I don't know why there is not a high activity of normal Bitcoin transactions It means less people use Bitcoin as a payment system. what if ordinals were really banned? There would be more space for more cheaper transactions, and Bitcoin users wouldn't have to move to shitcoins or even banks for small payments. |
|
|
|
What a good feel to have for long period of time low fees, i really miss it, i remember the bad and not s long ago time when consolidate some tx was a nightmare thanks to the ordinal boys. Look at Mempool Goggles, it's still 80-90% spam:  Barely anyone makes real normal Bitcoin transactions, and that's really bad. |
|
|
|
Are you looking for a legal tax loophole, or are you looking for tax evasion? Aren't they the same in the basic sense? One is legal (and it's your right to try to pay as little taxes as possible within the limits of the law), the other is illegal. That's quite a difference. |
|
|
|
How did this newbie get around the posting restriction? Maybe someone whitelisted him. I checked: I didn't do it. As long as it's properly translated I believe it is allowed. I don't think he hired that many people to do a translation, which means he's (most likely) breaking this rule: 27. Using automated translation tools to post translated content in Local boards is not allowed. |
|
|
|
You don't need to manually edit the wallet file. Just execute in the console: wallet.adb.remove_transaction("txid") and refresh the wallet interface by pressing F5. This can be done online, everything works. I tried that, but it didn't work (on my watch-only wallet). And even if it would work, it instantly syncs the unconfirmed transaction from the server again. |
|
|
|
Monero did not get faster than before and the last 50000 to 100000 blocks seem to be much slower than anything before. I didn't find any option similar to dbcache in Bitcoin. 600 blocks/h is the speed now. Used to be 2200 blocks/h for quite long. I benchmarked different file systems and certain types were occasionally faster than that but fell to the same slow level at some point.
Maybe it's SSD time next. Last time I synced Monero (on a server with 32 GB RAM, and HDD), the first thing it told me was to get a SSD. I couldn't do that, and eventually removed Monero because even after it was synced, the entire server felt "sluggish" while it was running. |
|
|
|
I am certain that all of these address are for the same wallet since it will be hard to track the deposit and withdrawal of each user unless the entire site run on a single wallet with different address. Try to check connections of addresses with https://www.walletexplorer.com/OP wants to link his own addresses to his game users. That has nothing to do with WalletExplorer. there is not a silnge reuslt for "bitcoind" Yuo msut hvae mdae a tpyo: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BitcoindI put the deposit address for a website and it gave me the amount I paid.
so each user have his own address to deposit just as I thought, these address are connected to the same wallet? or it basically a wallet for each user? WalletExplorer isn't a wallet, it's a chain analysis company. That's not what you're looking for. |
|
|
|
I'm sure someone did that on purpose - 1 inclusions  It's caused by theymos' DT1-update. The only thing that changed to Lauda's Trust list was an additional DT1-exclusion. Isn't adding alt accounts to each other against the DT system rules?
OK, maybe not the same person behind all known freebitco accounts, but certainly all their famous accounts served the same purpose. They'd argue they're different people. But adding an account that never left any feedback is not how the Trust system is supposed to be used. |
|
|
|
Every website that use Bitcoin (games, casino, or exchange platform) has a system where it generate a new bitcoin address for each new user, users also can have more than one. I'm pretty sure they use Bitcoin Core ( bitcoind, not bitcoin-qt). What is the best API system and how can I add it to my website? An API means you rely on a third party. You should run your own node. |
|
|
|
|
Fees are down to 6.05 sat/vbyte minimum.
|
|
|
|
|
RBF has it's downsides for privacy: I always use coin control, and I try to avoid change. So when I used RBF in Bitcoin Core, it took another input, and added it to my transaction. I didn't expect that, and didn't get a warning about it. It's bad for privacy, and lead to a much larger transaction: 2 inputs and 2 outputs instead of 1 input and 1 output.
|
|
|
|
the only link that works for me is if you change the link from HTTPs to HTTP after changing this to a non-secured protocol the onion link is accessible A .onion site without https isn't insecure. See HTTPS for your Onion Service: When visiting a site over the Onion Services protocol, the Tor protocol prevents data in transit from being read or manipulated by man in the middle attacks, and the Onion Service protocol validates that the user is connected to the domain name in the browser address bar. No certificate authority is required for this proof, because the name of the service is the actual public key used to authenticate the underlying connection. It's been almost a month, and my support ticket still hasn't been resolved. This is concerning, to say the least. |
|
|
|
Update:No Trust lists were created or wiped in the past week. That's 4 weeks in a row without changes on this part: Week 283 (2024-06-15_Sat_05.07h)
Week 284 (2024-06-22_Sat_05.07h)
Week 285 (2024-06-29_Sat_05.07h)
Week 286 (2024-07-06_Sat_05.07h)
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
