|
^^ Very good. Please keep us informed!
BTW, how do I eliminate a mistaken "Receiving address" in my DigiByteTip wallet?
|
|
|
|
Any Plans in the works to get Noble listed on Cryptopia since cryptsy is goxed.  We should all vote for that to happen. I'm doing my share...  we still have poloniex... And Poloniex is a first class exchange. We need to do everything we can to stay on it! It's the only one left of the seven listed on the OP (BTW, shouldn't we brush up the OP a bit?) so let's make an effort to send people there and help to keep the volume up there as much as we can: one of the worst things that can happen to a cryptocurrency is to find itself without an exchange - that's one foot in the grave. We should also be telling everybody and their cousins about the fantastic price and great buying opportunity right now. A liitle Dev activity would go a long way too: like getting http://www.noblemovement.com back online, or updating the OP, or just even saying hello from time to time.  |
|
|
|
|
Be careful everyone with the other exchanges in the coming days and weeks, especially at peak usage times, since there are indications that some may not be fully prepared for the sudden increase in customer numbers. Exercise extra caution for a while.
|
|
|
|
That's the biggest joke of all: you buy and sell "ether", the "gas" that "makes it go", and somehow that makes it different? Call it by whatever name you like, but if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a duck, or, as in this case, a poorly made decoy. Oh, and for the rest of what is claimed to be of value, being the "world computer" where anyone can install their private programs to be run from anywhere at anytime, please, don't make me laugh. But, I agree, enough of this for now and will leave it for the time being with a P.T. Barnum quote: "There's a sucker born every minute." Good discussion, but you're right, we should let others join in too, more than anything with direct comparisons of fundamental aspects, since, as I said before, this is where the real conversation resides. I firmly maintain DGB beats them several times over. Prove me wrong by showing that DGB isn't the hands down winner IN ALL CATEGORIES (if you really compare the essential building blocks and principles . . . which differ not one iota, regardless of what they're called or the name they're given). When you think about it, when seen from that point of view, that's about as DGB thread related as it gets.  Again, I don't feel the need to discuss this on this thread but also from a trading perspective, ETH seems to be the hedge of choice for BTC. Also technical fundamentals unfortunately (and I want to stress this because I'm interested in technical aspects of coins) aren't everything when determining the value of a blockchain, its a wide variety of different things (as you've pointed out) and objectively ETH with a market cap of around $70m far exceeds that of DGB (around $1m). Whether you agree with that fact or not is another discussion, the markets perspective is pretty clear imo. P.S. Please do not interpret this as an attack on DGB. As you can see by the extensive amount of time I have invested into making DGB better that I am firmly in the DGB camp If you don't want to talk about the fundamental underpinnings, and only want to focus on market technicals suggesting that they make right and that markets are never irrational and there never was a time when fortunes were made and lost on tulips in Holland, then I agree 100% about the value of that conversation. |
|
|
|
DigiByte needs to make a serious and energetic effort to recruit Hearn, first by showing him how DGB strictly and faithfully adhears to the original crypto ethos and that it STILL IS a "decentralised form of money" with no “systemically important institutions” and “too big to fail” entities and will never become "a system completely controlled by just a handful of people" because the community's commitment is firmly set on doing just that and there's no better proof of that than the DGB track record. Our Dev team needs to make a concerted effort to communicating these facts to him. Then comes the second part of the challenge: convincing him that his participation will be another key element in making his dream a reality. Let's get him on board! We're doing everything he says a successful crypto should be doing, so, unless he doesn't really believe in what he says (which I doubt), it should be as easy as counting 1, 2, 3. We completely agree. Maybe you should create a new video in which you underline the current problems surrounding bitcoin and explain why DigiByte is a much better alternative. If I were a bitcoin fan, I d much rather have DigiBytes! |
|
|
|
DigiByte needs to make a serious and energetic effort to recruit Hearn, first by showing him how DGB strictly and faithfully adhears to the original crypto ethos and that it STILL IS a "decentralised form of money" with no “systemically important institutions” and “too big to fail” entities and will never become "a system completely controlled by just a handful of people" because the community's commitment is firmly set on doing just that and there's no better proof of that than the DGB track record. Our Dev team needs to make a concerted effort to communicating these facts to him. Then comes the second part of the challenge: convincing him that his participation will be another key element in making his dream a reality. Let's get him on board! We're doing everything he says a successful crypto should be doing, so, unless he doesn't really believe in what he says (which I doubt), it should be as easy as counting 1, 2, 3. |
|
|
|
Can we use DigiByte in a system similar to ethereum so that DigiByte is used as a fuel (gas, payment) to do smart contract? Maybe it is not necessary as that market is occupied by Ethereum already.
Who would want to? But seriously, have you really researched Ethereum? Their code base? Their network security? Their total lack of scaleability? Their distribution? Their pre-mine? Their now current cost cuttings with office closures? Well, I do admit they are good at marketing and packaging, but if that's all they've got, would you really want to imitate them? Ethereum? They're light years behind us. I think we should all agree that Ethereum is pretty amazing tech and it has a lot more 3rd party developers than DigiByte. Based on hype, and unfounded hype at that. What 3rd party developers? Look into it closely. It's smoke and mirrors. There's really nothing under the hood. And it's not like they hide it either: it's all right there in their own documentation for the whole world to freely see. Technically, they're even worse off than BTC, and developmentally worse yet; you almost get the idea they're laughing in everyone's face. My prediction is that they are going to give new meaning to the word bagholder. But don't take my word for it, look into it closely . . . don't forget to read all the different threads on them while you're at it, and please advise if you find a positive community thread somewhere other than their own sock puppet laiden forum or reddit, 'cause I've yet to find anything positive there either. If I had Ethereum, I'd sell it now. ADD: Please duly note that these are my thoughts being expressed to our community members both as strong opinion and a healthy challenge to really start comparing apples with apples and oranges with oranges, and that means in this case cryptographic digital currency basics with cryptographic digital currency basics. I am not on another coin's thread bashing it. I'm here saying they don't hold a candle to us. Big difference. On top of that, my last newsletter clearly laid out 4 of the most basic cryptographic digital currency fundamentals to compare with, so, if you want to really compare, you know right where to go for a head start. Prove me wrong. And don't worry, I will be proving my point anyway. It's only a matter of time until I fully document my top 10 shams. I don't want to dispute what your saying here (mainly because I have no time) but you should take into consideration that Ethereum is NOT a cryptoCURRENCY its a crypto smart contracts platform, its not meant to be a currency so if we're comparing DGB with ETH then we are indeed comparing apples with oranges. I also think a basic risk your taking with any cryptocurrency is that its a scam of some type or another (mainly due to the non-regulated nature of the market) and I'm quite comfortable taking that risk with certain cryptocurrencies. In the spirit of keeping the thread mainly focused on DGB and other healthy discussions I will refrain from commenting. That's the biggest joke of all: you buy and sell "ether", the "gas" that "makes it go", and somehow that makes it different? Call it by whatever name you like, but if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a duck, or, as in this case, a poorly made decoy. Oh, and for the rest of what is claimed to be of value, being the "world computer" where anyone can install their private programs to be run from anywhere at anytime, please, don't make me laugh. But, I agree, enough of this for now and will leave it for the time being with a P.T. Barnum quote: "There's a sucker born every minute." Good discussion, but you're right, we should let others join in too, more than anything with direct comparisons of fundamental aspects, since, as I said before, this is where the real conversation resides. I firmly maintain DGB beats them several times over. Prove me wrong by showing that DGB isn't the hands down winner IN ALL CATEGORIES (if you really compare the essential building blocks and principles . . . which differ not one iota, regardless of what they're called or the name they're given). When you think about it, when seen from that point of view, that's about as DGB thread related as it gets. |
|
|
|
Can we use DigiByte in a system similar to ethereum so that DigiByte is used as a fuel (gas, payment) to do smart contract? Maybe it is not necessary as that market is occupied by Ethereum already.
Who would want to? But seriously, have you really researched Ethereum? Their code base? Their network security? Their total lack of scaleability? Their distribution? Their pre-mine? Their now current cost cuttings with office closures? Well, I do admit they are good at marketing and packaging, but if that's all they've got, would you really want to imitate them? Ethereum? They're light years behind us. I think we should all agree that Ethereum is pretty amazing tech and it has a lot more 3rd party developers than DigiByte. Based on hype, and unfounded hype at that. What 3rd party developers? Look into it closely. It's smoke and mirrors. There's really nothing under the hood. And it's not like they hide it either: it's all right there in their own documentation for the whole world to freely see. Technically, they're even worse off than BTC, and developmentally worse yet; you almost get the idea they're laughing in everyone's face. My prediction is that they are going to give new meaning to the word bagholder. But don't take my word for it, look into it closely . . . don't forget to read all the different threads on them while you're at it, and please advise if you find a positive community thread somewhere other than their own sock puppet laiden forum or reddit, 'cause I've yet to find anything positive there either. If I had Ethereum, I'd sell it now. ADD: Please duly note that these are my thoughts being expressed to our community members both as strong opinion and a healthy challenge to really start comparing apples with apples and oranges with oranges, and that means in this case cryptographic digital currency basics with cryptographic digital currency basics. I am not on another coin's thread bashing it. I'm here saying they don't hold a candle to us. Big difference. On top of that, my last newsletter clearly laid out 4 of the most basic cryptographic digital currency fundamentals to compare with, so, if you want to really compare, you know right where to go for a head start. Prove me wrong. And don't worry, I will be proving my point anyway. It's only a matter of time until I fully document my top 10 shams. |
|
|
|
Can we use DigiByte in a system similar to ethereum so that DigiByte is used as a fuel (gas, payment) to do smart contract? Maybe it is not necessary as that market is occupied by Ethereum already.
Who would want to? But seriously, have you really researched Ethereum? Their code base? Their network security? Their total lack of scaleability? Their distribution? Their pre-mine? Their now current cost cuttings with office closures? Well, I do admit they are good at marketing and packaging, but if that's all they've got, would you really want to imitate them? Ethereum? They're light years behind us. |
|
|
|
|
I agree that both short term and long term trading/investing strategies are equally respectable; what I disagree with is the short termer who tries to psychologically manipulate to his or her favor, regardless if it's shouting pie in the sky when price is up, or that the sky is falling when at lows. That's what I consider to be despicable as its specific aim is to get the average person turned upside down losing money at each turn, and, thus, the main reason why I normally limit my recommendations to ignoring the short term "crap", and saving ourselves the time and effort by just focusing on the long term historical project we're working on. Nevertheless, indeed, honest short term traders are to be respected, I agree.
|
|
|
|
Great to here that DGB will be partnering with Microsoft.
LOL now were in the hell did you dig that BS up from...... Yeah this is straight up bullcrap, please no one pay attention to this. He's already spreading the crap on Twitter - just ignoring may be too little to distance Digibyte from such unwanted attempts to pump the coin. good to see the community jump on him quickly this time though! It might create a negative effect in the end if that fake news spread like wildfire. People will do research first, The only negative effect will be on Monsterpricezero his reputation (If thats even possible) Well, his reputation was already low imo before that comment lol Click on “MonsterZeroPrice” and in the user profile click on “Trust”, then click on “Post new feedback” and leave your comments about what's occurred. |
|
|
|
Few years from now, us faithful and loyal DigiByte supporters will be driving ferraris while Pringles has become a frustrated alcoholic thinking to himself "I was so foolish! that could have been me"  . Jared and team keep rocking DigiByte will succeed one way or the other. I don't see myself driving a ferrari, but I will certainly be doing a lot more traveling! i'd suggest this model  Okay, but only if you let me fly it. |
|
|
|
I learned from a successful stock market investor that it's always wise to "take some money off the table" when an investment rises in value. You want to take profits from time to time, and not hold out everything for the hope of even more future gain. So it sounds like raginglikeaboss made a good decision based on when he initially invested. I came on board much later, and I hope at some point to cash out a portion of my DMD at profit, but to also keep some for future growth. Two things DMD has going for it are the cloud mining payouts and the minting rewards. This means that if the price of DMD (relative to BTC/USD) never changed, profits could be made from selling off minting rewards and/or additional cloud mining rewards. Basically, this particular "investment" pays out a dividend which could be either reinvested or sold off. So a DMD holder has more to hold out for than simply speculating on the actual price of DMD. That's what I personally like about this particular venture, but I realize not every investor has the same basic values that I do.
good analysis and description of one kind of DMD investor mentality It all turns on perspective and time horizon. If you don't believe in the product, in this case, a storage of wealth (like art, collectables, precious metals, or, yes, even diamonds), you're going to take profits soon, and if you're short term, even sooner. Problem there is that they eventually lose out on what could have been authentic fortunes . . . if they had just seen the real potential and been a bit more patient. And what's more is that if they all just stopped thinking like kids at an amusement park, they'd see all those same profits now while still holding 90% of what they started with. . . . said another way, weak hands, and it's not a question of if, but rather when . . . they'll be gone |
|
|
|
Few years from now, us faithful and loyal DigiByte supporters will be driving ferraris while Pringles has become a frustrated alcoholic thinking to himself "I was so foolish! that could have been me" . Jared and team keep rocking DigiByte will succeed one way or the other. I don't see myself driving a ferrari, but I will certainly be doing a lot more traveling! |
|
|
|
|
#7 & #8 in volume last 24 hours on Poloniex and Bittrex respectively. ~$25,000.00 of trading. Very hard to view as a typical crypto P&D since the kids don't have that kind of money to throw around. I'd say we're probably seeing very healthy buying on the part of new money coming in from long term investors - very unlikely that fiat is being used to "manipulate".
For those stuck on Craptsy, use your funds to buy DGB (if their market really works); it's priced at a handsome discount (again, if their market really is working).
|
|
|
|
Bump
It looks very probable to me that a bottom is either in, or in the process of being put in, which means, in other words, that my analysis suggests that, while it is still possible that DGB could trade in a range between 30 and 40 SAT for a while longer, it is highly unlikely that it will break below 30 (a panic capitulation would be one short lived low probability scenario that would bring that about and give stink bidders a lovely Christmas gift).
It sure looks to me like 30-40 is already a gift buy, but you shouldn't take my word for it and you should do your own analysis and make your own decisions, of course.
|
|
|
|
Awesome news, just a quick question, why DiguSign and not DigiSign?
I'll test it out when its back online
I've wondered the same thing xD Me too. And digisign.com is available https://www.networksolutions.com/mobile/search-results.jsp?isExplicitSearchAvailable=trueAnd a lot more logical too, I think, since it further leverages the brand name . . . On the topic of price and why it's moving higher, well, when price can't find a way to go any lower, there's no way but up. Unless you're making a market (and if you don't know what that means, it means you're not), my advice is to sit tight until we hit at least 1000 SAT. |
|
|
|
Happy birthday and congrats on Digusign release! Price has already got from 31 to 45 sat in the last 24h nice! Nice ramp on volume to 48 on Poloniex and 49 on Bittrex last night. Definitely a breakout from the basing/accumulation pattern. Good news on the price front as well! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
