Are the connects for V1 in the OP seed-nodes with open ports?
I'm trying to connect, to help solo-mining directly into the V1-wallet in order to get the remaining work done, but it does not sync after a long time.
With that low diff, a CPU should be sufficient, right? But we need open nodes so that we can exchange data.
Any other node with open ports there?

Tried:

connect=192.99.37.224
connect=107.170.166.51
connect=crypto2.net

I'll send you a link to the reddit-post, that reveals how it was done for Dogecoin until they changed to static rewards. I don't want to post the link here, to prevent other irresponsible miners from using that, too. Would be nice, if you check that out and confirm it here. I'll also send that link to peme and redjedievolution, so that they can check that, too.

The only problem with placing at 5 Litoshi now with over 800 LTC already there could be, that you maybe never get coins, because you're the last in the line then. I'd say 6 Litoshi is still a good buy at the moment. Even 7 would not be too bad. If you're investing long term, it should be relatively negligible anyway, if 5,6 or 7. OK, the lesser the entry, the nicer the gain. But who cares for Litoshis anymore, when Mooncoin will be at the old highs again ...  

Edit: Just restartet the moonchain-server, so it is accessible again - was stuck, as it seemed. But please don't you all check the suspicious address 2QgWwFic9H45Waeac7Gr4iveRp8UUuPAy8 at once now again, ok?  

Edit 2: You could also only pick the latest blocks with the highest "value out" (example1, example2, example3) instead of checking the whole address and will see, that most of them by far have been found by that address. See "Generation: xxxxxxxx" - this is the reward, that has been paid to the block-finder, it can best be seen in blocks with only 1 transaction. You can then pick a block like this one or this one, where you can see the aggregated rewards being sent to another address ( 2LKFcMY6Uk3qYqA4NYbgDS274ei2kx3BNf ), which I suppose is Cryptsy's, because when I observed it over a certain timeframe, exactly those amounts were some minutes later sold on Cryptsy. We cannot countercheck this at the moment, because Cryptsy's wallet is under maintenance. But I'm sure, as soon as Cryptsy reopens the wallet, all the summed amounts from over the last days will be sold there and after that we can see transfers like linked above being sold there again, too. If you check those blocks, where the aggregated amounts are transferred from that address in question, you'll most probably never see any single amount below 200000 being sent from there ...
Now try the opposite and check several blocks with lower and lowest rewards. I bet, you'll never find that address above in it as the address to which the generated reward-coins were going. That explains, why many miners are disappointed by the rewards they get over time. They simply are being cheated by that dodger, who uses a script to only mine the higly rewarded blocks, leaving the other miners with the little crumbs. Just like here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MoonCoin/comments/2h0p1e/mooncoin_can_we_have_a_serious_discussion/
Btw: I am - of course - not seeing Mooncoin going down or even disappear from exchanges because of this, like he does, but totally can understand his frustration for not getting the rewards he has to get, for dedicating his hashrate to the Mooncoin-network.
The next problem that comes out of this is, that sometimes it lasts quite a time until a new block is found, because the miners that mine on the smaller rewarded blocks have the same difficulty and the cheater is mining something else, leaving the other miners with their small machines with the work, to only chime in again, when there's another big block to get, so he can make out like a bandit. Therefore we not only need this solved because of fairness, but also for the functionality of the coin, so that all blocks are found fast and transactions will be confirmed as soon as possible.

Conclusion: We need a dev, who can help us with handling the wallet update to address this problem by changing from random to static rewards AND doing the necessary hardfork of Mooncoin.

I've tried it today myself already, after resetting the explorer. That was why the explorer was offline some time today, because I had to raise the limit, what the explorer shows for a single address and therefore you have to refill the Abe-database again, which takes ~4-6 hrs. The limit for the shown tx's per address in Abe is 1000 normally. That address has so much transactions, you won't believe it. You would have to wait really long, until the explorer has found all the single transactions. They start somewhat in June and then several tx's per hour. Just try it again when the explorer is less busy. Then you'll see, that all the reward-transactions are above ~250000 ...

Edit:
As I see, the server is overloaded at the moment. That is, why I left the limit at 1000 previously.
So please, people, have mercy with the server and don't try to check that address all at once now, so that at least the normal operation of showing the blockchain can still work. Thanks.  

Edit 2:
FYI: That address does not have so much balance, since all the rewards go straight into Cryptsy normally.

Only winners here, as it seems ...  

The rising price is nice, indeed. But keep in mind, that at the moment Cryptsy's Mooncoin-wallet is in maintenance-mode, which means that the miners cannot send their rewards to Cryptsy to sell them. So be prepared for the moment, when the wallet is open again and the aggregated mining-returns pour in. That will push the price down a little bit again, most probably.

For all miners who want to sell their Mooncoins and don't want to wait, until Cryptsy's wallet is out of maintenance, I'd recommend https://www.swisscex.com/market/MOON_LTC
The surface is nice and the support is really responsive, should there be anything to ask. It just works.

Regarding the bounty for an Android-wallet, that is a great idea. We only have to get deaconboogie communicating again with the community, so that he will post that into the first posting of this thread. This seems to be the hardest part.

Edit:
While talking about bounties: I'm still thinking about offering a bounty to the operator of www.coinplorer.com. Now that we have a working block explorer again to check addresses, we could offer him, that he can create a wallet-address, where we can send Mooncoins, so that we will reach, what he offered as minimum to be paid, to include Mooncoin into his service.
See this posting on reddit, which I opened some time ago: http://www.reddit.com/r/MoonCoin/comments/2c28yx/just_contacted_coinplorercom_to_get_mooncoin/

What do you all think?

I hope that too.
What I find amazing: Mooncoin is number 3 on Cryptsy for all LTC-traded coins, based on volume. And this against all odds, which MOON is facing at the moment ...
That shows the potential.

If you buy some ... 

Edit:
Does anyone now, why Cryptsy is still in maintenance-mode for the MOON-wallet? You can buy and sell, but not withdraw and deposit Mooncoins.

The difficult thing is, to know the right time, when to buy the higher price then, before another one does it and you'll not going to get the coins at that price again. That's tricky, I know.

 

But beware: everytime you challenge the price, there will be some, who sell into the newly risen price. We just have to sit out, until every coin has been sold this way and nobody wants to sell at the low price anymore.  

Just found this:
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2gyt85/people_are_turned_off_to_buying_bitcoin_because/

So it seems, that Mooncoin is in advantage with so many coins to be spread ...  

Because only deaconboogie (original dev) can alter the first posting in this thread. But he is away for several days now ... 

Why "but"? That sounds, as if a blockchain explorer or rich list would change the price ...
The price can only go up, if you buy Mooncoins.
Btw, it just went up to 6 Litoshis today. But generally you're right, the price is still low and a bargain at the moment.  

To add to the discussion:

If the explorer is not used for a few hours/days and then has to fetch all the latest block-data from the blockchain to store it into the database with the fcgi-call by the visitor, you'll most probably get an timeout-error. I'd recommend the following, to keep the database up-to-date automatically in the background through a cronjob:

In /etc/crontab add:

*/2 * * * * USER cd /home/USER/bitcoin-abe; python -m Abe.abe --config abe.conf --no-serve >/dev/null 2>&1

Replace USER with the actual username, which runs Abe on your machine.

Maybe this helps some people on a slower machine. It makes Abe check the blockchain every 2 minutes by the cronjob and add new transactions to the database, even if no website-visitor runs an Abe-call by opening the page. So normally by this the database should be mostly current and only the latest few transactions are added by the call of the real user on the website, hence he does not get an error-message. Just make sure, that the paths and names of the files in the above command are set correctly, according to your installation.

Edit:
Regarding the 1000 rows-limit, just remove the outcommenting hash mark in the config-file and set to -1 to check, whether your system can cope with unlimited tx-numbers for an address: https://github.com/bitcoin-abe/bitcoin-abe/blob/54ee67eafff81ec9cd1f5ef5cebea3514c267ae5/abe.conf#L267

We already have a very good block explorer: www.moonchain.net - which is based on Abe.
A richlist is not part of Abe, btw. You have to implement another script to read out the database or the whole blockchain itself (PHP, for example). I've checked that out, but the coin has other problems at the moment, so a richlist is not really top priority, since it is only a gimmick.
FYI: a rich-list is not that meaningful anyway, because one person can use different addresses. So at the end it could mean, that the top richest persons aren't represented at all via that rich-list.

See here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=22785.msg8082943#msg8082943

Is the V2-wallet optimized in regard to sending transactions that are composed of small mining-rewards from P2Pool? I'm transferring my old balance to V2 and it is a pain. With every sent amount the possible size of tx is getting smaller and smaller. Now I have left 2 CGA and can send only 0.5 CGA in one tx. I suppose with 1 CGA it is only 0.001 CGA that can be sent without an error ...

Edit:
At the end I tried to send 0.00055000 CGA, but got the message, that it could not be sent because of the fees. Why should there be a fee at all, if I did not set this in the configuration? I can wait to get the amount at the other wallet. No need to pay a fee at all ...

As a good (hopefully long term) investor, you should not do that ... 

Swisscex up to 8 Litoshi, was even at 30 for a short time ... 

Then you should buy a bunch now. It's cheap again, after someone dumped larger quantities today.
Don't know why he/she's doing that. Selling MOON at such a low price is probably the worst thing one can do ...

I don't know exactly, since I'm no wallet-coder. Maybe we should get help from someone who really knows what to do in such a case.