I had bet that was rejected, and the btc won't be released into my wallet until 1 confirmation. It has been 25 minutes and not sight of my BTC being sent back. Please advise
Just wait patiently. It will be there in a hour.
|
|
|
Sad news now we have to pay for these picks sorry bud I figure 25$ is not much since A lot of people are making well over 3 or 4 bitcoins a month on then. Only for the people who bet large is this useful. For people who bet only €100 every month, this is too expensive. If you only bet 0.01 each bet make 0.01 btc/day, you make 0.3 at the end of the month which is around $150 right now. Minus $25, you still have 125 left. However, this is just the perfect condition 1. The odds are mostly worse than 2.00 2. You will not win every bet. When I bet 0.01BTC every day: If I make 0.002 on average, I may count myself very lucky. 0.002 * 30 = 0.06 = $29 If I have to pay $25 for that, it isn't worth it. Besides, 20% return on total wagered isn't realistic. With e.g. 5%, the profit will be even lower.
|
|
|
Sad news now we have to pay for these picks sorry bud I figure 25$ is not much since A lot of people are making well over 3 or 4 bitcoins a month on then. Only for the people who bet large is this useful. For people who bet only €100 every month, this is too expensive.
|
|
|
this bet is winner w/o djokovic.not winner champion. he won to djokovic.this bet should be won???
That bet was placed after he beat djokovic. It was a bet to win the U.S. Open. He came in second, not winning. So, the bet lost. when i bet.there are 2 bets. first is winner odd 1.96 (there is no live at this bet) and second is Winner W/O Djokovic 1.76 (there is live at this bet) if my bet need Kei Nishikori win first place to win so this bet have odd not fair. and there is not thing different between 2 bets WINNER AND WINNER W/O DJOKOVIC. my bet is WINNER W/O DJOKOVIC.Kei Nishikori is second place till have higher place than Djokovic You don't get it, do you? You did not bet on Nishikori to be higher in the ranking then Djockovic. You did bet on Nishikori to win the tournament without the participation of Djockovic.
|
|
|
Of course it won't be refunded. The bet was lost fairly. You're saying that the odds were low? It was his own choice to make this bet.
|
|
|
this bet is winner w/o djokovic.not winner champion. he won to djokovic.this bet should be won???
Your bet was 'to win the tournament when Djockovic doesn't participate.' You chose Nishikori. Unfortunately for you he didn't win. Cilic did.
|
|
|
Profit -200!
That's 450 down in 24 hours. Not a coincidence to me anymore.
|
|
|
Same case for me. As an investor, i was positive at around BTC0.10 and when i withdrew today i lost BTC0.19...
@Dicebitco : What do you planned for investor loss? (My DB account : Teddy76)
Investors loss? That's the risk you take when you invest. You know people can win big.
|
|
|
now my coins is stuck in DB. withdrawal still not working..
How much is it? I just withdrew 0.3 BTC. It appeared instantly in my wallet.
|
|
|
Compensation? So we wont be getting re-funded in full?
that is what i mean. Since everyone is now being refunded in full, I too demand my full refund. My DB name is "Focus" and I was only refunded 8 BTC This is because i happened to win 16 btc few days prior to the glitch, and then lost 25 or so btc to the glitch as you can see in the video...but since my account profit said -8 i was only refunded for 8 of the bitcoins lost which is not fair...when well over 10 of my nonces were skipped/changed and all rolls were 1-2 BTC+. And as stated by Manl in his post, all WINNING rolls had altered/skipped nonces. Therefore I am still owed some bitcoins. Here is the proof in this video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zx3yIy4Llng Video will be taken down once I am refunded in full. Hope this gets sorted and everyone else is refunded in full as well. Thanks Yeah sure. And I am president Obama. i'm not sure what that has to do with anything, but i think Lowkeystoned has a valid argument. Refunds of deposit isn't enough to make things good. The site unfairly skipped winning bets, which should be paid out. Now i don't know how to deal with the losing bets that wouldn't have happened if the bet order was restored to how it should have been, or how martingale type bets should be handled with. But at least the Missing winning bets should be refunded as well. I'm just saying he isn't Focus. His account is 2 hours old. He just want to profit from this.
|
|
|
Compensation? So we wont be getting re-funded in full?
that is what i mean. Since everyone is now being refunded in full, I too demand my full refund. My DB name is "Focus" and I was only refunded 8 BTC This is because i happened to win 16 btc few days prior to the glitch, and then lost 25 or so btc to the glitch as you can see in the video...but since my account profit said -8 i was only refunded for 8 of the bitcoins lost which is not fair...when well over 10 of my nonces were skipped/changed and all rolls were 1-2 BTC+. And as stated by Manl in his post, all WINNING rolls had altered/skipped nonces. Therefore I am still owed some bitcoins. Here is the proof in this video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zx3yIy4Llng Video will be taken down once I am refunded in full. Hope this gets sorted and everyone else is refunded in full as well. Thanks Yeah sure. And I am president Obama.
|
|
|
About the Mateo story: What if Mateo is someone who wants to make DB guilty? He won some BTC and now people think DB is using the seeds. Mission completed.
I'm just saying.
|
|
|
Trying to get caught up on this thread after a few days....
What's this recent talk of refunds and caught cheating?
Official story: Bad anonymous employe changed server code so that some of the winning bets were not shown to the players and dropped into nonexistence. Edit: to be exact, for those winning bets dice rolled again, until turned into losing bets. It was noticed that the nounce of the winning bets were missing. The bold part isn't true. Sometimes a winning bet was rolled again only once. If it was a winner the second time, it wasn't rolled again.
|
|
|
Stayeduptodate, why do you remind us on prediction you make that we have to bet at primedice? In my opinion DB is a lot better. Besides, why didn't you include a referral link? That would give you a certain amount of money.
|
|
|
Do not send multiple bets in the same Bitcoin, Litecoin or Dogecoin transaction. This non standard way of sending coins is not supported by our automated system. If you do that, one of your bets might be processed normally (if it's the first one in the transaction) but the others will not be processed and therefore will not confirm and we will have to refund them manually. http://www.directbet.eu/Rules.cshtmlSo in order to get a 0% house edge and to get a fair chance at winning the jackpot I need to send 100,000 separate bets of 0.01 BTC in 100,000 separate transactions, and everyone supporting the Bitcoin network by running a full node has to keep a record of those 100k transactions on their hard drive forever? I'm beginning to see why "on blockchain" betting died out a couple of years ago. Not true. Just one bet of 1000 BTC will earn you the same amount of loyalty points as 100000 bets of 0.01 BTC.
|
|
|
this site is a scam Interesting. Tell us a little more about your evidence.
|
|
|
two questions i currently have 84557 loyalty points and the month ends tomorrow. Therefore I still need a lot of turnover if I want to be eligible for the next VIP reward until tomorrow. Now i´ve read in another thread that your direct-dice can also be used to accumulate points? Would it be possible to simply play 1.01 direct-dice bets (high probability, low odds) in order to gain my next VIP reward? Or is this against the rules? (of course it would suck to lose a high bet with 99 % probability ) My second question is how it is possible to win the 10 BTC jackpot at direct-dice? I´ve read the rules but I´m not sure if I understand them correctly. I win the jackpot with any bet that rolls a 101? Or how is a jackpot win triggered? Thank you 1. Yes, it is allowed. 2. You win the jackpot when you roll 101 with the dice.
|
|
|
|