. I've bought in too early a few times and now I'm not going to invest in any ICO because "most of the time" two months later the token or whatever is involved will be half price or less and then has to stand on it's own merit and show actual viability to be priced above the ICO price.  

Try restarting the wallet, I've had this happen in the past and a restart seemed to clear it up. 

Yes and what's happening with the website?

No! Some altcoins solve Bitcoin's flaws too well to be ignored.  PIVX for example has complete Zero Coin privacy now, with super fast transaction speeds and ultra low fees, it's a true "cup of coffee" currency that BTC can't match any more.

PIVX is currently undervalued for being the first Proof of Stake Zero Coin implementation, check it out!