meanwhile.....
people who brought at 19$ are selling at 2$..........
Where the fuck does all this URO keep coming from thats getting dumped?
You must be new to crypto. |
|
|
|
Please Guys it's just an idiotic badly put together scam by two blokes in a small town in NSW. I know it's hard to imagine from your perspective (inside the group) that an entire group of people can form on the internet that have the combined mental capacity of a monkey suffering from a traumatic brain injury but that is the case and that is you guys. There's no point arguing anything with you twats, but the sooner you wake up and realize you're completely fucking idiotic cunts and you've got absolutely no hope in life until you change that fact the better IMO.
You must eat a lot of shit to have a mouth that dirty. I've had to swallow a lot from you fucking morons during the course of following this idiotic crap!  So what you're saying is, you eat your own shit... |
|
|
|
Please Guys it's just an idiotic badly put together scam by two blokes in a small town in NSW. I know it's hard to imagine from your perspective (inside the group) that an entire group of people can form on the internet that have the combined mental capacity of a monkey suffering from a traumatic brain injury but that is the case and that is you guys. There's no point arguing anything with you twats, but the sooner you wake up and realize you're completely fucking idiotic cunts and you've got absolutely no hope in life until you change that fact the better IMO.
You must eat a lot of shit to have a mouth that dirty. |
|
|
|
"Rivaa exports ltd a leading textile import and export company based in surat ,(gujarat). India ,have under their diversification programme has planned to enter into field of fertilizers,
On 10th of july 2014 ,MR HARISH VIRMANI DIRECTOR of M/ S, RIVAA EXPORT LTD have signed contract of 25000 metric tonn of urea fertilizers with M/S, GREEN EARTH SYSTEMS , HK IMPORTATION. UREA IS THE WORLDS MOST WIDELY USED FERTILIZERS AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MORE THAN 50% of world food production.
"RIVAA SUPPORTS UROCOIN"
Is this post from Rivaa old or something everyone already knew about?
Yes this has been known since it was posted. This too as well with GES and Lakhani Enterprise from Pakistan https://www.linkedin.com/pub/aman-lakhani/66/b01/9b6Starting in August 2014. With the support of family business est. more than 30years ago, Lakhani Enterprise is now successfully importing urea into Pakistan, aid of Urocoin.That's the thing that just stands out at me. If this were a scam neither of those entities would go near this. If it were a scam and they did Nelish better move to Siberia because some very angry and wealthy people will want his head on a plate. This is why I don't think it's a scam, it's just too obvious to be a scam. Too many large entities involved and wayyy too much risk for Bohan and Nelish. It just doesn't add up to scam at all. Not to mention Bohans coding skills. Take syscoin for example. They gather 1500 btc (750,000 USD) for a non working (to this day) wallet. A team of so called experts, meanwhile Bohan is quietly working away at the next generation of cloud assisted Wallet software. No man, not a scam. |
|
|
|
because i dont think its a scam, nilesh being bankrupt doesnt make it a scam, he makes no money from this.
That's laughable. Why would anyone be involved in any sort of business venture not to make money?? Prove that he makes no money. False premise, strawman argument. Try again pl0x. |
|
|
|
some context, GES HK is the one to talk to about an order of Urea using Uro for global distirbution, its obvious their linked (same owner to the Aus company) that 25 millions isnt a check that nilesh recieved into his personal bank account, it could have cost them 24.5 million to put together whatever it was that was provided. that means they have 500k not 25 mil.
So how does a bankrupt have $500,000? Commission. |
|
|
|
whocares
Well isn't it relevant that a person who is an undischarged bankrupt and is the sole Director of GES HK claims they and their company have $25 million??? If they are bankrupt it means they can't meet their debt. So what does it say about GES being a so-called multi-international company that supposedly has contracts worth millions?? It means the so-called Uro is worth nothing. No. |
|
|
|
I haven't been called a cunt in awhile, I sort of miss the abuse.
I could call you a cunt, but I wouldn't mean it so it wouldn't carry the same emotional weight. |
|
|
|
whocares
Well isn't it relevant that a person who is an undischarged bankrupt and is the sole Director of GES HK claims they and their company have $25 million??? If they are bankrupt it means they can't meet their debt. So what does it say about GES being a so-called multi-international company that supposedly has contracts worth millions?? It means the so-called Uro is worth nothing. Ahh, the power of the DBA. |
|
|
|
As stated trustees are just obligated to follow the law. Nothing more and nothing less. If they don't they will be disqualified.
Incorrect, they represent the law and are often lawyers themselves. They can be disbarred for not following the law, or breaking it. They are the court the same way the judge is the court. They are pieces of a larger puzzle and all your bankruptcy documents are filed with them and with the court they represent. That's laughable. A trustee is a lawyer??? A lawyer is not eligible see this from this website https://www.afsa.gov.au/practitioner/trustees/solicitor-controlling-trustees-eligibility-requirementsControlling Trustee Eligibility Requirements On 1 December 2004, new eligibility requirements for solicitor controlling trustees were introduced. Bankruptcy Regulation 8.35(1)(f) will provide that for subsection 188(2A) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 a person (other than the Official Trustee or a registered trustee) is not eligible to act as a controlling trustee if the person has not by 1 December 2006: (i) become a full member of the Australian Restructuring Insolvency & Turnaround Association (ARITA); or (ii) satisfactorily completed a course in insolvency approved by the Inspector-General [PDF 38KB] Umm, that's not what that means. |
|
|
|
As stated trustees are just obligated to follow the law. Nothing more and nothing less. If they don't they will be disqualified.
Incorrect, they represent the law and are often lawyers themselves. They can be disbarred for not following the law, or breaking it. They are the court the same way the judge is the court. They are pieces of a larger puzzle and all your bankruptcy documents are filed with them and with the court they represent. |
|
|
|
Just like accountants have laws to follow too!
accountants aren't officers of the court. however there are accountants that are officers of the court. |
|
|
|
|
It's not false, it's just misunderstood by "Truthful".
|
|
|
|
You are being distracting again. These are just layers of bureaucracy. It doesn't matter who takes the report, the only authority to enforce the result is the court. you are just trying to keep people away from the truth. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=742456.20Community, please keep bumping this so that new investors can get a clear picture of the situation. Thank You. Not being distracting. Just stating what the true case is around bankruptcy. Did you look at the forms and relevant information from AFSA that I posted? None of it states that any court is needed for a debtor to file for bankruptcy. Only time a court is needed is if someone (creditor) wants to make another person bankrupt. Since Nilesh's bankruptcy was a debtors petition, no court was needed. That is like saying a traffic cop can put you in prison for 10 years because he caught you jaywalking. A court is ALWAYS needed. ONLY the court has the power. This is just stupid. No it's not. The forms and websites I referred you to do not lie. Maybe you are having trouble accepting the way the Bankruptcy Law works. I'm only providing you with that information. If you read this it might give you more information. http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ba1966142/It's stated trustees are officers of the court. Anything they accept as legally binding and bankruptcies are legally binding are representations of the court and are court binding. It's stated clearly, I even made it bold for you. it's obvious you just cannot comprehend which is okay but don't sit there and tell me it's raining while you're pissing on my shoe. |
|
|
|
https://www.afsa.gov.au/practitioner/trustees/trustee-registration"Overview of a Trustee’s Duties Bankruptcy trustees are required to maintain the utmost professionalism, independence, impartiality, honesty and ethics in their dealings. They are considered officers of the Court and in exercising powers and discretions and making decisions no lesser standard is to be expected of them than of a court or judge. They play a central role in the administration of estates and are under a general duty to exercise the powers in such a fashion that the objects of the Act, including those of equality between creditors and fairness to bankrupts and debtors are served." There can you finally understand? That states the role of a trustee as set out in Bankruptcy Law https://www.afsa.gov.au/practitioner/trustees. They are required to follow the law. That statement just says that they are to ensure that the Bankruptcy Law is upheld and if they breech their duties as a trustee they can be disqualified from being a trustee. Has nothing to do with a person needing to go to a court to file for bankruptcy. As an officer of the court you represent the court legally, therefor all bankruptcy filings are automatically filed with the court. Whether or not an actual judge drools on your case makes no difference. Appointees or officers of the court hold the same weight when it comes to filing paperwork and court documents. There is no difference. They can even make decisions based on your case to keep it out of the actual court room. That's not true. The trustee is just bound by Bankruptcy Law. If they are found to be negligent of their duties they can be removed as a trustee. If a trustee shows bias to any party in "order to keep it out a court room" they are in breech of their duties. Did you read any of this?? https://www.afsa.gov.au/practitioner/trusteesor perhaps you can read this http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ba1966142/A trustee doesn't have the power to go to court and represent someone so they can file for bankruptcy. In fact, if you want to file for bankruptcy you don't need to go to court. It is true, you just can't comprehend it. Call them and see what they say about it. |
|
|
|
https://www.afsa.gov.au/practitioner/trustees/trustee-registration"Overview of a Trustee’s Duties Bankruptcy trustees are required to maintain the utmost professionalism, independence, impartiality, honesty and ethics in their dealings. They are considered officers of the Court and in exercising powers and discretions and making decisions no lesser standard is to be expected of them than of a court or judge. They play a central role in the administration of estates and are under a general duty to exercise the powers in such a fashion that the objects of the Act, including those of equality between creditors and fairness to bankrupts and debtors are served." There can you finally understand? That states the role of a trustee as set out in Bankruptcy Law https://www.afsa.gov.au/practitioner/trustees. They are required to follow the law. That statement just says that they are to ensure that the Bankruptcy Law is upheld and if they breech their duties as a trustee they can be disqualified from being a trustee. Has nothing to do with a person needing to go to a court to file for bankruptcy. As an officer of the court you represent the court legally, therefor all bankruptcy filings are automatically filed with the court. Whether or not an actual judge drools on your case makes no difference. Appointees or officers of the court hold the same weight when it comes to filing paperwork and court documents. There is no difference. They can even make decisions based on your case to keep it out of the actual court room. |
|
|
|
https://www.afsa.gov.au/practitioner/trustees/trustee-registration"Overview of a Trustee’s Duties Bankruptcy trustees are required to maintain the utmost professionalism, independence, impartiality, honesty and ethics in their dealings. They are considered officers of the Court and in exercising powers and discretions and making decisions no lesser standard is to be expected of them than of a court or judge. They play a central role in the administration of estates and are under a general duty to exercise the powers in such a fashion that the objects of the Act, including those of equality between creditors and fairness to bankrupts and debtors are served." There can you finally understand?
|
|
|
|
There may never be any judgement , the petition may be withdrawn by consent of the creditors involved upon satisfactory terms, or the court may decide that there are sufficient assets to satisfy all creditors and approve a repayment schedule, or simply dismiss the case as frivolous.
Many outcomes.
A start to proceedings means NOTHING.
You don't need a court to file for your own personal bankruptcy. Yes you do. The court is directly involved. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
